logo
Scalise: Megabill changes never an option

Scalise: Megabill changes never an option

Politico20 hours ago
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is blasting Republican colleagues over Medicaid as he issues extended remarks ahead of the final GOP megabill vote.
Jeffries is utilizing his so-called magic minute to read off letters sent in by individuals in each state who rely on benefits that potentially hang in the balance as a result of the megabill's provisions.
After reading a story from Arizona and criticizing Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz), Jeffries told the chamber: 'I'm still in the A section right now, so strap in.'
He read another story from a constituent in GOP Rep. David Valadao's district in California, which Jeffries said has the highest concentration of Medicaid recipients in the country. The writer's son has Down syndrome and autism and lives at home with aging parents. He requires in-home care, which is provided through a Medicaid service that could be threatened.
Jeffries said his goal in reading out these stories is to 'lift up the voices of everyday Americans all across the country.'
'This one big ugly Republican bill has put a target on their back,' Jeffries said. 'This is a question for so many individuals of life and death. … It is so extraordinary that in the middle of the night, Americans face a bill that will target their health care.'
The minority leader is also hinting at the vulnerability of certain Republicans who are voting to advance the bill in potentially toss-up districts. Jeffries said one letter came from someone in a district 'currently represented by Congressman Gabe Evans — currently represented.'
Speaker Mike Johnson predicted Jeffries would speak for an hour, but it's unclear how long the speech will go on.
'I'm going to take my time,' Jeffries declared to applause from Democrats on the floor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Free America' Anti-Trump Protests Expand Across Nation For 4th of July
'Free America' Anti-Trump Protests Expand Across Nation For 4th of July

Newsweek

time6 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

'Free America' Anti-Trump Protests Expand Across Nation For 4th of July

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hundreds of "Free America" demonstrations against President Donald Trump and his administration are planned nationwide on July 4. The protests are being organized by the same group behind the Women's March, with the stated goal being to "Free America from the grip of hate and the politics of fear." They are taking the form of various community gatherings, including block parties, banner drops, barbecues, and dance events. Nichole Geibel, a 'Free America' protest organizer in Ohio, and Co-Chair of the North Ridgeville Democrats, told Newsweek: "The motivation behind this event is the growing frustration so many Americans have with the policies at the federal and state levels that infringe on our fundamental rights and take choice away from all of us and our communities. We believe that freedom of speech, personal autonomy and accountability in government are always important and always need to be fought for." Newsweek has reached out to the White House for comment via email. A protester waves an upside down American flag in front of the Capitol, Tuesday, March 4, 2025, in Washington. A protester waves an upside down American flag in front of the Capitol, Tuesday, March 4, 2025, in Washington. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo Why It Matters These protests come only a few weeks after the "No Kings" nationwide demonstrations, which were the largest anti-Trump gathering since his inauguration in January. The demonstrations also come just one day after Trump's sprawling tax and spending bill, known as the "Big Beautiful Bill", was passed by the House of Representatives What To Know The "Free America" organizers are calling attention to several aspects of the Trump administration, including the growing wealth disparity in America and mass layoffs enacted across the federal government. Geibel told Newsweek: "We want our elected officials to see that we're paying attention. We want them to know that their constituents understand that freedom and individual rights are being stripped away from all of us, and we expect them to represent us and our rights. Our hope is they'll listen more, restrict less, remember who they work for and remember that America is not a fascist nation." There are currently 264 "Free America" protests planned across Republican and Democratic states, including Florida, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, New Hampshire, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina. The protests have grown since June 30, when 170 demonstrations were listed on the organization's site. The number of protests is still a great deal smaller than the roughly 1,800 "No Kings" protests that took place on June 14. Organizers say the language of "freedom" reflects the symbolism of the July 4 holiday, which commemorates the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Speaking to how protests have grown in size throughout the first months of the Trump administration, Geibel said: "We have been protesting weekly [in Lorain County, Ohio] since March. Our protest group has grown exponentially since March and our local democratic community meetings have seen an increase in attendance this year also. The people in Lorain County Ohio are not giving up on the fight for democracy." Protesters demonstrate against the policies of President Donald Trump during a No Kings rally, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Orlando, Florida. Protesters demonstrate against the policies of President Donald Trump during a No Kings rally, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Orlando, Florida. Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP Photo What People Are Saying Nichole Geibel, a 'Free America' protest organizer in Ohio told Newsweek: "We hope people feel less alone and more connected with others who want to take peaceful, meaningful action. It's about showing up, using our voices, and reminding ourselves that democracy only works when everyday people participate and stand up for what they believe in. As Rep. John Lewis once said 'Never be afraid to make some noise and get into good trouble, necessary trouble.' We want people to leave feeling empowered and not be afraid to speak up for themselves and for this country." Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff, posted on X in response to Trump's Big Beautiful Bill passing the House before July 4: "The most incredible opening 6 months to an American presidency in history." What Happens Next The demonstrations are planned nationwide for July 4.

Trump pitches plan allowing farmers to vouch for illegal immigrant workers facing deportation
Trump pitches plan allowing farmers to vouch for illegal immigrant workers facing deportation

Fox News

time6 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump pitches plan allowing farmers to vouch for illegal immigrant workers facing deportation

The Trump administration plans to implement a process whereby farmers in Iowa can vouch for hard-working, law-abiding migrant farmworkers who may be facing deportation, so that they can remain in the U.S. The proposed process was shared by President Donald Trump during an event at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on Thursday night, kicking off a year of patriotic celebrations meant to honor the nation's 250th birthday. Trump said the new plan will take place in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security and that legislation for the measure is currently being drafted, while speaking Thursday evening from Iowa. "You know, they've had people working for them for years. And we're going to do something … we're going to sort of put the farmers in charge," Trump told the crowd of people in attendance. "If a farmer has been with one of these people that worked so hard – they bend over all day, we don't have too many people that can do that, but they work very hard, and they know him very well, and some of the farmers are literally, you know, they cry when they see this happen – if a farmer is willing to vouch for these people, in some way, Kristie, I think we're going to have to just say that's going to be good, right?" "We don't want to do [border security] where we take all of the workers off the farms," Trump added. "We want the farms to do great." According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, Iowa is the nation's second-largest agricultural exporting state. While announcing the new plan, Trump cited cases he had heard of when migrants who have worked on farms for 15 years "get thrown out pretty viciously." "We can't do that," Trump added. "We got to work with the farmers and people that have hotels and leisure properties." Earlier this week, when Trump previously hinted at the new immigration exemption for farmers, he also suggested the move could be implemented for workers in the hospitality industry, as well. While sharing the new immigration proposal with the crowd at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on Thursday night, Trump spoke to potential criticisms of the move by "serious radical-right people" within the GOP, asking the crowd rhetorically if they think these folks "will understand." After the president first brought up the proposal earlier this week, critics have already started sounding off. "So, if I'm to understand this correctly, we should look the other way regarding illegal immigration as long as it's in the construction, hotel, or restaurant industries? This is far beyond disappointing, it's infuriating," California Republican state Sen. Melissa Melendez wrote on X. The president noted Thursday evening that the move will put farmers "in charge" and ultimately the responsibility for any problems that arise will fall to their feet. "If the farmers don't do a good job, we'll throw them the hell out of the country. We'll let the guys – we'll let the illegals stay, and we'll throw the farmers the hell out," Trump said. "Okay, get ready, farmer, I'm telling you."

How Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect US Housing Market
How Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect US Housing Market

Newsweek

time20 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect US Housing Market

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which House Republicans narrowly passed on Thursday, is likely to help high-end buyers in the U.S. housing market while doing little for lower-income renters and potential first-time buyers, experts have said. The House passed the sweeping bill, which extends tax cuts and slashes the U.S.'s social security net programs, with a 218-214 vote—with all Democrats voting against it and all but two Republicans supporting it. The bill has been strongly contested over the past few weeks, exposing rifts within the GOP. Its approval marks a significant win for the president, who told reporters on Thursday that the legislation would "make this country into a rocket ship." "This is going to be a great bill for the country," Trump said. The president is expected to sign the bill into law on July 4. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson celebrating with fellow House Republicans during an enrollment ceremony of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July 3. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson celebrating with fellow House Republicans during an enrollment ceremony of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July experts have expressed skepticism that the bill will bring positive changes for everyday Americans. Many economists have denounced the bill, saying it is likely to benefit the wealthiest individuals in the country while stripping poorer families of crucial benefits. "There has never been a single law in U.S. history that has hurt low-income households more, from both the largest Medicaid cuts and the largest SNAP cuts in history," Bobby Kogan, a former top numbers cruncher for the Senate Budget Committee, said in a statement shared with Newsweek. He added: "And what's particularly egregious is this bill hurts low-income households while simultaneously bestowing huge tax cuts on the richest Americans. Quite literally, this bill makes the poor poorer while making the rich richer." The bill is also likely to affect the struggling U.S. housing market, which is in the midst of a slowdown as inventory surges while buyers are kept to the sidelines by elevated mortgage rates, sky-high prices, rising costs and growing economic uncertainty. "There are several parts of the bill that could affect real estate and housing markets, but its impact won't be uniform," senior economist Jake Krimmel told Newsweek. "Its overall impact is likely to vary significantly across regions and income groups, depending on local tax burdens, home prices, and how tight supply is," he said. "That's because the bill includes provisions that affect both housing demand and housing supply, and they operate differently in different parts of the country—especially given today's large regional divides in local economic conditions." High-End Buyers, Investors and Professionals to Benefit the Most The tax package passed by Congress includes a provision raising the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction to $40,000—effectively quadrupling the previous $10,000 limit. For homeowners in certain states and metros, this could mean saving thousands of dollars in annual taxes. Ed Fernandez, the president and CEO of exchange investment company 1031 Crowdfunding, told Newsweek that the measure "would be incredibly productive" and "create a real estate boom again." This change, however, "disproportionately benefits higher-income buyers in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Illinois—regions where housing markets remain tight and prices elevated," Krimmel said. The states with the highest share of properties taxed over $10,000, according to data, are New Jersey (39.9 percent), New York (25.9 percent), Connecticut (19.4 percent), California (19.3 percent), Massachusetts (18.4 percent), New Hampshire (16.3 percent), Illinois (13.7 percent), Texas (12.4 percent) and Rhode Island (9.3 percent). The District of Columbia (15.6 percent) is also included in the top 10. The top 10 metros are San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, California (47.9 percent); New York-Newark-Jersey City, New York-New Jersey (47.8 percent); San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, California (40.9 percent); Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, Connecticut (39.3 percent); Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, New York (37.5 percent); Trenton-Princeton, New Jersey (35.8 percent); Nantucket, Massachusetts (35.5 percent); Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, Texas (32.0 percent); Jackson, Wyoming-Idaho (28.7 percent); and Santa Cruz-Watsonville, California (28.1 percent). An additional $30,000 in deductions could amount to about $10,500 in annual tax savings for homeowners in these states and metros, assuming a 35 percent federal marginal tax rate, calculated. The higher SALT deduction cap "may supercharge demand in places where affordability has already been declining and inventory remains below pre-pandemic norms, potentially adding upward pressure to already strained markets," Krimmel said. That means that your average buyer in these already-expensive states and metros might face even higher prices as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "In the near term, the bill offers meaningful support to higher-income buyers and real estate investors but does less comparatively for lower-income renters and potential first-time buyers, who are still facing the steepest affordability challenges in today's housing market," Krimmel said. A permanent qualified business income deduction that the bill introduces is also likely to give an advantage to real estate investors and professionals, potentially fueling more investment in both residential and commercial property, Krimmel said. While everyday Americans may not benefit from the changes introduced by the new legislation, professionals are thrilled. Abe Schlisselfeld, the senior managing director and national real estate industry leader at CBIZ—a company that provides financial, insurance and advisory services in the U.S. and abroad—told Newsweek that the bill was "a big win for the real estate industry." One of the most attractive provisions for real estate investors in the bill is the return of 100 percent bonus depreciation, he said. "This would allow you to fully deduct the cost of qualifying renovations, property improvements, and certain building components immediately, instead of spreading the deductions out over several years," Schlisselfeld said. "This could be a game changer for your 2025 renovation or development plans," stimulating a significant amount of activity. A special depreciation allowance for qualified production property contained in the bill might also "create an additional tax advantage for investors in logistics, warehousing, or production-related facilities," Schlisselfeld said. Lower-Income Buyers Unlikely to Catch a Break 'Anytime Soon' The bill is also likely to affect the U.S. housing market on the supply side by expanding the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and making tweaks to opportunity zone incentives, Krimmel said. These are tools that support affordable housing, community redevelopment and increasing housing supply "where it's so desperately needed," he said. While these measures could help address the national housing shortage—including in rural areas and in lower-income urban neighborhoods—"large-scale supply-side impacts will take time and aren't likely to relieve pressure in high-cost cities anytime soon," Krimmel said. Several sections of the bill also terminate the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, the Residential Clean Energy Credit, New Energy Efficient Home Credit and the deduction for energy efficient commercial buildings. An analysis by the think tank and progressive advocacy group Groundwork Collaborative found that abolishing the New Energy Efficient Home Credit, which incentivized the construction of energy efficient homes and was estimated to spur the construction of 3 million homes in the next few years, would increase the price of new homes. "Now, builders that were expecting the credit will likely pass the cost on to consumers or cancel the construction of new homes altogether, further disrupting the housing supply and increasing costs," the group said. Construction of new homes in the U.S. has already significantly slowed down since the Trump administration's introduction of sweeping tariffs that brought up the cost of crucial material. A surge of for-sale listings in the U.S. market is also discouraging builders from hiking up production.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store