Curse of Fred & Rose West's children – from tragic suicide to paedo son who chillingly said ‘I have a bit of dad in me'
The children of Fred and Rose West lived with the threat that if they misbehaved they could end up buried under the patio like their sister, Heather, while the girls also had to fend off the disgusting sexual advances of their dad.
14
14
14
14
The couple's evil crimes were only uncovered when the traumatised children told teachers about Heather's gruesome grave, sparking a police search that uncovered nine bodies buried in the garden and cellar of 25 Cromwell Street in Gloucester.
The rapist and serial killer couple shared ten children in total - including five they had together.
Charmaine and Anne-Marie were Fred's daughters from his first marriage, then there were Heather, Mae, Tara, Louise, Rosemary Jr, Lucyanna, Stephen and Barry.
Three of these children were conceived with clients Rose slept with while working as a prostitute, while Charmaine and Heather were killed by their parents after enduring years of abuse.
The surviving siblings have felt the curse of the Wests' depraved crimes over the years, as they struggled to come to terms with the lasting impact of their warped childhood.
Fred committed at least 12 murders and killed himself in January 1995 while on remand in prison. Rose was convicted of ten murders in November 1995 and sentenced to ten life terms with a whole life order.
Now, after The Sun revealed their paedophile son Stephen has had his eighth child - a daughter with his former glamour model fiancée Emma Bradley - we look at where the troubled West children are now.
Anne-Marie
Anne-Marie was Fred's second daughter from his first marriage to Catherine Costello, known as Rena.
Her mother and older sister Charmaine were both murdered by the Wests.
Anne-Marie is the oldest surviving child of the family and she was the only one of her siblings to testify about the abuse they suffered at Rose and Fred's hands in court.
In 1972, when Anne-Marie was eight years old, she was restrained and raped by Fred, while Rose watched and actively encouraged the abuse, even forcibly undressing her step-daughter.
After this first assault, Rose — who was sexually abused by her own father — allegedly told Anne-Marie: 'I'm sorry. Everybody does it to every girl. It's a father's job. Don't worry, and don't say anything to anybody.'
From the age of 13, Anne-Marie was forced into prostitution, telling clients who visited the house - where Rose was already selling sex - that she was 16. Anne-Marie ran away from home in 1979 when she was 15.
She later changed her name to Anne-Marie, and married husband Philip Davis. She later wrote a book about her ordeal at the hands of her parents called Out of the Shadows.
Now aged 61, she still lives in Gloucester but has sadly struggled with her mental health for years.
Last month her husband told the Daily Mail that she was estranged from her siblings despite them living in close proximity.
'It's the siblings who live with the misery and pain of what went on in that house and the trauma is probably too much for them to have any contact," he said.
"Even though some of them live near each other, they don't speak or see each other because that only opens up old wounds for them."
Mae West
14
14
14
Shortly after Mae was born in 1972, Rose started selling sex from an upstairs room at their Cromwell Street home, meaning Mae always grew up with a string of strangers coming in and out of the house.
Mae also suffered physical abuse at the hands of her mother, and was sexually abused by Fred.
After her parents' arrest, Mae initially denied that she'd been sexually abused, but later wrote about it in her 2018 memoir, Love as Always.
She also detailed her struggle to come to terms with the crimes her parents committed.
"Knowing your parents are regarded by most people as evil beyond belief is incredibly hard to live with, especially when your own experience of them has been more complicated and you've seen a side to them which makes them more than simply monsters," she wrote.
"Both of them had a side which seemed, at times at least, like other people. Mum could be tender and gentle with very young children; she had a sense of humour. Dad could be friendly and make us laugh.'
Even after Rose was convicted of 10 murders and sentenced to life in prison, Mae still believed she was innocent and continued to write to her and visit her in prison.
She told That's Life magazine: 'As the years passed though, I realised how controlling and manipulative Mum was. She'd been dubbed the most evil woman who had ever lived.
'I've read about Stockholm syndrome, where a person can become emotionally dependent on the person who is holding them hostage. I realised I was an emotional hostage to Mum. Now we no longer speak.'
Mae is now married and has two children, Amy and Luke. After Luke was born she became a recluse, terrified to leave the house in case she was recognised as a West.
But with the help of therapy she has come to terms with her past and has a job in retail.
Stephen West
14
Stephen, now 51, lives in Gloucestershire with his former glamour model fiancée Emma Bradley just a few miles away from his childhood home, the Cromwell Street house of horrors.
Stephen may have been the first person Fred confided in about his crimes.
On the morning police began searching their infamous 25 Cromwell Street home, Fred reportedly told his son: 'Look son, look after mum and sell the house… I've done something really bad. I want you to go to the papers and make as much money as you can.'
Later, while in custody, Fred made chilling admissions to Stephen, including the horrifying revelation that as a child, the young boy had unknowingly helped dig the graves of his father's victims.
Stephen recalled: 'He [Fred] said to me: 'Can you remember helping me dig those holes in the garden when you were a kid?' I said I couldn't remember, but he said: 'We did it together, you know.' Then he said: 'That's where the girls were found, in the exact holes.''
Stephen struggled mentally and attempted suicide in 2002. Two years later, he was sentenced to nine months in prison after admitting to seven counts of having underage sex with a 14-year-old girl when he was 20.
He reportedly once remarked: 'There's a bit of my dad in me.'
Sources said Stephen and fiancée Emma are planning to tie the knot in August at the posh Celtic Manor hotel in Newport - against her family's wishes.
One family insider told The Sun: 'None of us support it. He makes us uncomfortable.'
Stephen, who is a grandad, has been married twice before and now has eight children.
The former builder is believed to be out of work and living on benefits, driving a motability car he gets for one of his daughters, who is disabled.
Last month he told the Daily Mail that most of the West children are estranged, explaining, "We don't have anything to do with each other. I don't speak to my siblings and there are no large happy family get-togethers. Too much has gone on. It's probably too painful for us."
Barry West
14
14
14
Born in 1980, Barry was one of the West's younger children and claimed to have seen his parents murder his sister Heather when he was just seven years old.
He said: 'I heard my mum slap her, then I looked through the crack and saw my dad walk round behind her and put his leg out. Then he grabbed her neck and tripped her over.
'She went on to the floor. I could see her just a few feet away. Then my mum just booted her.
'She was kicking and kicking her and calling her a s**g. My dad still had her by the throat.'
He later branded his mother a 'psychopath' and said: 'I was happy when my dad committed suicide and now I think they should put my mum in a room with all the parents of the people she helped murder so they could tear her to pieces.'
Who are the UK's worst serial killers?
THE UK's most prolific serial killer was actually a doctor.
Here's a rundown of the worst offenders in the UK.
British GP Harold Shipman is one of the most prolific serial killers in recorded history. He was found guilty of murdering 15 patients in 2000, but the Shipman Inquiry examined his crimes and identified 218 victims, 80 per cent of whom were elderly women.
After his death Jonathan Balls was accused of poisoning at least 22 people between 1824 and 1845.
Mary Ann Cotton is suspected of murdering up to 21 people, including husbands, lovers and children. She is Britain's most prolific female serial killer. Her crimes were committed between 1852 and 1872, and she was hanged in March 1873.
Amelia Sach and Annie Walters became known as the Finchley Baby Farmers after killing at least 20 babies between 1900 and 1902. The pair became the first women to be hanged at Holloway Prison on February 3, 1903.
William Burke and William Hare killed 16 people and sold their bodies.
Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe was found guilty in 1981 of murdering 13 women and attempting to kill seven others between 1975 and 1980.
Dennis Nilsen was caged for life in 1983 after murdering up to 15 men when he picked them up from the streets. He was found guilty of six counts of murder and two counts of attempted murder and was sentenced to life in jail.
Fred West was found guilty of killing 12 but it's believed he was responsible for many more deaths.
He tragically died of a suspected overdose in 2020, aged just 40, while he was living in a supported hostel for adults coming out of rehab or prison.
Journalist Howard Sounes, who wrote a book on the depraved couple, met Barry and had stayed in touch. He said Barry was tormented by his childhood.
He said: 'He was totally haunted by his childhood. How do you overcome being the son of Fred and Rose West?
'The whole West story is littered with these really tragic stories, there was a lot of collateral of the West murder case.'
Tara West
Tara was born of Rose West's prostitution and her biological father was one of Rose's clients.
Tara, now 47, was named after the Tara Hotel in Gloucester, which Rose frequented with her clients.
In 1992, she was taken into care and forbidden contact with her parents or her older siblings.
She is now believed to be married and living in the north of England under a different name.
Louise West
Louise, now 46, was also taken into foster care as a child and is now thought to be living in the north of England.
She is believed to have intermittent contact with some of her sisters.
Rosemary Jr. and Lucyanna
Both Rosemary Jr, 42, and Lucyanna, 41, were fathered by clients of Rose.
They too had their names changed when taken into foster care in 1992 and have remained private under their new identities.
14
14
14
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
How drivers were sold a car finance compensation fantasy
Britain has narrowly avoided a costly car finance compensation free-for-all after a landmark court ruling derailed chances of a payout for millions of drivers. Claims lawyers had been bombarding consumers with adverts suggesting they may have been entitled to thousands of pounds in a scandal over hidden commission on car finance deals. The scandal had been expected to rival the mis-selling of payment protection insurance, which cost banks more than £38 billion. It was thought that nearly 15 million drivers could be entitled to payouts worth as much as £44 billion in total — although Friday's Supreme Court ruling means the numbers are set to be far smaller. Questions have now been raised over whether those using car finance really lost out and how many of them deserve compensation at all. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had tried to intervene ahead of the ruling — arguing that a colossal compensation bill for the industry would damage the economy and consumers. The Supreme Court ruled on three cases where consumers bought cars on finance and argued that they had been treated unfairly because they had not been told about commission involved in their deals — which ranged from £183 to £1,651. The court rejected two of the three cases, but upheld a complaint by Marcus Johnson, a factory worker from south Wales — because in his case the £1,651 commission in his loan was 55 per cent of the fee (including interest) on his loan over five years. 'The fact that the undisclosed commission was so high is a powerful indication that the relationship between Mr Johnson and the lender was unfair,' the court's judgment said. It leaves the door open to claims for compensation on deals that contained large amounts of commission, or where the commission model influenced what they paid. How much would be needed for a deal to be unfair is something that is likely to be decided by the City regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which said it would confirm if it would introduce a redress scheme before stock markets open on Monday morning. The FCA had been investigating finance deals that had used a model called discretionary commission, which incentivised dealers to give customers a worse interest rate on their loan. However, a judgment by the Court of Appeal last October opened the door to compensation claims by millions of motorists who had bought cars on finance, regardless of the commission model. Lenders appealed to the Supreme Court over the ruling. About nine in ten cars are bought on finance and £39.7 billion was borrowed on more than two million cars in the year to May, according to the Finance and Leasing Association, a trade body. The Court of Appeal had ruled in October that car dealers had a duty to make clear the nature and value of any commission paid to them to ensure that borrowers could give 'informed consent' before agreeing to a deal. Reeves was among those concerned about a claims free-for-all, with the Treasury reportedly drawing up contingency plans to shield lenders from having to pay out billions of pounds in compensation. The Treasury attempted to intervene in the Supreme Court case, arguing that a ruling had 'the potential to adversely affect the United Kingdom's reputation as a place to do business, with a consequent impact on economic growth'. In the meantime complaints about car loans to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), a body that solves disputes, have risen from 4,130 in the first three months of 2023-24 to 37,230 in the last three months of 2024-25. Most of these have been brought by claims companies and no-win, no-fee law firms that file complaints on behalf of consumers in return for up to 30 per cent of any compensation. These companies have swamped radio, social media and television with adverts that tell consumers they could be owed thousands of pounds. On Thursday the FCA said it had required 224 adverts from claims firms about car finance to either be taken down or changed. There had been highly speculative figures advertised for how much consumers could get back, it said, including compensation figures that did not make clear they covered multiple car loans and misleading claims that refunds were guaranteed. It said companies had been signing up consumers without their consent after they clicked on adverts. Philip Salter, a former FCA regulator now at the consultancy Sicsic Advisory, said: 'I haven't liked a lot of the claims company advertising. You've had a lot of companies arguing that time is running out, but the clock hasn't even started. It's been a bit of an unseemly scramble.' • Common sense has triumphed over compensation culture If there is to be compensation for consumers, it is expected that the FCA will announce a free redress scheme where lenders will contact those eligible, meaning consumers should not need to use a claims company. Gary Greenwood from the investment bank Shore Capital said: 'It's one of those things where if you go by the letter of the law of the previous Court of Appeal judgment, you're almost coming to the conclusion that commission is bad. But the problem is that if you look at the reality of what had happened, there doesn't seem to have been a lot of consumer harm that's gone on. 'So any sort of redress has got to come down to: has there been any consumer harm here, or are people just trying to claim money back on a technicality?' Greenwood said. Charlie Nunn, the chief executive of Lloyds Banking Group, which runs Britain's biggest car finance lender, Black Horse, has denied the scandal was on the same level as PPI. 'Some 80 per cent of people need finance to buy a new car, and a large number of second-hand car buyers do as well,' he told The Times in January. 'We need a well-functioning motor finance industry that supports consumers.' The National Franchised Dealers Association, a trade body, told the Supreme Court that 'nobody goes to a car dealer with a reasonable expectation that it is acting without self-interest in relation to any of the products it sells'. The Supreme Court's judgment could have been the difference between lenders facing a compensation bill of £11 billion — for complaints about a specific form of commission — and £29 billion, according to Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets, an investment bank. It could also have led to compensation claims about the sale of other financial products such as insurance where commission was involved but not properly disclosed. Consumers in turn could have had to foot the bill. Stuart Masson, the editor of the advice website The Car Expert UK, said that if lenders have to pay compensation to millions of people, car finance could get more expensive in the future as the industry tries to 'claw back' that money. 'That's not money they're going to find down the back of the sofa,' he told the BBC. 'They're going to have to get that back from increasing the costs of future lending, which won't just be on car finance. It could be on credit cards, it could be on personal loans, it could be on mortgages.' In January Reeves told bankers at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: 'There is nothing pro-consumer about making it harder for people to buy an affordable car for their family.' Before the courts widened the scope of possible mis-selling, the FCA had been investigating a specific model of commission called discretionary commission. This is where the cut that lenders paid dealers was linked to the interest rate consumers were charged, incentivising dealers to charge borrowers more. This model was used in about 35 per cent of car finance deals, according to the FCA, before it banned the practice in January 2021. The FCA said consumers could have paid about £1,100 more in interest over a four-year £10,000 car finance deal because of this commission model — which is being used as the basis for many of the estimates around possible compensation. Salter, who worked on the ban when he was at the FCA, said: 'That previous Court of Appeal ruling surprised me. I think everyone knows that if they're buying a car the salesman's getting commission, don't they? But discretionary commission never felt right to me.' The FCA began its investigation in January last year on whether consumers had been properly told about the link between their repayments and the commission. The investigation was kicked off by two rulings by the ombudsman against Lloyds and Barclays last year, which ordered the banks to refund two consumers more than £1,000 each. The FCA is expected to set out its next steps, including whether there will be a redress scheme, within six weeks. Any scheme would be free and easy for consumers to use, it said, while the FOS is also free for consumers to appeal to. Rob Lilley-Jones from the consumer group Which? said: 'It's vital that finance firms are held accountable for mis-selling and if a large number of motorists are eligible for compensation consumers are likely to be bombarded with ads from claims firms offering to take on their case. 'Affected customers should be careful when enlisting the services of claims management companies as the wrong choice could lead to their case being poorly handled, losing a significant portion of the compensation in legal fees — or both.' Coby Benson from the law firm Bott & Co, which helped win the ombudsman's case against Lloyds, said the experience from PPI was that consumers could sometimes recover more money by going to court than through a redress scheme. He said: 'We would support a proactive redress scheme if it fairly compensated consumers. But we have doubts over the effective implementation of a scheme, because our data shows that about half of clients have a different address now to that which the lender had from the time of the agreement.'
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough school uniform event is a helping hand for parents
Dozens of parents turned up to an event offering school uniform swaps and free items ahead of the autumn summer holidays have only just started, but many families are thinking ahead to the new term or a new school – and the financial challenges that new uniforms event was held at Peterborough's Queensgate shopping centre on Friday, and the city council said it hoped it could "help cut down on their costs... while also benefitting the environment".Parent Jessica Harper said it was "the perfect opportunity to reuse clothes that still have a lot of life left in them". Ms Harper said the event "could really help families that are struggling".The mother-of-two said the cost of school uniforms "is so much, and I've been trying to budget to afford uniforms for both my children, so when this event came up it was the perfect opportunity I needed without costing me so much money".She added that it was "great to reuse clothes that still have a lot of life left in them".Cristina Fernandez-Hierro, the recycling education co-ordinator at Peterborough City Council, said the aim of the event was to "tackle the cost-of-living crisis and also raise awareness of textile waste and the impact it has on the climate and our world".She added: "I think if people think they're not just getting something for free but also helping the environment then they will feel proud about it." Layla, 10, who was at the event with her mum, said: "Seeing if it fits, and seeing if you're comfortable enough, means [that when] we go to school, we will look incredible and smart."Her mother, Sandra, added: "It's really expensive when you need to buy everything with the school uniform, so it's a great support when we can find a blazer or a PE kit for a different school."Youth MP Danielle Daboh, who helped set up the swap-shop, said: "The event is championing reusing school uniform and also helping to alleviate the stress for families during the back-to-school period."It's also about signposting the environmental effects and economic benefits of events such as these, and hopefully we can do more in the future."It is sad to see that so many families need this but I'm happy that they're here to get the stuff that's here for them." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Telegraph crossword solvers supported the Allied victory. Can you crack our modern GCHQ puzzle?
If you look at today's prize cryptic crossword, you'll see something fishy going on. The clues are full of references to espionage and intelligence work, and we're even told that GCHQ have hidden one of the clues – with solvers are challenged to find it. This puzzle was written the Second World War. With the world teetering on the brink of disaster, the War Office needed to find the brightest minds to crack the German Enigma cipher, and so turned to the Telegraph's crossword solvers. During the war, paper shortages shrank the Telegraph to just six pages but the crossword was still published every day and received considerable attention. In late 1941, a flurry of letters debated whether the puzzle had become too easy. One solver even boldly claimed to be able to crack the prize cryptic in just six minutes. This provoked W A J Gavin, a magazine proprietor in the early part of the century, to put up a stake of £100 to challenge readers to back up their claims. This sum, about £4,000 in today's money, would be donated to support the war effort if the solvers triumphed. Gavin was so sceptical that he allowed competitors not just six, but a full 12 minutes to demonstrate their prowess and win the wager. Crack the code Arthur Watson, the Telegraph's editor, invited readers keen to pick up the gauntlet to send in their names. On January 10 1942, 25 competitors gathered at the Telegraph offices in Fleet Street to put their solving skills to the test. First to finish was Vere Chance of Orpington, although in his haste he misspelt a word and was disqualified. The winner was a Mr Hawes of Dagenham, who cantered home in seven minutes 57.5 seconds and won a cigarette lighter. The puzzle used in the competition was subsequently published in the newspaper, accompanied by a short article praising the 'five swift-moving minds' who won the wager against Gavin. What the competitors didn't know was that their endeavours were being monitored by the War Office. Enigma, a cipher machine originally developed by the Dutch, could encode messages in billions of ways, and typically changed settings every 24 hours. With cryptography vital to the war effort, crossword solvers were seen as possessing the analytical and lateral-thinking skills needed to help crack these codes. 'We were very good at crosswords,' one veteran Bletchley Park codebreaker recalled. 'And anything to do with anagrams.' 'A matter of national importance' Shortly after the competition, the War Office contacted competitors, inviting them to meet an officer of the General Staff 'on a matter of national importance'. Stanley Sedgwick, an accountancy clerk, recalled going to Whitehall and signing the Official Secrets Act, before being inducted into Bletchley Park on the strength of his performance in the competition. The work done there by the codebreakers devised methods which allowed the Allies to decipher the Axis Powers' communications. This vital information, called 'Ultra' because it was the highest level of classified intelligence, was necessary to support military operations, saving countless lives and playing an indispensable role in the Allied victory. In tribute to the historical links between the Telegraph's crossword and Bletchley Park, GCHQ have laid down a solving challenge for 2025 to match that set by Gavin in 1942. In the words of Colin, GCHQ's Chief Puzzler: 'For this centenary puzzle we have produced what we hope is a fun puzzle, but one which reflects the work of GCHQ and other intelligence agencies. 'Every clue has a relevant reference, including to our history, our current signals intelligence and Cyber Security work on national security and serious crime, and our wider relationships with the military and overseas. The kind of thinking required to solve puzzles helped codebreakers at Bletchley Park and remains relevant to the complex problems we solve today. I hope you enjoy it.' If any further inducement to attempt the puzzle were needed, it comes with a very special prize: guided tours of Bletchley Park. The 'swift-moving minds' of today are invited to take up a unique challenge, which they can choose to crack in 12 minutes or to savour at their leisure, as they prefer.
