Talks to finalise US steel tariff exemption ongoing as deadline due to pass
The UK has already managed to negotiate a deal with the US which eliminates the threat of tariffs for British car and aeroplane manufacturers.
But a reprieve for the steel industry is yet to be finalised, leaving open the threat that the current 25% tariff rate could rise to 50% after the deadline.
Mr Trump is reportedly stepping up pressure on countries who could soon be subject to the tariffs, urging them to negotiate trade deals with the US.
But amid signs of confusion within the US administration, trade secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested America's trade partners will see the levies begin on August 9, after receiving a letter outlining them on July 9.
Mr Trump told his cabinet that negotiating trade deals was 'too time-consuming' so he was sending out letters to countries detailing tariff rates.
In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday night, he said letters to 'a minimum of 7 Countries' would be released on Wednesday morning with more in the afternoon, although he gave no indication of which countries would be receiving the letters.
Gareth Stace, director general at industry body UK Steel, said: 'A swift and positive resolution is needed to safeguard jobs, unlock growth, and restore confidence in the UK steel sector.'
Downing Street said on Tuesday that discussions are ongoing between UK and US officials to secure 0% tariffs on core steel imports to the US.
A Number 10 spokesman said: 'As we've said before, this is something that we continue to discuss with the US, just as we did with aero and auto, and those discussions will continue.'
Asked if the Government understands the frustration of British steel workers, he said they want to see the deal in force 'as soon as possible'.
The spokesman added: 'We obviously want to see this deal in force as soon as possible. That remains our priority.
'But as we've said before and set out, the Government remains relentlessly focused on making sure British businesses can feel the benefits of the deal as soon as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
We're becoming inured to Trump's outbursts – but when he goes quiet, we need to be worried
In the global attention economy, one titan looms over all others. Donald Trump can command the gaze of the world at a click of those famously short fingers. When he stages a spectacular made-for-TV moment – say, that Oval Office showdown with Volodymyr Zelenskyy – the entire planet sits up and takes notice. But that dominance has a curious side-effect. When Trump does something awful and eye-catching, nations tremble and markets move. But when he does something awful but unflashy, it scarcely registers. So long as there's no jaw-dropping video, no expletive-ridden soundbite, no gimmick or stunt, it can slip by as if it hadn't happened. Especially now that our senses are dulled through over-stimulation. These days it requires ever more shocking behaviour by the US president to prompt a reaction; we are becoming inured to him. Yet the danger he poses is as sharp as ever. Consider the events of just the last week or so, few of them stark enough to lead global news bulletins, yet each one another step towards the erosion of democracy in and by the world's most powerful country. On Wednesday, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs – yes, he's climbed back on that dead horse – on Brazil, if the judicial authorities there do not drop the prosecution of the country's Trump-like former president Jair Bolsonaro, charged with seeking to overturn his 2022 election defeat and leading a coup against the man who beat him, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. As concisely as he could manage, Lula explained, via social media, that Brazil is a sovereign country and that an independent judiciary cannot 'accept interference or instruction from anyone … No one is above the law.' This is becoming a habit of Trump's. He made the same move in defence of Benjamin Netanyahu last month, hinting that Israel could lose billions in US military aid if the prime minister continues to stand trial on corruption charges. In both cases, Trump was explicit in making the connection between the accused men and himself, decrying as a 'witch-hunt' the efforts to hold them to account. 'This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent,' he posted, of Bolsonaro's legal woes. 'Something I know much about!' It's easy to make light of the transparent effort by Trump to forge an international trade union of populist would-be autocrats, but he's not solely moved by fraternal solidarity. He also wants to dismantle a norm that has long applied across the democratic world, which insists that even those at the top are subject to the law. That norm is an impediment to him, a check on his power. If he can discredit it, so that a new convention arises – one that agrees that leaders can act with impunity – that helps his animating project in the US: the amassing of ever more power to himself and the weakening or elimination of any rival source of authority that might act as a restraint. He is being quietly assisted in that goal by those US institutions that should regard themselves as co-equal branches of government – Congress and the supreme court – and whose constitutional duty is to stand up to an overmighty executive. Republicans in Congress have now approved a mega bill that they know will leave future generations of Americans drowning in debt and deprive millions of basic healthcare cover. Even so, they put aside their own judgment and bowed to the man who would be king. Less discussed was the bill's extraordinary expansion of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or Ice. Its budget has been increased by a reported 308%, with an extra $45bn to spend on detention and $29.9bn for 'enforcement and deportation'. It will soon have the capacity to detain nearly 120,000 people at any one time. And, remember, latest figures show that about half of all those detained by Ice have no criminal record at all. No wonder even conservative critics are sounding the alarm. The anti-Trump Republicans of the Bulwark warn that within months, the 'national brute squad' that is Ice will have twice as many agents as the FBI and its own vast prison system, emerging as 'the primary instrument of internal state power'. In this view, Trump has realised that corrupting the FBI is a tall order – though still worth trying – so he is supplanting it with a shadow force shaped in his own image. As the Bulwark puts it: 'The American police state is here.' Those most directly threatened might share clips of masked Ice agents snatching suspected migrants off the streets and manhandling them violently, just as reports circulate of appalling conditions in Ice premises, with people held in 'dungeon-like facilities', more than 100 crammed into a small room, denied showers or a chance to change clothes, and sometimes given only one meal a day and forced to sleep on concrete benches or the floor. But it is hardly a matter of national focus. Because it is not accompanied by a neon-lit Trump performance, it is happening just out of view. The same could be said of a series of recent decisions by the supreme court. They may lack the instant, blockbuster impact of past rulings, but they accelerate the same Trump trend away from democracy and towards autocracy. On Tuesday, the judges gave Trump the green light to fire federal workers en masse and to dismantle entire government agencies without the approval of Congress. Earlier, the supreme court had ruled that Trump was allowed to remove Democrats from the leadership of government bodies that are meant to be under politically balanced supervision. More usefully still for Trump, last month the judges limited the power of the lower courts to block the executive branch, thereby lending a helping hand to one of the president's most egregious executive orders: his ending of the principle that anyone born in the US is automatically a citizen of the US, a right so fundamental it is enshrined in the constitution. In ruling after ruling, the supreme court is removing restraints on Trump and handing him even more power. Small wonder that when one of the dissenting minority on the court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, was asked on Thursday what kept her up at night, she answered: 'The state of our democracy.' Meanwhile, Trump is succeeding in his goal of cowing the press, extracting serious cash from major news organisations in return for dropping (usually flimsy) lawsuits against them, a move that is having the desired, chilling effect. It all adds up to the steady erosion of US democracy and of democratic norms whose reach once extended far beyond US shores. Even if it is happening quietly, by Trump's standards, without the familiar sound and fury, it is still happening. The work of opposing it begins with noticing it. Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses
EXCLUSIVE: Hospitality chiefs have called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" to those in England. Pubs across Scotland are continuing to struggle due to rising costs despite enjoying a bumper weekend as a heatwave grips the country. Hospitality chiefs have today called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" compared to those in England. UKHospitality Scotland, which represents members of the licensed trade, said the industry was being squeezed by sky-high energy bills and the impact of employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) being hiked by the UK Government. The trade body warned pubs and bars were now shedding jobs as a result of the NIC hike and is demanding a rethink ahead of the autumn Budget. Pubs are currently closing across Britain at a rate of one a day. The Record previously revealed how 56 bars closed for good in Scotland last year, compared to 42 that shut down in 2023. Around 1,000 pubs have closed north of the border over the last 20 years, with the total dropping from the more than 5,000 operating in 2004. In a letter to Keir Starmer, the trade body warned the 2024 Budget had directly contributed to a reversal in hospitality's ability to create jobs. Between October 2024 and May 2025, the sector lost 69,000 jobs across the UK. In the same period the previous year, hospitality created an additional 18,000 jobs. Leon Thompson, Executive Director of UKHospitality Scotland, said: "The damaging impact of increasing employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) is being felt by businesses and teams across Scotland, with thousands of Scottish hospitality jobs undoubtedly lost since the Budget. "While the damage caused by employer NICs was a decision made in Westminster, we still need Holyrood to step up and back our businesses with vital support. "The Scottish Government needs to speed up in delivering its promise to reform the broken business rates system, before it's too late and Scottish businesses are put at a further competitive disadvantage to those in England. "It's also critical that the Scottish Government maintains and extends business rates relief for the sector at the Scottish Budget later this year - this is the lifeline our venues need." Kate Nicholls, chair of UKHospitality, said: "In the years following the financial crisis we created one in five net new jobs and today employ 3.5 million people. The Government needs sectors like hospitality to create jobs and meet their ambition to get more people back into work. "We have a proven track record of being able to deliver those jobs in every part of the country and for people from all backgrounds. "The NICs change was socially regressive and had a disproportionate effect on entry level jobs." Shona Robison, the Finance Secretary, said: "Businesses are being hit by the impact of the UK Government's decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions and rising energy costs continue to bite hard. "While many levers to grow Scotland's economy lie with the UK Government, we are providing a package of non-domestic rates reliefs worth an estimated £733 million in 2025-26, including 40% relief – capped at £110,000 per business – for hospitality premises liable for the Basic Property Rate. "Around half of properties in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors also continue to be eligible for 100% Small Business Bonus Scheme relief – the most generous small business rates relief in the UK.'
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Immigration officials can't detain people based on race, speaking Spanish in Los Angeles, judge rules
A federal judge on Friday ruled that immigration officers in southern California can't rely solely on someone's race or speaking Spanish to stop and detain people. Magistrate Judge Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong issued a temporary restraining order after a lawsuit was filed by three men who were arrested as they waited to be picked at a Pasadena bus stop for a job on June 18. Frimpong's order bars the detention of people unless the officer or agent "has reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law." It says they may not base that suspicion solely on apparent race or ethnicity; speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent; presence at a particular location like a bus stop or day laborer pick-up site; or the type of work one does. The lawsuit, against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the head of Immigration and Customs and Enforcement, was filed as the federal government under President Donald Trump has aggressively made immigration arrests in Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California. The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California called the restraining order a victory for rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. 'No matter the color of their skin, what language they speak, or where they work, everyone is guaranteed constitutional rights to protect them from unlawful stops," Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, said in a statement. "While it does not take a federal judge to recognize that marauding bands of masked, rifle-toting goons have been violating ordinary people's rights throughout Southern California, we are hopeful that today's ruling will be a step toward accountability for the federal government's flagrant lawlessness that we have all been witnessing," Tajsar said. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, have objected to the federal immigration actions in Southern California. Bass has said they are they are motivated by a political agenda 'of provoking fear and terror.' The Trump administration has defended the crackdown on people in the country without authorization. President Donald Trump ran on a campaign that promised deportations.
