
More than a million Muslims in Germany with a 'migrant background' are at risk of being radicalised, study finds
Experts at the University of Münster's Research Centre for Islamic Theology last week shared the results of a survey it conducted to gauge socio-political views of Muslims with a 'migration background' across the country.
Their study found that 19.9% of almost 1,900 respondents in the representative survey exhibited an emotional state that is ripe for radicalisation, based on strong anti-Western, anti-Semitic attitudes and a 'resentment' of German politics and societal norms, German media reported.
'Migration background' is a term used in Germany to refer to first-generation migrants and their offspring.
There are more than 5.5 million Muslims in Germany with such a background, suggesting that one million people could be susceptible to being radicalised, according to Die Welt.
Of the nearly 20% of respondents that researchers claimed could be targets for radicalisation, a third reportedly support violence in response to perceived injustices against Muslims.
A majority of these respondents also said they felt that Islamic Sharia law was far superior to German law and want Islam to be the 'sole and final political authority' in Germany, according to media reports.
Speaking to German outlet NOZ, Münster-based religious psychologist Sarah Demmrich said: 'With the emotional state of resentment, we were able to uncover a new and even strong factor in radicalisation.
'The capacity for criticism within Islam must be strengthened in order to promote reflective debates on religious and social issues,' she said.
MailOnline has contacted the research centre for comment.
The emergence of the research by the Centre for Islamic Theology comes weeks after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz scrapped his nation's open border policy and issued orders to turn undocumented migrants away at the frontiers.
Alexander Dobrindt, Merz's new interior minister, rescinded former Chancellor Angela Merkel's 2015 order, which had previously allowed hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers to enter Germany.
The new rules will now see everyone without proper documentation, apart from children and pregnant women, turned away if they try to enter Germany from a neighbouring country.
Merz also moved to initiate a process to allow for the deportation of Syrian migrants following the overthrow of former President Bashar al-Assad's regime late last year.
The Chancellor, who made the order on his first day in office early May, pledged during the election to crack down on migration.
To implement the new measures, Dobrint ordered a massive increase in border force personnel, with local media reporting that a further 3,000 cops are being brought in for a total of 14,000 border guards.
'It's clear that we want to take stronger steps against illegal immigration and the result must be that we deploy a bigger police presence at the borders for that. The numbers remain significantly too high,' Dobrint said.
Merz defended the policy, saying: 'The European Union must send a signal to those who are setting off for Europe without valid entry permits.
'Above all, we need to send a signal to the smuggling organisations that these routes will become much more difficult in the future - and that at some point, they will be closed altogether. That is the right and strong common signal.'
Suspected illegal migrants sit on the ground after they were detained by German police during their patrol along the German-Polish border to prevent illegal migration
Merz last month succeeded his predecessor, Olaf Scholz, whose government collapsed six months ago.
Scholz, too, had been under pressure to curb migration as shelters across the country had been filling up for years.
His government tried to speed up asylum procedures and also negotiated agreements for countries to take unsuccessful asylum seekers back in exchange for more opportunities for legal immigration.
In February, Scholz extended strict border controls brought in to tackle migration and Islamist terrorism by a further six months past their planned expiry in March.
According to the EU, member states are allowed to temporarily reintroduce border controls in cases of a serious threat, such as internal security.
But the regulations stipulate that border controls should be time-limited and applied as a last resort in exceptional situations.
Recent attacks on German soil refocused attention on security and immigration ahead of the election earlier this year.
In December, the country was rocked by an attack in Bavaria, when an Afghan asylum seeker allegedly stabbed a two-year-old boy and a passerby to death in a German park.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ukrainian drone attack sparks blaze at oil refinery in Russia
An overnight Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire at an oil refinery in Sochi, Russia. Footage recorded on Sunday (3 August) shows smoke rising from the depot following the explosion, which Moscow has said was caused after debris from a downed drone struck a fuel tank. More than 120 firefighters were sent to extinguish the blaze, whilst flights were temporarily grounded at Sochi's airport. Mayor Andrei Proshunin later announced that 'the situation is totally under control' and confirmed that there were no victims.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on an EU army: leadership and unity remain elusive
The Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, called for the creation of a European army earlier this year, suggesting that, this time, the continent might finally be serious. Defence budgets are rising. Threats are mounting. The US is distracted. Surely now is the moment. Except, of course, it isn't. For all the political soundbites that rattle sabres with increasing confidence, Europe is probably no closer to fielding a unified military force than it was when the French rejected the European Defence Community in 1954. The problem is not one of capacity. Europe, including the UK, collectively boasts about 1.5m active military personnel, and some of the world's most successful defence firms. The problem, as ever, is politics. Or more precisely: who leads? Germany, claiming a Zeitenwende (turning point), and asking the EU to exempt military investment from budget rules, might be the frontrunner. Poland is spending more as a share of GDP than anyone. The French would like to think they would be at the front of any queue. But their Gaullist, unilateral instincts run deep. Italy has industrial knowhow but lacks the economic heft. Post-Brexit, the UK is building bridges with the EU's military powers but it still sees itself as Nato's keystone. And the Baltic states? They want no European project that might scare off Washington. Even defining a European army is difficult. Would it be a single force under the EU flag, combining the 27 national armed forces of the EU members into one common force? Or something looser, to keep Irish and Austrian neutrality intact? Could it be a smaller European intervention force? Or a joint effort by regional groupings in a new hat? The short answer is no one can agree on anything but disagreement. Squabbling might not be the best response to an increasingly assertive, hawkish and unpredictable Russian giant. Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine made territorial defence a pressing concern. Suddenly, Europe remembered why armies exist. Brussels pins its hopes of an industrial renaissance on a five-year rearmament plan that is meant to reduce reliance on US contractors. European firms like Rheinmetall and MBDA are scaling up, but the economies of scale found in the US military industrial complex elude the continent. Everyone wants to protect their local champion. No wonder the bloc has appointed a commissioner for defence whose role is about overseeing the companies making drones, shells and missiles – not the armed forces per se. A Gallup poll in 45 countries last year showed deep ambivalence toward war among Europeans. Four of the five least willing to fight were in the EU – including Spain, Germany, and Italy, where only 14% said they'd take up arms. Even in frontline states like Poland and Lithuania, fewer than half were willing to fight. This pacifist mood reflects an EU integration designed to make war between member states unthinkable. The irony is that the European army is seen as a symbol of independence from the US – while quietly relying on American satellites, command structures and munitions. Many European countries have upped defence spending, but they are not ready to go it alone. An integrated force would demand pooled sovereignty, unified command and a level of political consensus that don't currently exist. That may change. But for now, Europe continues to depend on Washington's capricious leadership – even as it dreams of 'strategic autonomy'.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Thomas Partey on verge of joining Villarreal despite rape charges
Thomas Partey, who is due in court this week to face rape charges, is close to signing for Villarreal. The Spanish club hope to announce a deal, believed to be for one year with the option of a further 12 months, in the next few days. Villarreal will face Partey 's former club Arsenal in a friendly at the Emirates this week. Partey has already passed a medical at the La Liga side with terms being agreed. The 32-year-old is due in court on Tuesday, the day before Arsenal host Villarreal, after being charged with five counts of rape and one count of sexual assault. Partey was charged on July 4, four days after his contract with Arsenal expired, although the alleged offences took place while he was playing for them. The Ghana international had been the subject of an investigation that started in February 2022 after police first received a report of rape. He will make an initial appearance at Westminster Magistrates Court and denies the charges against him, which relate to three women who reported incidents between 2021 and 2022. Arsenal were in talks to extend the midfielder's career at the club, having joined in 2020 from Atletico Madrid for €50m (£45.4m). Partey went on to make 167 appearances for Arsenal with manager Mikel Arteta suggesting they offered him a new contract because he is a 'really important player for us'. However, no agreement could be reached and Partey left as a free agent, allowing him to join another club without a fee being paid. During Arsenal's recent tour to the Far East and following Partey being charged, Arteta said he was '100 per cent' comfortable with the way that the club handled the case. On the day the charges were announced, they released a statement which noted Partey's contract with them had ended and that, because of 'ongoing legal proceedings', they were 'unable to comment on the case'. Speaking publicly about the matter for the first time, Arteta said on Monday: 'I think the club was very clear in its statement. There are a lot of legal matters that are very complicated so I cannot comment on any of that.' It was then put to him: 'A lot of fans have questions over the way in which the matter was handled by the club. Do you feel confident and comfortable that the club followed all the right processes in that?' Arteta answered: '100 per cent, yes.' Villarreal, who played Leeds United last Saturday as they prepare for the new season with a tour of England, have qualified for the Champions League which has clearly been a factor in Partey agreeing to join them who also wanted to return to Spanish football.