logo
What to Know About Medicare Cost Increases

What to Know About Medicare Cost Increases

Health Line2 days ago
Medicare costs, such as premiums, deductibles, and copayments, are subject to annual changes. The amounts may vary based on healthcare inflation, beneficiary income, and program utilization.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency that oversees both Medicare and Medicaid, announces changes to Medicare costs each year.
Most costs associated with Medicare are subject to annual increases.
For example, in 2025, the Part B standard premium increased to $185, an increase of $10.30 from 2024. Also, the Part B deductible increased to $257 in 2025, an increase of $17 from 2024.
Glossary of common Medicare terms
Out-of-pocket cost: This is the amount you pay for care when Medicare doesn't pay the full cost or offer coverage. It includes premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments.
Premium: This is the monthly amount you pay for Medicare coverage.
Deductible: This is the annual amount you must spend out of pocket before Medicare begins to cover services and treatments.
Coinsurance: This is the percentage of treatment costs you're responsible for paying out of pocket. With Medicare Part B, you typically pay 20%.
Copayment: This is a fixed dollar amount you pay when receiving certain treatments or services. With Medicare, this often applies to prescription medications.
What contributes to annual Medicare cost increases?
Medicare cost increases are generally affected by factors like healthcare inflation, program utilization, and beneficiary income.
Beneficiary income
For example, Part B and Part D premiums are determined by your income. This is known as the income-related monthly adjustment amount (IRMAA). In 2025, if you file taxes individually and have an income over $106,000, you will pay a higher monthly premium for Part B.
According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), the government pays around 75% of the Part B premium, and you pay the remaining 25%. However, if the SSA determines your income is above the set limits, you will pay a higher premium equal to a higher percentage of the total premium cost:
35%
50%
65%
80%
85%
Healthcare inflation
Medical prices have generally increased more than overall economic prices. For example, in June 2024, the nonprofit KFF reported that medical prices increased by 3.3% compared to the year before, while the overall annual inflation rate was 3%.
Also, between 2000 and 2024, the price of healthcare rose by 121.3%, while the prices for other consumer goods and services rose by 86.1%.
The increase in healthcare costs can naturally lead to higher out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries. If Medicare is paying more for services, your cost will also increase.
Program utilization
According to KFF, Medicare spending is set to rise from 10% of total federal spending in 2021 to 18% by 2032. In the same years, it's set to increase from 3.1% of GDP spending to 3.9%.
There are several factors that may contribute to this, including growing Medicare enrollment.
As of February 2025, CMS reported that the total Medicare enrollment was 68.5 million, of which 90.1% were age 65 years or older.
KFF notes that in the entire year of 2024, 61.2 million people were enrolled in Original Medicare (parts A and B). This is a difference of more than 7 million people enrolling in Medicare.
What healthcare trends affect the costs for Medicare?
According to KFF, healthcare spending in the United States has risen over the past several decades due to various factors, including:
aging population
higher rates of chronic conditions
advancements in medicine and technology
higher prices
expansions in health insurance coverage
It is estimated that by 2030, the U.S. population 65 years old and over will increase to 67 million. This means there will be more people in this age group with Medicare coverage. Higher rates of program utilization can lead to cost increases.
In 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 9 in 10 older adults had at least one chronic condition. It also noted that roughly 3 in 4 older adults reported having multiple chronic conditions.
The report also highlighted that the rates of at least one chronic condition in younger adults increased from 52.5% to 59.5% between 2013 and 2023. The rate of multiple chronic conditions increased from 21.8% to 27.1% in the same time period.
This means that as the younger population ages, they are more likely to require additional medical care. This is likely to add to cost increases for Medicare and health insurance.
Medicare cost increases in 2025
The following table shows the Medicare cost increases from 2024 to 2025.
2024 2025
Part A deductible $1,632 $1,676
Part B premium $174.70 $185
Part B deductible $240 $257
Medicare Advantage (Part C) maximum out-of-pocket limit $8,850 $9,350
In 2024, the individual IRMAA income limit was set at $103,000, and the joint income limit was $206,000. In 2025, these limits increased to $106,000 for an individual and $212,000 for a married couple. This means that if your tax returns from 2 years prior showed incomes higher than these limits, you will have to pay more for your Part B premium.
Potential increases for 2026
CMS has not officially released all cost increases for 2026. However, it has stated that in 2026, the out-of-pocket spending limit for Part D will increase to $2,100 from $2,000 in 2025.
This means that in 2026, when your Part D out-of-pocket spending reaches $2,100, you will automatically enter catastrophic coverage and not have to pay anything for your prescription drugs for the rest of the year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why People Delay Dental Visits, and What It Means for Their Health
Why People Delay Dental Visits, and What It Means for Their Health

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Why People Delay Dental Visits, and What It Means for Their Health

Missing or putting off dental appointments may seem harmless in the short term but over time those delays can have long term consequences – not just for your teeth but for your overall health. From cavities in toddlers to infections in cancer patients, understanding why people put off treatment is the first step to changing those habits. Research shows those delays are rarely about laziness – they're more often about cost, anxiety, lack of support and access barriers with lack of dental insurance or not being covered by a dental plan being a common reason for delay. Table of Contents Dental delays are more common than you think. A 2025 cross-sectional study found that over 71% of preschoolers with cavities didn't get treated right away. The average delay? Nearly four months—117.5 days [1]. Reasons ranged from financial hardship and logistical challenges to caregivers not knowing their child had a problem until it got worse. Dependents like children rely on caregivers to find the right dental care and meet the requirements for timely treatment. And it's not just kids. During the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly half of U.S. adults admitted to putting off dental care [4]. What's interesting is that urban residents—despite having more dentists nearby—were more likely to delay treatment than those in rural areas. That means it's not just about distance; stress, work schedules and transportation logistics may be just as big of a factor. Fear is a powerful barrier. A 2023 study found that dental anxiety and low self-efficacy—the belief that one can't handle the stress or logistics of dental treatment—were stronger predictors of delay than simple procrastination [3]. In plain terms, some people aren't avoiding the dentist because they don't care—they're overwhelmed, nervous, or unsure how to take the first step. In older adults, social support can make all the difference. Research from China on oral cancer patients found that those who lived with their adult children were less likely to delay treatment [2]. When people feel supported, they're more likely to seek care promptly. We hear all the time about the importance of early dental visits for kids but the data tells a more complicated story. A 2012 Medicaid study found no significant difference in outcomes between kids who had their first dental visit before 18 months and those who started later [5]. Early care is important but maybe not as early as some programs suggest. Dental benefits and dental coverage for kids are based on state Medicaid policies and kids have to qualify for these services according to specific criteria. That could help us target our prevention efforts more effectively. Meanwhile dental neglect—intentional or not—remains a big problem. States vary in how they provide dental services and preventive services to kids through Medicaid. A global review found 34-56% of kids and teens are affected by dental neglect [8]. Whether it's financial strain or caregivers not knowing the signs of dental disease, the takeaway is clear: education and access matter just as much as timing. Dental health doesn't exist in isolation. For patients undergoing cancer treatment, a minor dental issue can be life threatening. If a dental problem is left untreated it can complicate or delay cancer therapy. A 2018 systematic review found a high rate of untreated dental infections like pericoronitis in oncology patients [9]. These infections can delay or complicate chemotherapy and radiation. That's why cancer care teams are working more closely with dental professionals – often involving a dental practice to treat emerging oral health issues as they arise – to catch problems early and avoid preventable setbacks. If a tooth has been neglected for too long many people assume the only option is to extract and replace. But is that always the best choice? The goals of dental treatment should include both preserving natural teeth whenever possible and patient preferences for long term outcomes. A 2013 review compared long term outcomes of preserving compromised teeth vs replacing them with implants. Surprisingly well maintained natural teeth lasted longer than implants [10]. This finding supports the value of early conservative treatment – acting sooner means saving teeth rather than replacing them. Not directly related to delays but a 2022 Cochrane review on full-mouth disinfection for periodontitis brings up a related question: timing matters but so does method. Not all periodontitis cases need antibiotics and overtreatment should be avoided. Full-mouth treatment is meant to be aggressive but the evidence didn't show it was superior to step-by-step scaling and root planing [6]. It raises the question of overtreatment especially when antibiotics are involved. This applies outside of dentistry too. A 2025 study on statin therapy in diabetic patients found that delays in preventive care even when not related to teeth led to worse outcomes [7]. The lesson applies across all medical disciplines: proactive care is better. Delaying dental care isn't about being lazy—it's about fear, finances, logistics and sometimes just lack of information. What's clear is that delays are costly in dollars and in health. Fixing this requires a multi-faceted approach: Timely dental care doesn't just save smiles it saves overall health and quality of life. [1] Huang, J., Sun, J., Ji, Y., Chen, C., Yang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2025). Analysis of factors influencing delayed treatment seeking for dental caries in preschool children: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 25(1), 1669. [2] Yang, Y., Ning, H., Liang, B., Mai, H., Zhou, J., Yang, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Exploring Factors Influencing Patient Delay Behavior in Oral Cancer: The Development of a Risk Prediction Model in Western China. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 12(22), 2252. [3] Steinvik, L. M., Svartdal, F., & Johnsen, J. K. (2023). Delay of Dental Care: An Exploratory Study of Procrastination, Dental Attendance, and Self-Reported Oral Health. Dentistry journal, 11(2), 56. [4] Kranz, A. M., Gahlon, G., Dick, A. W., & Stein, B. D. (2021). Characteristics of US Adults Delaying Dental Care Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. JDR clinical and translational research, 6(1), 8–14. [5] Beil, H., Rozier, R. G., Preisser, J. S., Stearns, S. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Effect of early preventive dental visits on subsequent dental treatment and expenditures. Medical care, 50(9), 749–756. [6] Jervøe-Storm, P. M., Eberhard, J., Needleman, I., Worthington, H. V., & Jepsen, S. (2022). Full-mouth treatment modalities (within 24 hours) for periodontitis in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 6(6), CD004622. [7] Shah, N., Lan, Z., Brown, C. J., Martin, S. S., & Turchin, A. (2025). Impact of Statin Nonacceptance on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes. Journal of the American Heart Association, 14(11), e040464. [8] Khalid, G., Metzner, F., & Pawils, S. (2022). Prevalence of dental neglect and associated risk factors in children and adolescents-A systematic review. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 32(3), 436–446. [9] Hong, C. H. L., Hu, S., Haverman, T., Stokman, M., Napeñas, J. J., Braber, J. B., Gerber, E., Geuke, M., Vardas, E., Waltimo, T., Jensen, S. B., & Saunders, D. P. (2018). A systematic review of dental disease management in cancer patients. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(1), 155–174. [10] Levin, L., & Halperin-Sternfeld, M. (2013). Tooth preservation or implant placement: a systematic review of long-term tooth and implant survival rates. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 144(10), 1119–1133.

Nurses rally against ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Medicaid cuts
Nurses rally against ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Medicaid cuts

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nurses rally against ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Medicaid cuts

DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — Registered nurses are teaming up across the nation to push for change. National Nurses United is the nation's largest union of registered nurses. On Tuesday, they planned rallies at lawmakers' offices in eight different states, urging lawmakers to vote against proposed Medicaid cuts in the GOP reconciliation package. Senate passes big, beautiful bill 2 NEWS visited Congressman Mike Turner's office, where dozens of registered nurses showed up to protest against a decision they say could cost thousands of lives. There are almost 80 million Americans enrolled in Medicaid as of March 2025. Medicaid provides healthcare coverage to all types of Americans, including vulnerable populations like the elderly, disabled and children. 'We all know someone who depends on Medicaid, and for many families, this is life or death,' said Irma Westmoreland, National Nurses United vice president. 'For our friends, for our community, for our relatives, Medicaid and Ohio Medicaid provides necessary resources to many, so that they can live a full, productive life.' Specifically, these registered nurses showed up to ask Rep. Turner to vote against the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act. They said his initial condemnation of attacks of federal works and co-sponsoring the Protect America's Workforce Act gave them hope that he would stand by them. However, in light of his latest votes and the Senate decision today to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill, nurses are now asking him to make a critical choice. 'We've seen you do what's right, and we need you to stand up with us now more than ever. Representative Turner, do you want to be on the side of billionaire donors, or do you want to support the patients and the loved ones that we care for each and everyday?' said Westmoreland. 2 NEWS reached out to Turner's office for comment and are waiting to hear back. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Washington, Oregon sue Trump admin for sharing Medicaid files with immigration enforcement
Washington, Oregon sue Trump admin for sharing Medicaid files with immigration enforcement

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Washington, Oregon sue Trump admin for sharing Medicaid files with immigration enforcement

Washington's Nick Brown is among the state attorneys general suing over the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for sharing Medicaid patients' files with the Department of Homeland Security. (Photo by Ryan Berry/Washington state Standard) Washington and Oregon's attorneys general are suing the federal government for sharing residents' Medicaid records with federal immigration enforcement officials. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, alongside 13 other Democratic state attorneys general, filed a lawsuit on Tuesday challenging the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for sharing Medicaid patients' files with the Department of Homeland Security, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, is housed. The Health and Human Services Department, it's secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the Homeland Security Department and it's secretary, Kristi Noem, are listed as defendants. California Attorney General Rob Bonta is leading the lawsuit, which also includes the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. The state attorneys argue that sharing personal health data violates federal administrative procedure laws and federal privacy laws. States are asking the court to block any new transfer of data, and the use of any data currently held by Homeland Security and ICE for immigration enforcement purposes. Since Congress established Medicaid seven decades ago, 'federal law, policy, and practice has been clear: the personal healthcare data collected about beneficiaries of the program is confidential,' officials from Brown's office said in a news release. On June 13, the state attorneys general learned through news reports that officials at the Health and Human Services Department transferred Medicaid data files to ICE officials. Those reports indicate that the federal government plans to create a database for mass deportations and other large-scale immigration enforcement purposes, Brown said in a news release. 'Washington residents expect that the confidential information they give to the government to access medical treatment will only be used for healthcare purposes,' Brown said in a news release. 'Their data should not go towards creating a giant database of Americans' personal information or used so that ICE can deport undocumented immigrants because they had to go to the doctor.' Oregon and Washington are among seven states that offer Medicaid to eligible adults regardless of immigration status, and are among 14 states, plus Washington, D.C., that cover children regardless of immigration status. Oregon has 100,000 people enrolled in its 'Healthier Oregon' program, a state-funded program which provides access to Medicaid coverage regardless of immigration status, according to the Oregon Health Authority. About 49,000 people of the nearly 2 million people in Washington who rely on the state's Medicaid Program Apple Health have an immigration status that makes them ineligible for federal funding. 'This has a chilling impact on people who need healthcare in our country,' Rayfield said in the news release. 'Parents may choose not to take their kids to the doctor because they're afraid of what may happen. We need to protect the privacy and dignity of every person who calls Oregon home.' UPDATED at 5:50 p.m. with information from the filed lawsuit and a link to the lawsuit. This article was first published by the Oregon Capital Chronicle, part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Julia Shumway for questions: info@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store