Tesla's finance chief says Americans should buy its cars now — Trump's Big Beautiful Bill could affect later deliveries
On Wednesday's earnings call, Tesla's chief financial officer, Vaibhav Taneja, said that President Donald Trump's tax law could affect the availability of its cars. One of the law's changes is the removal of the $7,500 EV credit by the end of the quarter.
"Given the abrupt change, we have limited supply of vehicles in the US this quarter," Taneja said. "If you are in the US and looking to buy a car, place your order now as we may not be able to guarantee delivery orders placed in the later part of August and beyond."
Earlier this month, the House passed the final version of the bill, which extends the president's 2017 tax cuts and makes key changes to the tax system. The law also ends the $7,500 EV tax credit awarded to buyers on September 30, which analysts saw as a win for smaller rivals such as Lucid and Rivian, who are less dependent on the credit.
The Tesla CFO said that the company would start "paring" back planned incentives as cars start to sell.
After the tax law was passed, Tesla began offering perks such as free supercharging on select models, a one-month free trial of Full Self‑Driving, and a $1,000 discount for "American heroes" like military members, teachers, and first responders.
Tesla said it delivered over 384,000 vehicles in the quarter that ended in June.
On the call, CEO Elon Musk said Tesla is in a "weird transition period" as it navigates the expiration of incentives and the wider regulatory environment for autonomous vehicles.
The Trump administration's tariffs are also raising costs for the automaker, the CFO said.
"While we are doing our best to manage these impacts, we are in an unpredictable environment on the tariff front," Taneja said. He estimated that the cost of the tariffs increased by around $300 million this quarter.
On Wednesday, the EV giant reported second-quarter revenue of $22.5 billion, compared to expectations of $22.64 billion — its sharpest quarterly revenue decline in at least the last 10 years.
It reported earnings per share, a key measure of profitability, were 40 cents, compared to Wall Street's estimates of 42 cents.
Tesla's stock fell over 4% after hours on Wednesday. It is down 17.6% so far this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of canceling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was canceled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Samsung stock rises on Tesla partnership after $16.5 billion AI chip deal
Shares in Samsung Electronics eked out small gains on Tuesday, following a sharp rally the previous day after the South Korean technology company clinched a $16.5 billion deal to supply artificial intelligence chips to Tesla TSLA.O. Analysts said the agreement could bolster the company's unprofitable contract manufacturing business, but Samsung faces challenges in securing additional large customers both for logic chips and memory chips where it struggles against TSMC and SK Hynix "This new deal breathes some much-needed life into the business and may signal the start of a turning point for Samsung, but its memory business will need to make considerable progress too," Ben Barringer, global technology analyst at Quilter Cheviot, said. Samsung Electronics, the world's top memory chip maker, has suffered delays in supplying the latest high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips to key U.S. customer Nvidia NVDA.O, a setback that has dented its profits and weighed on its stock. In its "foundry" or contract manufacturing business, where it manufactures logic chips designed by customers, Samsung remains a distant second to market leader TSMC. "Whether this will open the door for additional large customers will depend heavily on its execution," Barringer said. Shares of Samsung recovered from early losses to close 0.3% higher on Tuesday, lagging the broader market's .KS11 0.7% gain. The shares were down more than 2% earlier in the session after surging nearly 7% on Monday, following the Tesla deal. Meanwhile, Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee departed for Washington on Tuesday. A Yonhap News Agency report said he was expected to support trade talks between South Korea and the U.S. but a company spokesperson, when contacted by Reuters, described it as "business trip", with no further details. While South Korea has been promoting partnerships in chips and shipbuilding with the U.S., a trade official said the Tesla deal was unrelated to ongoing trade talks aimed at reducing U.S. tariffs. Analysts, however, said the deal could enhance prospects for Samsung's investments in its Texas-based new chip factory. Eating at the Tesla Diner: Now serving EVs, burgers and fries. What the Tesla Diner could mean for drivers Favorable terms Tesla CEO Elon Musk said late on Sunday that Samsung's new chip factory in Taylor, Texas, would make the auto company's next-generation AI6 chips, likely to be used in self-driving cars, humanoid robots and data centers, without elaborating on the timing of the production. The deal comes as Samsung has struggled to win major customers for its new Texas factory, partly due to low production yields of its cutting-edge chips. "There also has to be a chance that the company was able to strike the long-term deal on favourable terms, given that Samsung needed to prove its contract manufacturing capabilities," said Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell. The long-term supply deal for a key technology from a U.S. factory would "lessen the risk of supply-chain dislocations or tariff friction," he said. "Samsung now needs to prove it can deliver in the right volume to the right quality for what is likely to be a demanding customer." While the deal is "more about securing the longer-term future, we won't see these in cars for at least a year or two," said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in Seoul and Zaheer Kachwala in Bengaluru, Additional reporting by Heekyong Yang and Jihoon Lee in Seoul; Editing by Ed Davies and Jacqueline Wong
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration considers additional hurdles for wind energy
The Trump administration will consider putting up further hurdles for the development of wind energy onshore and offshore, it announced late Tuesday afternoon. In a press release, it said that it would undertake a review to consider 'whether to stop onshore wind development on some federal lands and halting future offshore wind lease sales.' In addition, the Interior Department will review bird deaths associated with wind energy. The Trump administration has weakened protections on migratory birds when they're killed by companies generally. The wind move comes after Trump again railed against wind energy while visiting Europe over the weekend. 'These policy changes represent a commonsense approach to energy that puts Americans' interests first,' said Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in a written statement. They follow a series of other actions taken by the Trump administration to hamper wind energy development as the president has repeatedly made clear his distaste for wind power. The Interior Department recently said it will also put solar and wind projects through an elevated review process that is expected to significantly slow down their approval. One of the first moves of Trump's presidency was also a pause on federal wind approvals. While the last Trump administration pledged to support an 'all of the above' energy strategy, this time around the administration has made clear that it favors fossil fuels and other energy sources like nuclear while it tries to hold up solar and wind energy development.
