logo
Masked Israeli troops block media visit to West Bank site of Oscar-winning film

Masked Israeli troops block media visit to West Bank site of Oscar-winning film

The Guardian03-06-2025
Masked Israeli soldiers have blocked an international group of reporters from visiting Palestinian villages on the West Bank which have been under sustained attack by Jewish settlers, and which were the subject of an Oscar-winning documentary film.
The Academy Award won by No Other Land has not stopped the attacks on Masafer Yatta, a cluster of villages on the southern edge of the occupied territory, which has been the target of settler violence and house demolitions and forced displacement by the army for many years.
After soldiers almost complete destroyed one of the hamlets in the area, Khalet Al-Daba'a, in early May, two of the film's co-directors, Yuval Avraham and Basel Adra, invited journalists to visit the area, which is Adra's home, to witness the extent of the destruction first hand.
'It's not easy for me to write this, but my community Masafer Yatta will be destroyed unless more activists and journalists don't urgently come and join us on the ground,' Adra wrote on X. 'Settlers are now in [Khalet Al-Daba'a] village 24/7 after the army destroyed it.'
The convoy of 20 reporters in press vehicles was stopped on the way to Masafer Yatta on Monday by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers wearing black balaclava-type masks hiding most of their faces. In a video taken at the scene and posted by Avraham, an IDF major gives the journalists 'a reasonable time of 10 minutes' to leave.
The two film-makers can be seen remonstrating with the officer, pointing out that Adra had invited the journalists to his own home. 'They are coming to see the destruction in Masafer Yatta, the way that you are destroying the community, the settler violence,' Avraham says.
The major responds by saying that the journalists were being prevented from visiting 'to keep order in this area', claiming they were causing a 'public disturbance'.
Adra replies: 'You didn't prevent the settlers when they came to burn the homes inside, the cars, and attack people. I have so many videos of settlers coming to attack us and shoot people here. You do nothing. Why? Why now, only when journalists are coming to see this and to film this and to interview people, [are] you coming to prevent them?'
He later wrote on X: 'This is what it means to live under occupation: a masked soldier decides who and when can pass, when to destroy or to invade our homes.'
The IDF was asked for comment on Monday's incident but did not provide one.
The International Solidarity Movement, a group set up to resist land seizures on occupied Palestinian territory, has said that two of its activists were detained in Khalet Al-Daba'a on Saturday, and that one of them, a 48-year-old Swedish resident of London, Susanne Björk, was deported.
No Other Land, made by a Palestinian-Israeli collective, won the Oscar on 2 March as the year's best documentary feature. Three weeks later, another of its co-directors, Hamdan Ballal, was attacked at his home in Masafer Yatta by a group of settlers and then detained by the IDF.
Backed by the hardline coalition of the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, settlers have accelerated their seizure of Palestinian land and villages since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023.
The government announced last week that it would establish 22 new settlements in the occupied territory, legalising a series of outposts initially established without official authorisation.
The defence minister, Israel Katz, said the creation of the new settlements was 'a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state that would endanger Israel'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Hamas negotiations collapse
Israel-Hamas negotiations collapse

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Israel-Hamas negotiations collapse

Talks to end the war in Gaza have collapsed, bringing to an end the longest round of negotiations since the war started in October 2023. On Thursday afternoon, Benjamin Netanyahu's office said it had decided to withdraw its team from Qatar after studying Hamas's latest response to its proposals. The fresh negotiations were instigated in part due to significant pressure from Donald Trump, the US president, to reach a deal, following the perceived success of the Iran offensive in June. In recent days, leaks have suggested that the two sides were at loggerheads over the extent to which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would withdraw from Gaza once a ceasefire began, and also how aid would be distributed. It comes as the humanitarian situation in Gaza is deteriorating, with aid agencies warning of starvation and people 'collapsing' in the street. Both sides are facing huge pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal. Sources said Hamas still wants guarantees – despite guarantees from the White House – that Israel would not start fighting again after a 60-day initial ceasefire elapsed. The breakdown comes ahead of a huge protest in Tel Aviv calling on the Israeli government to end the war and secure the release of the remaining hostages. Around 20 are believed to be alive. An official in Mr Netanyahu's office said: 'In light of the response that Hamas gave this morning, it has been decided to return the negotiating team to continue consultations in Israel. We appreciate the efforts of the mediators Qatar and Egypt and the efforts of envoy Witkoff to bring about a breakthrough in the talks.' Another senior official said: 'Negotiations will continue, but there are serious differences and we face difficult decisions.' The statement came as Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's Middle East envoy, held talks with Ron Dermer, Mr Netanyahu's right-hand man, and the Qatari prime minister in Sardinia. It prompted hope in Israel that a way forward could still be found, despite the lack of progress in Doha. Mr Trump is known to be impatient for the war to end. One Israeli source told Kan, the Israeli public broadcaster, that the momentum of negotiations remained 'positive' and that the withdrawal of the negotiators did not signify a total collapse of dialogue. However, another source said the talks were at an impasse. Axios reported sources as saying that Hamas was insisting on the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 200 serving life sentences, in return for the hostages. Earlier in the week, it had been reported that the sides had agreed on a lower number. Israeli sources said officials had told Mr Witkoff that Hamas's demands were 'unacceptable', but that they are not necessarily final. Dependent in his coalition on ultra-nationalist ministers who want to take over Gaza with Jewish settlements, Mr Netanyahu has been accused of continuing the war despite reported warnings from his generals that the military rationale is wearing thin.

Far-right Israeli politicians and settlers discuss luxury ‘Gaza riviera' plan
Far-right Israeli politicians and settlers discuss luxury ‘Gaza riviera' plan

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Far-right Israeli politicians and settlers discuss luxury ‘Gaza riviera' plan

A group of far-right Israeli politicians and settlers met in parliament this week to discuss a plan to displace Palestinians from Gaza, annex the territory and turn it into a hi-tech, luxury resort city for Israelis. The scheme, titled 'The master plan for settlement in the Gaza Strip', envisions the construction of 850,000 housing units, construction of hi-tech 'smart cities' that trade cryptocurrency and a metro system that runs across the territory. It took its inspiration from an idea shared by the US president, Donald Trump, in February, where he pledged to turn Gaza into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'. 'The right of the people of Israel to settle, develop and preserve this land is not just a historical right – it is a national and security obligation,' the text of the plan said, boasting of economic benefits that it would bring to Israel. The plan, seen by the Guardian, would require Gaza's existing population of about 2 million to be emptied out. Legal experts warn that forcible displacement on such a grand scale would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. 'This is a plan for ethnic cleansing. Under international law, this would amount to a crime against humanity because deportation is a war crime when committed on a small scale and a crime against humanity when it is committed on a massive scale,' said Michael Sfard, one of Israel's leading human rights lawyers. The plan was discussed on Tuesday in the Knesset during a conference called 'The Riviera in Gaza: From Vision to Reality'. Among the speakers was the minister of finance, Bezalel Smotrich, and the settler activist Daniella Weiss. The conference drew criticism from other politicians, including Gilad Kariv from the Democrats party, who accused Smotrich of calling for war crimes to be committed. Weiss told the Guardian over the phone: 'Gazans will not remain there. They will go to other countries. Supporters of Hamas we will fight. But those who want to live a normal life, they will have to leave Gaza because of the 7 October attack.' Palestinians would be relocated to Egypt and other unspecified 'African countries', she added. Weiss said that she had a list of 1,000 Israeli families who had signed up already to live on land in Gaza, once Palestinian residents were pushed away. 'My plan is to make [Gaza] paradise, to make it Singapore,' she said. Weiss represents a small, but increasingly influential group of radical settlers within Israel who seek to illegally occupy the Gaza Strip. Their calls to create Israeli settlements have grown stronger after the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack which killed about 1,200 people and the Israeli war in Gaza which has killed more than 60,000 so far. The war in Gaza has levelled much of the strip and destroyed basic civilian infrastructure and most cities. The Gaza riviera plan would build luxury resorts on the ruins of Gaza, once Israel stopped bombing it. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has denied any plans to resettle residents of Gaza, though his defence minister, Israel Katz, has suggested transferring residents into a so-called 'humanitarian city' in southern Gaza. Legal experts have called the plan a blueprint for crimes against humanity and the Israeli military itself pushed back on the idea, which it said would be a security nightmare. Trump has also floated the idea of expelling the population of Gaza, suggesting at one point that neighbouring Jordan take in those displaced. Trump suggested that the US could assume control over Gaza to 'develop' the strip – which drew the ire of rights organisations across the world. As the conference was held, Gaza's starvation crisis continued to worsen. At least 113 people have died of hunger in Gaza, 45 of whom died over the last four days, health authorities said. Aid organisations have blamed Israel's virtual blockade of aid into the strip for the growing levels of extreme hunger. Human rights experts said the suggestion of displacing Gaza's residents inside and outside the territory should not be viewed in isolation. Rather, this is part and parcel of a displacement policy. 'When an occupying power creates a coercive environment by, for instance, withholding food, and that coercive environment leaves no choice to the civilian population but to move, then this can amount to the war crime of forced displacement,' said Janina Dill, the co-director of the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict.

The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza
The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza

There aren't many organisations Israel is less inclined to heed than the BBC, and most of them come with their own armed wing. So the Corporation's joint statement with news wires AFP, AP and Reuters, professing itself 'desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families' is unlikely to move Benjamin Netanyahu or his government. Nor is the BBC's call for foreign journalists to be allowed back into Gaza, which is not only not in Israel's military interests but would put journalists in mortal danger. Israel is being pummelled daily by the BBC. It's not about to be responsible for one of Auntie's reporters being abducted by Hamas or killed in crossfire. Even if the BBC had any credibility remaining inside Israel, its statement would be misguided, but the Corporation seems not to realise just how degraded its reputation is among Israelis across the political spectrum. In the past six months alone, the BBC has aired a documentary on the Gaza war narrated by the son of a Hamas deputy minister, livestreamed Bob Vylan chanting 'death, death to the IDF' at Glastonbury, and its news chief executive has opined that 'we need to continually remind people of the difference' between the Hamas government and its armed wing, a distinction which does not exist in UK law. This is what will be to the forefront of the Israeli government's mind when receiving this statement. Jeremy Corbyn's new political party has a better chance of getting a hearing. The BBC's intervention is especially unfortunate given that it risks amplifying Hamas's messaging against those trying to alleviate the horrific suffering in Gaza. There is a concerted effort to make sure the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation fails and for one reason only: the GHF's mission is to distribute aid to the residents of Gaza. That's it. Nothing more nefarious than feeding people. But feeding people is a threat to the Hamas-NGO complex that has hitherto held a chokehold on humanitarian aid distribution inside Gaza. Whatever the aid, whatever its source, when Hamas is in charge it siphons off the best for its own and uses the remainder to coerce ordinary Gazans into joining its ranks or toeing the line – or see their families go hungry. This strategy is not unknown to the NGOs that work on the ground in Gaza and have become too willing to turn a blind eye. The GHF is disrupting this cartel. By directing its efforts to dispensing food parcels to the needy, and declining to become part of Hamas's propaganda echo chamber, the GHF is a trial run for a different future for Gaza. A Gaza in which humanitarian aid is not controlled by Hamas is a Gaza in which Hamas will struggle to retain control. That Gaza is one in which the gruelling work of state-building can finally begin, if the Palestinians choose a new leadership more concerned with developing the economy than using the strip as an eternal launching pad for a self-defeating war on the Jews. Ergo the deliberate provocations at food distribution sites, ergo Hamas's determination to bait the IDF into opening fire, ergo the death toll propaganda war. By cosigning this statement, the BBC is contributing to the propaganda war. The Corporation can either be a reporter of the conflict or a participant in it, but it can't be both. In less than two years since October 7 the BBC has accelerated a case for its privatisation that its detractors spent decades trying (and failing) to force into the political mainstream. Hamas controls Gaza today because, in 2007, it seized the territory during a brief civil war against rival Fatah. The two organisations proved incapable of cooperating in the wake of the 2006 Palestinian elections, which Hamas won and ended decades of Fatah dominance. Palestinian voters chose Hamas at the ballot box but almost two decades later there have been no further elections. The Israelis kidnapped on October 7 aren't the only hostages being held by Hamas. The international community should, for reasons both humanitarian and self-interested, be willing on Israel in its efforts to smash Hamas and give Gazans an opportunity to break free of their grip, reject bigoted and futile anti-Zionism, and choose a better future for themselves. As long as the international news media, including and especially the BBC, continue serving as useful idiots for Hamas, this cannot happen. And as long as Western populations are bombarded with unverified Hamas claims about starvation and fatalities, Western leaders will continue to heap pressure on Israel to relent and allow Hamas to keep its hold over Gaza. The result will be more terrorism, more wars, and more dead Palestinians. Gaza will continue to hold itself hostage from its own future. The Corporation's statement will have no impact in Israel. The Israelis have stopped listening to the BBC. Unless it changes, they won't be the only ones.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store