Trans Dem Rep. McBride suggests party went too far with transgender agenda before public was ready
McBride, the first transgender representative who was elected to Congress in 2024, spoke to The New York Times' Ezra Klein about where the Democratic Party went wrong on transgender issues and how they should approach winning back the public.
"I think that's an accurate reflection of the overplaying of the hand in some ways — that we as a coalition went to Trans 201, Trans 301, when people were still at a very much Trans 101 stage," McBride said.
McBride suggested that the trans movement caused a perceived cultural aggression that allowed the GOP to say, "We're punishing trans people because of their actions. Rather than: We're going after innocent bystanders."
"And I think some of the cultural mores and norms that started to develop around inclusion of trans people were probably premature for a lot of people. We became absolutist — not just on trans rights but across the progressive movement — and we forgot that in a democracy we have to grapple with where the public authentically is and actually engage with it. Part of this is fostered by social media," the Delaware lawmaker said.
McBride argued that progressives pushed for every single perfect policy and cultural norm without keeping public opinion in mind.
"We decided that we now have to say and fight for and push for every single perfect policy and cultural norm right now, regardless of whether the public is ready. And I think it misunderstands the role that politicians and, frankly, social movements have in maintaining proximity to public opinion, of walking people to a place," McBride told the NYT.
The Democratic lawmaker cautioned the party not to get too far ahead of public opinion and said they lose their grip on it if they do.
"And I think a lot of the conversations around sports and also some of the cultural changes that we saw in expected workplace behavior, etc. was the byproduct of maybe just getting too far out ahead and not actually engaging in the art of social change-making," McBride continued.
McBride said in November that the GOP's focus on countering trans issues was a "distraction."
"I think we are all united that attempts to attack a vulnerable community are not only mean-spirited, but really an attempt to misdirect. Because every single time we hear the incoming administration or Republicans in Congress talk about any vulnerable group in this country, we have to be clear that it is an attempt to distract," McBride said during an interview last year with CBS.
The lawmaker was surprised by Republicans prioritizing efforts to keep transgender athletes out of girls' sports, according to a January 2025 interview.
"I've had conversations with colleagues about many of the bills that are coming before us and certainly have heard from some colleagues who, like me, are mystified that this is a priority for a Republican conference that is entering a Republican trifecta, that this is an issue that they prioritize," McBride said.
McBride noted during the interview with Klein that the transgender movement needed to negotiate with public opinion, and that they shouldn't treat the public like Republican politicians.
"When you recognize that distinction, I think it allows for a pragmatic approach that has, in my mind, the best possible chance of shifting public opinion as quickly as possible. It would be one thing if screaming about how dangerous this is right now had the effect of stopping these attacks, but it won't," McBride said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump pauses export controls to bolster China trade deal, FT says
(Reuters) -The U.S. has paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support President Donald Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with President Xi Jinping this year, the Financial Times said on Monday. The industry and security bureau of the Commerce Department, which oversees export controls, has been told in recent months to avoid tough moves on China, the newspaper said, citing current and former officials. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House and the department did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment outside business hours. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials are set to resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies. Tech giant Nvidia said this month it would resume sales of its H20 graphics processing units (GPU) to China, reversing an export curb the Trump administration imposed in April to keep advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands over national security concerns. The planned resumption was part of U.S. negotiations on rare earths and magnets, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said. The paper said 20 security experts and former officials, including former deputy US national security adviser Matt Pottinger, will write on Monday to Lutnick to voice concern, however. "This move represents a strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence," they write in the letter, it added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How Li Ka-shing Landed in the Middle of US-China Tiff
When President Donald Trump called for the US to retake control of the Panama Canal during his inauguration speech in January, it set off a chain of events that landed Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing in the middle of a US-China tiff. Li, whose conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd. owns two port operations on the Panama Canal, came under political pressure from the Trump administration after the US leader falsely claimed that the strategic waterway was operated by China.
Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US, China Officials to Meet in Sweden for Trade Talks
00:00 Is now sort of a sense of optimism in the air. I think the expectation is that we are likely to get another extension on the US-China fronts, which implies there's no final deal yet. So what are still the sticking points between the US and China right now? Yeah, well, I think there is a sort of open question as to conceptually what a final deal with the United States is on trade. But certainly the Chinese are further away from one than the Europeans from what they clinched over the last the last 24 hours. And the Chinese basically are trying to get another a further extension on the runway for that trade deal that would expire, that truce that would expire on August the 12th. And just to remind everybody where we are, because it's hard to keep track of all of these numbers, the U.S. had imposed 125% tariffs on China that basically foreclosed any ability to have any trading between the two biggest economies in the world. And that was sort of talked down to this truce. And now we're stuck at these 30% tariffs, ten of which are sort of universal retaliatory tariffs and 20% of which are from these sort of fentanyl tariffs that the Trump administration has put forward. What we will get today is the beginning of the third talks between the vice premier of China and the US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessen, who will be here over the next couple of hours in Stockholm to have those negotiations. The desired outcome here is probably another 90 day extension truce to that truce. We have some reporting from the Chinese media that that is already basically almost fully secured. The question will be then what will come next? Where will they be able to make progress on the other issues that they would like to discuss and they would like to see some changes? There is, of course, the main sort of elephant in the room here, which is a rare earth minerals and those advanced AI chips that the US has capitulated on agreed to sell to China in exchange for those rare earth metals. What they will also likely be discussing is the continued purchasing of crude oil and fossil fuels from Russia, from Iran, which are sanctioned by the G7 and the and the United States. And of course, there are some other issues like Tik-Tok, right? There is the fact that the US government, that the US there is apparently a US buyer for TikTok that still needs a Chinese sign off. So these are some of the conversations that'll be happening here in Stockholm over the next couple of hours. Yeah, I mean, the thing about President Trump is he also likes to make a big show of having achieved these these trade deals or getting to these trade agreements with various counterparts. And you've got to wonder whether in this case, perhaps he's holding off to make that big announcement side by side with President Xi later this year. What do we know about the prospects of the two leaders meeting at some point? Yeah. So he definitely has an instinct for the sort of showmanship and the sort of TV production side of things. And I think that if you were to get a sort of momentous large deal between the Chinese and the United States, it is the sort of thing that Donald Trump probably himself would like to bring into being. I mean, this is basically what we saw with the EU, right? We had Ursula von der Leyen flying up to Scotland in order to have the person in person meetings that Trump could announce at alongside her, you know, in person. So, I mean, the Chinese, we understand that there was a call between Xi Jinping and Trump. We understand that there has been an invitation extended to the President of the United States and the first lady to come to China at some point. We are probably still some distance away from that. We should say that the fact that these discussions are happening between the Chinese and the United States and, you know, sort of neutral territory was in Switzerland, in the U.K. and now in Stockholm, really wants to sort of demonstrate the idea that nobody wants to be seen to be being pulled in either one of the directions. So I think we're probably still some distance away from that. That being said, this is the kind of announcement, Jomana, that as you expect, you think that the president of the United States would like to make right next to the the premier of China to really have the sort of full impact of what would be really a momentous trade deal and really one of the most important pledges of the Trump administration in that campaign, saying that basically he's going to solve the trade problem with China.
