logo
Calgary homeowner livid after city proposes bylaw change mid-fight

Calgary homeowner livid after city proposes bylaw change mid-fight

Yahoo06-05-2025
Evgeny Zhuromsky has lived in his home in the southwest community of Windsor Park for 10 years. Zhuromsky, pictured with his wife Elena Petrenko, is fighting a rowhouse development next door in court, and was frustrated to learn that the city released a development permit while he has a provincial appeal underway — and is proposing to change the bylaw altogether. (Karina Zapata/CBC - image credit)
When Evgeny Zhuromsky won the right to appeal a major infill development next door, he thought he finally had a chance.
He figured the company developing a nine-unit row house on his next-door neighbour's land would be forced to pause until he finally got his day in court.
Now the rules could change.
Calgary city council is being asked to vote Tuesday on a bylaw change that would allow homebuilders to proceed with a project even if it's before the Alberta Court of Appeal. And Zhuromsky feels it's desperately unfair.
"Residents of Calgary … are penalized for not following or breaking bylaws, like, for example, if you over park or do not shovel your sidewalk on time," said Zhuromsky.
ADVERTISEMENT
"That's a double standard because they require you and me and all Calgarians to follow bylaws and they allow themselves not to."
Construction has begun on the rowhouse development directly next door to Evgeny Zhuromsky's house. It will include five units and four secondary suites — unless Zhuromsky wins his appeal. (Karina Zapata/CBC)
Zhuromsky lives in Windsor Park, one lot in from the corner. He lost his appeal to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, then won the right to have his appeal heard at the provincial court. But the developer has already dug a hole and started laying the foundation for the row house next door after the city recently released the permit, despite Zhuromsky's appeal.
These developments are happening across the city , one year after city council passed blanket rezoning last spring. They're mainly being built in inner-city neighbourhoods like Bowness, but they're starting to pop up in established communities farther from the city centre, too.
Many are being appealed to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, a quasi-judicial board that can revoke individual city permits. But that process can take months, and it's even longer if it's brought to court. And for developers, that means costly delays.
ADVERTISEMENT
That could change if council approves this move on Tuesday. But lawyers warn that will make it much more expensive and difficult for Calgarians who want to stop a development that affects them.
Delays cost up to $500 a day
The designer of the row house development, Designhaus Studio, declined to comment on behalf of its client, Best Investment Group, since the case is before the courts.
The Calgary Inner City Builders Association, a group of more than 200 developers, didn't know about the proposed bylaw change. But chair Shameer Gaidhar has had concerns about the cost of appeals for a long time.
Shameer Gaidhar is the president and CEO of Millenium Plus Homes. He's also the chair of the Calgary Inner City Builders Association. (Bryan Labby/CBC)
He said the appeal process is important — Calgarians deserve that right. But it costs an average of $200 to $500 per day when a project sits empty, he said.
"It costs money for the appellant, it costs money for the developer. In the end, there's a cost. That cost gets passed on to the end user. Let it be the renter, let it be the buyer. Whatever it is, someone has to pay for it. So we're eroding affordability," said Gaidhar.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gaidhar said he needs to learn more about the bylaw change before commenting on what it means for developers.
Councillors, city decline to comment
Ward 11 Coun. Kourtney Penner, whose ward includes Windsor Park, wouldn't comment on the situation because it's related to Zhuromsky's appeal before the courts.
Coun. Sonya Sharp's ward is hot with development. Her team reached out to city administration to get clarity on the bylaw change, however they couldn't give an answer — but indicated all councillors would receive an update ahead of the public hearing. So the Ward 1 councillor declined to comment.
The city also declined to comment on the particular part of the proposed bylaw change that would allow development permits to be released, even when a provincial appeal is underway.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The City of Calgary believes that Calgarians are an important part of building a great city. Throughout the planning process Calgarians can provide feedback and comments for consideration. More information on how Calgarians can get involved in the planning process can be found in the Community Involvement Toolkit. "
'A disastrous effect'
Randi Collins, a Calgary lawyer whose specialty includes real estate, said as the land use bylaw stands today, the city can't release development permits while a provincial appeal is underway. But she said it's well within the city's right to change its bylaw.
If it's approved, Collins said anyone who wants to stop a development from going ahead would have to go through another complicated and costly process: going to court and obtaining an injunction.
"It is actually a disastrous effect, in my opinion," said Collins.
"Essentially, the average person is going to have little recourse without expending large sums of money and navigating a very difficult legal system to do anything about it, which is concerning."
An example of row housing in Calgary. These are popping up across Calgary when corner lots become available for redevelopment. (Robson Fletcher/CBC)
Collins said it speaks to a larger issue.
"Sometimes if the municipality is on board with a development, there's going to be little that you can do about it," she said.
"Municipal governments actually have quite a lot of rights and a lot of power, and the court system does hesitate to intervene unless there's a clear abuse of that power. So it's unfortunate for the average person."
Running out of time
It's been a long, difficult and expensive process for Zhuromsky to fight his next-door development, and he feels like he's running out of time.
The cost engineer in the oilpatch, who's lived in his home in Windsor Park for 10 years, is still waiting for a court date to be set so his appeal can be heard. Until then, all he can do is watch construction proceed.
"[The developers] aren't doing anything that they're not supposed to be doing. It's the City of Calgary that … allowed them," said Zhuromsky.
While he considered applying for an injunction, he just doesn't think it's practical. So he's hanging on to hope that he'll win the appeal.
"I hope that if I win and they have to reapply, they will change the design so the structure that they are building now as we speak is per the municipal development plan, is complementary, sensitive and compatible with the rest of the community."
In the meantime, he plans to attend the public hearing on Tuesday to ask city councillors to say no to the change.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protest over Bellevue land development reaches premier's desk
Protest over Bellevue land development reaches premier's desk

Hamilton Spectator

time3 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Protest over Bellevue land development reaches premier's desk

A group of Crowsnest Pass residents has appealed to Premier Danielle Smith to halt a controversial housing development in Bellevue, saying it threatens land of deep Indigenous cultural and archeological importance. In a letter sent July 9, the group urged the province to intervene following Crowsnest Pass council's April 15 approval of Bylaw 1221, 2025, a rezoning measure that clears the way for high- and medium-density housing on three municipal parcels — two in Bellevue and one in Coleman. While the land in Coleman has faced little objection, residents say the Bellevue parcels are inappropriate for development due to their historical and cultural significance. According to residents, oral histories shared by Blackfoot communities and archeological studies dating back to the 1970s say the site was used as a winter camp by Indigenous Peoples for thousands of years. 'There's a sign right on the land. It's archeologically designated. You're not even allowed to drive your vehicle across it. Now they want to basically excavate everything and put up a bunch of apartment buildings on a sacred site,' said Vern Harrison, a resident leading the campaign. Residents say the land is protected by a restrictive covenant registered in 1999 under Alberta Land Titles, requiring an archeological review before any development. Despite this, they say the municipality is pressing ahead with no consultation with Indigenous communities and limited transparency around the land sale. What's the issue? On Feb. 11, council passed first reading of the bylaw, which sought to redesignate more than eight acres of public land in Bellevue and Coleman from open space and non-urban area to high-density residential. The changes were prompted by a proposed multi-family development by Pace Industries, which planned to build apartment complexes up to three storeys high. Public opposition mounted quickly. Ahead of a March 11 public hearing, council received 38 written submissions against the proposal. Dozens of residents packed the hearing, prompting council to delay second and third readings to gather more information. On April 15, council passed the bylaw with an amendment — changing the zoning of one Bellevue parcel nearest existing homes from high-density (R3) to medium-density (R2A). While council said the change addressed community feedback, residents say their core concern — the cultural and archeological value of the land — was ignored. Development permit appeal and new bylaws Residents took their concerns to the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, which in June overturned Pace Industries' development permit, citing issues including inadequate parking. Soon after, residents say, council introduced a new measure — Bylaw 1237, 2025 — to lower parking requirements. Council's July 8 agenda explicitly states the bylaw was brought forward in response to the appeal ruling, Harrison said. According to the agenda, the development permit issued by the municipal planning commission included a 13 per cent variance in required parking — reducing the number of stalls from 126 to 110. The SDAB overturned the development permit due to reduced parking, warning of spillover into neighbourhoods. It recommended stricter rules, citing lack of public transit. But rather than tighten the rules, residents say, council introduced Bylaw 1237 to loosen them further. 'They're changing the bylaws to lower the parking requirements,' Harrison told Shootin' the Breeze. 'The reason for this bylaw is to get around the appeal. And that is the most recent example of how the council and the administration is demonstrating that they can't be trusted.' Tensions rise over heritage concerns Harrison also cited remarks from a council meeting that residents say helped trigger their letter to Premier Smith. According to minutes from council's June 24 meeting, Coun. Lisa Sygutek attended a meeting in Fort Macleod, where she raised the development issue with Smith during a conversation about red tape. 'We have a council that is pro-development, but it's getting logged up by people who are using the Indigenous Heritage section within the Cultural and Status of Women [department] to hold up development in this community,' the minutes quote Sygutek as saying. 'They lock it up.' The minutes go on to say: 'Premier Danielle Smith and Coun. Sygutek spoke on that department and how it is being weaponized to hold up development in Alberta.' 'This just makes us very angry,' Harrison said. 'That was one of the triggers for us to send this letter to Premier Smith, because we saw that this councillor was trying to basically circumvent the law, and try and influence the premier, and portray us as red tape. That's not right, not fair, and also very disrespectful.' Calls for provincial intervention The resident group's letter to Smith was also copied to Indigenous Relations Minister Rajan Sawhney, NDP shadow minister for Indigenous relations Brooks Arcand-Paul, and Arts, Culture and Status of Women Minister Tanya Fir. 'We went to the province because we don't believe we can trust council anymore on this,' Harrison said. 'We really hope that the Alberta government will do the right thing. It's an opportunity for them to demonstrate that these guys are serious about respecting our Indigenous people and their culture.' So far, he added, they have received acknowledgement from the local MLA that the issue is under review. Why not build in Coleman? Harrison said their efforts are not about stopping development altogether but protecting the right place. 'They are saying that affordable housing is an urgent matter. What we don't understand is, they have the approval in Coleman, they have no opposition in Coleman … yet they're not building there,' he said. What's next While the land has been sold, no construction has begun and Pace Industries does not currently have a valid development permit. For now, more than 80 households in Bellevue remain committed to challenging the project and protecting the land they believe should be preserved for future generations. A group called Guardians of Sacred Lands in Alberta has also joined the residents to protect the land, Harrison said. 'We think this is the unique opportunity for the province to do the right thing and protect these lands,' he said. Council's response Deputy mayor Dave Filipuzzi said council's decision reflects the community's urgent need for housing and limited developable land in Crowsnest Pass. 'We can't stop our hospitals or our long-term care facilities because we don't have places for people to stay,' he said, adding that the whole town of Bellevue is designated a 4A archeological area, requiring procedures even for building garages or gardens. Filipuzzi said the designation can be removed and the developer has started the process of hiring professionals to conduct digs and submit findings to the province for review. 'This is just a bunch of people trying to make a big deal out of something because they don't want a two- or three-storey building in their neighbourhood,' he said. 'A view is not an excuse not to develop.' He added that development is essential for community growth, schools and small businesses to survive. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Alberta's Danielle Smith says new East-West pipeline is necessary as ‘back-up plan'
Alberta's Danielle Smith says new East-West pipeline is necessary as ‘back-up plan'

Hamilton Spectator

time4 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Alberta's Danielle Smith says new East-West pipeline is necessary as ‘back-up plan'

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says a new East-West pipeline is necessary as a 'back-up plan' if Michigan follows through on its long-threatened plan to stop Enbridge Line 5 from going through the state due to concerns about spillage and environmental damage. Smith tells CBC's David Cochrane on Power and Politics than Canada needs to lessen its reliance on the United States in getting its oil and gas to market. Line 5 runs about 1,000 km from Superior, Wisconsin to Sarnia, Ontario via Michigan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store