logo
Health Effects of Daylight Saving: Risks Outweigh Benefits

Health Effects of Daylight Saving: Risks Outweigh Benefits

Health Line13 hours ago
Daylight Saving Time (DST) is often associated with extended daylight hours, but its health effects are more complex than they may seem. While some argue that DST encourages outdoor activity and boosts mood due to the 'extra' hour of evening daylight, research indicates that the health risks may outweigh the minimal benefits.
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) has expressed concerns about the adverse effects of DST on public health. The AASM recommends eliminating seasonal time changes in favor of a fixed, national, year-round standard time, as current evidence best supports this approach for public health and safety.
The Mayo Clinic conducted a nationwide study examining the effects of DST on heart health. Researchers found that the impact of DST on heart health is likely minimal, suggesting that concerns about heart health should not be a primary factor in decisions regarding DST.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WHO pushes for 50% price rise through taxes on sugar, alcohol and tobacco
WHO pushes for 50% price rise through taxes on sugar, alcohol and tobacco

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WHO pushes for 50% price rise through taxes on sugar, alcohol and tobacco

By Jennifer Rigby LONDON (Reuters) -The World Health Organization is pushing countries to raise the prices of sugary drinks, alcohol and tobacco by 50% over the next 10 years through taxation, its strongest backing yet for so-called "sin taxes" to help tackle chronic public health problems and boost government health budgets. The United Nations health agency said the move would help cut consumption of the products, which contribute to diseases like diabetes and some cancers, as well as raising money at a time when development aid is shrinking and public debt rising. "Health taxes are one of the most efficient tools we have," said Jeremy Farrar, WHO assistant-director general of health promotion and disease prevention and control. "It's time to act." The WHO launched the push, which it is called "3 by 35" at the UN Finance for Development conference in Seville. WHO said that its tax initiative could raise $1 trillion by 2035 based on evidence from health taxes in countries such as Colombia and South Africa. The WHO has backed tobacco taxes and price rises for decades, and has called for taxes on alcohol and sugary drinks in recent years, but this is the first time it has suggested a target price rise for all three products. WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the conference that the taxes could help governments "adjust to the new reality" and bolster their own health systems with the money raised. As an example, it would mean a government in a middle-income country raising taxes on the product to push the price up from $4 today to $10 by 2035, taking into account inflation, said WHO health economist Guillermo Sandoval. Nearly 140 countries had already raised tobacco taxes and therefore prices by over 50% on average between 2012 and 2022, the WHO added. Sandoval said the WHO was also considering broader taxation recommendations, including on ultra-processed food, after the agency finalises its definition of that type of food in the coming months. But he added that the agency expected pushback from the industries involved. The initiative is also backed by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and involves support for countries who want to take action. Sign in to access your portfolio

Beach bacteria warnings plague Fourth of July weekend plans nationwide
Beach bacteria warnings plague Fourth of July weekend plans nationwide

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Beach bacteria warnings plague Fourth of July weekend plans nationwide

Americans heading to the beach for Independence Day weekend may want to check if the waters are OK for swimming or wading. Warnings of high bacteria levels from public health officials have begun popping up in various states coast to coast. Vibrio is a bacterium that naturally lives in coastal waters, causing fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and cramps, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). On the West Coast, California officials in San Diego issued many warnings and closures of popular beaches, noting that some "bacteria levels exceed health standards." Two counties in Long Island, New York, have issued similar advisories. Suffolk County health officials posted, "Benjamin Beach in Bay Shore, Ronkonkoma Beach in the Town of Islip, and Sayville Marina Park Beach in Sayville are closed to bathing due to the finding of bacteria at levels in excess of acceptable criteria." The beaches will reopen when further testing reveals bacteria levels have dropped to acceptable levels, said the press release. Three Nassau County beaches — Hewlett Point, Island Park, and Phillip Healey Beach — are under advisory after heavy rainfall, according to the Nassau County Department of Health (NCDOH). Beaches will reopen when further testing reveals bacteria levels have dropped to acceptable levels. "Stormwater runoff may have impacted water quality at 3 South Shore beaches. As a precaution, NCDOH is advising against swimming at these locations. Stormwater runoff can raise bacteria levels, possibly exceeding NYS standards for safe bathing," said an NCDOH press release. In Massachusetts, nearly 20 beaches were closed as of Wednesday morning. Seventeen beaches are listed on the Massachusetts Department of Health "Beaches Dashboard," due to bacteria levels. Washington state lists advisories to "stay out of the water" at seven beaches with "high bacteria" in King County, according to its website. The Prairie State lists 34 advisories on their Illinois government website. There are 80,000 cases of the infection reported each year, according to the CDC. Michigan has nine beaches closed due to high bacteria levels from "wildlife" and "storm water runoff." Four beaches in the Great Lake State also have contamination advisories.

With RFK Jr. in Charge, Insurers Aren't Saying If They'll Cover Vaccines for Kids If Government Stops Recommending Them
With RFK Jr. in Charge, Insurers Aren't Saying If They'll Cover Vaccines for Kids If Government Stops Recommending Them

WIRED

time2 hours ago

  • WIRED

With RFK Jr. in Charge, Insurers Aren't Saying If They'll Cover Vaccines for Kids If Government Stops Recommending Them

Jul 2, 2025 10:25 AM RFK Jr.'s vaccine advisory board could stop recommending some routine childhood immunizations, leaving insurers to decide whether to still cover them. For now, most are remaining tight-lipped. Photograph:In the wake of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) announcing plans to revisit its recommended schedule for childhood vaccinations—a move that has drawn widespread criticism from experts—major insurers have not confirmed whether they'll continue to cover the full cost of routine shots for children. For 60 years ACIP has provided vaccine guidance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including on the timing and dosage of childhood immunizations. Insurers are required to cover the cost of most jabs on the recommended schedule for children. On Wednesday June 25, ACIP announced it would review the schedule, just weeks after health secretary and longtime anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced the entire committee with his own appointees. When WIRED then asked 21 of the country's largest health insurance groups whether they would stop providing cost-free coverage of current routine immunizations in the event ACIP stops recommending them, only Blue Shield of California—a company in the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association—confirmed it would. 'As a payer our role is to ensure ongoing coverage and access to preventive, evidence-based care, including immunizations,' says company spokesperson Mark Seelig. 'Therefore, Blue Shield of California is committed to maintaining coverage of immunizations. The decision on whether to receive a vaccine is between our member and their provider.' Other large insurers, including UnitedHealthcare (which provides coverage for 50 million people), Cigna, Kaiser Permanente, Anthem, Humana, and Centene Corporation, did not respond to requests for comment. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan said it had no comment. Most insurers that did respond said they were keeping an eye on developments in Washington, without indicating whether they would or would not cover vaccines dropped from the recommended schedule. 'Vaccines play an important role in the prevention of more serious illnesses,' says Phil Blando, a spokesperson at CVS Health, which owns the insurer Aetna. 'We are monitoring any changes the federal government makes to vaccination guidance and eligibility and will evaluate whether coverage adjustments are needed.' Highmark Inc., part of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, operating in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, and New York, is also waiting to see what decision ACIP reaches. 'We are closely monitoring the evolving vaccine discussions occurring in Washington, DC. Various vaccines and immunizations are covered under Highmark's member benefits, with any future coverage considerations to be evaluated as more information becomes available,' says spokesperson Aaron Billger. Bryan Campen, of Health Care Service Corporation—the licensee of Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in Illinois, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas—notes that no changes have yet been made to the vaccines ACIP recommends or the company's vaccine coverage, but says that the company will 'continue to monitor any activity that may impact preventive care recommendations and will communicate any changes to recommendations that may impact standard coverage of preventive services.' Insurers had an eye on changes in ACIP guidance even before the committee announced it would revisit the schedule. 'As we navigate an evolving health care landscape, maintaining robust immunization coverage continues to be a top priority for protecting both individual and community health,' the industry's trade association, AHIP, said in a June 24 statement, the day before ACIP's announcement. 'We are committed to ongoing coverage of vaccines to ensure access and affordability for this respiratory virus season,' the statement continued. 'We encourage all Americans to talk to their health care provider about vaccines.' ACIP made headlines in early June when RFK Jr. fired all 17 of its members and replaced them with eight new appointees. (The HHS secretary appoints the committee's members, but conventionally they serve fixed 4-year terms.) These new appointees include Retsef Levi, who has stated—in the face of scientific consensus—that mRNA vaccines are deadly, and Robert Malone, who routinely shares articles about supposed links between cancer and the Covid vaccine, which no credible research has found to exist. Neither Levi nor Malone replied to a request for comment. Michael A. Ross, another recently appointed committee member, resigned from ACIP during a review of his financial holdings, the New York Times reported on June 24. When introducing his new ACIP appointees in a post on X earlier in June, RFK Jr. had described Ross as a faculty member at George Washington and Virginia Commonwealth universities—but spokespeople for the universities told NBC News4 that Ross had not taught at either in years. Ross did not reply to a request for comment. The committee made news again on June 25 when, during its first meeting of the year, it announced it would form a working group to review the recommended immunization schedule for children and teens. 'The number of vaccines that our children and adolescents receive today exceed what children in most other developed nations receive, and what most of us in this room received when we [were] children,' ACIP chair Martin Kulldorff said during the meeting. He noted that the group would examine the 'cumulative effect' of the recommended vaccine schedule, including interactions between vaccines, the total number of vaccines given, their timing, and recipients' exposure to vaccine ingredients. But the process for adding vaccines to the schedule is already rigorous. Before a vaccine can receive FDA licensure, its manufacturer must prove it does not negatively affect the safety or immune response of other vaccines administered at the same time on the schedule, says Paul Offit, director of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's Vaccine Education Center. In addition, 'the notion that these vaccines are somehow weakening your immune system or overwhelming your immune system is fanciful,' Offit says. Today, children are exposed to fewer viral or bacterial proteins in the first few years of the vaccine schedule than those in earlier generations. When Offit's parents received the smallpox vaccine, they were exposed to 200 proteins in a single shot. In contrast, the measles vaccine only contains 10. During the meeting, Kulldorff repeated claims he made in 2024 that he was fired from Harvard because he refused to get the Covid vaccine; he and Malone have also each served as paid expert witnesses in two separate suits against Merck over the safety of the company's HPV vaccine and its mumps vaccine, respectively. Kulldorff did not reply to a request for comment. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) did not send representatives to last week's ACIP meeting, as it typically does. According to Academy president Susan Kressly, this was because the AAP believes the vaccine recommendation process lost credibility when its original membership was gutted by Kennedy. 'We won't lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children's health,' Kressly said in a video posted online before the meeting was set to begin. The AAP did not reply to a request for comment about the video. The most recent child immunization schedule that the AAP endorses, from November 2024, is posted on the AAP website. A newer one, posted on the CDC site, has already changed recommendations. It no longer lists as 'routine' Covid vaccines for children under 18 who are not immunocompromised, but instead lists them under vaccines recommended for 'shared clinical decision-making,' informed by 'personal preference and circumstances.' The change should not affect insurance coverage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store