Former President Ram Nath Kovind performs Ganga Aarti in Rishikesh, says
The serene event was also attended by Swami Chidanand Saraswati Maharaj, the president of Parmarth Niketan.
Speaking to the media, Kovind said, 'It feels very good, every Indian should come here. Whoever comes here feels a spiritual bliss... This river has been flowing for the welfare of people for centuries and gives everything to everyone. We also get to learn the same from Maa Ganga... Yesterday I performed Maa Ganga's Aarti at Har Ki Pauri and had darshan. I felt very good.'
Swami Chidanand Saraswati also praised the spiritual and cultural significance of Uttarakhand, saying, 'The land of Uttarakhand is a blessed and energised one. People from all over the world come here to witness this energy.
He also shared that Kovind has had a long-standing association with the ashram. 'Former President Ramnath Kovind has been associated with the Parmarth Niketan Ashram for a long time, and he also loves coming here. He will stay here for three days and soak in spirituality,' said Saraswati.
The visit comes at a time when the ashram is preparing to observe Menstrual Hygiene Day on May 28.
'Tomorrow is Menstrual Hygiene Day and we will raise awareness about menstrual hygiene with the help of people from all walks of life,' Saraswati said.
Earlier in March, Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami performed Ganga Aarti at Parmarth Niketan in Rishikesh and had prayed to Maa Ganga for happiness, peace and prosperity in the state.
The Chief Minister also inaugurated the International Yoga Festival 2025 organised by Parmarth Niketan from March 9-15, 2025. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
PM Modi meets Maldivian leaders, says India looks forward to deepening ties in tech, energy and climate
India looks forward to deepening its partnership with the Maldives, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Saturday, as he met several Maldivian leaders, including Vice President Uz Hussain Mohamed Latheef. read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday said India is keen to further strengthen its partnership with the Maldives as he held meetings with several key Maldivian leaders, including Vice President Uz Hussain Mohamed Latheef. 'Had a very good meeting with Vice President Uz. Hussain Mohamed Latheef. Our discussion touched upon key pillars of the India-Maldives friendship. Our nations continue to work closely in sectors like infrastructure, technology, climate change, energy and more. This is greatly beneficial to our people. We look forward to deepening this partnership in the years to come,' he posted on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Had a very good meeting with Vice President Uz. Hussain Mohamed Latheef. Our discussion touched upon key pillars of the India-Maldives friendship. Our nations continue to work closely in sectors like infrastructure, technology, climate change, energy and more. This is greatly… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) July 26, 2025 Latheef said it was an honour to call on the Indian prime minister. 'As this year marks 60 years of formal diplomatic relations with India, the Prime Minister and I reflected on the journey of friendship and reciprocal support our countries have taken. I hope that the strong cooperation with India continues to grow and strengthen,' Latheef said. PM Modi also met leaders of political parties. 'Had a meaningful meeting with members of different political parties of the Maldives. The participation of leaders across the political spectrum underscores the bipartisan support for the strong and time-tested India-Maldives friendship. Our shared values continue to guide this important partnership,' he posted on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Had a meaningful meeting with members of different political parties of the Maldives. The participation of leaders across the political spectrum underscores the bipartisan support for the strong and time-tested India-Maldives friendship. Our shared values continue to guide this… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) July 26, 2025 'Had a very good meeting with Vice President Uz. Hussain Mohamed Latheef. Our discussion touched upon key pillars of the India-Maldives friendship. Our nations continue to work closely in sectors like infrastructure, technology, climate change, energy and more. This is greatly beneficial to our people. We look forward to deepening this partnership in the years to come,' he posted on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Had a very good meeting with Vice President Uz. Hussain Mohamed Latheef. Our discussion touched upon key pillars of the India-Maldives friendship. Our nations continue to work closely in sectors like infrastructure, technology, climate change, energy and more. This is greatly… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) July 26, 2025 Prime Minister Modi also met former Maldivian president Mohamed Nasheed. India will keep supporting the Maldives through capacity building and developmental cooperation, the prime minister said. Nasheed, who served as president of the Maldives from November 11, 2008 to February 7, 2012, expressed gratitude for India's continued support for a stronger India-Maldives relationship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Met the former President of Maldives, Mr. Mohamed Nasheed. He has always been a strong advocate of deeper India-Maldives friendship. Spoke about how the Maldives will always be a valued pillar of our 'Neighbourhood First' policy and Mahasagar vision. India will keep supporting Maldives through capacity building and developmental cooperation. ', he said in a post. Met the former President of Maldives, Mr. Mohamed Nasheed. He has always been a strong advocate of deeper India-Maldives friendship. Spoke about how the Maldives will always be a valued pillar of our 'Neighbourhood First' policy and Mahasagar vision. India will keep supporting… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) July 26, 2025 The prime minister conveyed wishes on the 60th anniversary of Independence Day of the Maldives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Both sides exchanged views on the deep-rooted & special relationship. VP Latheef thanked PM for India's continued assistance to Maldives in times of need,' Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a social media post. Modi also met Abdul Raheem Abdulla, Speaker of the People's Majlis (the Maldivian Parliament). 'Talked about the deep-rooted India-Maldives friendship, including the close relationship between our respective Parliaments,' Modi said. He also welcomed the formation of the India-Maldives Parliamentary Friendship Group in the 20th Majlis. 'India remains committed to supporting capacity building in the Maldives,' the prime minister said. Speaker thanked PM for India's continued commitment to enhancing ties with Maldives and between the two democracies, Jaiswal said. 'The two sides noted the excellent people-to-people ties between the two countries,' the MEA Spokesperson said. Prime Minister Modi also held a 'meaningful' meeting with members of different political parties of the Maldives. 'The participation of leaders across the political spectrum underscores the bipartisan support for the strong and time-tested India-Maldives friendship. Our shared values continue to guide this important partnership,' the prime minister said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Both sides reaffirmed their commitment for a stronger India-Maldives relationship, building upon the vibrant people-to-people ties and the shared values between the two democracies. The Maldivian leaders thanked the PM for India's continued support on developmental assistance for the welfare of the Maldivian people,' Jaiswal said. On Friday, Modi held wide-ranging talks with Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu and announced a Rs 4,850 crore line of credit to the island nation. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
EU sanctions Indian arm of UAE-based shipping company
Intershipping Services Hub Private Ltd , the Indian branch of the United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based entity, has been sanctioned by the European Union (EU). Captain Abhinav Kamal , the Indian-origin captain of crude oil tanker Argent also faces sanctions, the first and the only Indian to be sanctioned by the EU in connection with the Russia-Ukraine conflict , according to sector watchers. The company is under fire for providing cover to ships engaged in trade with Russian entities . The sanctions are not extraterritorial and only apply to EU citizens, territory and companies. The Indian government too maintains it does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. "This means the assets that Intershipping Services LLC holds in Europe will be frozen and European citizens and companies cannot make money available to it, hence cannot do business," an EU official told ET on condition of anonymity. Since the sanctions do not apply to any non-EU entities doing business with Intershipping Services Hub, the company can court non-EU suitors, said the people cited earlier. However, Kamal may find the going tough since the global maritime industry has vast linkages with the EU, they said. Now, Kamal cannot board or provide services to any of these EU associated vessels. The bloc has accused Kamal of providing material, technical or financial support to the operations of a vessel that transports Russia-linked crude oil or petroleum products.
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
How India failed to predict Kargil War
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated June 14, 1999)The relentless daily list of casualties shook the nation. By the end of last week, 57 Indian Army personnel had died and 203 grievously wounded as the armed forces struggled to push back the shock invasion of Pakistani- backed Islamic fundamentalists from the strategic heights around had died doing their duty—protecting the territorial integrity of their country. But as thousands of Indian troops brave a withering storm of artillery and machine gun fire to repulse the intruders, the country is asking what really went wrong. Former chief of army staff General V.N. Sharma has no doubts: 'It is an intelligence failure, one of the biggest in recent times.'Defence experts are amazed why an intrusion of such magnitude that must have taken Pakistan several months to execute went undetected. Briefings and authorizations would have been made in Islamabad and Rawalpindi months in advance, field officers would have recruited and trained the force in the Baltistan heights of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK), equipment and supplies would have been stocked in Pakistan army garrisons at Skardu and Astor before being sent to camps close to the Line of Control (LoC) where the battle now rages. Admits Lt-General H.M. Khanna, Northern Army commander: 'We are now positive the build-up began during and before winter for it requires extensive preparations.' Clearly, all three principal agencies— Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Military Intelligence (MI)—must accept their share of the blame for failing to anticipate the move. RAW, whose domain is external intelligence, should have ferreted out information from its network of agents and technical means even while the planning for the assault was going on some time last year. The IBand MI should have detected the arrival of the intruders across the LoC the moment it happened in February or March. But in Kargil there was a string of major lapses:RAW collects an enormous amount of information on Pakistan's activities in Kashmir through its Aviation Research Centre (ARC) headquartered in Sarsawa in western Uttar Pradesh, which flies special electronic intelligence and photo-reconnaissance aircraft. But in the case of Kargil, say insiders, these missions were only flown after the intrusion was discovered. RAW is also supposed to have humint or human intelligence, mainly its agents stationed in Pakistan and POK. Although RAW headquarters in Delhi had information as far back as September 1998 of a Pakistani plan to send infiltrators into Kargil, the agency failed to act on army must shoulder a large share of the blame too. Its failure began from the time the Pakistanis started to build supply bases apparently along the LoC between January and March this year for the militants, who subsequently breached it and took positions on the strategic heights. Says a senior officer of 121 Brigade somewhat lamely: 'We were prepared for an infiltration, not an invasion.' Also, during winter army aviation choppers are used to detect any such movement. Significantly it was not done this IB with over 400 intelligence gathering personnel has even a stronger presence in the Ladakh region than RAW. In October 1998 an IB report from Leh spoke of preparations for Pakistani special operations in the Kargil sector. IB officers in the sector claim they shared the information not only with their headquarters but also with 121 Brigade stationed at Kargil. Yet neither the brigade nor IB headquarters followed it up with greater surveillance to see if the information was accurate. IB now says that its Leh office reported in June 1998 that there was a noticeable army build-up at Skardu in POK but none of the other agencies involved took cognisance of most critical piece of information, it is now claimed, came from the G-Branch, the intelligence wing of the Border Security Force stationed in Srinagar, in October 1998 when it interrogated Azhar Shafi Mir, a Kashmiri militant, in Baramulla. He revealed that he was one among a group of 80 militants trained by a Colonel Shams for specialised road-sabotage operations focusing on the Leh-Srinagar highway. IB also interrogated him but both the agencies didn't act on the information. The BSF report reached its parent Home Ministry only on May 26, well after the battle for the Kargil heights had are other vital signs that seem to have been ignored. There was an IB report in October 1998 of a Pakistan Army survey of the area using Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPVs) for reconnaissance. An Indian Army analysis in January concluded that RPVs had not been used and, therefore, missed the significance of the report. In February a Pakistani Mi-17 helicopter was seen over Indian territory near Kaksar in army now says the chopper even opened fire but later went back and the conclusion was that the chopper had strayed into Indian airspace. Further, unlike previous years when little or no fire was exchanged between the two armies in Kargil in the winter months, there was a constant exchange of artillery fire this year. Officers now concede this could have been related to the unfolding of the Pakistani plan in Drass, Kaksar and how is it, despite having so much evidence of the build-up, none of the agencies rang the alarm bell? Some critics charge that both RAW and IB officials are so busy safeguarding their necks that they usually drown headquarters with a torrent of useless information. Insiders say some of their reports are like astrological forecasts, suitably vague about the specifics and frequently issued as bureaucratic ploys to cover all eventualities. Separating the chaff is a herculean task and on many occasions genuine tipoffs go unheeded because agency officials have cried wolf once too that may sound like a charitable explanation, the real problem is that many of these agencies work at cross-purposes with the hierarchical structure still ill-defined. Information from intelligence agencies moves up the chain of command, depending on its significance. Data useful for the military is sent directly to the three services while other significant information is sent to the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), concurrently the secretariat of the National Security Council, that works out of Sardar Patel Bhavan in Delhi. Its chairman reports directly to the prime minister's Principal Secretary Brajesh Mishra who also happens to be the National Security Adviser (NSA).advertisementThis is largely in theory. In reality both IB and RAW keep the most important pieces of information to themselves and provide them directly to the Prime Minister's Office. They also produce daily intelligence summaries which are bland bits of analyses that do not usually go into the specifics. In the case of the Kargil failure even if the army was lax in acting on the alarming reports, why didn't the RAW and IB chiefs take it up directly with the prime minister to whom they have routine access?One explanation that seems to have considerable currency is that the failure was because of the history of the area. The sector dominated by Shias had not supported militancy and there had been no known instance of infiltration through this inhospitable terrain. But as General Sharma points out, the job of an intelligence professional is to predict the unexpected.K. Subrahmanyam, a leading defence analyst, says that the failure in Kargil was not the lack of intelligence information but of assessing and interpreting the available data. Chairman of the JIC in 1977-79, he says it is not enough to collate information. It has also to be adequately processed and analysed and placed in context. 'More than 50 per cent of the CIA comprises 'white collar' analysts, the professorial types who attend seminars and spend time in universities,' he intelligence work, according to him, requires the mastering of 'inductive as against deductive logic'. All that RAW and IB do is collate information, deduce its implications and present it to the government. What is needed is a more complex exercise that 'requires you to think what you would do were you in your adversary's position'. This means a profound understanding of the opponent's psychology, the context of his politics and is the kind of job the JIC was set up to do in 1963. But the reality is that for the past several years it has functioned with little guidance and with a key staff of just two dozen persons to undertake the task it was set up for. Emasculating the JIC is the consequence of the generally poor appreciation of the need for 'assessed and processed intelligence'. One reason for this has been the skewing of intelligence work to benefit the party in power rather than towards national security. This has given enormous clout to the agencies enabling them to get involved in areas outside their charter. According to former foreign secretary J.N. Dixit, RAW became an actor in influencing Indian policy towards Sri Lanka in the '80s rather than being an agency gathering intelligence and information. The Sri Lanka experience also deepened the distrust between the army and RAW which is supposed to provide it external its great importance as the eyes and ears of India's national security, RAW's management by the government seems to defy explanation. A 'steering committee' of top-level secretaries of the government is supposed to exercise some control over RAW and IB but this is more on paper. A few months ago, the government appointed A.S. Dullat, special director in the IB, as officer-on-special duty in RAW. Given his seniority it appeared that Dullat was being positioned to succeed Arvind Dave, the current chief who was denied the usual two-year extension of service on technical grounds and given a one year extension last on April 30, the government citing a redressal of grievance petition from the next seniormost RAW official, R. Nagarajan, gave Dave a three-month extension and said the next government would decide on the appointment. This stop-go arrangement is hardly conducive for the proper functioning of the only agency that provides the country with external lack of an intelligence culture is rooted deep in its history but the inability of its present leaders to find measures to rectify this compounds the problem. Three years ago when the armed forces put up a request for a dedicated surveillance satellite, something the Indian Space Research Organisation can easily fabricate, the project was stymied by the then cabinet secretary. 'He just did not understand what space surveillance was all about,' says one bemused army general. Besides adequate satellite surveillance, the country's intelligence services need to boost their electronic intelligence gathering. A single aircraft, that too a vintage Boeing 707, does the job today. The army needs to enhance its own surveillance capability in the form of additional RPVs, battlefield surveillance radars and wide-area thermal imaging is a massive systemic failure for which India is already paying a heavy price. The intruders have to be evicted because from their pickets overlooking the vital Srinagar-Leh highway they can play havoc. Given the disadvantage in heights, the battle to push them back is going to be long drawn and costly. The exchequer is already doling out an estimated Rs 15 crore daily. For every soldier who is pressed into battle, four others are needed to support him. Many more Indian soldiers will be killed in the war to regain the heights. It is therefore important to know why India's intelligence failed in Kargil, not just to punish the guilty, but also to recompense the dead and prevent such serous lapses in future.—with Ramesh Vinayak in LehSubscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
