logo
‘It's ourselves and society on trial': playwright adapts Gisèle Pelicot case for stage

‘It's ourselves and society on trial': playwright adapts Gisèle Pelicot case for stage

The Guardian2 days ago
A stage play based on the trial of the men who drugged and raped Gisèle Pelicot will be staged this week in the southern city of Avignon, as France continues to debate the lessons for society from the country's biggest ever rape trial.
The three-hour performance, The Pelicot Trial: Tribute to Gisèle Pelicot, has been created by Milo Rau, the Swiss director and playwright acclaimed for his theatre interpretations of court proceedings, including the Moscow trial of the Russian punks Pussy Riot and the trial of the Romanian despot Nicolae Ceaușescu.
The play has the backing of Pelicot's lawyers and feminist groups, and Rau says he felt compelled to turn the trial into a theatre piece: 'To have done nothing would have been like not speaking of Gaza or of Ukraine, it would have been a silence that's complicit.'
The director said the Pelicot piece was about looking at rape culture, the trivialisation of rape and patriarchy in all its forms. 'Through the Pelicot trial, it's ourselves and our society on trial,' he said.
Pelicot was hailed worldwide after she waived her right to anonymity to ensure a public trial of her ex-husband, Dominique Pelicot, who drugged her unconscious and invited dozens of men on an internet forum to come to her bedroom and rape her for almost a decade from 2011 in the southern village of Mazan. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison in December and guilty verdicts were returned for all the 51 accused men.
Gisèle Pelicot, who had said in court she wanted 'all of society to be a witness' and 'shame must change sides', was this week given France's top civic honour, the Legion d'Honneur, in recognition of her determination to expose and change what she called a 'macho, patriarchal society that trivialises rape'.
Rau, who worked with the playwright Servane Dècle to create the performance, said Pelicot's decision to choose a public trial instead of holding the case behind closed doors had in effect opened up the courtroom like a theatre. 'So we thought we should perhaps now turn the theatre into a courtroom,' he said.
The performance is made up of staged readings of extracts from the trial, police files, social commentary and psychiatric reports. It looks at the 51 convicted and the question of how these men, including a nurse, a soldier, a journalist, a prison warden and delivery drivers, aged from 26 to 74, could travel to Pelicot's home to rape her. More than 50 performers will read extracts from the trial, and those on stage will include a psychiatric expert from the case and court artists who were present at the trial.
Rau said it was important to stage the theatre piece in Avignon, where the trial took place and where crowds had gathered outside the court daily to cheer Gisèle Pelicot, and where the city walls were plastered with her quotes. It will be staged in a 14th-century open-air Carmelite cloister, with seats for 500 people, as part of the city's renowned theatre festival. But, with massive local interest, Rau said it would also be livestreamed in cinemas in Avignon as well as online.
Rau said he had resolved to create the piece while he was preparing another play, La Lettre, for the Avignon festival. Having tackled other major trials on stage, he said it would have been a 'kind of absurd silence' not to also work on the Pelicot case. 'In the German-speaking world, Avignon is not famous for the theatre festival, it's famous for the Pelicot trial.'
Pelicot's lawyers approved the idea, and journalists and researchers willingly gave Rau and Dècle thousands of pages of their notebooks to piece together the trial. 'It was clear for everyone that we had to do this, particularly here in Avignon and particularly now,' he said.
The trial presented difficult topics for staged readings. 'At the start, there were many different issues – the rapists themselves, rape culture, masculinity, the family, the spaces where this took place,' Rau said. 'And then we followed the line of the trial and the questions it raised in society, in the media, and in people's minds.'
The performance looks at the cross-examination of the accused men as well as their initial questioning by police, showing their shifting awareness of what was at stake. 'We see really what culture they're coming from, the patriarchal system, fraternity and rape culture that produces this,' Rau said. 'There was a moment of growing awareness in this city, but also in this country and in civilisation as a whole, to understand human relationships and how they have developed under a regime of capitalism, a regime of internet pornography, patriarchy, and drug-induced abuse.'
The piece underlined to him how 'omnipresent' rape was in society, Rau said.
A first performance took place at the Vienna festival last month, lasting seven hours, and the play will travel to other cities including Lisbon, Belgrade and Warsaw.
Dècle, the play's co-writer, said: 'It's about pulling at all the threads with the audience to understand what is it that made these men – who were so different from one another – converge on that bedroom, share recipes for drugging women, suggest women close to them who should also be raped, and doing all of that while having apparently ordinary lives. It's very important what this says about our society today.'
The Pelicot Trial: Tribute to Gisèle Pelicot, Avignon festival, 18 July and streamed online
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Lottie endured months of rape and abuse as a teenager from her first ever boyfriend before finally breaking free. But when he asked to meet her to say sorry, he inflicted unimaginable horrors upon her...
EXCLUSIVE Lottie endured months of rape and abuse as a teenager from her first ever boyfriend before finally breaking free. But when he asked to meet her to say sorry, he inflicted unimaginable horrors upon her...

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Lottie endured months of rape and abuse as a teenager from her first ever boyfriend before finally breaking free. But when he asked to meet her to say sorry, he inflicted unimaginable horrors upon her...

When she was 14, Lottie Mears got her first ever boyfriend. Like many teenagers, she was happy and excited, sharing her days with Riley Kirk in Grangemouth, central Scotland. The pair had met on Snapchat and bonded over their love of basketball. Snapchat messages escalated to phone calls and soon the pair were meeting up in person and calling themselves a couple. Then one day, Lottie invited Kirk to her house for the first time and everything changed. Kirk, then 14, cornered her in her garage, and forced himself on her and raped her. Afterwards he told her she was 'just annoyed because she had sex she didn't like'. Blaming herself, Lottie was left confused, but after a series of attacks, they split. The following year, Kirk called Lottie, claiming to want to apologise for the abuse. Yet, when they met, he grabbed her breasts, groped her intimately and forcefully kissed her. This month, Kirk, now 20, was jailed for eight years with an extended period of three years, for multiple counts of rape and sexual assault against four women including Lottie. Now, Lottie is bravely waiving her anonymity to encourage other survivors to come forward. Recounting the first attack, Lottie, now aged 19, exclusively told Femail: 'I was mortified and couldn't believe what was happening to me. 'Then, without a word, Riley walked back into the house, like it was nothing.' Lottie Mears (right aged 14) got her first ever boyfriend as a teen. He raped and attacked her. Riley Kirk is pictured in his mugshot left, now aged 20 The pair had met on Snapchat and bonded over their love of basketball. Snapchat messages escalated to phone calls and soon the pair were meeting up in person and calling themselves a couple. Lottie is pictured now Lottie, met Kirk in October 2019 when she was 14 after he added her on Snapchat. The pair got chatting and hit it off and after hours on the phone they decided to meet up. They began dating and one day, she invited him along with some friends, to her house where she lived with her granddad. 'We had a few drinks but Riley was quiet and not socialising with my friends. 'Wanting to cheer him up, I suggested we play a game of basketball in my garden. A sport we both loved.' Only, as they entered the garage to look for the ball, Kirk tried to initiate sex. 'He started to kiss me and his hand moved downwards. 'I told him I wasn't ready but he forcefully pushed me into a table, before grabbing my hips roughly. 'When he yanked down my trousers, I started to cry.' As Kirk forced himself on Lottie, she told him 'no' and 'stop' over and over. When he finishing raping her, he forced her to her knees and made her perform a sex act on him. Disturbed by the attack, Lottie blamed herself as Kirk acted normal in front of Lottie's friends. She wondered if she was clear enough with her protests. 'I thought I might be to blame. 'Did I not stress enough that I didn't want to have sex? 'I was confused why he wanted to hurt me.' The following morning, Lottie confronted Kirk. Yet, he acted confused. Claimed they'd just had 'sex'. Lottie was stunned. 'He made me feel like I was overreacting, that maybe relationship consent was different. 'I was embarrassed so didn't bring it up again.' A week later, when they met again, Kirk started acting 'weird'. He tripped her up at a youth disco and pinged a tree branch in her face. One day, while Lottie waited to get the bus home, he grabbed her roughly and kissed her again. 'He was really aggressive and forceful, ' Lottie explained. 'He left a bruise on my arm. 'I was so scared, and fed up of his mind games.' A month later, the couple split. But in February 2020, Kirk reached out to her on FaceTime. When Lottie saw he was with another girl she snapped. She says: 'I lost it on the phone to him, screaming at him that he knew what he'd done to me. 'He laughed and said, "just because you had sex you didn't like"'. 'He was a monster.' After that, Lottie blocked him on social media. In June that year, Kirk messaged, asking if he could apologise to her for what had happened the night of the assault. Reluctantly she agreed, and they met on a grassland near her house. Lottie remembers: 'He wasn't remorseful at all and he didn't apologise. 'I told him he was wasting my time and went to leave.' With that, Kirk grabbed her by the arms and put his hand over her neck. Then he began to kiss her. Shocked, Lottie slapped him in the face. Raging, Kirk grabbed her by her breasts and moved his hand down below, groping her. When she shoved him off, he called her 'boring' and walked off. Lottie says: 'I was frozen for a few minutes trying to process what had just happened. 'As I made my way home, I threw up. 'I was disgusted that he'd abused me again.' In the years that followed, Lottie spiralled. She dropped out of school aged 16 and began drinking heavily and even developed an eating disorder. It took Lottie until March 2022 to report Kirk to the police after confiding in a new partner about his attacks. But she was told the case couldn't be taken forward, due to 'lack of evidence'. Six months later, Lottie discovered another girl had reported Kirk for abuse and an investigation was launched. Shockingly, Kirk had even raped an 18-year-old while out on bail. Two years on, in May this year, Lottie bravely gave her evidence at court. At the High Court Edinburgh, Kirk was convicted of six charges involving rape and sexual assault against four victims. He was jailed for eight years with a probation period of three years. He will be placed on the Sex Offenders' Register. Sentencing, the judge, Lord Harrower, said: 'The social worker has highlighted aspects of your offending that suggest a high level of planning. 'These include the use of social media to facilitate offline harmful sexual behaviour, and the deployment of strategies to be alone with your victims in order to avoid being disturbed and to ensure your offending would go unnoticed.' 'You are still only 20. 'I have taken your youth and immaturity into account when accessing culpability, just as I do your victims' youth and immaturity when assessing harm. 'have been provided with victim impact statements from three of the young women you raped. 'They explain the significant effect which your attacks have had on their mental health, their education and employment, and ultimately their hopes for the future. 'It is a reasonable assumption that your other victim will have suffered similar harm.' Lottie added: 'I was relieved the fight was finally over. I felt I could breathe again. 'Riley silenced me for too long and now I'm shouting from the rooftops about the monster he is.' 'For years, I thought Riley would get away with what he did to me. 'I was made to believe it was my fault. 'But, after six years, I finally have my justice. 'Now I want others to know they will be believed and see their abusers punished.'

Reform would nationalise half of water industry, says Nigel Farage
Reform would nationalise half of water industry, says Nigel Farage

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Reform would nationalise half of water industry, says Nigel Farage

Nigel Farage has vowed to nationalise half of the water industry by striking a deal with the private sector. The Reform UK leader said he would attempt to fix the 'mess' blighting Britain's waterways by bringing 50 per cent of the sector under public ownership. He refused to say how much the reforms would cost but insisted it would be 'a lot less' than the £50bn that has been estimated. Mr Farage's promise comes as the Government has pledged to halve the amount of raw sewage being pumped into rivers, lakes and seas by the end of the decade. But Reform has said the British taxpayers 'need to be in control' of their own utilities. In its 2024 manifesto, the party vowed to launch a 'new model' that brings 50 per cent of all utilities under public ownership, with the other half owned by UK pension funds. Asked about the pledge on Sunday, Mr Farage said Britain had become 'completely incapable of coping' with the demands placed on the water sector by a huge increase in the population. Pressed on how much it would cost to have 50 per cent of the industry under public ownership, Mr Farage told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show: 'That depends what deal you do with the private sector investors. 'We are in a hell of a mess with this – an increase of the population by 10 million has left us completely incapable of coping, companies have been badly run. 'We would look for private sector investment, the Government can be a partner.' Labour has resisted calls to nationalise the industry with Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, saying on Sunday it would cost too much and take too long. Reform's 2024 manifesto said the British taxpayer 'needs to be in control of Britain's utilities' and vowed to 'launch a new model that brings 50 per cent of each utility into public ownership'. 'The other 50 per cent would be owned by UK pension funds, benefiting from new expertise and better management,' it added. 'We will ensure standing charges are capped to help low users and pensioners.' The Government has estimated that it would cost more than £99bn to nationalise the water industry, based on figures from Ofwat, the water regulator. But Mr Farage said it would cost 'a lot less' than half that to bring 50 per cent of the sector under Government control if the right deal was struck. The leader of Reform told the BBC: 'I'm sorry, Defra [Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] and Ofwat are part of the problem. Everybody thinks the same. 'It's public sector thinking, we need private sector innovation.' Pressed again on whether he would spend £50bn, Mr Farage said: 'Well, I think it'd be a lot less than that if you strike the right deal.' Asked how much it would cost, he continued: 'I don't know, I haven't sat in the negotiations – but a completely different mindset is needed.' Mr Farage added: 'We don't know what negotiations we're going to have, but it doesn't need to be a big sum of money if you incentivise private capital to come in and do the job properly.' The Reform UK leader also warned that British people are being defrauded of billions of pounds to fund net zero. In an attack on Labour's environmental agenda, Mr Farage claimed that subsidising green energy schemes at the taxpayers' expense is having 'literally zero effect' on global emissions. Reform has been heavily critical of the UK's bid to achieve net zero by 2050 and vowed to scrap the target if it wins the next election, claiming it would save £225bn. Labour has pushed on with its attempts to decarbonise the economy, sticking to its pledge to achieve clean power by 2030 despite concerns about the impact on the UK's energy security. Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, Mr Farage acknowledged the impact humans have had on the climate, saying it was 'impossible to think' that billions of people have not had an effect on rising temperatures. But he insisted this did not mean Britain should 'beggar itself' by sacrificing traditional industries in favour of green initiatives when the UK accounts for around one per cent of greenhouse ga s emissions worldwide. When Laura Kuenssberg put to him that the scientific consensus is 'absolutely clear that man's activity has a significant impact on the climate', Mr Farage said: 'Well, say it does, is that sufficient reason to defraud British taxpayers of billions of pounds every year, which is what we're doing in subsidising wind energy and solar energy for literally zero effect on global CO2 emissions? 'The same goes for closing our steel plants and moving the production to India. We've got ourselves stuck in this mindset. We believe that man has an influence on changing the climate. I didn't deny that. 'I think man does... it's impossible to think that seven or eight billion people can't have some effect.' Earlier this year, research found that Britain's green energy subsidies have added an estimated £280 to household energy bills. The figure was similar to the £300 that Labour promised bills would decrease by if the party came to power and moved Britain's energy system to renewables. The Government has argued that subsidies are accelerating the move to clean energies and reducing UK vulnerability to future surges in gas and oil prices. But critics have warned against sacrificing traditional British industries if it means outsourcing carbon-intensive production to other countries, at no net benefit to the environment. Gareth Davies, shadow financial secretary to the Treasury, said: 'Nigel Farage is flogging billion-pound promises with no plans to deliver them, meaning higher taxes and more borrowing – and working families footing the bill. It's pure theatre – they are not serious. 'Only the Conservatives believe in sound money, lower taxes, and serious leadership. Britain deserves better than this circus.' A Labour Party spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage summed up his ideas for the water industry in three words: 'I don't know'. 'He has no answers, no plan and nothing to offer apart from bluster. Working families can't afford an unfunded, uncosted Reform experiment with their money.'

Trump has every right to berate the technocrats
Trump has every right to berate the technocrats

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Trump has every right to berate the technocrats

Knucklehead or numbskull? Donald Trump uses both terms to describe Jerome Powell, the chairman of the US Federal Reserve. It depends on which day of the week it is. His attacks on Powell are now so frequent they have lost the power to shock, but imagine the horror if Sir Keir Starmer started regularly describing Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, as a nitwit or a simpleton. Or if France's president, Emmanuel Macron, were to refer to Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, as a 'nigaud' or 'crétin'. Imagine also if they let it be known that they were examining ways of ridding themselves of their troublesome monetary priests, as Trump has done in the US. The entire political and economic establishment would be up in arms and there would be mayhem in the bond markets. Yet Trump is Trump and iconoclasm comes with the territory. Trump's bark may in practice turn out to be worse than his bite. It often does. It is none the less worth considering whether in this instance he might not have a point. Looked at objectively, the unwritten understanding that presiding governments should never criticise their central banks is one of the modern world's more absurd conventions. Of course, we all know how it came about. It was part of a much wider shift in which key parts of government were removed from direct political control and vested instead with independent technocrats. Free from the need to win elections, it was argued, these arms-length bodies would do a much better job than the politicians in keeping things on the straight and narrow. In Britain, granting the Bank of England independent control of monetary policy, was very much part of the then-Labour government's attempt to sanitise itself with markets and present the UK as a trusted and stable monetary regime that had finally put its post-war inflationary past behind it. As with most other central banks, independence has been buttressed by provisions that make it virtually impossible to sack the incumbent governor except in the case of madness or misfeasance. Much as he would like to dismiss Powell, even Trump has struggled to find a way around these guardrails. The ballooning costs of renovating the Federal Reserve's grandiose Washington headquarters may be evidence of public sector waste and incompetence but it is not, on the face of it, a case of outright fraud. All the same, the lavish nature of the Fed's refurbishment touches a chord that characterises central banks as out of control, unaccountable and often just plain wrong. And now they build themselves palaces and cathedrals as symbols of the once-ruling idolatry. Admittedly, Trump's own vulgar redecoration of the Oval Office in his trademark gold chintz is in some respects just as bad, even if far less expensive. But at least Trump is elected, while Powell is a mere appointee. This in itself is causing much amusement, for in this week describing Powell as a 'terrible' chairman, Trump added that he was 'surprised he was appointed', seeming to forget that it was he who originally chose him. He soon regretted it and, by the end of Trump's first presidency, the two were barely on speaking terms.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store