Under-strength Brumbies eye 'big opportunity' against Lions
The Brumbies are the strongest of Australia's four Super Rugby sides and will take heart from the Lions' struggles to grind past an under-strength NSW Waratahs 21-10 at the weekend.
They were also the only provincial team to beat the tourists when last in Australia in 2013, stunning Warren Gatland's men 14-12.
But they will take on the might of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales in Canberra on Wednesday without their top players.
Eight Brumbies were in the Australia matchday squad that needed a late-gasp try to beat Fiji 21-18 on Sunday, and seven of them will not feature.
They include veteran forwards James Slipper and Allan Alaalatoa, along with first-choice Wallabies backs Noah Lolesio, Len Ikitau and Tom Wright.
Only lock Tom Hooper, who came off the bench, will play.
"The boys have been back in training for a couple of weeks and they are aware of how big an opportunity this is for them to take on the Lions," said Larkham.
"We're under no illusions of the challenge that lies ahead, they are an incredibly strong and powerful side."
Hooper's brother Lachie was also included in the Brumbies squad, with the pair set to play together for the first time in a professional capacity.
Prop Lington Ieli, flanker Rory Scott, scrum-half Ryan Lonergan, centre David Feliuai and wing Corey Toole all start after recently being involved in the Wallabies training camp.
Lock Cadeyrn Neville will face the Lions for the second time, having played for the Melbourne Rebels during the 2013 tour.
ACT Brumbies (15-1):
Andy Muirhead; Ben O'Donnell, Ollie Sapsford, David Feliuai, Corey Toole; Declan Meredith, Ryan Lonergan (capt); Tuaina Taii Tualima, Rory Scott, Tom Hooper; Cadeyrn Neville, Lachie Shaw; Rhys van Nek, Lachlan Lonergan, Lington Ieli
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Wimbledon blames human error for a mistake by the tech that replaced officials. Here's what happened
LONDON: The All England Club, somewhat ironically, is blaming "human error' for a glaring mistake by the electronic system that replaced human line judges this year at Wimbledon. The CEO of the club, Sally Bolton, said Monday that the technology was "inadvertently deactivated" by someone for three points at Centre Court during Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's three-set victory over Sonay Kartal a day earlier in the fourth round. On one point, a shot by Kartal clearly landed past the baseline but wasn't called out by the automated setup – called Hawk-Eye – because it had been shut off. Hours after Bolton spoke with reporters, the club issued a statement to announce that it "removed the ability for Hawk-Eye operators to manually deactivate the ball tracking,' meaning "this error cannot now be repeated due to the system changes we have made.' Bolton declined to say who made the mistake on Sunday or how, exactly, it occurred or whether that person would face any consequences or be re-trained. She did note that there were other people at fault: the chair umpire, Nico Helwerth, and two who should have let him know the system was temporarily down – the review official and the Hawk-Eye official. "We didn't need to put line judges back on the court again,' Bolton said. "We needed the system to be active.' Is Wimbledon using AI for line calls this year? No. But like most big tennis tournaments nowadays – the French Open is one notable exception – Wimbledon has replaced its line judges with cameras that are supposed to follow the balls on every shot to determine whether they land in or out. There are those, particularly in the British media, who keep referring to this as part of the ever-increasing creep of artificial intelligence into day-to-day life, but Bolton objected to the use of that term in this case. "The point I would want to emphasize – and perhaps contrary to some of the reporting we've seen – is it's not an artificial intelligence system. And it is electronic in the sense that the camera-tracking technology is set up to call the lines automatically, but it requires a human element to ensure that the system is functional,' Bolton said. "So it is not AI. There are some humans involved. And in this instance, it was a human error.' What happened on the missed call at Wimbledon? Russia's Pavlyuchenkova was one point from winning a game for a 5-4 lead in the first set against Britain's Kartal on Sunday when a shot by Kartal landed long. But there was no ruling from Hawk-Eye. After a delay, Helwerth decided the point should be replayed, which Pavlyuchenkova thought showed bias toward an opponent competing in her home country. With Hawk-Eye back up and running after a delay, Kartal won that game, but Pavlyuchenkova took that set and the match. The All England Club looked into what happened and found that the line-calling system actually was off for three points before anyone noticed. The system itself worked "optimally,' Bolton said repeatedly. "In this instance, sadly,' she said, "it was the human part of the operation that made a mistake.' Why was the Hawk-Eye system accidentally turned off during a match? Bolton said the system is shut down between matches – "and the humans are the people that need to do the activating and deactivating" – and someone accidentally did so during Pavlyuchenkova vs. Kartal. Asked why, Bolton responded: "Well, I don't know. It was a mistake, obviously.... I wasn't sat there, so I don't know what happened." She said Helwerth could have made a ruling himself on the controversial non-call, the way he did on the prior pair of points, but instead just decided to pause the match. "I'm assuming,' Bolton said, "he felt he had not seen it properly.' Pavlyuchenkova said after the match the official told her he thought the ball was out. What do players think about the use of technology at Wimbledon? Players are divided on whether there even should be electronic rulings during matches – unless it is fool-proof – or whether there should be a return to Wimbledon's old way of doing things. Since 2007 through last year, there was a combination of the human touch and technology: There were line judges on court to make calls, but players were allowed to challenge and ask for a video replay of a point if they thought there was a mistake. "It's such a big match, big event,' Pavlyuchenkova said. "Since we have already automatic line-calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' – AP
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
Tennis-Sabalenka ready for Siegemund's tricks as Alcaraz faces 'nightmare' Norrie
Jul 6, 2025; Wimbledon, United Kingdom; Aryna Sabalenka reacts to a point during her match against Elise Mertens of Belgium on day seven at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club. Mandatory Credit: Susan Mullane-Imagn Images (Reuters) -Top seed Aryna Sabalenka faces a tricky test against Germany's Laura Siegemund, while Cameron Norrie, the last Briton standing, takes on defending champion Carlos Alcaraz when the Wimbledon quarter-finals kick off on Tuesday. TOP WOMEN'S MATCH: ARYNA SABALENKA V LAURA SIEGEMUND World number one Sabalenka recently called Wimbledon her "dream tournament." But despite reaching the semi-finals twice, the three-times Grand Slam winner has been unable to lift the trophy at the All England Club lawns. This year, the 27-year-old is once again tantalisingly close to achieving her dream, but in the last eight she faces an opponent who has a few tricks up her sleeve. Siegemund, who came into the tournament ranked 104th in the world, did not drop a set and beat sixth seed Madison Keys on her way to the quarter-finals. She is known for her drop shots and slices that often throw opponents off their game. Regarding Siegemund's technique, Sabalenka said: "Especially on the grass ... it slows (the ball) down and you have to stay really low and work with your legs. "It can be tricky, her game style. It's annoying, but I've been facing many tricky players .... I have enough variety to handle the trick shots." Sabalenka, who hoped for "no more upsets" last week as a number of top seeds were knocked out in the first three rounds, will hope not to become the latest and biggest name in the list to be upset by unheralded contenders like Siegemund. TOP MEN'S MATCH: CAMERON NORRIE V CARLOS ALCARAZ Cameron Norrie is the last British singles player still standing in the championships, with Emma Raducanu and Sonay Kartal bowing out at the weekend. The 29-year-old former semi-finalist battled past Nicolas Jarry in a gruelling contest over 4-1/2 hours on Sunday with a win that showed his fighting spirit but drained him physically. The odds will be stacked against the world number 61 when he faces holder Alcaraz. But the Spaniard has said Norrie, who has won two of their last three meetings, is a headache to play. "For me, facing him is almost a nightmare, to be honest. Really tough from the baseline. I'm not surprised he's in the quarter-finals playing great tennis because I've seen him practice," the world number two said. "He's playing at home, as well. So he's going to use the crowd on his side. I have to be really strong mentally and focused to play good tennis if I want to beat him.' The winner will play either American fifth seed Taylor Fritz or Russian 17th seed Karen Khachanov in the semi-finals. REJUVENATED ANISIMOVA SEEKS NEW HEIGHTS Reaching the quarter-finals is a return to familiar territory for Amanda Anisimova, whose form took a dive after she got to this stage at the tournament in 2022. She took several months off due to the tour taking a toll on her mental health. The 13th seed endured two three-set battles to reach the last eight, but the rejuvenated American said her fresh outlook on the grind of professional tennis had armed her to reach for new heights. "Ever since I took my break, I just found this new perspective and this new-found sense of fighting for everything and accepting the challenges that come and embracing them," she said. "A lot of things have changed ... I feel like my professionalism and work ethic has taken a whole 360 (degree turn). Everything is centred around my tennis and how I can prepare the best that I can." Anisimova, who has beaten Pavlyuchenkova all three times they have met, said she had exceeded her expectations with her rise through the rankings and reaching the semis for the first time would seal her return as a major contender on the circuit. WIMBLEDON ORDER OF PLAY ON TUESDAY (prefix number denotes seeding) Centre Court (Play begins 1230 GMT) 1-Aryna Sabalenka (Belarus) v Laura Siegemund (Germany) Cameron Norrie (Britain) v 2-Carlos Alcaraz (Spain) Court Number One (Play begins 1200 GMT) 5-Taylor Fritz (U.S.) v 17-Karen Khachanov (Russia) 13-Amanda Anisimova (U.S.) v Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (Russia) (Reporting by Chiranjit Ojha in Bengaluru; Editing by Ken Ferris)
The Sun
19 hours ago
- The Sun
Wimbledon blames ‘human error' for embarrassing line-calling glitch
WIMBLEDON chiefs on Monday blamed human error for an embarrassing failure of the tournament's electronic line-calling system. Officials apologised to Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Sonay Kartal after the malfunction during their fourth-round match on Centre Court on Sunday, which Pavlyuchenkova won in straight sets. After an investigation, organisers admitted the technology was turned off in error on a section of the court for a game, with the mistake only becoming apparent when a shot from Britain's Kartal that clearly missed the baseline was not called out. Had the call been correct, it would have given Russia's Pavlyuchenkova a 5-4 lead in the first set, but instead umpire Nico Helwerth ruled the point should be replayed, with Kartal going on to win the game. The Russian accused the official of home bias, saying: 'Because she is local, they can say whatever. You took the game away from me.' Wimbledon issued a statement on Sunday saying the system had been 'deactivated in error' for one game by those operating the system. 'In that time, there were three calls not picked up by live ELC on the affected part of the court. Two of these were called by the chair umpire, who was not made aware that the system had been deactivated,' it said. 'Following the third, the chair umpire stopped the match and consulted with the review official. It was determined that the point should be replayed. 'The chair umpire followed the established process. We have apologised to the players involved.' Sally Bolton, chief executive of the All England Club, told reporters on Monday that the system was 'working optimally.' 'The issue we had was human error in terms of the tracking system having been inadvertently deactivated, and then the chair (umpire) not being made aware of the fact that it had been deactivated,' she said. She added: 'We've spoken to the players, we've apologised to them, we've very quickly moved into reviewing everything that had happened yesterday afternoon and putting in place the appropriate changes to the processes.' A fully automated system has replaced human line judges at Wimbledon in 2025, in line with the Australian Open and the US Open. But the glitch in Sunday's fourth-round match follows concerns raised by other players about the technology, including British stars Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper. Around 80 former line judges are employed as match assistants, with two on each court offering support to the umpire. But Bolton said there was no need to put them back on the courts. 'The system was functional,' she said. 'It had been deactivated. We didn't need to put line judges back on the court again, we needed the system to be active.' Automated line-calling technology has become standard across tennis, with all events on the men's ATP Tour and many WTA tournaments using it. – AFP
