Bill would make swatting a four-year felony
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security as 'making malicious hoax calls to emergency services to falsely report an ongoing emergency such as a violent crime or explosive device at a certain location,' with the goal of drawing an emergency response.
'Swatting' at schools: Police investigate false reports
'If the false report is made with the intent that it cause a response to address the reported crime, regardless of whether or not a response occurs, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for 4 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00,' reads.
If there is a response and someone suffers injury, serious impairment or death as a result, the person responsible for the false report would face harsher penalties, the bill continues.
State Sen. Dayna Polehanki, D-Livonia, introduced Senate Bill 202 Tuesday alongside , which specifies penalties for swatting incidents. The bills were referred to committee.
Swatting has , including in West Michigan. For instance, in October, after the high school was the target of a fake threat. Officers searched each school in the district and didn't find any threat, so the schools were released from lockdown.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
The America We Knew Is Rapidly Slipping Away
Of all the terrible things Donald Trump has said and done as president, the most dangerous one just happened on Friday. Trump, in effect, ordered our trusted and independent government office of economic statistics to become as big a liar as he is. He fired Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for bringing him economic news he did not like, and in the hours immediately following, the second most dangerous thing happened: The senior Trump officials most responsible for running our economy — people who in their private businesses never would have contemplated firing a subordinate who brought them financial data they did not like — all went along for the ride. Rather than saying to Trump: Mr. President, if you don't reconsider this decision — if you fire the top labor bureau statistician because she brought you bad economic news — how will anyone in the future trust that office when it issues good news' — they immediately covered for him. As The Wall Street Journal pointed out, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer had actually gone on Bloomberg TV early Friday and declared that even though the jobs report that had just been released was revised downward for May and June, 'we've seen positive job growth.' But as soon as she got the news hours later that Trump had fired the very B.L.S. director who reports to her, she wrote on X: 'I agree wholeheartedly with @POTUS that our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes.' As The Journal asked: 'So were the jobs data that were 'positive' in the morning rigged by the afternoon?' Of course not. The moment I heard what Trump had done, I had a flashback. It was January 2021, and it had just been reported that Trump, after losing the 2020 election, had tried to pressure Georgia's Republican secretary of state to 'find' him enough votes — exactly 11,780, Trump said — to overturn the presidential election and even threatened him with 'a criminal offense' if he didn't. The pressure came during an hourlong telephone call, according to an audio recording of the conversation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Los Angeles Times
30 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers have left Washington for the annual August recess, but a few weeks of relative quiet on the U.S. Capitol grounds can't mask the partisan tensions that are brewing on government funding and President Trump's nominees. It could make for a momentous September. Here's a look at what's ahead when lawmakers return after the Labor Day holiday. Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Charles E. Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilian nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations, is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Freking writes for the Associated Press. AP writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
New Hampshire becomes first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming care for minors
New Hampshire is the first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming health care for minors after its Republican governor gave final approval to bills that will ban the use of certain prescription medications and surgeries to treat gender dysphoria beginning next year. Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a former U.S. senator who won New Hampshire's gubernatorial election in November, signed two bills Friday restricting access to transition-related care in the state, which already prohibits rare genital surgeries for minors to transition. House Bill 377 prohibits doctors from administering puberty blockers and hormones to transgender youth starting Jan. 1. Like a handful of other, similar measures adopted by nearly all Republican-led states, New Hampshire's prohibition includes a 'grandfather clause' that allows minors already receiving care to continue doing so even after the law goes into effect. The second bill, House Bill 712, builds on New Hampshire's existing restrictions on gender-affirming surgery. The measure, which will also take effect in January, bars adolescents younger than 18 from undergoing certain procedures when they are used to treat gender dysphoria, including facial feminization or masculinization surgery and 'transgender chest surgery.' In a statement, Ayotte said, 'Medical decisions made at a young age can carry lifelong consequences, and these bills represent a balanced, bipartisan effort to protect children.' The New Hampshire House approved HB 377 in June, with two Democrats, state Reps. Dale Girard and Jonah Wheeler, voting with nearly all Republicans to advance the measure. Eleven Democrats were excused from voting. New Hampshire senators approved the bill in a 16-8 party-line vote. Wheeler joined House Republicans again in voting to pass HB 712, and 11 Democrats again were excused. The state Senate approved the measure in June in another vote along party lines. New Hampshire state Rep. Lisa Mazur, a Republican and the prime sponsor of both bills, celebrated their approval Friday in a post on X. 'My two bills that will protect NH kids from irreversible harm were just signed into law by Gov. Ayotte. We are now the 1st state in New England the whole Northeast to do so. Go NH!!' Mazur wrote. In June, while defending House Bill 377, Mazur pointed to a recent Supreme Court ruling that upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors. 'It is now legal and constitutional for states to regulate and or ban the use of these harmful drugs in minors,' she said. LGBTQ rights groups immediately condemned Ayotte's signature on the bills, which they said ignore testimony from transgender youth who have benefited from gender-affirming care and statements from major medical organizations that such care for transgender adults and minors is medically necessary and can be lifesaving. 'It is heartbreaking to witness lawmakers inserting themselves into deeply personal, private conversations between families, their doctors, and their children,' Julia Hawthorne, a board member of the state LGBTQ rights group 603 Equality, wrote on Facebook. Linds Jakows, the organization's founder, said transgender young people in New Hampshire 'are not only tangibly losing access to life-saving healthcare — but also receiving a disturbing message of rejection from their state government.' 'To youth impacted by these bills, please know: You are loved, you are worthy of respect and dignity, and there is a community here in New Hampshire and beyond that is ready to support you,' they said. The Campaign for Southern Equality, an LGBTQ rights group that has since 2023 distributed more than $900,000 in grants to families of transgender children needing to travel out-of-state for gender-affirming care, announced on Friday that it would expand its Trans Youth Emergency Project into New Hampshire. 'Every day I speak with families of transgender youth who are worried about the future. Many are panicking, unsure of where or when they'll get the medicine that their child needs to continue leading a healthy, happy life,' said Van Bailey, a patient navigator for the program. 'These laws are cruelly thrusting families into impossible choices, and it is deeply unfair.'
