Pueblo 2A special election: Will voters opt to leave Black Hills?
For the special election on May 6, city of Pueblo residents are weighing in on Ballot Initiative 2A — a question asking whether the city should cancel its franchise agreement and "acquire the generation, transmission and distribution assets" of Black Hills, if "determined feasible."
A similar election took place on May 5, 2020. Then, voters were asked if the city should cancel the agreement to authorize the formation and operation of a publicly-owned electric utility through the Pueblo Board of Water Works.
The 2020 question was resoundingly rejected by voters: over 75% voted against the measure. Will 2025 be any different? It's up to voters to decide.
Pueblo City Council President Mark Aliff speaks in opposition to Blacks Hills Energy rate increases on June 11, 2024.
What are the arguments for and against 2A in 2025?
Opponents of 2A have pointed to a pair of Black Hills Energy-commissioned studies conducted by the Brattle Group that conclude it is too costly for the city of Pueblo to purchase all Black Hills assets within the city and also too expensive for the city to form a regional co-op with other communities paying Black Hills' electric rates. A city-commissioned study also concluded that a city-only utility is not feasible.
Proponents of 2A have ruled out the possibility of the city purchasing assets alone, but have not ruled out the chance of garnering regional or statewide support to explore all possibilities. Those supporting 2A in 2025 are distraught by Black Hills' recent rate increase and a study demonstrating that — even before the rate increase — Black Hills customers were paying higher rates than anyone else in the state.
A 24 hour ballot drop off box outside the Colorado State Fairgrounds on Prairie Avenue.
How and where to vote on 2A in Pueblo
Ballots featuring Ballot Initiative 2A were mailed to active voters starting April 14. It's too late to return a ballot by mail, so those seeking to vote in the election must turn in their ballot at a designated drop-off location by 7 p.m. on May 6. Drop-off locations within the city of Pueblo include the following locations:
Pueblo County Election Office: 201 W. 8th St., on the east side of the building
Pueblo County Courthouse: 215 W. 10th St., on the west side of the building
Colorado State Fair: 950 S. Prairie Ave., outside gate along Prairie Avenue
Barkman Branch Library: 1300 Jerry Murphy Rd.
Lamb Branch Library: 2525 S. Pueblo Blvd., behind the building
Routt Ave MV Drive Thru: 1228 Routt Ave.
Colorado State University Pueblo: 2200 Bonforte Blvd., accessible from Gonzales Drive
Pueblo Community College: 900 W. Orman Ave., accessible from Harrison Street
Additionally, the Pueblo County Election Office will have an in-person voting location open until 7 p.m. on the seventh floor of the building, according to an official notice on the May 6 election.
Where to find live election results
When available, election results will be shared by Pueblo County at facebook.com/PuebloCounty. Because results will not be released until after the Chieftain's May 7 print deadline, coverage of the results will appear in print on May 8.
More on 2A: 'Continue the path forward': Mayor Graham discusses findings of full 2A feasibility study
Pueblo Chieftain reporter James Bartolo can be reached at JBartolo@gannett.com. Support local news, subscribe to the Pueblo Chieftain at subscribe.chieftain.com.
This article originally appeared on The Pueblo Chieftain: Pueblo special election: Get results here
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
4 days ago
- Washington Post
With federal program cuts and immigration raids, farmers fear labor shortage
Politics With cuts, farmers fear labor shortage July 24, 2025 | 7:34 PM GMT Farmers rely on seasonal workers with H-2A visas. But freezes to labor programs and immigration fears are putting some farms in financial peril. We visit two Minnesota farms to find out how these cuts, as well as the climate of fear around migrant labor, could have lasting impacts on our food industry.
CNBC
6 days ago
- CNBC
Greenhouse growers take aim at Trump's 'tomato tax' on Mexican imports
When the Trump administration announced a new 17% tariff on Mexican tomatoes, Florida-based growers celebrated the win. They'd pushed for years to end a trade agreement that they said failed to keep Mexican imports from flooding the market. But greenhouse growers, importers and industry groups in Arizona and Texas are blasting the Commerce Department's withdrawal from the agreement, warning that it could raise prices and cost U.S. jobs. "There has to be a better way of doing business than just putting duties on products that the consumers want," said NatureSweet CEO Rodolfo Spielmann, who grows greenhouse tomatoes in Arizona and Mexico. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, he's waged a sweeping trade war to promote domestic industries and specific political demands. Earlier this month, he threatened to impose a 30% tariff on Mexico for allegedly failing to dismantle drug cartels. But the tomato levy is distinct. It stems from the termination of a nearly 30-year-old trade agreement specific to Mexican tomatoes. Growers like Spielmann hoped — and still hope — the agreement would be renegotiated instead. Because NatureSweet works on both sides of the border, he says it's impossible to scale back Mexican operations without also hurting domestic ones. The footprint of NatureSweet's Arizona greenhouse could hold 30 football fields, Spielmann said. The company, whose tomatoes are primarily sold in grocery stores, planned to more than double its capacity in the United States, in response to growing demand and a desire to innovate. But it has now put that expansion on hold, he said, because of the change in trade policy. He says the new tariff will support Florida growers, who mostly plant in open fields, at the expense of everyone else, including consumers, who've grown accustomed to enjoying a wide variety of tomatoes grown in greenhouses year-round. "We understand that there's a need to protect the Florida tomato production, but also we should be protecting the total U.S. tomato production," Spielmann said. Moving more operations to the U.S. would present hurdles for NatureSweet. The climate in Mexico is better for growing tomatoes, he explained. And the partial-year H-2A visa program for farmworkers doesn't account for greenhouse operations that need employees for a full year. It would "take years and a lot of money" to transfer more greenhouses to the U.S., said Tom Stenzel, executive director of the Controlled Environment Agriculture Alliance, whose members include greenhouse tomato growers with operations in the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Economists have warned that the new tomato tax could mean price increases of up to 10%, harming both consumers and restaurants that rely on tomatoes. Industry groups that represent companies that distribute Mexican tomatoes in the U.S. say their workers are now at risk. "There is such a wide selection of tomatoes, and there's so many different factors that go into bringing all those different varieties to the store shelf," said Dante Galeazzi, CEO and president of the Texas International Produce Association, which represents warehouses handling imported produce. The White House did not respond to questions but referred NBC News to a statement Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick gave last week when he announced the end of the trade agreement. "Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices," he said. Critics say the trade agreement's safeguards didn't prevent Mexican tomatoes from being "dumped," or being sold at unfairly low prices, in the U.S., despite being renegotiated several times in an effort to help level the playing field. "People say, 'you're protectionist,'' said Tony DiMare, president of DiMare Fresh, which has operations in Florida and California. "You're darn right I am." The U.S. needs "boundaries and guidelines and trade laws to keep these countries in check," he said. The number of family farms has dwindled in recent years, according to Robert Guenther, executive vice president of the Florida Tomato Exchange, which spearheaded the original trade case against Mexican imports. Mexican tomatoes now comprise roughly 70% of the tomatoes consumed in the U.S. "We're talking about 100 years of domestic tomato supply that we don't want to see go away and this will help," he said. The Commerce Department's decision to impose anti-dumping duties is in line with tariffs imposed on other products, he said. Political leaders and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle in Texas and Arizona aren't convinced that the tomato tax will ultimately benefit the U.S. A statement from Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, cited a Texas A&M study estimating that nearly 50,000 jobs in Arizona and Texas are tied to the import of tomatoes, jobs she said are now at risk. "Donald Trump's reckless trade war is raising prices, threatening our economic growth and killing jobs," she said. In June, four Republican lawmakers in Arizona and Texas warned against abandoning the agreement in a letter to Lutnick. "This agreement has safeguarded American jobs, stabilized markets, and driven agricultural innovation without burdensome government interference," they wrote. The Republican-dominated Legislature in Texas passed a resolution opposing the Trump administration's withdrawal from the agreement. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a staunch Trump ally, signed it last month.
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Yahoo
Pueblo city councilors are set for their first raise since 1998. Here's how much
The salary of Pueblo City councilors is set to double in 2026 following a 4-3 vote on July 14. Council voted to increase the monthly salary for most members from $700 — a rate approved on March 24, 1997 — to $1,400. The pay for Pueblo City Council president was approved to increase from $900 to $1,800 per month. Just as the 1997 increase took effect the following year, Pueblo City Council's recently approved raise will take effect on Jan. 1, 2026. The ordinance establishing council pay increases cites "inflationary factors," with $700 in 1997 being equal to $1,405.40 in 2025, according to the Federal Reserve Bank. Supporters of the pay increase included Councilors Dennis Flores, Roger Gomez, Joe Latino and Sarah Martinez. Pueblo City Council President Mark Aliff and Councilors Brett Boston and Regina Maestri voted against the ordinance. Flores argued that pay increases outlined in the ordinance would not only align council pay with inflation but also encourage younger candidates to run for public office. He also noted that sitting council members would not benefit from the pay increase unless reelected. "I think it's time that we just make an adjustment for inflation," Flores said. "There isn't a negotiated salary within the city that doesn't have a cost of living factor in all of our agreements. I just think that this is the time to do this." While Flores' at-large seat is up for election in 2025, he is unable to run for reelection due to term limits. Brett Boston, council's youngest member, is also the only sitting council member who's filed to run for reelection this November. However, Boston argued that a raise for councilors would not be fiscally responsible. "Do I think that council is underpaid? Yes," Boston said. "Do I think they deserve a raise? Sure. But I don't support this. This council constantly preaches fiscal responsibility. Certain council members say 'You don't got it, you don't give it.' That's just my opinion." Despite the pay rates for Pueblo City Council doubling in 2026, wages will remain below the Colorado minimums for tipped and non-tipped employees working full-time jobs. However, Pueblo City Council pay rates will exceed rates in the comparably sized city of Greeley. Members of Greeley City Council earn $12,600 per year, according to a presentation by Pueblo Deputy City Attorney Harley Gifford. Martinez argued that pay increases are necessary to make serving on council accessible to a diverse field of candidates, while also stating that increases should not come "at the expense" of other city employees. "I don't think that we can justify raising our own pay while also talking about laying off the very employees to keep this city running every single day," she said. "If we do end up in a position where layoffs are necessary, I believe that we have a duty to come back to this if it passes and reevaluate." Pueblo City Council District 1 candidate Elvis Martinez spoke against the ordinance during a public hearing before the vote. "It makes absolutely no sense," he said. "I know, and all of us know, that council shouldn't be getting paid double... I could bet $1 that council wouldn't double the work that they do." Pueblo D60 elections: Pueblo lawyer and professor announces Pueblo D60 school board run Pueblo Chieftain reporter James Bartolo can be reached at JBartolo@ Support local news, subscribe to the Pueblo Chieftain at This article originally appeared on The Pueblo Chieftain: Pueblo City Council approves first pay increase since 1998 Solve the daily Crossword
