
Putting a price on health — five key takeaways from Minister Motsoaledi's budget vote address
Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi tabled the 2025/26 health budget vote in Parliament on Wednesday, 9 July, laying out the spending priorities for the current financial year.
His speech centred around strengthening infrastructure, reversing the impacts of yearslong austerity measures, and addressing the withdrawal of US aid funding for South African health programmes.
Wednesday's proceedings followed a tumultuous 2025 Budget process, which saw Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's Budget speech delayed twice and only finalised on 21 May.
'This [health] budget is being presented at a very challenging time in the history of our country, including geopolitical events of recent days,' said Motsoaledi. 'However, I must assert that challenging as the moment is, there is a lot we should be excited about.'
A National Department of Health budget of R64.8-billion was presented to the National Assembly for consideration.
Below are five key takeaways from Motsoaledi's address.
1. Strengthening infrastructure
Motsoaledi spent a significant portion of his 15-minute time allocation on infrastructure, saying it was 'one of the biggest problems that the public health system encountered'.
He referenced the health ombud investigation into allegations of poor management at Helen Joseph Tertiary Hospital in Gauteng, which found problems with infrastructure and human resources at the facility.
He noted that South Africa's eleventh academic hospital, the Limpopo Central Hospital, was under construction in Limpopo and was 26% complete.
Other hospitals under construction are:
Siloam District Hospital in Vhembe, Limpopo — 90% complete;
Dihlabeng Regional Hospital in the Free State — 30% complete;
Bambisana District Hospital in the Eastern Cape — 82% complete;
Zithulele District Hospital in the Eastern Cape — 50% complete; and
Bophelong Psychiatric Hospital in North West.
'In addition to the hospitals currently under construction, the National Department of Health has prioritised several key hospital projects placed strategically to strengthen South Africa's public health hospital network, particularly in high-demand areas in Gauteng, but also in underserved areas,' said Motsoaledi.
'These include 17 major hospital projects which have been identified for development. They are in various stages of design and development.'
While the budget didn't necessarily cover all the funding needed for the department's 'massive infrastructure injection', Motsoaledi said officials were also speaking to international and local financial institutions about financing options.
2. Reinforcing HIV/AIDS, TB programmes
The loss of US foreign development assistance, particularly funds provided for HIV programmes through the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (Pepfar), has been a major concern in the health sector over the past few months. Experts and activists have called on Motsoaledi and the National Department of Health to develop an emergency funding plan to prevent a loss of ground in the fight against HIV/Aids.
'In the aftermath of the withdrawal of Pepfar, we presented our plans to National Treasury and asked for help. At the same time, we approached other funders, both domestic and globally,' said Motsoaledi.
He said the National Treasury had 'come to the party' by allocating R753.5-million. These funds will be used to provide:
R590-million for provincial departments of health;
R32-million for the National Department of Health; and
R132-million for the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) to support health researchers around the country.
The R132-million allocation for the SAMRC is part of a R400-million budget the Treasury has designated for health research over the next three years.
Motsoaledi said the Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust had each pledged an additional R100-million to South Africa.
'This means we are going to have a total of R600-million offered to researchers, despite Pepfar having pulled the plug on their work,' said Motsoaledi.
'These amounts are intended to cover the most urgent needs, and further allocations may be considered later.'
3. Reversing austerity measures
On top of the R64.8-billion budget allocation for health, the National Treasury had earmarked an additional R6.7-billion to 'reverse years of austerity measures which have crippled the public health system', said Motsoaledi.
The National Health Council (NHC), made up of Motsoaledi, Deputy Health Minister Dr Joe Phaahla, provincial health MECs and representatives of the South African Local Government Association and the military, has elected to use the additional funds to:
Hire 1,200 doctors, 200 nurses and 250 other health professionals at a cost of R1.7-billion;
Acquire 1.4-million articles for public hospitals, including beds, mattresses, bassinets and new hospital linen at a cost of R1.3-billion;
Permanently employ 27,000 community health workers who have been in the system for close to two decades, but were supported through NGOs, at a cost of R1.4-billion; and
Start paying accruals that have accumulated over the years in oxygen supply, blood and blood products, laboratory services, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals.
The NHC originally announced its intention to fund an additional 1,650 public sector health worker posts in April.
4. Reaffirming commitment to NHI
In their presentations before the National Assembly, both Motsoaledi and Phaahla reaffirmed the National Department of Health's commitment to implementing the National Health Insurance Act.
Motsoaledi said one of the main objectives in the health budget was 'to lay a strong foundation in preparation for improvement of the public health system of our country, in preparation for the National Health Insurance (NHI). There are people who believe that we have no plans, nor inclination to do that. We want them to listen very attentively today.'
Phaahla said the department was well on the way to implementing the NHI Act, 'despite the court challenges by those opposed to equity and transformation. When this Act is fully implemented, the aspirations of a preventative health scheme run by the state and free medical care at the point of service, as espoused in the Freedom Charter, will be realised in full.'
There are currently six legal challenges to the NHI Act.
5. Parties push back
While the ANC expressed its support for Motsoaledi's health budget vote, not all parties were satisfied with the minister's priorities. Key among those raising objections were the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party and the DA.
Moshome Motubatse, an MK party MP, said the party opposed the health budget vote.
'This budget fails to provide meaningful healthcare for the people of South Africa,' said Motubatse, noting that the allocation for the 2025/26 financial year was increasing by only 1% when accounting for inflation.
'It represents a cut in real terms, even as the demand [on health] continues to grow.'
Dr Karl du Pré le Roux, a former rural doctor, spoke for the DA, the ANC's largest partner in the Government of National Unity. He said that while there was much justified criticism of the inequity between the public and private health systems in South Africa, there were also large disparities in the resourcing of different areas within the public health system.
He said managerial incompetence, poor leadership and corruption were among the largest problems facing the public health sector. Du Pré le Roux added that NHI was not the best way to achieve universal healthcare in the country.
'Though your aims are noble, most academics, analysts and ordinary South Africans recognise that the implementation of the NHI legislation by a government health system that is riddled with incompetence, mismanagement and corruption at every level, will be a complete disaster,' said Du Pré le Roux. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
How toxic leaders are impacting SA's workforce
Half also reported being concerned about their mental health, while a third took time off from work due to mental health challenges. A rising body of research is unearthing a troubling dynamic in corporate leadership: a concerning prevalence of narcissistic and psychopathic traits among those at the helm. This disturbing trend not only compromises organisational integrity but also adversely impacts the mental health and well-being of employees, creating an epidemic of workplace toxicity that is increasingly hard to ignore. Prof Renata Schoeman, Head of Healthcare Leadership at Stellenbosch Business School, highlights that certain personality traits typically associated with psychopaths—charm, fearless dominance, boldness, and a grandiose sense of self—are often seen as advantageous in the cutthroat world of business. Research indicates that while only about 1% of the general population meets the criteria for antisocial personality disorder, nearly 4% of business leaders may fit this profile, with CEO roles being the most common breeding ground for such traits. The consequences for employees are alarming. National studies have revealed that one-third of South African workers have left jobs due to toxic leadership. Moreover, over 40% of workplace illnesses are linked to stress, with one in four employees diagnosed with depression. Prof Schoeman states that while the situation appears dire, it is critical to differentiate between leaders who exhibit narcissistic or psychopathic tendencies and those who may simply be difficult bosses. 'Narcissists and psychopaths have distinct, clinically identifiable traits,' she asserts, emphasising the importance of accurate recognition to prevent wrongful labelling and conflict.


eNCA
10 hours ago
- eNCA
UNAIDS warns of growing crisis to funding cuts
PRETORIA - The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has launched its latest Global AIDS Update at an event in Johannesburg. The report sounds the alarm on a growing crisis one that threatens to reverse decades of hard-won progress in the global fight against HIV. At the centre of concern are cuts to international funding, which are putting critical prevention and treatment programmes at risk worldwide.

IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Medical schemes face scrutiny over racial discrimination against black health professionals
Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi addressed the Portfolio Committee on Health regarding the Section 59 investigation report, which revealed that three medical schemes applied discriminatory risk ratios to black health professionals in disciplines such as physiotherapy, psychology, and social work. Image: GCIS There must be consequences and punitive measures, which include back payments by medical schemes, that were found to have applied systemic discrimination against black health professionals when they applied risk ratios against them. This call has come after the findings of a Section 59 investigation report revealed that three medical schemes, namely GEMS, Medscheme, and Discovery, applied discriminatory risk ratios to black health professionals, in disciplines such as physiotherapy, psychology, and social work, who are 'more likely' to be guilty of fraud, waste, and abuse. It is unclear how many medical professionals were affected by racial profiling and how many lost their business practices. The investigation was launched in 2019 after several healthcare providers made allegations that they were being unfairly treated by medical aid schemes based on race and ethnicity. The affected section relates to the payment of claims by black medical professionals. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ However, in the absence of remuneration guidelines by the National Health Act, Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, during a portfolio committee meeting on Friday, said they will seek legal advice on the matter. The findings of the report raised questions during the meeting about equity within the profession, igniting discussions about fairness, accountability, and restitution. Motsoaledi said the Act does not indicate what steps should be taken, and currently, it appears the medical schemes decide their measures. 'This is a statutory matter due to the silence in the Act. It does not indicate the steps that the schemes must take when they investigate such a fraud. That is the weakness picked up by the panel, and the Act itself does not provide guidance on what should be done. 'The medical schemes have decided to divulge their methods, which were unfortunately tampered with by racial bias. Even if the Act does not outline what must be done, whatever is done in a new South Africa governed by democracy cannot be informed by racial profiling. We will have to look into that,' said Motsoaledi. The minister said the members of Parliament are 'not mere bystanders and observers', and have an onus on them to have the Act amended to speak specifically to such reform. Motsoaledi said they are still studying the report, and legal advice is being sought after its release on Monday. Chairperson for the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS), Dr Thandi Mabeba, said the council will have a special sitting next Monday to interrogate the findings, recommendations, and the implications of such recommendations. Dr Mabeba said they would also hold engagements across the industry, including the steering committee. 'The minister has alluded to the report, which has damning findings, and as such, we need to apply our minds in ensuring that we guide the industry in a manner that is legally and in line with our statutory mandate.' On Monday, chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Health, Dr Sibongiseni Dhlomo, welcomed the findings of the Section 59 investigation panel. 'The report paints a concerning picture of the disproportionate impact that medical schemes' fraud, waste, and abuse systems have had on black healthcare providers…These findings are deeply troubling and point to systemic flaws in the design and implementation of the fraud, waste, and abuse systems. 'It is unacceptable that black healthcare providers have been subjected to such blatantly discriminatory treatment, which has undoubtedly had a devastating impact on their livelihoods and the communities they serve. 'We cannot allow such systemic discrimination to continue unchecked, as it undermines the transformation of the healthcare sector and the constitutional right to equality,' said Dr Dhlomo.