SCBAP terms toll hike by NHA 'extortion', vows legal challenge
The Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan (SCBAP) has issued a strong statement condemning the National Highway Authority's (NHA) recent decision to increase motorway and highway toll taxes by 50%, calling it an act of 'extortion' and vowing to challenge the decision through legal means.
In a press statement released on Wednesday, SCBAP President Mian Muhammad Rauf Atta termed the tax hike 'entirely unjustifiable' and demanded its immediate withdrawal.
READ MORE: SCBAP rejects Indus canal plan, calls for fair water sharing
'The imposition of an additional 50% tax is a move that deserves unequivocal condemnation,' he said, adding that if the decision is not reversed, SCBAP will challenge it through legal forums in a competent court of law.
The bar association also criticised the leadership of the Ministry of Communications, under which the NHA operates. It questioned why a non-political figure primarily known for his involvement in the property business was given charge of a ministry responsible for public infrastructure.
'This is a classic example of how a person with private business interests is handling public matters that require genuine political leadership concerned with the welfare of the people,' the statement read.
SCBAP said the ministry should focus on addressing inefficiencies within the NHA rather than placing an additional burden on the public through increased toll charges. The decision, it said, is 'utterly unacceptable.'
The association intends to challenge the decision through legal means if it is not withdrawn immediately.
The statement further raised alarm about the upcoming federal budget, expected next week, criticising the allocation of large sums to non-developmental schemes. SCBAP warned that such allocations pose a significant corruption risk and must be discouraged.
READ MORE: IHC seeks NHA fund details for Bhong Interchange
'It is concerning to note that the federal government has taken significantly higher loans compared to the previous year,' it added. 'This move could have dire consequences for the economy.'
SCBAP announced it will soon convene a meeting of its Executive Committee to discuss these public concerns and determine a further course of action.
NHA enforces 50% toll hike for non-M-Tag vehicles starting June 15
Earlier, the NHA announced a 50% increase in toll taxes for vehicles without M-Tag or with low balance, effective 15 June 2025, as part of a move to implement a 100% M-Tag system across the country's motorways.
The decision, notified under Section 10(2)(vii) of the NHA Act 1991 as amended in 2024, applies to key motorways including M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4, M-5, M-9, M-14, and E-35. The notification details revised toll rates incorporating a 50% penalty for non-compliant vehicles.
According to the NHA, the new toll for cars on the Islamabad–Lahore (M-2) motorway has been fixed at Rs 1,800, while tolls for Lahore–Abdul Hakeem (M-3) and Pindi Bhattian–Multan (M-4) have been set at Rs 1,200 and Rs 1,600 respectively.
Multan–Sukkur (M-5) tolls for cars now stand at Rs 1,800, and the rate for DI Khan–Hakla (M-14) has been raised to Rs 1,000. Meanwhile, cars travelling on the Hassanabdal–Mansehra Expressway (E-35) will pay Rs 450.
Heavy vehicles will also face steep charges. Two- and three-axle trucks on the Lahore–Islamabad route will be charged Rs 7,900, while articulated trucks will be charged Rs 10,200.
Motorists have been urged to ensure timely M-Tag registration and sufficient account balance to avoid the fine. M-Tag facilities are available at motorway toll plazas and authorised service centres nationwide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran
The UN nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff over their return to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel deepens. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority. Iran's parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. "An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict," the IAEA said on X. Diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the June 13 start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors' safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media. Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action. IAEA wants talks Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). "(Grossi) reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible," the IAEA said. The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tonnes of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries' declarations. But the bombing of Iran's facilities has now muddied the waters. "We cannot afford that .... the inspection regime is interrupted," Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pivotal moment, indeed
EDITORIAL: When the central bank of central banks sounds the alarm, financial markets ought to listen. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), hardly given to rhetorical excess, has issued a blunt warning: the global economy stands at a 'pivotal moment.' And this time, it's not about business cycles or temporary liquidity crunches — it's about deep structural vulnerabilities that could shatter what's left of global economic resilience. The triggers are all around us. Global debt levels are climbing, productivity is stagnating, supply chains remain fragmented, and central banks are still grappling with the aftershocks of the post-Covid inflation surge. The dollar's weakening and rising interest rate sensitivity among indebted governments only deepen the sense of unease. Markets may have rallied in recent months, but the BIS is pointing to fault lines beneath the surface, not the technicals on top. What makes this warning different is its clarity about where the world is headed if course correction is delayed. Economic resilience is eroding, the BIS says, not simply because of economic forces, but because of policy failures. Years of fiscal complacency, underinvestment in productivity, and overreliance on monetary stimulus have created a fragile equilibrium. One external shock — from a geopolitical flashpoint to a trade breakdown — could be all it takes to tip major economies into prolonged distress. More troubling still is the observation that confidence in institutions, especially central banks, is under pressure. That alone should be a red flag. Central banks depend as much on credibility as on policy tools. The report's implicit criticism of trade fragmentation and re-shoring efforts also cuts to the heart of the current global policy dilemma. Governments are moving to reduce reliance on hostile or unreliable trading partners, but they're doing so at the cost of efficiency and coordination. In turn, this raises prices, complicates monetary policy, and slows down growth further. Yet there seems little appetite — let alone capacity — for collective economic management in a world where nationalism trumps multilateralism. Perhaps the most immediate signal to watch is the steep fall in the dollar, down 10 percent in just six months. BIS economists don't see this as a full-blown rotation out of US assets, but the fact that non-US investors are increasingly hedging their dollar exposures suggests rising discomfort. For financial institutions that manage global portfolios and sovereign debt strategies such moves often precede larger shifts in asset allocation—shifts that can reshape capital flows in very disruptive ways. There's also the question of how much policy space remains. The BIS is right to point to the trap many governments are falling into: high debt levels now leave very little room to respond to future crises. The next recession, when it arrives, may find both fiscal and monetary tools blunted, while citizens increasingly distrust the very institutions tasked with providing relief. It is a toxic brew. This is not the first time BIS has issued such a call, but it may be the most urgent. A system stretched across weak foundations, tested by simultaneous shocks, cannot afford inaction or delay. Global financial governance, especially across G20 economies, must stop pretending that the current model can muddle through. It cannot. The world economy is running out of buffers. Policymakers, investors, and institutions would do well to treat this moment with the seriousness it demands. Because if even the BIS is beginning to sound worried, the finance world should stop hoping for soft landings and start preparing for harder truths. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nuclear inspectors have left Iran: UN watchdog
VIENNA: UN nuclear watchdog inspectors left Iran on Friday, according to the agency, which called for the resumption of its 'indispensable monitoring' after the Islamic republic officially suspended its cooperation. The suspension came after last month's 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel, which saw unprecedented Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and escalated tensions between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 'An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict,' the IAEA said in a post on X. 'IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible,' it added. Iran officially suspended its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog on Wednesday. On June 25, a day after a ceasefire took hold, Iranian lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to suspend the cooperation. The law aims to 'ensure full support for the inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran' under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, with a particular focus on uranium enrichment, according to Iranian media. Washington, which has been pressing Tehran to resume the negotiations that were interrupted by Israel's resort to military action on June 13, has hit out at the Iranian decision, calling it 'unacceptable'.
