logo
The damage done by bottom trawling

The damage done by bottom trawling

Opinion
At the age of 99, the documentary filmmaker David Attenborough has achieved his greatest triumph. With a single film clip, he has signed the death warrant for one of the world's most destructive industries: bottom trawling. The companies and countries that do it will go down fighting and it will take time, but they will go down.
His film Ocean got a simultaneous global release last month to build pressure for a ban on bottom trawling before the third United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC-3) this week in the French city of Nice. The ban won't happen this week and it won't happen everywhere at once, but it is inevitable once enough people have seen that clip. You can't forget it.
It's long shots from underwater cameras at the mouth of an enormous net (you can't see the sides or the top). The bottom of the net, weighed down so it scrapes along the seabed, swallows up everything in its path — fish, crustaceans, plants, mud — as it advances inexorably, faster than a walking pace, throwing up a plume of muck in its wake.
These bottom trawlers have been working at sea for more than a century. No diver would survive where the cameras were, presumably fixed to the net's mouth by some rig that let them see the whole process.
Bottom trawlers are responsible for the bulk of the damage that human beings have done to the oceans. More than half the fish they catch are 'bycatch,' thrown back into the water dead or dying because the trawlermen are only after a couple of species that bring a good price. And the 'clean shave' they give the bottom leaves nowhere for juvenile fish to hide.
The first fishing boats that pulled big nets behind them, the so-called Brixham trawlers of the early 1800s, were sail-driven, but by the 1870s there were steam trawlers in Britain that could drag much bigger nets and catch 10 times as much fish. The global fishing catch then may have been as little as five million tonnes annually, but it went up fast.
With the advent of factory freezers in the mid-20th century — big ships that could travel to distant waters, catch up to 400 tonnes of fish every time they released their nets, and mechanically gut, fillet and fast-freeze the ones they wanted, dumping the rest — total catch reached 30 million tonnes a year by 1950.
It peaked at 130 million tonnes in 1996, by which time almost every major fishery in the world was being depleted. Human being have even changed the structure of ocean fish populations. Big, predatory 'table fish' (the kind people like to eat) have declined by two-thirds, while the biomass of smaller prey fish, facing fewer predators, has gone up.
The worst of it is that while the official UN goal is to have 30 per cent of the world's oceans in maritime protected areas by 2030, most of those MPAs still allow bottom trawling. We cannot rebuild healthy oceans unless that is stopped in the safe zones where fish populations should be able to recover, which is why Attenborough has made that his primary goal.
It won't happen at UNOC-3, but it is being heavily debated there. The European Union and the United Kingdom will be moving on the issue soon, and where they go, others will follow. But if they really do stop bottom-trawling those zones, what will people eat?
'We are eating bait and moving on to jellyfish and plankton,' warns Daniel Pauly of the University of British Columbia, but we may be spared that fate by the dramatic rise in the consumption of farmed fish. Half the protein people eat from all marine and freshwater sources is already from fish-farms, and the ratio is rising.
Moreover, the FIFO number (fish in/fish out) is steadily improving. It really used to be the 'little fish in/big fish out' ratio, with three tonnes of little fish ground up for fish meal and fish oil to produce one tonne of salmon or trout, but now fish feed is mostly plant-based and even big cage-raised predators are net neutral, one in/one out.
So the oceans, while still in terrible shape, are getting better, at least as far as fish are concerned. Now all we have to do is reverse the acidification process, stop sea level rise, and keep the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (the 'Gulf Stream') from collapsing.
Gwynne Dyer's new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World's Climate Engineers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Generations of Germans believe Frederick the Great brought potatoes to Germany. It's a myth
Generations of Germans believe Frederick the Great brought potatoes to Germany. It's a myth

Winnipeg Free Press

time9 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Generations of Germans believe Frederick the Great brought potatoes to Germany. It's a myth

POTSDAM, Germany (AP) — Generations of Germans believe Frederick the Great brought the beloved potato to Germany. The legend is this: King Frederick II of Prussia wanted his subjects to eat potatoes, introduced to Europe in the 16th century from South America. But the people of Prussia, which later became part of a united Germany, wouldn't touch the tuber. So the 18th-century monarch resorted to trickery. He placed royal guards and soldiers along the edge of his palace garden — thus creating the illusion that potatoes were a rare and valuable crop reserved for the royal family and its aristocratic friends. But the guards withdrew from their posts each night, creating an opportunity for enterprising locals to sneak in and 'steal' the spuds. Thus began Germany's love affair with the humble Kartoffel and Frederick's rebranding as Der Kartoffelkönig, the potato king. Except it's all fake. Bogus. Phony. Falsch! as the Germans would say. And debunking it is a royal pain for Jürgen Luh, historian of the Prussian Palaces and Gardens Foundation, even when history has receipts. Archives of royal menus show the king instead had a penchant for Italian food and French wine. 'He never ate it,' Luh said. 'Any potato. Not boiled, not fried.' The unexciting truth is that the potato has been cultivated in Germany's Bavarian region since 1647, Luh said. Frederick's great-grandfather, Elector Frederick William, introduced it to the Brandenburg area of Prussia in the 1650s, but only because he liked the aesthetics of the plant's leafy greens. By the time Frederick the Great took the throne in 1740, the potato was grown in gardens throughout Prussia but not on a large scale. The king did actually issue royal decrees promoting the farming and production of potatoes, but his people ignored them. Potatoes did not become widespread in Prussia, in central and eastern Europe, until after the Napoleonic wars ended in 1815, after Frederick II's death in 1786. The guarded garden story, Luh said, is nonsense. And Frederick was more of a wannabe potato king than an actual one. But the fable has deep roots, and the myth makes money. To this day, visitors to Frederick's summer home of Sanssouci Palace in Potsdam, outside Berlin, leave raw potatoes and paper crowns on the king's grave. The palace's gift shops sell potato merchandise, from postcards and children's books to a 35-euro ($40) apron proclaiming the wearer as a Kartoffelkönig. Luh used to correct tour guides and visitors to the palace, but he's largely given up. Besides, he said, at least it means people are coming to Sanssouci and experiencing its rich history. 'The fact is that the legend has beaten the truth and the legend is just too beautiful,' he added. Whatever its roots, the potato is undeniably part of the German cultural identity. At Biohof Schöneiche, an organic farm outside Berlin, workers will harvest roughly 2,500 metric tons (5.5 million pounds) of potatoes come the annual September harvest. 'In most parts of the world, potatoes are considered a vegetable. In Germany it's a staple food,' general manager Axel Boehme said. 'People cannot imagine to have a meal without potatoes.' Regional recipes, passed down from every Oma (grandmother) to each new generation, debate the merits of a vinegar- or mayo-based Kartoffelsalat. From boiled (Salzkartoffeln) or pan-fried (Bratkartoffeln) to dumplings and pancakes (Kartoffelklösse and Kartoffelpuffer), the versatile vegetable is intertwined with the country's emotional heritage. For Anke Schoenfelder, project manager for German potato marking company Kartoffel-Marketing GmbH, her favorite tuber tradition is rooted in making Kartoffel-Karotten-Gugelhupf (potato and carrot Bundt cake) for family gatherings. 'Taste is memory, right? And when this is related to your family, this is even more part of your identity,' she said. Plus, Schoenfelder added, the potato can be used as a beauty product — the juice can be good for your skin, she says — or a household cleaner, for stubborn stains on the bottom of your oven. For now, Der Kartoffelkönig's legend lives on. As Luh was speaking to The Associated Press in front of the king's grave, two tourists placed their offerings of potatoes on the tomb. One even took a selfie as she did so. 'I always think I should go here in the evening when I have no potatoes at home,' the historian joked. 'I could take them away and have a good meal afterwards.' __ Kartoffel-Karotten-Gugelhupf (potato and carrot Bundt cake) From Kartoffel-Marketing GmbH, a German potato marking company. In true European fashion, the measurements provided refer to weight, not volume. You will need a 10-cup Bundt pan. Time: 90 minutes Serves: 12 Ingredients 9 oz (250g) high-starch potatoes (such as Russets and Maris Pipers) 9 oz (250g) carrots 1.7 fluid ounces (50 mL) carrot juice 1.7 fluid ounces (50 mL) sunflower oil 4 eggs (medium-size, room temperature) 7 oz (200g) sugar 1 packet vanilla sugar 4.5 oz (125g) almonds, ground 4.5 oz (125g) flour melted butter to grease the mold 2 tablespoons breadcrumbs Directions Wash the potatoes and boil them in salted water for about 20 to 25 minutes, until tender. Let them cool slightly, peel them, and then press them through a potato ricer into a bowl. Wash and peel the carrots and grate them finely with the potatoes, using a vegetable grater or a mandolin. Generously grease the Bundt pan with oil or butter. Coat the pan with some breadcrumbs. Preheat oven to 392°F (200°C) on the fan setting. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. Add carrot juice, sunflower oil, eggs, vanilla sugar, sugar, flour, baking powder and ground almonds to the mashed potatoes and grated carrots and mix with a hand mixer for about four minutes until a dough forms. Pour the potato-carrot cake batter into the prepared Bundt pan. Place the pan in the oven and bake for about 50 minutes until cooked through (if necessary, cover the pan with aluminum foil after half an hour to prevent the cake from burning). Let the cake cool completely (you can also do this on a balcony or terrace) before decorating it with icing. This is important, because otherwise the icing will seep into the cake. In a bowl, combine the powdered sugar and a little lemon juice until thickened. Pour the icing over the cooled cake and decorate with your preferred toppings like chocolate chips, for example. Let it rest a bit to allow the icing to set.

People in Gaza 'starve or risk being shot': NGOs urge end to aid work backed by U.S., Israel as deaths rise

timea day ago

People in Gaza 'starve or risk being shot': NGOs urge end to aid work backed by U.S., Israel as deaths rise

More than 170 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have joined forces to call for the dismantling of a food distribution system run by a U.S.- and Israeli-backed group as civilian deaths and injuries mount near aid sites in Gaza. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating in the war-torn Gaza Strip in late May — becoming the linchpin of a new aid mechanism and diverting distribution from UN-led aid groups. Since then, at least 600 Palestinians have been killed in shootings and over 4,200 have been injured near GHF aid sites or on routes guarded by Israeli forces, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. A joint declaration by 171 charities that was released Tuesday urges the international community to pressure Israel to halt the aid system and allow the UN to return to co-ordinating food distribution. Palestinians in Gaza face an impossible choice: Starve or risk being shot while trying desperately to reach food to feed their families, the statement said. The United Nations, which has been critical of the GHF since its inception, says its distribution plan is inherently unsafe and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. Aid groups, including Save the Children, have also voiced concerns, saying the system puts civilians at risk of death and injury. The war in Gaza began after Hamas fighters stormed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza. Israel's subsequent military assault has resulted in the deaths of over 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The war has displaced nearly the entire 2.3 million population in Gaza and plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis. WATCH | UNICEF specialist says aid mechanism is 'unsafe' and 'unfair' : Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Aid distribution in Gaza goes 'against every humanitarian principle,' UNICEF specialist says UNICEF's Rosalia Bollen says the way aid is being distributed in Gaza is 'unsafe' and 'unfair' and says it has killed hundreds in Gaza. 'Nobody should have to choose between dying of hunger or risk being shot at when you try to get some food,' says the agency's communication specialist. As well as Save the Children, other NGOs that have signed the declaration include Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Amnesty International. The GHF responded to the NGOs' call to end the distribution system, saying it had delivered more than 52 million meals in five weeks and other humanitarian groups had nearly all of their aid looted. In a statement to media on Tuesday, the GHF said it is ready to collaborate with other aid groups. Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza. Attacks reported near food distribution hubs The GHF system limits food distribution to a small number of hubs under guard of armed contractors. There are currently four hubs, all close to Israeli military positions, where people must go to pick up their food. The NGOs have accused the GHF of forcing hungry and weak people to trek for hours, sometimes through active conflict zones, to get the aid. Children were killed or injured in 10 out of 19 deadly incidents reported near food distribution sites, according to Save the Children, which analyzed reports from the Gaza Media Office and the United Nations last week. A man places his head on the body of a Palestinian during a funeral at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City on Monday. He was killed in an Israeli airstrike on a school on Sunday, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. (Mahmoud Issa/Reuters) Photo: (Mahmoud Issa/Reuters) The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a UN-led system that Israel claims has allowed militants to divert aid. Hamas has denied it steals aid. Last week, Israel's Military Advocate General ordered an investigation (new window) into possible war crimes over allegations that Israeli soldiers were ordered by the army to deliberately fire at Palestinians attempting to reach aid distribution sites, according to an exclusive report by Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Haaretz said officers and soldiers, who were unnamed, revealed that commanders ordered troops to shoot at crowds to drive them away or disperse them, even though it was clear they posed no threat. The Israeli military acknowledged on Monday that Palestinian civilians have been harmed at aid distribution centres in the Gaza Strip, saying that Israeli forces had been issued new instructions following lessons learned. Sara Jabakhanji (new window) · Thomson Reuters

People in Gaza 'starve or risk being shot': NGOs urge end to aid work backed by U.S., Israel as deaths rise
People in Gaza 'starve or risk being shot': NGOs urge end to aid work backed by U.S., Israel as deaths rise

CBC

timea day ago

  • CBC

People in Gaza 'starve or risk being shot': NGOs urge end to aid work backed by U.S., Israel as deaths rise

Social Sharing More than 170 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have joined forces to call for the dismantling of a food distribution system run by a U.S.- and Israeli-backed group as civilian deaths and injuries mount near aid sites in Gaza. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating in the war-torn Gaza Strip in late May — becoming the linchpin of a new aid mechanism and diverting distribution from UN-led aid groups. Since then, at least 600 Palestinians have been killed in shootings and over 4,200 have been injured near GHF aid sites or on routes guarded by Israeli forces. A joint declaration by 171 charities that was released Tuesday urges the international community to pressure Israel to halt the aid system and allow the UN to return to co-ordinating food distribution. "Palestinians in Gaza face an impossible choice: Starve or risk being shot while trying desperately to reach food to feed their families," the statement said. The United Nations, which has been critical of the GHF since its inception, says its distribution plan is "inherently unsafe" and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. Aid groups, including Save the Children, have also voiced concerns, saying the system puts civilians at risk of death and injury. The war in Gaza began after Hamas fighters stormed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza. Israel's subsequent military assault has resulted in the deaths of over 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The war has displaced nearly the entire 2.3 million population in Gaza and plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis. WATCH | UNICEF specialist says aid mechanism is 'unsafe' and 'unfair': Aid distribution in Gaza goes 'against every humanitarian principle,' UNICEF specialist says 5 days ago Duration 10:36 UNICEF's Rosalia Bollen says the way aid is being distributed in Gaza is 'unsafe' and 'unfair' and says it has killed hundreds in Gaza. 'Nobody should have to choose between dying of hunger or risk being shot at when you try to get some food,' says the agency's communication specialist. As well as Save the Children, other NGOs that have signed the declaration include Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Amnesty International. The GHF responded to the NGOs' call to end the distribution system, saying it had delivered more than 52 million meals in five weeks and other humanitarian groups had "nearly all of their aid looted." In a statement to media on Tuesday, the GHF said it is ready to collaborate with other aid groups. "Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza." Attacks reported near food distribution hubs The GHF system limits food distribution to a small number of hubs under guard of armed contractors. There are currently four hubs, all close to Israeli military positions, where people must go to pick up their food. The NGOs have accused the GHF of forcing hungry and weak people to trek for hours, sometimes through active conflict zones, to get the aid. Children were killed or injured in 10 out of 19 deadly incidents reported near food distribution sites, according to Save the Children, which analyzed reports from the Gaza Media Office and the United Nations last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a UN-led system that Israel claims has allowed militants to divert aid. Hamas has denied it steals aid. Last week, Israel's Military Advocate General ordered an investigation into possible war crimes over allegations that Israeli soldiers were ordered by the army to deliberately fire at Palestinians attempting to reach aid distribution sites, according to an exclusive report by Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Haaretz said officers and soldiers, who were unnamed, revealed that commanders "ordered troops to shoot at crowds to drive them away or disperse them, even though it was clear they posed no threat." The Israeli military acknowledged on Monday that Palestinian civilians have been harmed at aid distribution centres in the Gaza Strip, saying that Israeli forces had been issued new instructions following "lessons learned."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store