logo
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: My round? Sorry if I sound mean, but with beer at £5 a pint I fear it may now be every man for himself

JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: My round? Sorry if I sound mean, but with beer at £5 a pint I fear it may now be every man for himself

Daily Mail​05-06-2025
Anyone conversant with pub culture will know the kind. This breed of drinker knows who they are too – shameless freeloaders. Some of them even admit as much with a chuckle.
They are Tam, perched on his stool at The Clansman in the Scottish sitcom Still Game – ever thirsty, ever eyeing opportunities for others to finance the quenching.
I've known many Tams and, on occasion, have become more fixated than I should in the course of an evening down the boozer on their modus operandi.
I can't let it go. How can they do this to their friends? Why so sleekit? Where is their sense of honour?
I am talking about the ones who disappear to the loo when they sense the next round of drinks is looming and return, minutes later, to find their next pint waiting for them. 'Oh, grand. Cheers everyone.'
The ones who quaff away for hours at their companions' expense and then, as expectant eyes turn to them, suddenly remember there's somewhere they have to be.
'Later, chaps. First round's on me next time.'
I've seen them finally cornered and marvelled at their gall as they ask if anyone can spot them 20 quid to get the next round in.
We have all met a character like Tam from sitcom Still Game, who constantly tries to avoid paying for a drink
I've watched that twenty cross the table – sometimes it has even come from my wallet – to land in the pub leech's paw, and I've known in that second the donor will never see it again.
The cardinal rule of my nights spent in licensed establishments was never to be that guy. Spend more than you planned if need be. Just avoid being thought of as him.
Drink with integrity. Take the hit on a round that wasn't strictly yours to get stung for rather than allow suspicions to ferment that you are not a team player.
I was aware, of course, that this plays straight into the freeloaders' hands. They stick close to people who don't want to be like them.
This certainly, was the game as I understood it two or three decades ago when my visits to pubs were more frequent and my staying power was at its peak.
Alas, today I am struggling with the rules. Do I even want to be a team player?
The average price for a pint of beer, we learn this week, has passed the £5 mark. And that's the cheap stuff. If your mates are on Peronis or Morettis or BrewDog's Punk IPA – as those I meet in pubs invariably seem to be – we are talking upwards of £6.
That £20 note was good for six drinks or more back when I was getting in the rounds. Today it will score you three Punk IPAs and you may as well put the few pennies change in the charity box, please, barman.
In the circumstances, are rounds even still a thing? Shouldn't it be every man for themselves? What is the modern etiquette now that the sums are getting serious?
I was wondering this even as I walked in the door of a Glasgow city centre watering hole a few weeks ago. Lots of people I knew were going to be there. There was an excellent chance – because I knew them to be kind-hearted souls – that someone would offer to buy me a drink within seconds.
What is the right answer? In truth, the situation requires more investigation, but pub environments, I find, are not conducive to the over-thinking of responses to simple questions like 'do you want a drink?'
But let us, in our sobriety, over-think it here. Now, you have very generously extended to me the offer of a drink. Let me tell you my problem with that.
I've only just arrived. For all I know, you are already in a round with six or seven people. If I accept your offer then I am – according to the etiquette with which I am familiar but, admittedly, may be out of date now – subsumed into this round, which entails certain obligations on my part.
In days gone by, this would not have worried me because I was either capable of drinking six or seven pints or past caring by pint four or five.
But you will accept that times have changed. You see before you today the enfeebled husk of the drinker I once was. Let me be brutally frank: I'm out of here after pint two or three.
I hope you are beginning to see my difficulty. Suppose for a moment I were to say yes. Half an hour from now, I would be dutybound to repay your kindness with my own offer of the refreshment of your choice from the bar.
But what if Tom, Dick, Harry, John, Paul, George and Ringo have empty glasses too? In the current climate, Peronis costing what they do, my tolerance for them being what is, I would find my presumed obligation to them, as fellow members of 'the round', vexatious.
And here, friend, is the other dimension to my quandary. Long ago, when I thought I knew my way around drinking culture, I made a promise to myself that I would never be that guy – the one that I am in grave danger of becoming if I accept your hospitality, keep my head down for round two and leg it as soon as that glass is drained.
So, you see, I am caught on the horns of a moral and financial dilemma. You ask me if I want a drink. I say that is far too complicated a question for a guy who has just walked in the door.
If I know anything about pubs, it is that the drinker you assaulted with this stream of verbiage would have started talking to somebody else – anybody else – five minutes ago.
So, actually, what I said was: 'No thanks, you're fine, mate. I'll get my own. I'm only staying for a couple.'
But might the dawn of the £5 and £6 pint be an appropriate juncture to give the more ponderous answer a fair hearing? Is the eyewatering expense of getting a round in – coupled with the collapse of my generation's ability to last the pace – forcing us to walk a pub protocol tightrope?
I cannot ever be Tam the sponger from Still Game and. Nor, I find, can I still be the willing dupe team player who says 'hey, who's counting anyway?' It turns out I am counting.
It was, then, with an every-man-for-himself bearing that I approached the bar and sorted myself out with a £6 Moretti. Did I feel good about it? Nope.
Did it seem churlish, petty, anti-social, an affront to the rich social culture, the sense of camaraderie that the pub round once engendered for me? Yup.
But, like I say, I no longer know how the game is played. And drink is too expensive – and I can hold too little of it – for occasional visitors like me to leave the pub with honour.
I skulked away after three or four, wondering if I should write to a problem page.
How does one negotiate a night in the pub? As the freeloader? The patsy? The standoffish loner? None of them work for me.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Historic Glasgow building could be taken over by community
Historic Glasgow building could be taken over by community

BBC News

time35 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Historic Glasgow building could be taken over by community

A historic Glasgow building could be taken over by the Hall, an A-listed building in Shawlands, has been shut since 2017 for a Glasgow City Council meeting heard there had been an expression of interest in the hall via the People Make Glasgow programme – which enables communities to run councillor Ruairi Kelly said there would be hopefully be a positive outcome for the building, which could see it reopen and potentially upgraded. Langside Halls is currently on Glasgow's Buildings At Risk Register as it did not have a plan for who is convener for housing and development, said he expected further information soon. He added he hoped there would be a "positive outcome that not only reopens it to the public but entails community ownership and management and also secures the much needed funding required" for facilities there."He said the plan would "ensure that it is used as a long term asset in the community."It is understood Glasgow Life has been working with Langside Halls Trust and the local authority to bring the Shawlands building back into update on the situation was given after Scottish Greens councillor Holly Bruce asked what is happening to ensure Langside Halls is kept under council or community also said £250m has been spent over the last decade on the wider city's heritage buildings and assets. He said stewardship of the city's buildings has not always met the public's expectations."He added that the council manages 97 operational heritage properties, including the city chambers and Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum.

‘Certain inevitability' to Grangemouth closure when Labour won power
‘Certain inevitability' to Grangemouth closure when Labour won power

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Certain inevitability' to Grangemouth closure when Labour won power

There was a 'certain inevitability' that Grangemouth would close by the time Labour came to power last year, the UK's energy minister has said. Michael Shanks said the UK Government 'did not take any option off the table' when asked about whether Scotland's last oil refinery could have been nationalised. But he said the plant was 'far too far down the line' for the outcome to have been averted. The plant ceased crude oil processing in April, with its closure causing the loss of 430 jobs. The SNP had previously called for the UK Government to nationalise the site, which its owners said was losing £385,000 a day. Appearing before the Scottish Affairs Committee in the Commons on Wednesday, Mr Shanks, who is the MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, said the Government is 'not in the business of nationalising failing businesses'. However, he also described Grangemouth currently as a 'hugely investable opportunity' for businesses. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer previously announced £200 million in funding for the future of the site, cash which he hopes to triple in private investment. That came after the Scottish Government had announced £25 million in funding, while both governments funded Project Willow – a £1.5 million report into future options to keep the plant open. Asked about whether the UK Government considered bringing Grangemouth into public ownership, Mr Shanks told MPs: 'I think it is fair to say we didn't take any option off the table and we did look at a whole series of options. 'But firstly, the Government's not in the business of nationalising failing businesses. 'That is difficult to say, but it is the reality that a business that's losing tens of millions of pounds, it can't be nationalised with the public facing the cost of that. 'That's the same position we're in with the Prax Lindsey refinery (North Lincolnshire), and it's the same position with Grangemouth.' Mr Shanks said Labour 'moved every possible option forward' to do what it could to save the refinery, but added: 'The truth is, we were far too far down the line with the Grangemouth process to really change the outcome and as regrettable as that is, and it genuinely is, and I've met the workers on a number of occasions, I know how significant the impact is on them and their families, there was a certain inevitability about the outcome by the point in which we came into Government.'

Royals brave torrential downpours as Holyrood Week continues
Royals brave torrential downpours as Holyrood Week continues

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Royals brave torrential downpours as Holyrood Week continues

King Charles and Queen Camilla have visited a Fife town as part of Holyrood week - the annual royal celebration of Scottish culture, community and achievements. The King and Queen faced torrential downpours as they were greeted by members of the public during a visit to Kirkcaldy to mark the centenary of the town's war monarch traditionally spends a week each July in Tuesday, the King began the official visit with the traditional Ceremony of the Keys in the palace gardens, before holding an investiture ceremony for honours recipients and garden party. King Charles sheltered under an umbrella as he unveiled a commemorative cairn, designed as a time capsule filled with mementos and photos from local Viewforth High School for future generations."It's a bit damp," said Queen Camilla. "We've been used to the heatwave."Hundreds of people watched the service through heavy the memorial, he viewed the centenary art exhibition at Kirkcaldy Art Gallery, where he met former prime minister Gordon visit and community reception celebrated the work of local charities and community organisations, which included Fife Multibank - an initiative founded by Mr Brown that provides essential goods to low-income families. The Queen visited a cancer centre run by charity Maggie's, which she has been president of since met people living with cancer at the town's Victoria Hospital, alongside Maggie's chief executive Dame Laura Lee, Mr Brown's wife Sarah and broadcaster Kirsty was founded by the late writer, gardener and designer Maggie Keswick Jencks and her husband, the late landscape designer Charles idea for the centres came after she was diagnosed with cancer and was then told in 1993 that it had returned while in windowless hospital corridor. The experience motivated the couple to create a more comforting environment for cancer patients. The first Maggie's Centre opened in Edinburgh in 1996. King Charles went on to meet first minister John Swinney at the Palace of Camilla will later host a reception for the Queen's Nursing Institute of Scotland at the in 1899 with a donation from Queen Victoria to organise the training of district nurses, the charity now provides professional development opportunities for Scotland's community nurses and midwives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store