eThekwini ratepayer associations warn against 'superficial' 50 percent debt relief measure
Image: File
The Bluff Ratepayers and Residents Association said that the eThekwini municipality's proposed 50% debt write-off is a welcome gesture, but it risks being more of a tick-box exercise than a real solution.
Norman Gilbert, chairman of the BRRA said that while it may offer short-term relief to struggling households and businesses, it doesn't address the deeper issues causing the debt—like poor service delivery, aging infrastructure, and unaffordable tariffs.
Ethekwini councillors gave the special debt relief programme the go-ahead at a council meeting on Wednesday. The water debt as at the end of January 2025, of R14.7 billion was the biggest contributor, due to undetected underground leaks and short payments by insurers. The municipality has found that many customers are unable to settle these debts and thus regarded this as irrecoverable.
The programme is an initiative aimed at reducing municipal debt by offering residents and businesses a 50% write-off, provided they pay the balance in full before the end of the financial year.
Other conditions include that prior to the customer settling the 50% of the arrear debt owed as at 31 January 2025, a customer must settle the entire debt from February 2025 to April 2025.
The municipality stated that should a customer not be in a financial position to settle the debt for the months after 31 January 2025, that such a customer must enter into a payment plan not exceeding six months, without making any down payment.
The total debtors book for the municipality, as of 31 January 2025 was R36 billion which grew significantly by R7.9 billion, when compared to January 2024. Government departments and parastatals owe the municipality R1.3 billion.
Gilbert stated that the water debt highlights systemic failures that have been ignored for too long.
'Similarly, R9 billion in unpaid rates and billions in household debt show just how unaffordable basic services have become for many residents. This isn't just about non-payment, it is about survival. The situation is worsened by government debt, which sends the wrong message to the public and undermines the municipality's debt recovery efforts,' he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Gilbert stated that while the debt relief proposal could help reduce the growing debt book, it lacks a long-term plan to prevent the same problem from recurring.
Ish Prahladh, chairperson of the eThekwini Ratepayers and Residents Association (ERRA), stated that ratepayers should be given oversight on municipal finances to put an end to tenders, advocate for competent staff and unnecessary overtime expenditure and consultancy fees.
'A municipal debt write-off will definitely benefit residents. Pensioners earn R2,000 but have to pay a R6,000 municipal bill (and this) makes life impossible for some residents. Hire competent plumbers to rectify the problems in the water department and cut our water losses to zero. Water insurance is pathetic as it does not cover the amount that is lost by the residents," Prahladh said.
zainul.dawood@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Old Mutual says it pays an average of R59 million per working day in life insurance claims
Old Mutual has paid out more than R14.7 billion in claims. Insurance giant Old Mutual has revealed that it paid an average of R59 million per working day for life insurance and other life underwriting claims. The insurer published claim statistics for 2024 on Friday, showing that it has paid out more than R14.7 billion in claims, with a 95% payout ratio on underwritten claims. Breakdown of claims paid out is underwritten policies, corporate claims and non-underwritten policies. ALSO READ: Here is how much it cost Old Mutual to build its near-to-launch bank Old Mutual underwritten policies According to the insurer's stats, underwritten policies include life, disability and illness claims. For these, Old Mutual paid out more than R7.3 billion in 2024. Most of the money, R6.2 billion, went to death claims. Old Mutual reported a 98% claim payout for 2024. Illness claims cost the insurer R888 million, while disability claims cost R297 million. 'Causes of underwritten claims include: cancer, trauma, cardiovascular disorders, central nervous system disorders, respiratory system disorders and musculoskeletal disorders,' said Old Mutual. Since 2002, Old Mutual has paid out more R91 billion in underwritten claims. Reasons why some claims were not paid out are due to non-disclosure, fraud, suicide exclusion, among others. Old Mutual death claims The insurer reports that death claims increased in 2021, reaching R9.73 billion, an 88% rise from R5.16 billion in 2020, primarily due to the Covid-19 pandemic. However, claims went back to normal levels after that, as Old Mutual paid R5.8 billion in 2022 and R5.6 billion in 2023. 'Life insurance includes a terminal illness benefit that pays the full cover amount if the insured person is diagnosed with a terminal illness and has less than 12 months to live.' 44% of death claims are due to car accidents, followed by crime and violence, accounting for 28% of death claims. 17% of death claims are due to shooting accidents, 6% due to accidents (unspecified location), 3% burns and 2% drowning. Disability claims 'According to the World Stroke Organization, stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Globally, one in four adults over the age of 25 will have a stroke in their lifetime,' said the insurer. According to the claim stats, 23% of the disability lump sum claims were due to musculoskeletal disorders, 21% central nervous system disorders, 15% cancer, 10% psychiatric disorders, 7% cardiovascular disorders, 5% connective tissue disorders, 5% sensory and communication, and 14% other. The stats show that cancer (50%) is the leading cause of illness claims, followed by cardiovascular disorders (25%), central nervous system disorders (13%), respiratory system disorders (3%), connective tissue disorders (2%), sensory and communication (2%), Musculoskeletal disorders (1%) and other (4%). NOW READ: Former Sanlam CEO to replace Iain Williamson as Old Mutual CEO after 32 years
Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
How to turn extra cash into long-term financial security by outsmarting debts and taxes
Before determining an investment strategy, you must take debt and tax implications into account. Question: My husband and I have finally reached the stage in life where we have some money left over at the end of each month. I would like to invest this wisely and need some guidance. We are both in our mid-forties and earn decent salaries. Answer: I would strongly recommend that you speak to a financial adviser who can do a full audit of your finances and help you clarify your short-, medium- and long-term goals. You can then construct an investment strategy to meet these goals. I will, however, run through a few of the factors you should consider when you have this discussion. Debt Before setting up an investment strategy, you need to get rid of short-term debt. If you have any car loans or overdrafts, I would strongly urge you to clear them. There are very few investments that provide an after-tax return that is better than what you are paying on short-term debt. Tax You mentioned that you and your husband are earning good salaries. It is, therefore, important that you take tax into account when you structure any investments. By using the correct structures, you can make a significant increase to the value of your investments through the tax savings. Here are some of the structures that you can consider when making an investment with a term of more than five years: Retirement annuity You are allowed to invest 27.5% of your taxable income into retirement savings and have that amount come off your taxable income. This will give you an immediate tax break on your contributions. For example, if you are paying tax at a rate of 40% and you invest R1,000, you'll get R400 back from the South African Revenue Service when your tax is assessed. In the meantime, the full R1,000 would be growing in a tax-free environment in the retirement annuity. Tax-free investment You are allowed to invest R36,000 a year in a tax-free investment and there will be no capital gains tax (CGT) on any growth. Be careful about using this for short-term or medium-term savings, as you are only allowed to invest a maximum of R500,000 in your lifetime. Endowments/sinking funds If your tax rate is above 30% or is likely to be above 30% when you want to access the investment, I would recommend that you consider investing through a structure such as a sinking fund or endowment. These are wrappers for housing your unit trusts or share investments, and the advantage is that you will only pay tax at a rate of 30%. This means the CGT you pay on any growth is 12% instead of a potential 18%. In addition to the potential savings in CGT, by housing your investments in a structure like this you can bequeath them to a beneficiary and save a further 4.025% in executor fees when you pass away. The transfer of this investment to your beneficiary will also not be subject to the delays that would happen if it went through the master's office. Offshore investments Most of us who are members of retirement funds or own property have the bulk of our wealth concentrated in South Africa. It is never a good idea to have all your wealth concentrated in one country, so you should consider moving some investments offshore. Most of the retired people I consult with have children living overseas. They typically visit them for an extended period every couple of years. By having an offshore investment they can access when they visit, they will not be as badly affected by any short-term volatility of the rand. It is a very easy process for each of you to invest R1-million a year offshore. Remember to use a structure such as a sinking fund or endowment. Not only will this save you on CGT and make the inheritance easier, you'll also be protecting yourself against being charged any potential inheritance taxes that may be levied offshore. DM Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at Send your questions to [email protected] This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
Joburg landlord in legal battle over property renovated by tenant and later sold for R3 million
A Johannesburg man's ambitious plan to transform his rental property into his future home has resulted in a significant legal defeat. Image: Freepik A Johannesburg man's ambitious plan to transform his rental property into his future home has resulted in a significant legal defeat, as a court has denied his claims for reimbursement for renovations made while renting. The saga began in January 2010 when the tenant entered into a two-year lease with his landlord, setting an initial rent of R20,000 per month, along with utilities, and stipulating a minimum 10% escalation upon renewal. However, both parties opted to delete certain clauses from the lease contract, which later proved pivotal in the ensuing disputes. The landlord said this was done to remove any obligations he may have toward the leasing agent, Jawitz Properties. Meanwhile, the tenant claimed that they had reached an oral agreement that he would put in an offer to purchase the property as soon as his financial position allowed him to obtain a home loan. After the lease expired in 2012, the landlord shifted the rental agreement to a month-to-month basis, increasing the rent to R22,000. In August 2015, he relocated to Canada, and his mother, a qualified estate agent, managed the property, including the collection of rent and inspection of the property on his behalf. The rent remained constant until December 2017, when it was increased to R 28,000. During this time, the tenant was an erratic payer; he skipped monthly payments or sometimes paid for more than one month's rent at a time. In May 2018, the landlord's legal representatives informed the tenant of R36,000 owed in rent arrears and invited him to submit an offer to purchase the property, which was listed for sale at R3.6 million. The tenant proposed a cash offer of R3.3 million, which the landlord rejected. The property was ultimately sold in March 2022 for R3 million. Subsequently, the tenant was evicted in December 2021, reportedly owing approximately R1 million in unpaid rent. In an effort to recuperate some of the funds, the landlord sought relief in the Johannesburg High Court seeking at least R896,000 from the unpaid rent. Meanwhile, the tenant argued that there was a verbal agreement within the first two years of the lease and based on that, he made several substantial improvements to the property because he had plans to buy the property. Among the renovations was a R394,000 kitchen refurbishment and a R520,000 painting and waterproofing, which the tenant argued increased the property's market value significantly. He argued that because of the improvements, the market value of the property increased from R2.6 million to R3.5 million and that the property was ultimately sold for R3 million. The tenant claimed over R900,000 for contractual damages and, in the alternative, an unjustified enrichment claim of R400,000. Furthermore, he didn't deny that he did not pay rent between December 2017 until his eviction in December 2021. He only paid for two months in March and April 2018. He explained that he refused to pay the rent because the landlord unreasonably increased the rental by 21% from R22,000 to R28,000. On the other hand, the landlord didn't deny the renovations; however, he challenged the necessity of the improvements and the obligation to reimburse tenant the expenses incurred. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Acting Judge Sha'ista Kazee presided over the case and noted that from the evidence presented, no verbal agreement existed regarding purchase discussions. She highlighted that the tenant had been granted a formal opportunity to purchase the property, but his offer was not accepted. Additionally, under the terms laid out in the lease agreement, the landlord was well within his rights to increase the rent by a minimum of 10% every two years. The judge underscored that if only this escalation had been considered, the rent would have already exceeded R28,000 by December 2017. Regarding the renovations, the judge found that the lease agreement's Clause 12 expressly denies the tenant any entitlement to reimbursement for improvements made to the property. Stating that: "with or without the consent of the lessor, he shall in any event receive no compensation therefore and shall either at his own expense remove same immediately at the request of the lessor'. Meanwhile, it was also noted that no inspection was conducted when the tenant left the house and when he left, he removed some of the improvements he made to the property. This includes a geyser in the garage. He also took the solar geyser, his furniture and other movables. Ultimately, judge Kazee ruled in favour of the landlord's claim for R896,000 and ordered that the tenant pay the legal costs of the proceedings. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
