BREAKING NEWS Tasmania announces snap election following no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff
Jeremy Rockliff returned to Government House on Wednesday evening to meet with Governor Barbara Baker, six days after he lost the confidence of the parliament.
In a statement after the meeting, Ms Baker confirmed she would dissolve parliament and issue the writ for an election to be held on July 19.
It will be the fourth state election in seven years after early polls were also held in 2021 and 2024.
'Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution,' Ms Baker said in the statement.
'I make this grant because I am satisfied that there is no real possibility that an alternative government can be formed.'
Rockliff has resisted pressure to resign and insisted the backing of his partyroom remains solid, despite reports former senator Eric Abetz and ex-deputy premier Michael Ferguson were willing to be leader.
'I have a commitment from my team to support me as leader and I am not going anywhere,' he said earlier on Wednesday.
Rockliff denied he was 'driven by ego' in not standing aside from leading the minority government.
Liberal MP Jacquie Petrusma didn't directly answer when asked if the party was doing numbers to roll Mr Rockliff.
'The premier is a fantastic leader and he has 100 per cent support of the PLP (parliamentary Liberal Party),' she said.
Ms Baker also met Labor leader Dean Winter on Wednesday afternoon.
Labor, which has just 10 of 35 lower-house seats, had said it would not look to form a minority government with the Greens.
'In that meeting (with the governor) I reiterated my position that Labor will not be doing a deal with the Greens,' Winter said.
Labor, whose no-confidence motion against Rockliff was backed by the Greens and three crossbench independents, had called on the premier to step down.
'We've gotten to this point because of Jeremy Rockliff and his refusal to resign,' Labor MP Shane Broad said.
'I come from a farm and no matter how much you love that old sheep dog, if you can't round up sheep anymore it's time to get a new one.'
Rockliff claimed the no-confidence motion was a deceptive power grab, while Labor says it was because of the Liberals' poor budget and project mismanagement.
Winter, cited growing state debt, a intention to slash public sector jobs and a sell-off of state assets as the reasons for having no confidence in Rockliff's leadership.
The premier took a crack at Winter for failing to 'front up' and hold a press conference on Wednesday.
The Liberals had already appeared to be in fully fledged campaign mode, visiting a hospital to announce a four-year elective surgery plan.
They were returned to power in March 2024, winning 14 seats and cobbling together enough support from the crossbench to govern.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Inside the Labor Party's bold push to increase taxes on property investors: 'Government now has a mandate to rectify inequity'
Labor Party activists are pushing to scrap the discount on capital gains tax when selling investment properties, despite Anthony Albanese ruling out such changes when in Opposition. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. The lesson of those election defeats led Albanese to rule out tinkering with capital gains taxes after he took over as Labor leader, and he went on to win the 2022 election and was resoundingly re-elected in May. But now a grassroots organisation within the Prime Minister's own party – Labor for Housing – wants the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount scrapped entirely, not just diluted. That meant someone who made a $100,000 capital gain on their investment property would be taxed on the entire increase, not just $50,000 of it. Labor for Housing co-convener Julijana Todorovic told Daily Mail Australia the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for selling residential properties introduced in September 1999, needed to be dismantled. 'We think it should be removed entirely, so not immediately,' she said. 'Property should not be an investment for which you can claim the discount.' Ms Todorovic, a land rights lawyer, said the Albanese government should change policy before the next election campaign. 'Our view is that the Labor government now has a mandate to rectify inequity in Australian society,' she said. 'While it's clear from the election results that we can't be too radical, we must do something to stem the flow of generational inequity.' She argued the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount should be grandfathered for existing investors but scrapped for future purchases - a position the Greens took to the May election. 'We are proposing that residential property is removed as a category for which the discount can be claimed,' Ms Todorovic said. 'But we're proposing that this change is grandfathered to a certain date – so if people have structured their finances based on the discount, then they will have time to restructure – they won't be left high and dry.' Labor for Housing argued that scrapping the discount for properties would encourage investors to invest in technology and businesses, rather than putting all their funds into real estate and thereby driving up the country's massive house prices. 'Australia's capital resources have become landlocked by a CGT discount on property,' it said in a submission to the government's August Economic Reform Roundtable. 'As Australia electrifies, transitions to renewables and increases our data capacity, businesses are struggling to find adequate capital. 'By incentivising investment in the productive powers of the market, the government can increase the circular flow of capital in the economy, creating jobs and additional economic activity.' The Greens went to the last election with a plan to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for future purchases of investment properties, and grandfather it to one property for those who already owned an investment property. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it just needs the Greens to get its legislation passed in the Senate without the need to win the support of other crossbenchers. The Labor-aligned McKell Institute has called for the federal government to reduce the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 35 per cent for existing investment properties with a backyard. This means $65,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed, up from $50,000 now. But it has also called for the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be increased to 70 per cent for newly-built apartments, arguing this kind of policy would boost housing supply and encourage more off-the-plan unit developments. That means only $30,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed - and force more Aussies into apartments rather than homes with a backyard as Labor aims to build 1.2million homes over five years. The McKell Institute's Harnessing Aspiration report argued the existing 50 per cent capital gains tax discount encouraged investor speculators to buy up houses at a time when there is a shortage. 'There is a unique incentive for investors to speculate on existing detached houses rather than non-existing off-the -plan attached dwellings or established attached dwellings,' he said. 'The blanket tax treatment of each of these asset types means an investor is much more attracted to high-growth existing detached dwellings than moderate-growth attached dwellings, especially new builds.' The average, full-time worker earning $102,742 a year is priced out of buying the median-priced house in every state and territory capital city except Darwin. Ms Todorovic said Labor for Housing's call to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount was not about stopping property speculation, but merely to have it treated the same way as other forms of speculative investment. 'It won't – this isn't the tool to correct speculation, this is about removing incentives which preference land above other more productive investments,' she said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Hidden cost of Labor's new super tax that could send prices soaring at Coles and Woolworths
Labor's radical tax plan for superannuation could end up seeing Australians pay more for their weekly food shop, farmers are warning. Parliament resumed for the first time since the May election on Tuesday, and one of the key pieces of legislation the Albanese government will try to get passed is a new tax on superannuation savings even before the funds are accessible. Anthony Albanese 's government wants to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised super balances above $3million, which would see self-managed super funds taxed on the paper value of assets before they are sold. This radical departure from the usual capital gains tax practice would also double the headline tax rate to 30 per cent, with superannuation already subject to a 15 per cent earnings tax during the accumulation or working phase. While most wage earners have their super invested in liquid assets like shares and bonds, many farmers hold self-managed super funds tied to their land, and may be forced to sell the farm to stay under the $3million cap. National Farmers' Federation president David Jochinke told Daily Mail Australia that this could result in less supply of food and therefore higher prices. 'Higher taxes and costs on farm business ultimately make it harder for them to keep fresh produce on supermarket shelves, and this one has the potential to be significant,' he said. 'These farmers will be taxed simply because their land value has gone up on paper. No additional income. No sale. Just a tax bill.' 'This is not just about yachts and waterfront mansions. It's about orchards, dairies, and the family farms that put food on the table.' The National Farmers Federation estimates Labor's Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill from 2023 would affect 3,500 farmers immediately, with Labor proposing to backdate it to July 1. It estimates 17,000 family farms are held within a self-managed super fund, which can have up to six members. The government will not index that $3million threshold, meaning more and more people will become subject to the tax as inflation continues. The NFF argues this would see another 14,000 farmers have assets worth more than $3million in coming decades. 'We urge the government to proactively consider changes it can make to the proposed 'Super Tax' to avoid impacts on farmers and small businesses across the country,' Mr Jochinke said. Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives but needs the Greens in the Senate to get legislation passed. The Greens want the threshold lowered from $3million to $2million but indexed for inflation. But Mr Jochinke said if the government is forced through negotiations to accept the Greens' position it would be an even worse outcome. 'This would be an even more devastating outcome for Australia's farming families than the original Super Tax parameters,' he said. 'Thousands more farms will be in jeopardy if the threshold is lowered to $2million. 'We are against the current bill, and in particular its taxing of unrealised gains, but to aim for an even lower threshold in order to ram the bill through the Senate is just reckless.' Nick McKim, the Greens' treasury and economic justice spokesman, said superannuation had become a way for people to accumulate vast sums at a tax rate that was well below that applied to income. 'Over time Australia's superannuation system has become less about providing a dignified retirement for working people, and more of a vehicle for wealth accumulation. This needs to change,' he said. 'The Greens want to ensure that very wealthy Australians pay their fair share of tax, so that governments can do more to support people who need it.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie Labor Party's plan to raise taxes on property investors
Labor Party activists are pushing to scrap the discount on capital gains tax when selling investment properties, despite Anthony Albanese ruling out such changes when in Opposition. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. The lesson of those election defeats led Albanese to rule out tinkering with capital gains taxes after he took over as Labor leader, and he went on to win the 2022 election and was resoundingly re-elected in May. But now a grassroots organisation within the Prime Minister's own party – Labor for Housing – wants the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount scrapped entirely, not just diluted. That meant someone who made a $100,000 capital gain on their investment property would be taxed on the entire increase, not just $50,000 of it. Labor for Housing co-convener Julijana Todorovic (pictured) told Daily Mail Australia the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for selling residential properties introduced in September 1999, needed to be dismantled. 'We think it should be removed entirely, so not immediately,' she said. 'Property should not be an investment for which you can claim the discount.' Ms Todorovic, a land rights lawyer, said the Albanese government should change policy before the next election campaign. 'Our view is that the Labor government now has a mandate to rectify inequity in Australian society,' she said. 'While it's clear from the election results that we can't be too radical, we must do something to stem the flow of generational inequity.' She argued the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount should be grandfathered for existing investors but scrapped for future purchases - a position the Greens took to the May election. 'We are proposing that residential property is removed as a category for which the discount can be claimed,' Ms Todorovic said. 'But we're proposing that this change is grandfathered to a certain date – so if people have structured their finances based on the discount, then they will have time to restructure – they won't be left high and dry.' Labor for Housing argued that scrapping the discount would encourage investors to invest in technology and businesses, rather than putting all their funds into real estate and thereby driving up the country's massive house prices. 'Australia's capital resources have become landlocked by a CGT discount on property,' it said in a submission to the government's August Economic Reform Roundtable. 'As Australia electrifies, transitions to renewables and increases our data capacity, businesses are struggling to find adequate capital. By incentivising investment in the productive powers of the market, the government can increase the circular flow of capital in the economy, creating jobs and additional economic activity.' The Greens went to the last election with a plan to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for future purchases of investment properties, and grandfather it to one property for those who already owned an investment property. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it needs the Greens or other Senate crossbenchers to get its legislation passed by the Upper House. The Labor-aligned McKell Institute has called for the federal government to reduce the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 35 per cent for existing investment properties with a backyard. This means $65,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed, up from $50,000 now. But it has also called for the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be increased to 70 per cent for newly-built apartments, arguing this kind of policy would boost housing supply and encourage more off-the-plan unit developments. That means only $30,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed - and force more Aussies into apartments rather than homes with a backyard as Labor aims to build 1.2million homes over five years. The McKell Institute's Harnessing Aspiration report argued the existing 50 per cent capital gains tax discount encouraged investor speculators to buy up houses at a time when there is a shortage. 'There is a unique incentive for investors to speculate on existing detached houses rather than non-existing off-the -plan attached dwellings or established attached dwellings,' he said. 'The blanket tax treatment of each of these asset types means an investor is much more attracted to high-growth existing detached dwellings than moderate-growth attached dwellings, especially new builds.' The average, full-time worker earning $102,742 a year is priced out of buying the median-priced house in every state and territory capital city except Darwin.
