Momentum builds to overhaul major housing handbrake
The reforms, which could be introduced to parliament as early as the August sitting, would enshrine the transport-oriented development zones and the Housing Delivery Authority, help address the housing crisis, and come after the government's audacious Rosehill Racecourse proposal was shot down by Australian Turf Club members.
Planning Minister Paul Scully and Liberal counterpart Scott Farlow have been meeting since the premier signalled in January he was open to bipartisan reform of the 46-year-old, 327-page EP&A act.
The act has been criticised by developers, governments and councils for being overly complex, allowing anti-development councils to undermine housing supply while creating a field day for consultants.
Senior Liberal sources privy to discussions said changes to the Complying Development Certificates process, allowing for low-impact development and code-based assessments, were under consideration. This would involve removing councils' ability to assess on subjective merit.
Loading
CDCs provide low-impact projects that meet a specific set of criteria to have simultaneous planning and construction approval. Under code-based assessments, proposals are assessed against a prescriptive set of rules rather than on merit.
Other proposals under consideration included legislating the Housing Delivery Authority, the three-person committee to accelerate large-scale developments by bypassing councils, along with installing pro-housing objectives in the act, a move favoured by both sides.
Urban Taskforce chief executive Tom Forrest has publicly backed the idea, and independent upper house MP Mark Latham proposed these amendments during earlier reforms of the act in March. While shot down, both Farlow and Labor indicated they would be supportive of the move later on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
NSW Premier Chris Minns warns trains a ‘massive' election issue after brutal report
NSW Premier Chris Minns has given a frank assessment of Sydney's train network, warning if they don't turn things around 'then voters will send a message' next election. Transport for NSW data released on Thursday revealed the bleak reality for commuters, with 16 per cent of city trains not running on time in the 2024-25 financial year. The result is the worst for Sydney's rail network in years and comes after months on instability wrought by protracted industrial action and major technical failures. Mr Minns on Thursday refused to blame industrial action as being the sole cause of the network's issues, admitting it was a 'huge challenge for the government'. 'If we don't rapidly improve performance on our railways in the coming months, then voters will send a message to us loud and clear at the next election,' he said. 'This is a massive issue for us. I'm not running away from it … I'm not putting it down to industrial disputes. 'The pressure and the responsibility is on us, the government, to increase reliability and on-time running in the public transport network. 'I can assure you, we're putting resources into it as we speak.' Mr Minns admitted solving the state's longstanding pay dispute with the Combined Rail Unions had been the government's 'focus'. With a deal reached, Mr Minns said the 'full resources' of senior leadership of Sydney Trains and TfNSW, and the Premier's office, would be on 'punctuality'. 'We're a big international city, (and) the only way big international cities work and people can get to work and from work is using public transport,' he said. 'There is no alternative, and we need to make sure that it's world class'. Mr Minns said the state government had invested $740m into backlog maintenance on the rail network. At the same time, TfNSW secretary Josh Murray announced in an email to staff on Wednesday plans to slash 950 senior positions at the transport authority. It comes after earlier jobs were cut as part of an election pledge by Mr Minns to slash senior echelons of the public service by 15 per cent. Public Service Association general secretary Stewart Little said the union was seeking details on the specific positions to be cut. Asked whether he could assure commuters the cuts would not affect the performance of the network, Mr Minns said: 'Yes, I can. 'I've looked and scrutinised these numbers very closely, and I'm not flippant about this. 'I realise that these are jobs, they're families, they're people's lives and … it's a difficult decision for the government to make. 'The simple truth, however, was that Transport for NSW grew by 48 per cent over four years – a massive, massive increase in the headcount of that department. 'We need more on-the-ground, frontline public servants doing the difficult but necessary job of providing that service, and that's where our focus is going.' Addressing the data later on Thursday, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said it 'came as no surprise' to commuters. 'This is not just a set of statistics. This is a set of failure by the Minns Labour government,' he said. 'We have the worst on-time performance on the city network since data started to be collected in 2019. 'One in six Sydney trains last year were late, and around one in three regional trains were late. 'This is a government that has failed to handle Sydney Trains. The Premier provides an apology but no plans to fix the trains. There's no timeline to get things fixed.' Mr Speakman called on the government to explain which jobs would be cut and how that would impact the network. When asked what he would 'do differently', Mr Speakman said he had 'a plan to get the trains running on time'. 'We have a program with clear timelines and a clear set of performance criteria to get, pardon the pun, the trains running back on track. 'What we'd be doing is having a clear plan with clear performance criteria, so you could mark whether you're making satisfactory progress.' Opposition transport spokeswoman Natalie Ward floated removing Mr Murray as Transport secretary. The Rail, Tram, and Bus Union led the Combined Rail Unions through months of industrial action. Earlier this month, they voted to approve a deal with the state government. While the details of the pay agreement are not known, the opposition has accused Labor of providing the union with 'perks'.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Michaelia Cash defends Jacinta Price in explosive parliamentary speech
Liberal Senator Michaelia Cash discusses her explosive parliamentary speech in defence of Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
MARK RILEY: Barnaby Joyce says net zero promise ‘insane', but ditching the plan is not an option
Restraint is a rare and elusive quality for an opposition leader to exercise in the early days of a new parliament. But Sussan Ley has done that this week. And not everyone is happy about it. It is natural that some in the Coalition would feel uncomfortable about not being able to dive hell-for-leather into the Government trenches with all guns blazing. It has been a painful, frustrating 11 weeks since they were so comprehensively smashed at the ballot box. And it is only natural that they would want to take out their anger and frustration on someone. Preferably the Government. But in politics, as in life, you only get one chance to make a first impression. And Sussan Ley is intent on making a positive one. She has maintained since becoming leader that the Liberal and National parties must demonstrate that they have not only heard the messages from the people but are responding to them. One of those messages was that voters have had enough of the reflexively confrontational model of politics. Our 'Washminster' system of democracy is fundamentally adversarial in nature, but not every idea has to be contested in a bare-knuckled fight. Sometimes being supportive is the best option. That doesn't mean simply saying 'yes' to everything. Oppositions can still say 'yes, but.' They can support an issue in the broad but still propose ways of making it better. And they can and should still say 'no'. But just not to every issue for the hell of it. It is about choosing your battles wisely. Matters of principle need to be defended. There are times when oppositions must go to the mat to demonstrate to voters what they really stand for. But if they do that on every issue, they will only be seen to stand for one thing — standing in the way. And that won't work. Figuratively or practically. The Labor Party has a 51-seat majority in the House of Representatives. The Coalition parties cannot stand in the way of any measure against that weight of numbers. But they can make statements of principle that can be defended more effectively in the Senate, where the Government needs either their numbers or the Greens' to pass legislation. Barnaby Joyce is taking a different approach, as is his want. His view, explained in multiple interviews this week, is for the Coalition to pick one big point of difference with Labor and then pull on a big fight over that. The issue he chose didn't surprise anyone who has been around Parliament House for the 20 years that he has walked its halls. He wants yet another episode of the climate wars. And he wants to apply the same template he used to fight Kevin Rudd's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and Julia Gillard's Emissions Trading Scheme. Remember his startling claim that pricing carbon would send the cost of a leg of lamb skyrocketing to $100? More than a decade later, it's still $35 at Coles or Woolies. This time Joyce is going after the shared commitment by the Government and the Opposition to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. According to him, the promise is 'insane.' But arguing to ditch that commitment doesn't just establish a point of difference between Labor and the Coalition. It also has the potential to split what is left of the Liberal and National parties. Again. Not everyone on the conservative benches buys into Joyce's almost religious zeal to smite the 'climate crusaders.' A backyard brawl over the issue won't just pit the Coalition against Labor. It will also set Nationals against Nationals, Nationals against Liberals and Liberals against other Liberals. At a time when Sussan Ley desperately requires unity, a Barnaby barney over net zero would give her net zero chance of achieving it. And the potential consequences of that for a new Opposition Leader are the opposite of restrained.
