Fines (R10 000 to R40 000) for electricity bypass in ELM
This has caused stakeholders to blame electricity theft as the reason why a small group of residents are resisting the installation of smart meters in the area – and gives insight into why Emfuleni residents owe ELM more than R6 billion for unpaid services.
According to smart meter service provider BXC, which says it has discovered more and more streets in the densely-populated suburb – due to concentrated student accommodation – are 100% bypassed and with even more streets reaching a 90% and 80% bypass rate.
The Emfuleni Local Municipality (ELM) is staggering under the financial weight of a deep-seated culture of non-payment throughout Emfuleni, but especially in densely-populated suburbs such as SE7, resulting in huge losses for ELM which must still pay Eskom for stolen power.
DA Councillor Yvonne Coertze says the installation of smart meters throughout Emfuleni is vital to normalise electricity supply and to ensure payment.
BXC is proceeding with smart meter installations in SE7 under Police guard and also assisted by the ELM By Law Unit.
ELM is on National Treasury's debt relief programme for its huge Eskom debt and a requirement of that programme is that smart meters be installed to protect and expand revenue security.
Most of ELM's revenue comes from electricity sales, currently managed by Eskom as its agent.
Although smart meter infrastructure can be bypassed, unlike traditional pre-paid meters it is picked up instantly by the BXC IT network and allows for swift action.
Fines of up to R10 000 or even R40 000 in the case of businesses can be issued if bypasses are found, and these must be paid along with the cost of stolen electricity before power is restored.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Warning for South Africans buying cars via online auctions
'These sophisticated scammers create convincing fake accounts that use WesBank branding, purporting to be official representatives selling bank auction vehicles.' Many people in South Africa opt to buy second-hand cars for various reasons and at different places. One of the most popular ways to buy a car is at an auction, due to the reasonable prices and varied conditions of the cars. As the world advances, so have the methods to participate in an auction. Thanks to technology, one can buy a car from an auction while sitting in the comfort of their own home, office, restaurant, or even at an airport. However, WesBank has warned individuals of the risks of buying at an online auction. ALSO READ: Consumer scammed out of R6 million while 'trading' on JSE The vehicle and asset finance provider reports a surge in online auction scams, particularly on platforms like TikTok. How car scams work WesBank says fraudsters are targeting unsuspecting customers, hoping to capitalise on bargains in the automotive retail space. 'These sophisticated scammers create convincing fake accounts that use WesBank branding, purporting to be official representatives selling bank auction vehicles. They lure unsuspecting buyers with seemingly irresistible deals, pressuring them to pay over large sums of money to 'secure' what appears to be an auction-listed vehicle,' said Lebo Gaoaketse, Head of Marketing and Communication at WesBank. However, once the payment is made, the scammers quickly close their fake accounts and vanish with the customer's money, leaving their victims with no recourse. Tips when buying cars online WesBank offered essential tips people can follow when buying cars online. Registration and deposits: To participate in a legitimate auction, registration is mandatory. A refundable deposit is typically required from the bidder upon registration. It is crucial to understand that a genuine WesBank auction will never require a deposit to secure a specific car before the auction. 'If you are asked for such a deposit, it is a major red flag.' Know the terms and conditions: Always familiarise yourself with the general terms and conditions of auction sales. This includes understanding payment procedures, buyer responsibilities, and refund policies. Beware of 'too good to be true' offers: Always ensure you are dealing with a reputable auction house and an authorised representative. 'As the saying goes, if an offer seems 'too good to be true,' it probably is.' ALSO READ: Tempted by unqualified finfluencers and social media investment ads? Here's why it's a bad idea Dealing with a trusted source 'Always ensure that you are dealing with a registered auction house, and in the case of a bank auction, an official bank representative,' said Gaoaketse. 'Do not be tempted to accept unofficial offers. It is often a ploy to defraud those looking for a good deal. Trust your instincts and proceed with caution. It's better to err on the side of caution than to fall victim to a fraud scheme.' Recognising red flags Staying alert for red flags is crucial to protect yourself. Be vigilant for common warning signs such as: Sellers requesting payment outside of the official auction platform. Reluctance to provide additional information or photos of the vehicle. Vague or inconsistent product descriptions. 'We urge participants to report any suspicious activity promptly to the auction platform to prevent others from falling prey to scams and contribute to a safer online marketplace. By taking note of these guidelines and exercising caution, buyers can confidently navigate vehicle auctions, maximising their chances of securing a quality vehicle at a reasonable price,' Gaoaketse concludes. Always verify information and find reliable details about official WesBank online vehicle auctions by visiting the vehicle and asset finance provider's official page. NOW READ: How to spot the signs and avoid falling victim to online scams
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Legal battle erupts as Ingonyama Trust pursues former chair over millions
THE former chairperson of Ingonyama Trust Board (ITB), Judge Jerome Ngwenya, who is being accused of hoarding millions borrowed by Ingonyama Holdings from the ITB SABELO NSELE The Ingoyama Trust Board (ITB) is pointing fingers at its former chairperson, Judge Jerome Ngwenya, for hoarding R41 million of its funds. The members of the board said they're at their wits' end attempting to recoup R41 million in loans that were borrowed by its investment arm, Ingonyama Holdings, when Ngwenya was still the chairperson of the board. Ngwenya is one of the directors of Ingonyama Holdings, and the board has failed several times to remove him from this position. The interim chief executive of ITB, Siyamdumisa Vilakazi, said they have taken legal action against Ngwenya. Vilakazi said Ingonyama Holdings was registered in 2019, and in 2021 it borrowed millions of rand from ITB. Vilakazi said Ngwenya has refused to answer where this money went. "This money was paid in three caches. The first batch was R10 million in March 2021, followed by another R10 million in July and then R21 million in November. Since then, Ingonyama Holdings has never produced any financial reports of its expenditure. The Auditor-General keeps asking when this money is going to be paid back," said Vilakazi. He said they've applied twice to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) to have Ngwenya removed as the director of Ingonyama Holdings. They've failed in both instances, according to Vilakazi, as Ngwenya's lawyers keep opposing the removal. "Today we are saying we are distancing ourselves from Ingonyama Holdings. We want people to know that Ingonyama Trust has been taken over by some people. That's why we have taken legal action." He said he can't explain further on their multi-pronged legal approach since there are ongoing investigations. "There are also suspicions of corruption that are being probed by the Hawks," said Vilakazi. Attempts to get Ngwenya's comment were met with anger. He asked how the board has failed to take away Ingonyama Holdings from him if the company truly belongs to the Ingonyama Trust. Ngwenya challenged this reporter to send proof of the registration of Ingonyama Holdings, attempts to remove him as the director of the company, and the details of the legal action allegedly taken against him before he could proceed with answering questions. The deputy chairperson of the Ingonyama Trust, Advocate Linda Zama, said it was a mistake to have Ngwenya as both chairperson of ITB and a director of Ingonyama Holdings simultaneously. Zama, who was a member of the ITB when Ingonyama Holdings was given R21 million in loans, said she opposed this decision; however, she was outnumbered when the board voted on the matter. The matter caused her to resign from the board.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Taxpayers foot legal bill for SANDF members accused of DPCI investigator's murder
Defence Minister Angie Motshekga says her department will continue to provide legal assistance to 12 SANDF members charged with several charges, including the murder of DPCI senior investigator, Lieutenant Colonel Frans Mathipa, who was shot dead in 2023 while probing allegations the accused in the abduction of an Ethiopian businessman and suspected ISIS leader from the Mall of Africa. Image: SAPS Taxpayers are coughing up the legal costs for the 12 South African National Defence Force (SANDF) members who are facing multiple charges, including the murder of Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation's (DPCI) senior investigator, Lieutenant-Colonel Frans Mathipa. Mathipa was killed while he was investigating the abduction of two Ethiopian men, Abdella Hussein Abadiga and his bodyguard, Kadir Jemal Abotese, who were abducted and allegedly taken to Zwartkop Military Base, and their whereabouts are still unknown. This was disclosed by Defence Minister Angie Motshekga when she was responding to parliamentary questions from DA MP Chris Hattingh and Maliyakhe Shelembe. Motshekga said the legal costs were paid on the basis of the Defence Act which provides for legal representation for SANDF members. 'The SANDF has the authority to provide legal assistance to its members in certain circumstances. The 12 members of the SANDF facing charges related to the death of Lt Col Frans Mathipa are receiving State-funded legal assistance in accordance with the Defence Act, 2022. This assistance was made available from the outset of the legal proceedings,' she said. Asked about the legal cost incurred to date in providing to the accused SANDF members, Motshekga said the defence could not confirm the total costs as the court case was currently ongoing and legal proceedings still in progress. 'The department will continue to provide the necessary support and the final costs will be determined once the matter is concluded.' She would provide the estimated cost that may be incurred should the case proceed to full criminal trial. 'The cost will depend on various factors, including the duration of the trial, the number of witnesses, and the complexity of the legal arguments. As such it is not feasible to provide a reliable estimate of the total costs, including legal fees and other relevant expenses, at this stage,' Motshekga said. The members of the SANDF special operations unit were each granted R10 000 bail by the Randburg Magistrate's Court following their arrest last month following Mathipa's death in August 2023. The National Prosecuting Authority has indicated that it will appeal the court's decision to grant bail to the SANDF members facing serious charges that include murder, kidnapping, fraud, obstructing the administration of justice, making false statements under oath and theft of a motor vehicle. Asked if SANDF has a framework to guide the provision of legal assistance to members charged with serious criminal offences, Motshekga said the process of acquiring legal representation at the State's expense starts with an application by an individual to the department's legal services division. 'The request includes an acknowledgement and undertaking by the member that any expense incurred maybe recouped if it is subsequently determined that the member did not qualify for legal representation at State expense.' However, she said the SANDF policy on legal assistance may differ depending whether the proceedings are held in military or civilian courts. Motshekga said members facing charges in military courts may be entitled to legal representation provided by the SANDF's military defence counsel. 'For proceedings in civilian courts, the SANDF's members, guided by the Defence Act, may be provided with legal assistance under certain circumstances, such as when the member's actions were taken in the course of their duties.' She would not say how much her department spent on legal assistance for SANDF members over the past five years. Motshekga, however, indicated that SANDF has received 26 requests for legal assistance at State's expense during the past five years.
