Thai prosecutors drop royal insult charge against US academic
Thai prosecutors
dropped royal defamation charges on Thursday against an American scholar accused of insulting the monarchy over an article published on a political website.
Paul Chambers
a longtime Southeast Asia politics scholar in Thailand, was arrested last month in Phitsanulok province, north of Bangkok, under the kingdom's strict
lese-majeste laws
.
The case marked a rare instance of a foreign national being charged under Thailand's lese-majeste law, which bans criticism of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and his close family and carries sentences of up to 15 years in jail per offence.
The Office of the Attorney-General said on Thursday it had decided "not to indict" Chambers.
"The director-general had decided not to indict the suspect," the statement said, adding that prosecutors would seek to dismiss the case in court and coordinate with police.
The Thai army, a staunch defender of the monarchy, filed the complaint over a short blurb posted on a political think tank website this year.
A military spokesperson last week defended the decision to file the case following criticism that the army had no legal standing to do so under the Thai law.
Trade talks between Thailand and the United States have been indefinitely postponed, fuelling speculation that the arrest may have strained diplomatic ties between the two countries.
International watchdogs have expressed concern over the use of the lese-majeste laws, known as Article 112 against academics, activists and even students.
One man in northern Thailand was jailed for at least 50 years for lese-majeste last year, while a woman was given a 43-year prison sentence in 2021.
In 2023, a man was jailed for two years for selling satirical calendars featuring rubber ducks that a court said defamed the king.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In latest Harvard vs Trump showdown, US launches probe into Ivy's exchange program
The US State Department has launched an investigation into Harvard University's eligibility as a sponsor in its exchange visitor program, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced in a statement. 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests,' Rubio said. 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' Rubio added as this marked the latest attempt by the Trump administration to pressure the Ivy League university. The State Department is probing the Exchange Visitor Program at Harvard, which enables the institution to host international students, scholars, and faculty for short-term academic engagements. If Harvard's sponsorship status is revoked, it would significantly hinder the university's ability to bring overseas talent to its Cambridge, Massachusetts campus. Rubio said that retaining the 'privilege' of sponsoring exchange visitors comes with responsibility. Harvard, he said, must not 'compromise' the national security interests of the United States. This is not the first time Harvard has clashed with the Trump administration during Donald Trump's second term as president. In June, a federal judge blocked an administration attempt to bar international students from enrolling at the university. Additionally, Harvard is suing the federal government over the loss of more than $2 billion in research grants. The renewed tension with one of America's top academic institutions also follows the Trump administration's intensified focus on tackling antisemitism on college campuses. Trump has repeatedly accused Harvard of failing to protect Jewish students, claiming the school violated the Civil Rights Act amid a wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations. 'Harvard is an Anti-Semitic, Far Left Institution, as are numerous others, with students being accepted from all over the World that want to rip our Country apart,' Trump wrote in an April post on Truth Social. 'The place is a Liberal mess, allowing a certain group of crazed lunatics to enter and exit the classroom and spew fake ANGER AND HATE.' While Trump suggested in late June that a potential deal with Harvard could be on the table, no agreement has emerged so far.
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Afghan man helped US military against Taliban, almost got a green card. Then, immigration officials came for him
A 35-year-old Afghan translator who aided American troops during the war in Afghanistan has been detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Connecticut, in a move that has sparked bipartisan outrage and raised questions about the Trump administration's treatment of wartime allies. Identified as Zia S, the man entered the US legally in October 2024 on a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) and humanitarian parole. He was arrested last week after attending a routine biometrics appointment for his green card in East Hartford, according to his attorney and multiple officials. He is currently being held at a detention facility in Plymouth, Massachusetts. Zia, a father of five, fled Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover in 2021. His visa was part of a US programme meant to protect foreign nationals who risked their lives to support US military operations abroad. 'This is the worst kind of abhorrent violation of basic decency,' said Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) in a statement quoted by The Guardian. 'He actually worked and risked his life in Afghanistan to uphold the values and rights that are central to democracy.' Congresswoman Jahana Hayes, also from Connecticut, said Zia's family had been left in the dark. 'Our credibility is at stake. We have families who have risked everything not just for themselves, but for their entire family … in the name of standing up for the promises of our American democracy,' Hayes told The Guardian. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) told Reuters that Zia is under investigation for a 'serious criminal allegation,' though no specifics have been made public. His lawyer, Lauren Petersen, said she has no knowledge of any charges. 'Zia has done everything right. He's followed the rules. He has no criminal history,' she said. 'If he is deported … he faces death.' A federal judge has issued a temporary stay on his deportation, but Zia remains in custody. Zia is the third known Afghan ally to be detained by ICE since Donald Trump returned to office. More than 70,000 Afghans were brought into the US under President Biden's 'Operation Allies Welcome,' but many still face legal limbo. The Trump administration has also moved to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals from countries including Afghanistan, Haiti, and Venezuela, despite ongoing unrest in those regions.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Landmark ICJ verdict on climate change: Inaction by nations is illegal; reparations possible
Activists protest outside top UN court ahead of climate change advisory ruling. (AP photo) United Nations's top court has said that inaction on climate change could be unlawful. The international court of justice (ICJ) said on Wednesday that countries may be breaching international law if they fail to take meaningful steps to protect the climate. It also opened the door for reparations to countries already affected by the crisis. Court president Yuji Iwasawa called the climate emergency 'an existential problem of planetary proportions' and warned that ignoring it could amount to a 'wrongful act' under international law. Activists celebrated outside the court. The case was led by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and supported by more than 130 countries. After years of pressure from vulnerable island states, the UN general assembly had asked the ICJ in 2023 to give its opinion. A panel of 15 judges answered two key questions: what are states legally required to do to protect the environment, and what happens if they don't? The court's opinion, over 500 pages long, said that every person has a right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. It's a human right. The statement alone could be used in domestic and international courts. Experts say this could shape future lawsuits, investment treaties, and even climate policies. Vanuatu's attorney general reminded judges that his people's survival was at stake. Sea levels in parts of the Pacific were rising faster than the global average. Global temperatures have already increased by 1.3°C since pre-industrial times. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo UN's top court says failing to tackle climate change 'could violate international law' Some countries, like the US and Russia, have opposed any court-mandated emission cuts. But ICJ's opinion adds to growing legal pressure. Earlier this month, the Inter-American court of human rights ruled that countries must avoid environmental harm and restore damaged ecosystems. Last year, the European court of human rights made a similar call. In 2019, the Dutch supreme court became the first to link climate change and human rights, ruling the government must protect citizens from its effects. Though the ICJ ruling is not legally binding, it marks a significant shift in climate law. The court itself admitted that law alone cannot solve the crisis, but said it plays an 'important' role in shaping global responsibility.
