BRICS nations voice 'serious concerns' over Trump tariffs
Emerging nations, which represent about half the world's population and 40% of global economic output, are set to unite over "serious concerns" about U.S. import tariffs, according to a draft summit statement.
Since coming to office in January, Trump has threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive duties.
His latest salvo comes in the form of letters informing trading partners of new tariff rates that will soon enter into force.
The draft summit declaration does not mention the United States or its president by name.
But it is a clear political shot directed at Washington from 11 emerging nations, including BRICS stalwarts Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
"We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO (World Trade Organization) rules," the draft text says.
It warns that such measures "threaten to further reduce global trade" and are "affecting the prospects for global economic development."
Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power.
But the two-day summit's political punch will be depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president.
"I expect there will be speculation about the reasons for Xi's absence," said Ryan Hass, a former China director at the U.S. National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank.
"The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing," said Hass.
The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay away, but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin.
Hass said Putin's non-attendance and the fact that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be a guest of honor in Brazil could also be factors in Xi's absence.
"Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi," who will receive a state lunch, he said.
"I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors."
Still, the Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage.
In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G20 summit, a BRICS summit, and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections next year, in which he is expected to run.
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel, is also skipping the meeting.
A source familiar with the negotiations said the BRICS countries were divided over how to respond to the wars in Gaza and between Iran and Israel.
Iranian negotiators were pushing for a tougher collective stance that goes beyond referencing the need for the creation of a Palestinian state and for disputes to be resolved peacefully.
But one diplomatic source said the text would give the "same message" that BRICS delivered in June when Iran was being bombed by Israel and the United States, expressing "concern."
Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit.
Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, by Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan to export used destroyers to Philippines to deter China: report
Japan will export used navy destroyers to the Philippines to strengthen its deterrence against China's maritime expansion, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Sunday, as the two U.S. allies increase cooperation to counter Beijing. The export plan involves six Abukuma-class destroyer escorts in service with the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force for more than three decades, the Japanese daily said, citing multiple unnamed government sources. Defense ministers Gen Nakatani and Gilberto Teodoro agreed to the destroyer export when they met in Singapore last month, the Yomiuri said, adding that the Philippine military will inspect the ships this summer as part of the final preparations. A delegation of naval experts from the Philippines will conduct an in-depth assessment of the ships, the Philippine Navy said in a statement on Sunday, following an official invitation from Japan's defense ministry. "The outcome of this inspection will guide further deliberations on the potential acquisition and its alignment with the Philippine Navy's modernization efforts," it said, adding that the initiative reflects the deepening strategic partnership between the Philippines and Japan. A Japanese defense ministry spokesperson declined to comment on the report and China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Tokyo and Manila say they face challenges from Beijing's increasingly assertive moves in waters including the South China Sea for the Philippines and the East China Sea for Japan. Bilateral military cooperation has included joint exercises, a Japanese radar aid package and a high-level strategic dialogue. Last year they signed a reciprocal access agreement, the first such for Japan in Asia, allowing deployment of forces on each other's soil. To clear military equipment export restrictions for the destroyers under Japan's pacifist mandates, Tokyo will treat the installation of equipment and communication systems requested by Manila as a joint development project, the Yomiuri said. The Abukuma-class destroyer escort, a relatively small type of destroyer with a 2,000-ton standard displacement, is operated by a crew of about 120 and is armed with anti-submarine and anti-ship missiles, torpedo tubes and guns, according to a Japanese navy website. The Philippine Navy does not have destroyers, only frigates and corvettes, which are typically smaller and lighter armed.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
China retaliates to EU ban with import restrictions on medical devices
China's finance ministry said on Sunday it was restricting government purchases of medical devices from the European Union that exceed 45 million Chinese yuan ($6.3 million) in value, in retaliation to Brussels' own curbs last month. Tensions between Beijing and Brussels have been rising, with the European Union imposing tariffs on China-built electric vehicles and Beijing slapping duties on imported brandy from the bloc. The European Union said last month it was barring Chinese companies from participating in EU public tenders for medical devices worth €60 billion ($70 billion) or more per year after concluding that EU firms were not given fair access in China. The measure announced by the European Commission was the first under the EU's International Procurement Instrument, which entered into force in 2022 and is designed to ensure reciprocal market access. China's countermeasures were expected after its commerce ministry flagged "necessary steps" against the EU move late last month. "Regrettably, despite China's goodwill and sincerity, the EU has insisted on going its own way, taking restrictive measures and building new protectionist barriers," the commerce ministry said in a separate statement on Sunday. "Therefore, China has no choice but to adopt reciprocal restrictive measures." The EU delegation office in Beijing did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China will also restrict imports of medical devices from other countries that contain EU-made components worth more than 50% of the contract value, the finance ministry said. The measures come into force on Sunday. The commerce ministry said products from European companies in China were not affected. The world's second— and third-largest economies are due to hold a leaders' summit in China later in July. On Friday, China also announced duties of up to 34.9% for five years on brandy originating in the European Union, most of it cognac from France, after concluding an investigation largely believed to be a response to Europe's EV tariffs. Major cognac producers Pernod Ricard, LVMH and Remy Cointreau were spared from the levies, however, provided they sell at a minimum price, which China has not disclosed.
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
China's housing crisis is worse than it seems
China's economy today bears an unsettling resemblance to Japan's in the 1990s, when the collapse of a housing bubble led to prolonged stagnation. But Japan's 'lost decades' were not the inevitable result of irreversible trends; they reflected policy blunders, rooted in a flawed understanding of the challenges the economy faced. Will Chinese policymakers make the same mistakes? Japan's housing bubble was preceded by sharply rising ratios of home prices to annual income, with Tokyo's surging from eight in 1985 to 18 in 1990. This trend was driven by a number of factors, including Japan's land-tax policy, financial deregulation and poor coordination of fiscal and monetary policy. But demand from first-time homebuyers — aged 39-43, on average — also made a substantial contribution. Because homeowners felt wealthier, they consumed more. This drove up the prices of goods, services and stocks, leading to more jobs and less unemployment. But demand for new housing soon began to fall, and demographic shifts were a key factor. In 1991, as the share of Japan's population aged 65 and older reached 13%, the number of first-time homebuyers began to decline. Property values plummeted, the stock market collapsed and Japan fell into a deflationary trap, characterized by falling fertility and rising unemployment. A misdiagnosis of the problem made matters much worse: What was actually a chronic demographic disease was treated as an acute illness. Policymakers believed that Japan was grappling with yen appreciation as a result of the 1985 Plaza Accord, under which the world's major economies agreed to devalue the dollar. So, to stem the currency's rise, they printed money, lowered interest rates, increased the government deficit and engaged in quantitative easing. These policies, together with the rebound in the number of new homebuyers that began in 2001, caused home prices to start rising again — and exacerbated the underlying disease. As starting a family became more expensive, young people delayed marriage and had fewer children. The government tried to boost birth rates with interventions like increased child allowances and improved child care services, but it achieved only limited success: The fertility rate rose from 1.26 births per woman in 2005 to a mere 1.45 a decade later. At that point, then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe set the goal of lifting the fertility rate to 1.8. But the relevant measures — which sought, for example, to make it easier for women to return to work after giving birth — could not offset the effects of the accommodative monetary policies that were viewed as vital to combat deflation and stimulate economic growth. Home prices continued to soar, marriages declined further and births plummeted. Last year, Japan's fertility rate amounted to just 1.15 births per woman. In the past, Japan welcomed low interest rates and a weak yen, because its economy was highly dependent on exports. But the aging and shrinking of its labor force have generated upward pressure on wages, fueling domestic inflation, weakening manufacturing and transforming Japan from a surplus country into a deficit country, thereby making it vulnerable to imported inflation. So, Japan has escaped its deflationary trap only to become ensnared in a long-term inflationary trap, which, by reducing purchasing power and parenting capacity, will reduce fertility further. By fueling a demographic collapse, Japan's approach to ending its 'lost decades' has set the stage for 'lost centuries.' This should serve as a cautionary tale for China, which is confronting real-estate and demographic crises of its own. In recent decades, rapid urbanization, policy-induced artificial land scarcity, the dependence of local governments on land sales for revenue and heady expectations of future growth caused real-estate prices to soar. Strong demand from first-time homebuyers also helped: Since young Chinese typically have no siblings, owing to decades of fertility restrictions, they tend to purchase their first home about 11 years earlier than their Japanese counterparts. But the number of Chinese urban dwellers aged 28 to 32 peaked in 2019 — and the real-estate bubble burst shortly thereafter. Now, the real-estate sector — which, at its 2020-2021 peak, contributed 25% of total gross domestic product and 38% of government revenue — is blighted by weak demand, falling construction and severe overcapacity. Declining prices have decimated household wealth, with losses equivalent to China's annual economic output. This has undermined consumption, employment, borrowing and investment. The crisis that is brewing in China is more severe than the one Japan faced. For starters, China's housing bubble is much larger. For example, residential investment, as a share of GDP, was about 1.5 times higher in China in 2020 than in Japan in 1990. Property accounted for about 70% of Chinese households' total assets in 2020, compared to around 50% in Japan in 1990. China's price-to-income ratio today is more than twice that of Japan in 1990. Moreover, China's fertility rate is lower. Whereas Japan experienced a second surge of first-time homebuyers a decade after the first, China can look forward to no such thing. The share of the population over the age of 65 is increasing much faster in China than it did in Japan: It took Japan 28 years to get where China will get between now and 2040. During that period (1997-2025), Japanese GDP growth averaged just 0.6% annually. Finally, China faces much greater deflationary and unemployment pressures than Japan did. Chinese household consumption accounted for only 38% of GDP in 2020, compared to 50% in Japan in 1990. But perhaps the most ominous portent is that China's government continues to tout a potential growth rate of 5%, with some prominent figures suggesting that it could achieve rates as high as 8%. To get there, policymakers are pursuing measures with high short-term returns — such as expanding the supply of affordable housing and carrying out quantitative easing — while all but ignoring the economy's weak fundamentals. As Hegel famously put it, 'The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.' Yi Fuxian, a senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, spearheaded the movement against China's one-child policy and is the author of "Big Country with an Empty Nest" (China Development Press, 2013), which went from being banned in China to ranking first in China Publishing Today's 100 Best Books of 2013 in China. ©Project Syndicate, 2025
