Man swims for his life after Tesla slips off Quebec ferry
Last Wednesday afternoon, Michael Demarinis took his Tesla on the ferry crossing from Île Bizard to Laval. As the ferry docked, he tried to drive off but something went wrong.
'My front tires made it. But my back tires fell (between the ferry and the dock),' Demarinis told Global News.
When that happened, he said the ferry operator pulled away from the wall in an attempt to help Demarinis.
'It only made the matter even worse,' the Laval native said.
Demarinis said that once the ferry operator realized that, he tried to lift the Tesla up with his vessel but the car began to be crushed. Things got worse from there.
Story continues below advertisement
'That's when the car completely let go and was able to fall into Rivière des Prairies,' Demarinis said, noting that the current began taking his vehicle downstream.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The 67-year-old credited his Tesla for its features at that point, as he said the windows automatically lower when they are submerged in water.
'I was swimming, swimming and swimming with these type of currents and drafts that are in there is almost impossible, even the best swimmer in the world won't make it across,' Demarinis said.
The Laval resident worked as a lifeguard in his 20s and said he allowed the current to carry him downriver, where he washed up on shore and got help.
He was taken to an area hospital for treatment but escaped injury.
The Transportation Safety Board of Canada is investigating the incident but it will be a while before it provides answers as to what happened.
'It takes long to do an investigation. Normally, it's a Class 3 investigation. The more common one, it's 450 days,' TSB's Line Laroche told Global News.
If during the investigation, the TSB discovers there is an issue, it will let the operator know immediately.
Demarinis believes the ferry was not properly secured to the dock, and wonders if the ferry's crew is properly trained to deal with these types of events.
Story continues below advertisement
'Nobody knew what to do, they didn't know nothing. I mean, they were just screaming and panicked,' he said.
He wants changes to ensure this never happens again and has not ruled out legal action.
Global News has contacted the ferry operator but did not receive a response by deadline.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $449,961!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,603!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $636,628!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Canada's bet on EVs coming up snake eyes
A Tesla dealership is seen on July 25, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Photo by Brandon Bell / Getty Images On April 27 last year, then prime minister Justin Trudeau posted a video on X boasting that, 'We bet big on electric vehicles. Now that industry is betting on us.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Fifteen months later, all bets are off. Trudeau's gone and U.S. President Joe Biden, who shared his enthusiasm for subsidizing the EV industry, has been replaced by Donald Trump, who is dismantling those subsidies. Despite that, Trudeau's successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, appears to be doubling down on Trudeau's bet. In some ways, the government is trapped. Canada's federal and provincial governments — mainly Ontario and Quebec — have already earmarked up to $52.5 billion of taxpayers' money to subsidize 13 major EV projects in Canada. That's $6.3 billion, or 14%, more than the $46.1 billion the industry itself is investing in them, according to the parliamentary budget officer. Meanwhile, EV sales are dramatically down in Canada and some EV projects are on hold as a result. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Sales dropped by almost a third in May compared to a year ago, comprising a mere 7.9% of all new car sales, according to Statistics Canada. That's far below the federal government mandate that begins next year, requiring that zero emission vehicles — meaning battery-electric, hydrogen fuel cell or plug-in hybrid — account for 20% of all new car sales, rising to 60% in 2030 and 100% in 2035. The auto sector says the only way to achieve that would be to pull a million new gas-powered vehicles off the market, limiting consumer choice, increasing delivery times and driving up costs for consumers at a time when our auto sector is under siege from Trump's tariff war. The only way for the Liberal government to increase EV sales — which are more expensive than gas-powered vehicles — is to restore a federal program giving taxpayer-funded subsidies of up to $5,000 to purchasers of new EVs. It began in 2019 and was suspended in January 2025 after doling out $3 billion in subsidies to EV buyers, whose incomes are already above average. With the Carney government promising to restore the program, the problem is that subsidizing a product few Canadians want to buy in an attempt to reach an unrealistic government-imposed mandatory sales target, is a bad bet for taxpayers. Surely the PM understands that. Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists Sunshine Girls Columnists
Globe and Mail
a day ago
- Globe and Mail
Prediction: 1 EV Stock That Will Be Worth More Than Lucid 1 Year From Now
Key Points Lucid has struggled to ramp up its production over the past three years. Its track record of missed forecasts and broken promises can't be ignored. Archer Aviation has more irons in the fire than Lucid's luxury EV business. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid (NASDAQ: LCID), a producer of luxury electric vehicles, attracted a lot of attention when it went public by merging with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) four years ago. That's mainly because it was led by Tesla 's (NASDAQ: TSLA) former chief engineer Peter Rawlinson, and it had already started delivering its first Air sedans. Yet, like many other SPAC-backed start-ups, Lucid overpromised and underdelivered. It originally set out to deliver 20,000 vehicles in 2022, 49,000 vehicles in 2023, and 90,000 vehicles in 2024. But in reality, its annual deliveries only reached 4,369 in 2022, 6,001 in 2023, and 10,241 in 2024. Lucid blamed that slower-than-expected growth on its supply chain constraints, intense competition, a challenging macro environment, and the delayed launch of its Gravity SUV. Peter Rawlinson also resigned from the CEO position this February, and the board still hasn't appointed his permanent successor yet. From 2022 to 2024, Lucid's revenue grew at a CAGR of 15% from $608 million to $808 million. However, its net loss widened from $2.56 billion to $3.06 billion. Its stock has declined nearly 90% since its first post-merger trade, but it still has a market cap of $8.6 billion -- or 11 times last year's sales. That high price-to-sales ratio suggests that some investors are hopeful that its Saudi Arabian investors (who own nearly two-thirds of its shares) can help it achieve its goal of more than doubling its production to 20,000 vehicles this year. That's why analysts expect its revenue to surge 71% to $1.38 billion this year as it narrows its net loss of $2.9 billion. I don't have much faith in those estimates, though. Lucid repeatedly missed its own expectations, struggled to scale up its business, and continues to dilute its shares as it racks up steep losses. So, instead of betting on Lucid's Hail Mary turnaround, investors should focus on a less valuable EV stock that might just grow faster and surpass its market cap within the next year: the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft maker Archer Aviation (NYSE: ACHR), which currently has a market cap of $8.43 billion. Why could Archer Aviation have a brighter future than Lucid? Archer's Midnight eVTOL aircraft can carry a single pilot and four passengers, travel up to 100 miles without recharging, and reach a maximum speed of 150 miles per hour. Compared to helicopters, they're quieter, greener, and easier to land in crowded urban areas. Those advantages make them well-suited for short-range taxi services. Archer hasn't generated any meaningful revenue yet, but it ended its latest quarter with a massive backlog of approximately $6 billion. That backlog includes big orders from United Airlines, Future Flight Global, Soracle (a joint venture between Japan Airlines and the Japanese conglomerate Sumitomo), Ethiopian Airlines, Abu Dhabi Aviation, Stellantis, and the U.S. Air Force. Archer plans to start its first air taxi flights in Abu Dhabi later this year. In the U.S., it's waiting for the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) final approval for its commercial flights to start up its air taxi services. To support that expansion, it aims to produce 10 aircraft in 2025, 48 aircraft in 2026, 252 aircraft in 2027, and 650 aircraft in 2028. It also plans to launch its own first-party air taxi service within the next two years. If it achieves those goals, analysts expect its annual revenue to rise from $13 million in 2025 to $437 million in 2027. Archer's roadmap sounds ambitious, but its growing backlog could support those plans, and its nascent market is expanding. From 2024 to 2030, Markets and Markets expects the global eVTOL aircraft market to grow at a CAGR of 35.3% as they displace traditional helicopters. Archer has two strengths that Lucid lacks: an early mover's advantage in a nascent market, and a lot of pent-up demand for its products. Lucid entered the EV market long after Tesla and other EV makers saturated the market, and it quietly stopped disclosing the size of its reservation backlog (which had been shrinking) at the start of 2023. With a market cap of $7.5 billion, Archer doesn't look cheap at 17 times its projected sales for 2027. By comparison, Lucid trades at less than two times its estimated sales for 2027. But if Lucid fails to ramp up its production this year, its stock could easily be cut in half. Why could Archer become more valuable than Lucid? Archer still trades at a steep discount to its biggest rival, Joby Aviation (NYSE: JOBY), which trades at a whopping 70 times its projected sales for 2027. If Archer launches its commercial air taxi flights in the U.A.E. and gains the FAA's approval for its planned flights in the U.S., it might command a much higher valuation within the next 12 months. If Archer achieves those goals and its stock trades at 30 times its estimated sales for 2027 by then, its market cap would swell to $13.1 billion and eclipse Lucid's current market cap. As for Lucid, it could struggle to maintain its current market cap if it keeps disappointing its investors. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
