
‘We have to keep growing': Mother of killed Israeli hostage in battle to have a grandchild with his harvested sperm
The new beginning that Haim now longs for is a grandchild, created from sperm she had harvested from Yotam's body upon its return home in December 2023.
'Yes, a disaster happened,' Haim, 59, told CNN of her son's killing from the Israeli town of Mevaseret Zion, a few miles west of Jerusalem. 'But it doesn't control me.'
Yotam, 28, was kidnapped by Hamas-led militants from kibbutz Kfar Aza on October 7, 2023. After spending 65 days in captivity, he was mistakenly shot by Israeli troops on December 15, 2023 along with two other hostages, Alon Shamriz and Samer Talalka, as they attempted to flee their captors in northern Gaza.
Yotam is the only Israeli hostage whose sperm is known to have been retrieved posthumously, and whose family is lobbying to use it to have a child.
Haim says Yotam, a single man at the time of his death, always wanted children. 'Yotam really wanted that – he talked about it a lot,' she said.
A total of 205 hostages have so far been returned, 148 of whom were released alive, and 57 returned dead, according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. Most had been dead for weeks, if not months, making the men's sperm no longer viable for use – except for Yotam's. That's where his mother saw an unexpected opportunity to have what would be her first grandchild.
Chances of successful sperm retrieval are highest in the first 24 hours after death, with the cut-off time being 72 hours, according to the Israeli government.
There are currently 50 Israeli hostages held in Gaza, of whom at least 20 are believed to be alive. Both Hamas and Israel have accepted a new ceasefire proposal and indirect negotiations on a deal have restarted, raising hopes that more could return home soon.
Haim remembers with painful clarity the moment Israeli authorities came to her home and told her about her son's death. 'Yotam was killed. By friendly fire. While escaping Hamas captivity. He was mistakenly identified as a terrorist,' Haim recalled the officers saying.
'Four sentences I will never forget,' she told CNN.
Half an hour after they broke the news of Yotam's death, one officer approached Haim and whispered, 'you can request sperm retrieval,' Haim said. The process 'immediately got started, immediately,' she said.
Yotam's sperm was retrieved within the necessary window of time. Ten samples were extracted, 'enough for five children,' Haim recalled being told by the doctor who performed the procedure.
Haim now faces an uphill battle to get approval to use his sperm to produce a grandchild. If she succeeds, her next challenge would be to find a woman to carry the child and raise it.
Sperm lives on briefly after death, which is why it's possible for doctors to retrieve it from testicular tissue. Any live sperm cells found are transferred and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
None, however, can be used without approval from a family court, where Haim now faces an uphill battle to continue her son's lineage.
In Israel, extracting sperm from a dead body is permitted, but there is no law that clearly defines the process of using the sperm for the purpose of producing offspring.
'In Israeli law, we don't have a law for this procedure,' Nily Shatz, Haim's lawyer, said, adding that family courts have only approved posthumous use of sperm by parents of the deceased to produce a child twice in the past; however, the second case was later overturned after an appeal brought by the state. 'All the other cases were rejected.'
The first case was that of a woman who after years of court battles was able to have a grandchild after proving that her son, who was killed in Gaza in 2002, wanted children, according to Shatz. The court, however, declared that the ruling should not be perceived as a precedent, saying legislators must decide on the matter in the future. The second case was that of a couple who are still fighting in court to have a grandchild with retrieved sperm of their late son, who died in 2012.
Last week, after CNN spoke with Shatz, an Eilat court gave permission in principle for Sharon Eisenkot to use sperm retrieved from her son Maor – a soldier killed in Gaza in 2023 – to have a grandchild through surrogacy. 'Should a specific request be submitted regarding the identity of the woman chosen to carry the embryo fertilized with M.'s sperm, it will require the court's approval,' the ruling Thursday said. In keeping with usual practice in family court, the full names of those involved in the case were not given but the court directed CNN to this ruling.
Meirav Ben-Ari, a lawmaker in Israel's parliament, the Knesset, is pushing for a bill that formally allows family members to use retrieved sperm even if the deceased had not specifically stated his wish to have a child posthumously, as long as they can prove the deceased would have wanted a child.
Ben-Ari told CNN the bill 'is not moving forward now, because the (governing) coalition objects (to) it, mainly the religious parties.'
Netanyahu's coalition is made up of some of the most religiously conservative parties ever to hold power in Israel, including ultra-Orthodox and far-right religious Zionist factions whose agendas are reshaping the country's legal and social fabric.
Shatz, Haim's lawyer, said that after the horrors of October 7, it was past time for parliament to pass a law on the issue, especially as families of hundreds of fallen soldiers retrieve the sperm of their dead.
But while Haim longs to be a grandmother, the issue of using the sperm of deceased men remains controversial. It raises ethical, religious and legal questions that lawmakers are yet to address.
For now, cases are assessed individually by the family courts, Shatz said. And since there are varying opinions in government about the practice, each case is viewed with extreme caution, she said.
At the moment, for families to use the sperm of their deceased, they must prove to the courts that the person who died wanted children, even after his death.
Yotam's family is working to prove that he wanted children by providing testimony from relatives, friends and his therapist, but such intangible proof is likely to be harder for many others to present.
'There's no logical way (where) usually people say that I want a child, even if I'm going from the world,' Shatz said, noting this isn't something ordinary men think about, especially when young.
Posthumous sperm retrieval (PSR) in Israel was previously open only to partners – provided other relatives did not object – while parents of the deceased had to apply for legal permission. Following the October 7 attacks, the Ministry of Health loosened the rules.
Sperm retrievals have soared since. There have been at least 224 sperm retrievals from fallen soldiers and security personnel, the ministry told CNN, as well as 17 from deceased civilians.
'In previous years, approximately 15–20 such retrievals were performed annually,' the ministry said.
Medical professionals, bereaved families and legal experts have told CNN that the atrocities of October 7 have made questions around how sperm is preserved and used more urgent than ever, as Israeli society grapples with the perceived threat to the Jewish people's existence. Israeli officials have repeatedly compared Hamas' October 7 attacks to Nazi atrocities during World War II, homing in on the narrative that the conflict in Gaza is a war of survival.
For Haim, having a grandchild is a way to prove that Israel will keep growing despite the massacre.
'Every mother whose child was killed wants to have something from that child, not just photos. She wants something tangible,' Haim said, her eyes briefly filling with tears. 'As the people of Israel, we need to understand today that, after October 7, we need to keep growing – to show our enemies that our way, this continuity of our lives here in this country, and in general, is through the creation of new life.'
Prof. Hagai Levine, a public health physician and head of the health team at the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, told CNN that Israel's recent wars have driven many in the country to 'think about your death, to think about your destiny, about what is most important for you.'
'That forces you to be in this situation. That's what war is doing to us,' he said.
Levine advocates for soldiers to decide early whether they'd like to have children, and for them to preserve their sperm while they are still alive.
Some have also called for soldiers to leave a 'biological will,' a testament that lays out an individual's wishes when it comes to posthumous use of eggs or sperm, whether they are retrieved after death or frozen while the person is still alive.
Bella Savitsky, whose son Jonathan died in combat on October 7, opted to retrieve his sperm and got approval for it, but it came too late.
Savitsky, a senior lecturer in the School of Health Sciences at Ashkelon Academic College, said studies show a maximum of 36 hours since time of death is the only time that retrieved sperm can be usable, a shorter timeframe than that cited by the Israeli government. This window is narrower in Israel because the hot weather can affect the sperm's quality in dead bodies, she said.
On October 9, 2023, Savitsky received 'the knock on the door' from authorities, telling her that her 21-year-old son had been killed in heavy fighting at an army outpost near Gaza.
Jonathan never wanted to be a soldier, she told CNN. He simply wanted to carry out his mandatory military service and return to civilian life.
'He wanted to get married, to have children, a dog, and a home in the countryside.'
It took many hours for Savitsky to obtain a court order allowing the harvesting of her son's sperm.
'Altogether, it took 70 hours,' she said. 'So, when the posthumous sperm retrieval was done, it was not intact. There was no live sperm.'
Sperm retrieval after death undoubtedly raises complex moral, ethical, judicial and religious questions. While technology has advanced, critics say the law has not kept up.
Experts say the controversy stems from the lack of clear consent from the father and the idea of bringing a child into the world who is fatherless from the outset.
'Even if the deceased wanted to be a parent when he was alive, who says he wanted to have a child after his death? It's not the same thing,' Prof. Gil Siegal, head of the Center for Medical Law, Bioethics and Health Policy at Ono Academic College, told CNN.
'You are bringing into the world a child whose parent is known, named and deceased. This has a significant psychological impact and is different from a single-parent family,' Siegal said.
Some may also object to having children that effectively serve as a monument to the deceased father.
In that case, 'the grandparents are seeking a 'memorial' – a form of commemoration – or trying to recreate something that cannot be recreated,' Siegal said. There are also religious considerations, as 'retrieving sperm is an intrusive act, and in Judaism, there is a critical prohibition against desecrating the dead,' he said.
To mitigate these issues, Savitsky believes that young men should be asked whether they would want their sperm to be posthumously retrieved before they enter army service, but said the ministry of defense may be wary of implementing this as it could dent troop morale.
For Haim, despite the difficulties, the battle to have a grandchild gives her strength in the face of the tragedy she faces after October 7, as well as hope for the future.
In May, the State Attorney's Office gave a green light in principle for Haim to use Yotam's sperm. That was a first step towards what may be a long journey for her to have a grandchild. The family still needs to present evidence to prove that Yotam would have wanted a child, Shatz, Haim's lawyer said.
'In the end, the reality did happen to us on October 7. So now – what will we do with that reality? Cry, wail, say, why did this happen to us?' she asked.
'Yes, a disaster happened. Period. But what else happened? A lot of amazing things also happened. That's where I'm aiming (for).'
Previous reporting by CNN's Lianne Kolirin.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
In Canada's pledge to recognize Palestine, much depends on what comes after the words
It was nearly 80 years ago that a Canadian diplomat and future prime minister first laid out the boundaries of an independent and equal Palestinian state. Lester B. Pearson was chairman of the United Nations committee that drafted the former British territory's 1947 partition plan . Had it not been hindered by a war the following year that led to the creation of the state of Israel and kicked off a decades-long cycle of violence, the plan would have carved up the land into side-by-side Arab and Jewish territories. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney took a significant step to revive the idea of a two-state solution to the conflict, one he said has been ' steadily and gravely eroded ' by the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel . In announcing that he would recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly in September, Carney said Canada was 'standing with all people who choose peace over violence or terrorism.' It is a step that Middle East observers see as a potentially powerful signal, one that comes in concert with an identical pledge from France and a warning that Britain will follow suit if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire in Gaza and commit to a peace deal . On top of snubbing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the recognition of Palestine risks isolating the United States, which could end up as the only permanent member of the United Nations Security Council resisting the movement. This is important because a potential United Nations member state must first have the backing of the UNSC before submitting to a vote of the General Assembly, where 147 out of 193 countries already support Palestinian statehood. The move by Canada, France and the United Kingdom could also split the wealthy and influential G7 member states and push their numbers into the majority at the G20. But this political recognition is far from a magic wand that will end the war and the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. Much depends on what comes after the words. If recognition is not followed by action, the declaration will remain largely symbolic, said Yossi Mekelberg, a senior consulting fellow with Chatham House in London. Canada can intervene in the case against Israel in support of the principles of international law. Canada can intervene in the case against Israel in support of the principles of international law. But it could also prove to be hugely significant if it leads to a larger plan to end the war in Gaza , free the remaining Israeli hostages, deliver humanitarian aid and rebuild the devastated territory, reduce tensions in the West Bank and forge a long-term peace between Israelis and Palestinians. 'It actually should have been done long before as a way to overcome the asymmetry in negotiation between a state (Israel) and a non-state actor (the Palestinian Authority),' Mekelberg said in an interview. Carney, who spoke with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas following his declaration, said he expects the governing body, which administers the West Bank, to commit to governance reforms, to holding elections in 2026 and to demilitarizing the Palestinian state. 'It puts the onus on the Palestinians to behave as a state and not as a liberation movement,' Mekelberg said. The Israeli government has strongly objected to the move, saying that recognition is a reward for terrorism and supports a movement that wants to destroy Israel, not live beside it in peace. On Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on social media that Canada's decision ' will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal with them .' Trump posted on Truth Social the move 'will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal' with Canada. Trump's deadline for a trade deal is Friday. Trump posted on Truth Social the move 'will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal' with Canada. Trump's deadline for a trade deal is Friday. The U.S. State Department also announced Thursday that it had decided to prevent Palestinian political leaders from obtaining travel visas on grounds they had, among other things, attempted to 'internationalize' the conflict with Israel through legal proceedings at the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice.' But the decision by Canada, France and Britain — three countries with historically close ties to Israel — to back the Palestinian cause will also make it hard for average Israelis to ignore the existence of a shifting tide in global public opinion. This, even if a Pew Research survey published last month found that only about one in five Israelis believed it was possible for separate Israeli and Palestinian states to peacefully coexist, while half said it was not possible. The prospects for a peaceful future have little to do with the determination about whether a territory constitutes a state. The generally accepted definition was agreed to nearly a century ago at a gathering of mostly central and South American countries in Uruguay. They signed a treaty, the 1933 Montevideo Convention , resolving that a state existed as a legal entity wherever four basic criteria were met: a permanent population; a defined territory; a government; and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. Canada's own difficult history with the Quebec independence movement and the geopolitical chaos prompted by the fall of communism in the 1990s is a reminder that what is written on paper rarely translates neatly into what occurs in real life. It took nearly a decade after the guns had fallen silent for Canada to recognize Kosovo as a state separate from neighbouring Serbia, although the Balkan nation still does not have a seat at the UN. In the case of Palestine and Israel, Canada and dozens of other frustrated countries have determined that recognition can serve as a potential precursor to peace, not simply as a reward for having achieved an end to the fighting. Mekelberg said that rather than viewing international recognition of Palestine as an attack on Israel, it should be seen as a 'pro-Israeli move' to end the wars, to ensure Israel's security and to fulfil the potential of both the Arab and Jewish populations. 'It's not a punishment,' he said. 'It's a step toward once and for all, finishing a conflict that is not only 77 years old, it's more than 100 years old.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump puts U.S. trade deal with Canada in doubt after Carney moves to recognize Palestine
Canada's intent to recognize Palestine may not bode well for ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States. During a news conference July 30, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced he would support Palestine as a state. 'International co-operation is essential to securing lasting peace and stability in the middle east,' Carney said in the streamed statement . 'Canada will do its best to lead that effort.' U.S. President Donald Trump was quick to react, posting on his own social media platform, Truth Social . 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' Trump shared. 'The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!!' Trump said in a later post . Trump and Carney are in the process of negotiating an updated trade deal, with a deadline of Aug. 1. Trump has said he will impose a 35-per-cent tariff on all Canadian goods not covered by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement by Aug. 1, if the countries do not reach an agreement before the deadline. On Nov. 30, 2018, Canada, the United States and Mexico signed an agreement to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement, the federal government said on its website . It included tariff rate quotas for refined sugar and sugar-containing products, as well as certain dairy products. There were also stronger regional requirements for core vehicle parts, such as engines and transmissions, with national security exemptions for US$32.4 billion worth of Canadian auto parts annually. Prior to Trump being sworn in as president in January, he threatened tariffs were coming to some Canadian goods. And he's made good on those threats, with additional tariffs added throughout the first six months of Trump's presidency. Trump wrote further about tariffs shortly after 6 a.m. July 31 . 'Tariffs are making America GREAT and RICH Again. They were successfully used against the USA for decades and, coupled with really dumb, pathetic, and crooked politicians, we're having a devastating impact on the future, and even the survival, of our country,' Trump wrote. 'Now the tide has completely turned, and America has successfully countered this onslaught of Tariffs used against it.' He added a year ago, America was a 'dead country, now it is the 'hottest' country anywhere in the world.' Carney said ongoing talks with Trump have been constructive and complex, but a deal may not be reached by Friday's deadline. According to a recent Angus Reid Institute poll, Canadians want Prime Minister Mark Carney to take a 'hard approach' in trade talks with Trump. Canada has already implemented a $1.3-billion border plan that includes new helicopters and resources on the ground, as well as a 'fentanyl czar' to appease Trump's idea that drugs are getting into the U.S. from Canada. Our country is also paying additional tariffs — 50 per cent — on steel and aluminum imported to the United States, which came into effect in March. Canada has decided not to retaliate that charge. Instead, to protect the country's steel sector, Canada announced effective Aug. 1 , the tariff rate quotas will be extended to countries that have a free-trade agreement in force with Canada, with the exception of the United States and Mexico. This will result in a 50-per-cent surtax being applied on steel imports above 100 per cent of 2024 levels. A 25-per-cent surtax will also be applied on imports from all countries other than the U.S. that contain steel melted and poured in China. All eyes will be on Trump and Carney today, waiting to see if a deal is reached. -with files from Mike Pearson Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Amnesty Intl. Researcher tells CNN why they call the Gaza crisis ‘genocide'
Budour Hassan, a researcher with Amnesty International, talks with CNN's Wolf Blitzer about the ongoing hunger crisis in Gaza and explains why her organization is calling Israel's actions "genocide."