Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen's cellphone ban in schools nears becoming law
LINCOLN — One of Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen's priorities advanced to the third and final round of debate with a vote on Monday, as a statewide cell phone ban in schools inched closer to becoming law.
The bill would ban student use of personal electronic devices, such as cellphones, on school grounds or while attending a 'school instructional function,' such as field trips. But it would leave school districts wide latitude in approving student cellphone use, including some exceptions.
Senators advanced Legislative Bill 140 to final reading Monday with bipartisan support, 44-0, with five lawmakers not voting or excused.
The proposed law moved out of the Education Committee 7-0, with one member absent. Pillen said during its public hearing last month that the bill focuses on student mental health and that he should have pushed the legislation earlier in his term as governor.
'The evidence, in my view, is crystal clear: Our kids are being harmed by their constant exposure to these things,' Pillen said at the time.
Several other states have pushed for similar legislation on students' cell phones with similar bipartisan support, but some experts warn that these types of restrictions could be outdated or challenging for classroom teachers and schools to enforce. State Sen. Terrell McKinney of Omaha echoed similar concerns.
'Most schools already have these policies, which are good,' McKinney said on the floor. 'The only thing I think about is how these school districts will enforce this.'
McKinney added that there might be an uptick in classroom discipline issues because kids will be kids. During the same hearing at which Pillen testified, State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha voiced caution about whether students could quickly access phones in emergencies, such as during school shootings.
The bill addresses such concerns with exceptions. LB 140 would allow students to use cellphones at school in the following circumstances:
If needed as part of a student's special education plan.
When authorized by a school district for educational purposes during instructional time.
In cases of emergency or 'perceived threat of danger.'
When necessary to monitor or manage a student's health care.
When otherwise determined appropriate by the school board or otherwise allowed by an appropriate school employee.
Students, teachers endorse bill to ban cellphones during Nebraska school days
Should the bill pass, all of Nebraska's 245 school districts would have to adopt device-related policies to conform to the law by the start of the 2025-26 school year. The bill doesn't apply to private schools. Enforcement and possible disciplinary action for violating the guidelines, if any, would be left up to individual school districts.
'It's time to prioritize student success by eliminating unnecessary distractions,' said State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, the sponsor of LB 140.
In a possible hint of tension within the Legislature, State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha used her time to speak during the debate as a 'shot across the bow' because the Nebraska Legislature has shown her that it's 'going to screw over the poorest people in the state for just pettiness.'
'I'm going to make this body fight like hell for the things that don't benefit low-income people,' Cavanaugh said. 'You're going to have to fight like hell for it, not this bill, even though it had some opposition, I'm not opposed to it.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Empathy and Action Go Hand in Hand for Christians
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Like many across America, I've been grieving the tragedy in Texas last week—especially the devastating loss of life at Camp Mystic. God have mercy: no child deserves to die at summer camp. No parent should have to hear that their baby isn't coming home. And yet, as the news broke, both sides of our cultural divide revealed just how much work we still have to do. On the left, some progressives sneered that Texas "had it coming" because it's a red state. One person on social media told me, "Every single Texan that voted for Trump deserves the worst that they can be given. I'm not gonna play the 'no one deserves what's happening' game." Someone from L.A. added, "Conservative Texans said my city deserved to burn ... why should I feel empathy for people who never show it to me?" On the right, leaders offered nothing but empty platitudes. Asked if more could be done, Speaker Mike Johnson said, "We feel just as helpless as everyone else does... all we know to do is pray." A woman holds a candle during a vigil for the victims of the floods over Fourth of July weekend, at Travis Park, in San Antonio, Texas, on July 7, 2025. A woman holds a candle during a vigil for the victims of the floods over Fourth of July weekend, at Travis Park, in San Antonio, Texas, on July 7, 2025. RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images But Christians should know better. As followers of Jesus, we must hold two truths our culture keeps trying to pull apart: we can grieve these lives and demand action. We can lament tragedy and work to prevent the next one. Love requires both. Two things are true: we cannot afford to lose empathy. And we cannot afford to stop pushing for action. Empathy Is Not Toxic—It's Transformative Empathy should not be controversial—especially for Christians—and somehow it has become an embattled word. Conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey recently published Toxic Empathy, warning that progressives manipulate heartstrings to push policies like affirming queer people or expanding health care. But this rejection of empathy has paved the way for dehumanizing rhetoric toward entire groups. On a post celebrating the opening of "Alligator Alcatraz," one commenter crooned: "I hear the gators like Mexican food!!" History tells us that this kind of language is the first step toward atrocities. Disturbingly, many on the left mirror that same posture. As progressive in my comments remarked of suffering Texans: "How am I supposed to feel empathy for people who never show it to me?" But we don't extend empathy because people deserve it. We extend it because they are people—made in God's image. That's what makes empathy so radical, so Christlike: it refuses to stop at the border of what's "deserved." Writing off suffering Texans because of how they vote is no more righteous than when conservatives dismiss suffering immigrants or queer kids in crisis. The reality is that empathy is not toxic. It's transformative. It breaks open hardened hearts and turns enemies into friends. We need it now more than ever—for undocumented immigrants and for MAGA-hat Republicans alike. We cannot afford to meet dehumanization with more dehumanization. Thoughts and Prayers Are Not Enough But empathy alone is not enough. It must move us to action. As the climate crisis accelerates, producing more frequent and devastating tragedies, our leaders must offer more than thoughts and prayers. We see this same feigned helplessness after every school shooting. This gruesome script plays out again and again: thoughts and prayers, but no reform. Conservatives chide progressives not to "politicize" tragedy, yet with no attempt to stop it from happening over and over, how sincere can their grief really be? As The Onion headline put it after every massacre: "'No Way to Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." Now, as climate disasters multiply, conservatives want us to treat them as inevitable—just another cost of living in a broken world. For the sake of my own children's future, I refuse to accept this. Demanding change to a system that allows unnecessary death isn't "politicizing a tragedy." The tragedy is already political, made so by the forces that let it continue unabated. Kerr County, where last week's floods claimed lives, was denied FEMA money in the past for a flood warning system. Worse: Texas has been sitting on hundreds of millions of dollars in federal disaster mitigation funds, failing to distribute them to local communities even as storms worsen. This isn't just negligence—it's cruelty. And yet, Republicans have continued to weaken FEMA, NOAA, and the NWS, at a time when we need them more than ever. Meanwhile, the same politicians who call these life-saving services "too expensive" gladly pour trillions into bombs, prisons, deportations, and tax breaks for billionaires. Love does not look like letting children die, communities drown, or families lose everything while we pray for God to intervene. Love Requires Both I understand the temptation to blame the other side—I've felt it myself. But we cannot let our empathy be swallowed by bitterness. And we cannot let our grief keep us from bold action. Empathy without action is hollow. And action without empathy can only go so far—we must always see each other's humanity. Jesus shows us a better way: he enters into our suffering and weeps over the world as it is, and he works to make it new. So should we. Weep with those who weep. And then rise up and demand change. Because love requires both. Brian Recker is a public theologian, speaker, and writer exploring Christian spirituality beyond exclusion and fear. The son of a Baptist preacher and a graduate of the fundamentalist Bob Jones University, he spent eight years as an evangelical pastor before deconstructing his faith and embracing a more inclusive vision of God. His debut book, Hell Bent, releases September 30 from Tarcher. His Instagram is @berecker. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Third Biden aide pleads the Fifth rather than answer questions about prez's cognitive decline
WASHINGTON — Former President Joe Biden's deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini became the third ex-White House aide to plead the Fifth Amendment in a deposition on Capitol Hill Friday, with Republicans accusing her of participating in a 'historic scandal' to cover up the commander in chief's mental fitness. 'There is now a pattern of key Biden confidants seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy,' House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) declared after Tomasini declined to say whether the White House 'instructed her to lie' about the president's health. 'She also pleaded the Fifth when asked if she ever advised President Biden on the handling of classified documents found in his garage, if President Biden or anyone in the White House instructed her to conceal or destroy classified material found at President Biden's home or office, and if she ever conspired with anyone in the White House to hide information regarding the Biden family's 'business' dealings,' added Comer. Joe Biden's former deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini (right) pleaded the Fifth Amendment in a deposition on Capitol Hill Friday about the former president's mental fitness. AFP via Getty Images 'It's apparent they would rather hide key information to protect themselves and Joe Biden than be truthful with the American people about this historic scandal.' Tomasini began her career as a press secretary for then-Senator Biden when he chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee nearly three decades ago. She initially agreed to come before the committee willingly, but reversed her decision earlier this week. Her lawyer requested a subpoena to compel her appearance in front of the Oversight panel. Oversight Republicans announced Thursday that the investigation into Biden's decline and autopen use will continue with a new slate of hearings. Four additional members of Biden's inner circle, including ex-Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, have been invited for a series of voluntary, transcribed interviews that will be carried out this fall. Ian Sams, a former White House counsel office spokesperson, will be the first to come before the committee on August 21. 'It's apparent they would rather hide key information to protect themselves and Joe Biden than be truthful with the American people about this historic scandal,' James Comer said. AFP via Getty Images Next to appear will be Andrew Bates, who served as Biden's senior deputy press security. Jean-Pierre, who became persona non grata in Bidenworld after announcing her new exposé book and change of party affiliation to independent, will follow him, appearing on September 12 to answer questions. Other member of the president's inner circle will also be interviewed, including Ron Klain, who is set to appear next week before the Oversight Committee.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
With new website, Democrats seek to target Trump on mega-bill, tariff costs
Donald Trump signs the tax- and spending-cut meg-abill on July 4. A new Democratic Party website uses key talking points from Donald Trump's 2024 campaign against the president and his policies. (Photo by Alex Brandon - Pool/Getty Images) Aiming to use President Donald Trump's signature policies against him, Democrats unveiled a website Wednesday that depicts their purported costs to taxpayers in each state. The website draws on projections from the Congressional Budget Office and other sources as it advances the argument that the mega-bill passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate and signed into law by Trump on July 4 'takes money out of working people's pockets to give handouts to the rich.' The campaign combines the impact of Trump's on-again, off-again tariff declarations with the mega-bill to derive a so-called 'Trump Tax,' generating state-by-state calculations for the data. 'The Trump Tax will explode the deficit by $3.3 trillion — leading to higher inflation, higher energy bills, and higher grocery and prescription drug costs,' the website states — pinpointing specific messages about consumer pocketbook issues that were key talking points during Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. The site lists all 50 U.S. states with a drop-down list of bullet points for each. In Wisconsin, the campaign projects 276,000 people will lose health insurance over the next decade. The number is calculated from changes to the Medicaid program that have been projected to cut some recipients off from the state-federal health insurance plan for the poor, along with the end of premium subsidies for low or moderate income households that purchase health insurance from the Affordable Care Act online marketplace. It projects 49,000 Wisconsinites could lose food assistance through SNAP, the federal nutrition program and pegs the cost to Wisconsin businesses to date of Trump administration tariff policies at more than $900 million, citing calculations published in Axios. 'The Trump Tax is the largest redistribution of wealth and the largest cut to health care in Wisconsin history,' Democratic National Committee Chair Kenneth Martin said in a statement with the unveiling of the website. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
