Can these Farage rivals' start-ups hurt Reform?
Both are ex-Reformers who came off worst in a fight with Nigel Farage
The two movements share several key features. The first is a championing of direct democracy, with both Advance and Restore urging members to join and shape their direction. The second is a focus on argument, ideology and principles, rather than the nuts-and-bolts work of door knocking and campaigning in the mould of traditional political parties and pressure groups. Of the two, Lowe's is the more intriguing. He is championing the 'Great Repeal Act' – a popular idea on the British right, to undo much of New Labour's constitutional settlement. Habib's 12-minute launch video consists mainly of him talking to the camera about internal party reform. Unlike Habib, Lowe is an MP and thus able to enjoy the use of written questions in the House, airtime in the chamber and parliamentary privilege when discussing contentious matters.
Yet the challenge facing both men is evident on day one. It is extraordinarily difficult to establish a new political party in the UK. For Reform, it took four years and hundreds of thousands of pounds just to get to the point last July where they won five seats. Organisation is key to success in British politics. The fact that both men launched on the same day is not a promising sign. Neither man did any pre-briefing; there was no big press conference to impress the Westminster press pack. As a result, neither launch garnered so much as a mention in today's Daily Mail or Telegraph – two papers which share many of Lowe and Habib's own views. Both men have big followings on X but even in a social media age, they will likely struggle to get cut-through.
The striking thing is that both men have decided to pursue separate ventures, rather than pooling resources and working together. Both are ex-Reformers who came off worst in a fight with Nigel Farage. They are each, understandably, bruised by that experience, which continues to shape their respective politics and their causes. Lowe and Habib clearly hope to hurt Reform by claiming back the intellectual and political leadership of the right. But the fact that they, so far, have been unable to work together will be held up as proof by Farage as one reason why they will never supplant him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
24 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Two arrests after Palestine Action claims blocking Israeli defence firm UK site
It comes ahead of proposed legislation that will ban the group under anti-terror law. Avon and Somerset Police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, have been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking onto a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier on Tuesday, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol, and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. Avon and Somerset Police said officers were called to the site at around 6.30am. A spokeswoman said: 'Two people have been arrested following a small protest outside a premises at the Aztec West Business Park, in Almondsbury. 'They remain in police custody and inquiries are ongoing. 'We're committed to facilitating people's right to peaceful protest, but will not tolerate any criminal behaviour.' The incident comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. MPs and peers are expected to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. A Palestine Action spokesperson said: 'While the Government is rushing through Parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. 'Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid, and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.' The group also occupied the rooftop of UK subcontractor Guardtech Group, the spokesperson added. Officers are also at the scene at the site in Brandon, Suffolk. A Suffolk Police spokesman said: 'Officers and specialist negotiators are currently at the location and our immediate priority is to bring this to a conclusion and to ensure the safety of everyone at the scene.' Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. 'Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests.'
Western Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Two arrests after Palestine Action claims blocking Israeli defence firm UK site
It comes ahead of proposed legislation that will ban the group under anti-terror law. Avon and Somerset Police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, have been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking onto a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier on Tuesday, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol, and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. Avon and Somerset Police said officers were called to the site at around 6.30am. A spokeswoman said: 'Two people have been arrested following a small protest outside a premises at the Aztec West Business Park, in Almondsbury. 'They remain in police custody and inquiries are ongoing. 'We're committed to facilitating people's right to peaceful protest, but will not tolerate any criminal behaviour.' The incident comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. MPs and peers are expected to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. A Palestine Action spokesperson said: 'While the Government is rushing through Parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. 'Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid, and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.' The group also occupied the rooftop of UK subcontractor Guardtech Group, the spokesperson added. Officers are also at the scene at the site in Brandon, Suffolk. A Suffolk Police spokesman said: 'Officers and specialist negotiators are currently at the location and our immediate priority is to bring this to a conclusion and to ensure the safety of everyone at the scene.' Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. 'Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests.'
The Herald Scotland
34 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why is the BBC in the dock? Why not call out Glastonbury?
The latest calumny to rock the corporation to its foundations, concerns its apparent failure to immediately stop filming an obscure singer shouting some moronic things in a field in Somerset. On that basis the world – and by that I mean the Conservative Party and the Daily Mail – have gone into meltdown, demanding the immediate arrest of anyone remotely connected to the affair, up to and including the director-general of the BBC. God help us. If that was to transpire, we truly would be on a runaway train towards the terminus of a police state. Read more by Carlos Alba Amid the froth and fury of events at Glastonbury last Sunday, it would benefit us all to draw breath and calmly consider what actually happened. One of two punk singers, both called Bob Vylan – but whose true identities we don't know because they refuse to divulge them – took time from their set to chant 'death to the IDF' (Israeli Defence Force). The performer of whom, before last weekend, few of us had ever heard, also used the phrase 'from the river to the sea', interpreted by some as advocating the destruction of Israel. From the little information that is publicly available about Bob Vylan, they are clearly more Ali G than Malcolm X. The pair hail from Ipswich, from where they have waged a near decade-long campaign of meat-headed, sixth-form sloganeering, with song lyrics like 'violence is the only language some people understand'; 'I heard you want your country back/shut the f**k up'; and 'Whitney was everything to me when I was a kid'. Prior to Glastonbury, all the talk was about the platforming of the Belfast hip hop trio Kneecap, who have form when it comes to upsetting the British establishment, through an overtly pro-Irish republican agenda. If Bob Vylan's intention was to boost their own profile by grabbing the spotlight of infamy from Kneecap, they clearly succeeded, though at a cost. Their antics have sparked an investigation by Avon and Somerset Police, cost them their relationship with their agent, and led to the imposition of a ban on them entering the United States. Someone should tell them that a minimum obligation on anyone claiming the right of free speech is to divulge who is doing the speaking. There are those however – like the Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, and former Home Secretary Priti Patel – for whom Bob Vylan are small fry, and who have their eyes on the bigger prize. Philp urged police to investigate and prosecute both the performers and the BBC, condemning the broadcaster for airing "vile hatred" that incites violence. The first test for the police, in deciding whether to bring charges, will be whether the singer's words actually did incite violence and here, the evidence is scant. Police reported a total of 145 crimes over the five days of the festival, which included 27 reports of violence against a person, 22 drug offences, 13 public order offences, and one report of 'miscellaneous crimes against society'. They didn't reveal how many arrests were made before or after Bob Vylan's comments. Historically, the number of arrests is on the low side when compared, for example, with 1999 when 244 people were arrested at Glastonbury – 70 more than the previous year. For those watching on TV, anyone simple-minded enough to arm themselves for a tilt at the Israeli army – one of the world's most formidable fighting forces – based on the ramblings of a provincial clodpole at a music festival is just as likely to be influenced by something they have read on a toilet wall. There is also the nature of the comments, and whether they constitute incitement to violence. Calling for an individual to be killed clearly is a crime, but can the same be said about a military force in a war? To express support for the victory of Ukraine, following its illegal invasion by Russia, for example, implies the inevitability that some Russian soldiers will be killed. Should that too be regarded as an incitement to violence, punishable by UK law? Issues of free speech aside, there is the question of the BBC's culpability. It is shocking that there does not appear to have been a protocol in place for the broadcaster to mute a performance that contained potentially illegal content. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has urged police to investigate and prosecute both Bob Vylan and the BBC (Image: PA) Was it beyond the wit of anyone at the corporation to use the same birdsong dubbing techniques that Channel Four used during live broadcasts of Big Brother when housemates made potentially defamatory comments? Why is all the focus on the BBC, rather than on the festival organisers making vast amounts of money platforming such acts? It's not as if organisers didn't know the potential dangers posed by Bob Vylan, who posted on Facebook ahead of their performance: "Turns out we're finally at a point where the BBC trust us on live TV! Watch us live either in the field or in the comfort of your own home!" Let's be clear, the chances of Tim Davie – or anyone else at the BBC – being successfully prosecuted for anything over this affair are slimmer than Kneecap campaigning for the Tories at the next General Election. Beyond the silly season neurosis of the Bob Vylan saga, the real villains are the Israeli politicians and soldiers responsible for the deaths of 56,531 Gazans since October 7 and the animals from Hamas who perpetrated the 2023 atrocity. Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
