Vodafone Idea resumes relief talks with govt., links capex to bank funding
The struggling company is also engaging with banks to secure debt funding for its long-term expansion, chief executive Akshaya Moondra said, adding that banks would want clarity on the dues the telco owes to the government before they agree to lend.
But it is not preventing the discussions from moving forward, Moondra said.
'I see no reason why the government should be constrained in any way to offer relief…,' Moondra said on Monday during a call with analysts to discuss Vodafone Idea's March-quarter earnings.
Vodafone Idea is set to incur capital expenditure of ₹ 5,000-6,000 crore for the first half of 2025-26 to enhance its network and infrastructure. However, its next leg of spending would be dependent on funds from banks, Moondra said.
The Supreme Court on 19 May dismissed writ petitions by Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel Ltd and Tata Teleservices Ltd seeking relief on interest, penalty, and interest on penalty on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues to the government.
Vodafone Idea owes ₹ 83,400 crore in AGR dues to the government and had sought a waiver on over ₹ 45,000 crore comprising interest, penalty, and interest on penalty.
While rejecting the petitions, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan clarified the court would not stand in the way if the government chose to step in. 'If the government wants to help you, we are not coming in your way,' Pardiwala had said.
However, the court's written order, issued on 21 May, makes no reference to that remark, which was widely seen as a green light for possible relief.
Vodafone Idea, India's third-largest telecom operator, is grappling with huge regulatory dues of around ₹ 2 trillion. The telecom operator said in its recent petition to the Supreme Court that it would not be able to operate beyond this fiscal year without bank funding, which remains elusive as lenders remain wary of its AGR dues worth more than ₹ 84,000 crore.
Starting 31 March 2026, Vodafone Idea must pay an annual instalment of over ₹ 18,000 crore for the next six years towards AGR and spectrum dues to the government. The dues are under moratorium, which will expire in September.
In 2025-26 itself, Vodafone Idea will have to pay ₹ 16,428 crore towards AGR dues and ₹ 2,539 crore towards deferred spectrum dues.
'The government may have to extend the moratorium or increase its stake in the telco,' said analysts at IIFL Capital in a 20 May note.
Vodafone Idea has been trying to raise bank funding of ₹ 25,000 crore for a long time now. The company said a recent credit rating upgrade as well as the government's recent conversion of dues worth ₹ 36,950 crore into equity has supported conversations with the lenders.
'There are some activities which we have to finish, which are currently in progress. We will again get to the point of discussions with the banks somewhere this month once some of the pre-requisites in terms of those actions and activities are completed,' Moondra said.
In May last year, Vodafone Idea said it would incur a capital expenditure of ₹ 50,000-55,000 crore over the next three years for expanding its 4G network and launching its 5G service.
'A large part of the capex will be implemented in the current quarter. In terms of our next round of capex, we have to decide and firm up our plan. It also has some dependence on funding. At least for this quarter and coming quarter, we are on track of incurring a capex of around ₹ 6,000 crore,' Moondra said.
'(With) the capex, which is already under execution, we should be reaching a level of 84% of (4G) population coverage. I believe we will move up from 84%, but to get to 90% (the capex) has got linkages with bank funding,' Moondra said, adding that Vodafone Idea had increased its 4G coverage to 83% as of March-end from 77% a year earlier.
Vodafone Idea incurred a capex of ₹ 4,230 crore in the January-March period, its highest in a quarter since the merger of Vodafone India and Idea Cellular in 2018. For FY25, the capex was at ₹ 9,570 crore, up from ₹ 1,850 crore in FY24.
In an exchange filing on 30 May, Vodafone Idea said its board had approved raising another ₹ 20,000 crore through a further public offering (FPO), private placement, or other permissible mode. A capital raising committee will evaluate and decide on the potential route of fundraising, the company said.
Moondra called for a tariff hike to help increase the return on capital employed for telecom operators. Despite a price increase in July 2022, the average revenue per user (Arpu) for telecom operators in India is still among the lowest in the world, he said.
'To ensure a fair return on significant investments and support future capital expenditure in the telecom industry, further tariff increases are essential. Additionally, the industry needs to move towards a pricing model where heavy data users contribute more proportionally to the high usage than the current pricing structure where the incremental data usage comes at an extremely low, unsustainable price,' Moondra said.
According to Moondra, there is no room to increase the tariffs much at the lower level and the industry collectively has to switch to a new tariff structure.
Last month, Bharti Airtel vice chairman and managing director Gopal Vittal also called for tariff restructuring to sustain the domestic telecom sector's financial health. Vittal too had explained that a tariff restructuring would mean reducing data allowances on some packs and charging more for those who can afford to pay.
Vodafone Idea's net loss in the fourth quarter of 2024-25 widened to ₹ 7,166 crore from ₹ 6,609 crore in the third quarter and ₹ 7,675 crore a year ago, due to an increase in expenses, especially finance costs, which include interest payments on debt and other liabilities.
Finance costs, accounting for 59% of the telecom operator's revenue from operations, rose 9% quarter-on-quarter and 3% year-on-year to ₹ 6,471 crore.
Revenue from operations rose 4% on-year to ₹ 11,014 crore. The revenue, however, was down nearly 1% sequentially owing to subscriber loss, largely in the lower-end segment.
The company's subscriber churn rate slowed during the March quarter. Compared to a loss of 5 million subscribers each in the September and December quarters, Vodafone Idea's subscriber churn slowed to 1.6 million in the fourth quarter. As of 31 March, it had 198.2 million mobile subscribers. Sequentially, its blended subscriber churn fell to 4.1% from 4.5%.
The number of 4G subscribers nudged up to 126.4 million in the fourth quarter from 126 million three months earlier.
Vodafone Idea shares climbed 1.73% to end Monday's trading session on BSE at ₹ 7.04 each.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
FM calls OGE delay 'unpardonable', urges action on five key tax priorities
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, on the 166th Income Tax Day on Thursday, sharply criticised delays in the issuance of Orders Giving Effect (OGEs), calling them 'unpardonable,' and urged the income tax department to act decisively on five priority areas identified during a high-level review in June 2025. OGE refers to the implementation of appellate or court decisions by tax officers. It ensures that the outcomes—such as refunds, reassessments, or adjustments—are formally carried out based on the ruling. 'After all the decisions are taken, the delay in OGE issuance is just not explainable. But we have a category—would you believe it? You have a category of OGE issuance delay. Why pray? The decisions are all done. You just have to issue the OGE. Unpardonable,' she said, addressing senior officials. Reinforcing the need for accountability, she said that good policies alone are not enough. What matters, actually, is timely execution. Referring to the progress made in redrafting the Income Tax Act, she added, 'For a group or the CBDT, which is able to reduce five lakh words of the 1961 Act within a matter of three months to give me a draft bill which is half the size of that earlier 1961 Act… you're able to do that, but you can't issue OGEs? What's going on?' Recalling the key action points from the June 2025 review, Sitharaman said: 'I would recall five of them (including the issue of OGE), which I would think are important for all of us to re-look at—not because things have changed from then to now, June 2025 to now, but to refresh ourselves that these were things which all of us spoke about together.' The first, she said, is to 'accelerate disposal of disputed tax demands pending before the faceless appellate authorities and ensure timely resolution of litigation backlog.' Second, departments must 'identify and withdraw departmental appeals falling below the revised monetary threshold announced during the Union Budget 2024–2025 within the next three months.' The Union Budget 2024–25 raised the monetary thresholds for filing departmental appeals in tax-related cases, setting the new limits at ₹60 lakh for tribunals, ₹2 crore for High Courts, and ₹5 crore for the Supreme Court. These enhanced limits apply to disputes under Direct Taxes, as well as legacy cases in Excise and Service Tax. The third priority is to 'ensure timely processing of tax refunds and proactive and timely resolution of taxpayer grievances,' said the Minister. Fourth, departments must 'analyse the grievances and devise strategies not only to resolve the existing pendency but also to address the challenges that are causing the grievances in the first place.' And fifth, Sitharaman said, is to 'undertake region-wise performance reviews to help identify factors hindering performance and streamline operations through indicators such as grievance disposal and orders giving effect issuance.' Calling the Income Tax Day 'the moment when we reaffirm the unsaid social contract between the state and the taxpayer,' Sitharaman said this contract must not be allowed to 'fray at the edges' or 'become loose, become diluted.' She urged officials to raise the benchmark and ensure that the reform process is matched by efficient delivery on the ground. In addition, the Finance Minister lauded the drafting of the new Income Tax Bill as the first-ever comprehensive review of the Income Tax Act since 1961. She said that several members of the select committee of the Lok Sabha had informally appreciated the drafting of the IT Bill 2025. She expressed hope that 'Parliament actually looks at the good work done… we will welcome the suggestions by honourable members and… expect with enough engagement, discussion, and debate in the House… this bill… passes through Parliament's scrutiny.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sri Lanka orders Singapore shipowner to pay US $1 bn over marine disaster
Advt Advt Sri Lanka's highest court on Thursday ordered a Singaporean shipping firm to pay US$1 billion in damages for causing the island's worst marine pollution when its vessel sank four years Supreme Court directed Express Feeders , the owners of the MV X-Press Pearl which sank off Colombo Port in June 2021 after a fire that raged for nearly two weeks, to pay the money within a year."The X-Press Pearl... shall make further compensation payments as may be directed by this court," the 361-page judgement had brought the case to court, alleging that both government authorities and firm owners had failed to prevent the fire from becoming an unprecedented ecological shipping firm initially apologised and paid $7.85 million for the immediate cleanup and as compensation for fishermen who were deprived of their livelihoods following the catastrophic then obtained an order from London's admiralty court in July 2023, limiting their liability to a maximum of 19 million pounds ($25 million). Sri Lanka has appealed that Sri Lankan government also filed a lawsuit against the ship's owners in the Singapore International Commercial Court, claiming unspecified case has been put on hold pending a decision from the admiralty court in was no immediate response from the Singaporean owners or their local vessel was carrying 81 containers of "dangerous cargo", including acids and lead ingots, when it of microplastic granules from the ship inundated an 80-kilometre (50-mile) stretch of beach along Sri Lanka's western coast. Fishing was prohibited for months due to the plastic Lankan authorities believe the fire was caused by a nitric acid leak, which the crew apparently knew about nine days before the blaze in Qatar and India had refused to offload the leaking nitric acid, and the vessel arrived in Sri Lankan waters with the
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC says Hyatt's India operations are taxable under PE norms
In a ruling that has significant implications for multinational companies operating in India, the Supreme Court Thursday held that UAE-headquartered Hyatt International Southwest Asia , which provides hotel consultancy and advisory services in India as part of its business operations, has a fixed place Permanent Establishment (PE) in India for tax purposes. Upholding a Delhi High Court order that ruled against the hotel company, a bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan dismissed various the appeals by Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd, while affirming the findings of the HC that Hyatt had a fixed place PE in India within the meaning of Article 5(1) of the DTAA, and that, the income received under the strategic oversight services agreements (SOSA) is attributable to such PE and is, therefore, taxable in India. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Leadership PGDM Finance Design Thinking Cybersecurity CXO Technology Digital Marketing Data Science Artificial Intelligence Healthcare MBA Project Management Operations Management Data Science Degree Management Others others healthcare Product Management MCA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details The top court said that was undisputed that Hyatt's executives and employees paid frequent and regular visits to India to oversee operations and implement SOSA. 'The finding of the assessing officer, based on travel logs and job functions, establish continuous and coordinated engagement, even though no single individual exceeded the 9-month stay threshold,' according to SC Under Article 5(2)(i) of the agreement between the government of India and the United Arab Emirates for avoidance of double taxation (DTAA) Under Article 5(2)(i) of the DTAA, the relevant consideration is the continuity of business presence in aggregate – not the length of stay of each individual employee. Once it is found that there is continuity in the business operations, the intermittent presence or return of a particular employee becomes immaterial and insignificant in determining the existence of a PE, Justice Mahadevan, writing for the bench stated, adding the HC was correct in concluding that Hyatt's role was not confined to high-level decision making, but extended to substantial operational control and implementation. The Dubai-based company's ability to enforce compliance, oversee operations, and derive profit-linked fee from the hotel's earnings, demonstrate a clear and continuous commercial nexus, and control with the hotel's core functions, the judgment said, adding that this nexus satisfied the condition necessary for the constitution of a fixed place of PE under Article 5(1) of the India – UAE DTAA. The top court further said that 'the extent of control, strategic decision-making, and influence exercised by the appellant clearly establish that business was carried on through the hotel premises, satisfying the conditions under Article 5(1)…the hotel itself was the situs of the appellant's primary business operations, carried out under its direct supervision and aligned with its commercial interests.' Welcoming the ruling, Amit Baid of BTG Advaya said that "the judgment provides a clear conceptual framework for determining PE thresholds—frequent, regular visits by employees, rather than the duration of individual stays, is the key factor; once continuity of business presence is established, the return or rotation of individuals becomes irrelevant; and operational control, oversight, and income linked to core functions establish a commercial nexus necessary for a PE. The ruling could set a precedent for PE determinations in cases involving frequent employee travel to India." The judgement establishes that substantive operational involvement, such as orchestrating policies, directly overseeing operations, and controlling implementation, will be closely scrutinised when determining the existence of a fixed place PE in India, said Varun Gakhar, Research Associate at Janssen-Sanghavi & Associates. 'In essence, oversight that crosses into operational control may trigger domestic tax exposure under Indian tax treaties. This judgement will have to be analysed closely by multinationals, as determining whether a PE exists is a very fact- and circumstance-specific question,' he added. In 2008, Hyatt had entered into two strategic oversight services agreements with Asian Hotels Ltd. One was in respect of hotel Hyatt Regency, Delhi owned by Asian Hotels, and the other pertained to a hotel in Mumbai. Under the terms of the agreement, Hyatt agreed to provide strategic planning services and "know-how" to ensure that Hyatt Regency was developed and operated as an efficient and a high quality international full-service hotel. Asian Hotels was thereafter reorganised and its name was subsequently changed to Asian Hotels (North) Ltd., which continued to own Hyatt Regency. For the Assessment Year 2009-10, Hyatt filed its return of income declaring 'Nil' income and claiming a refund of around Rs 88 lakh. The Assessing Officer had passed assessment orders for 2009-18, holding that Hyatt's activities constituted a business connection under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act; a PE under Article 5 of the DTAA; royalties and fees for technical services under both the Income Tax Act and DTAA. However, Hyatt asserted that its income was not taxable under the Act as there was no specific Article under the DTAA for taxing Fees for Technical Services. It further stated that it did not have any fixed place of business, office, or branch in India, and that the presence of its employees in India during the relevant previous year did not exceed the nine-month threshold under Article 5(2) of the DTAA. Therefore, the appellant claimed that it did not have a PE in India and that its business income was not taxable under Article 7 of the DTAA. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in December 2019 and then the HC rejected Hyatt's contention that it did not have a PE in India.
