Meet the most important voice in Australian foreign policy
Ms Wong's answer reveals a political savvy and quick wit that have made her the most popular minister in Australia's Labor government, re-elected in a thumping of the opposition in May's general election, and the most consequential Australian foreign minister in a generation. Anthony Albanese, the prime minister, has little interest in questions of geopolitics, leaving them to Ms Wong and Richard Marles, the defence minister. But Ms Wong's popularity and reputation for mastering her brief means that hers is the most important voice on the big strategic questions.
When Labor returned to office in 2022, Ms Wong inherited a mess. The previous government, a conservative coalition, had turned sharply against China, which in turn had stopped buying Australian commodities or taking its ministers' phone calls. More worryingly, China had signed a security agreement with the Solomon Islands on Australia's northern approaches and was looking to rack up more deals with other island states wary of the previous government's refusal to take climate change seriously. The announcement in 2021 of the AUKUS submarine-building pact surprised South-East Asia, which reacted with suspicion.
So the dramatic improvement in relations with the rest of the region has been Ms Wong's big achievement. But what is impressive is that it has been accomplished mainly through her personal diplomacy, without any underlying change in policy. A gruelling travel schedule in her first year on the job took Ms Wong to 18 Pacific Island states and every country in South-East Asia but Myanmar. China has slowly lifted all trade restrictions imposed under the previous government, but Australia has continued to work closely with America to constrain China's regional ambitions. AUKUS remains on the books.
A big part of this has been the rapport with her counterparts in Asia. Ms Wong was born in Malaysia to an ethnic Chinese father and an Australian mother, and lived on the island of Borneo until eight years old. She has begun to talk about this heritage more now, she says, because she wants Asia to see the multicultural society that Australia has become. She was only the second Asian-Australian elected to parliament in 2001. But, she points out, there are now more than a dozen serving. Nor has her sexual identity been a hindrance. One minister from a conservative Muslim country regularly asks after her wife.
Ms Wong's diplomatic skills will be put to the test in her second term. Australia faces a more difficult international situation than during Labor's first three years in office. China continues to bully its neighbours. But now the Pentagon is demanding that Australia sharply increase defence spending, and asking it to commit in advance to fighting alongside America were it to fight China over Taiwan. Many Australians regard this as an affront to their sovereignty. AUKUS hangs in the balance.
Critics say that Ms Wong has not done enough to preserve the alliance with America. She has met Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, twice, but otherwise the government seems to be keeping the Trump administration at arms' length. In a speech in Kuala Lumpur in May, she highlighted Australia's differences with America on trade. Asked whether she fears such talk might lead to a backlash, Ms Wong shrugs. 'I think we have to be who we are.' ■
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Power plays, tax fights and lost voices: PVO reveals what the first week of new parliament tells us
Parliament returned this week not with a bang, but with a calculated rhythm. No drama in the numbers, no early leadership tension, and no surprise legislative ambushes. And yet beneath the calm surface, the first full sitting week of this new term - which only included two days of Question Time - revealed a lot. The government was keen to look measured but quietly ruthless, an opposition still licking its electoral wounds was slowly finding its voice, while the crossbenchers immediately discovered just how little leverage they now have, other than the Greens who hold the balance of power in the Senate in their own right. There was strategy at play on all sides: defensive, offensive and performative. And with tax policy fast becoming the next political battlefield during this parliamentary term, the tone may already have been set. What were Anthony Albanese 's priorities? Labor returned to Canberra laser-focused. Top of the list: pushing the HECS‑HELP cut to student debts through the parliament. Their signature pre-election promise - a 20 percent wipe-off for roughly 3 million Australians - was formally introduced in the House on Wednesday. But beyond policy, optics mattered too. Labor deliberately dialled down the triumphalism. The tone was 'steady hand', not swagger. Ministers fronted the media emphasising unity and focus, a calculated effort to sidestep hubris. Welcoming new MPs added another layer to the week. Ali France, Sarah Witty and others delivered first speeches: personal, grounded and in contrast to the Coalition's more familiar faces (those few who survived the electorate's cull). Labor also took the chance to underscore the Coalition's troubles on the floor of parliament. Their failure to back a modest income tax cut before the election got plenty of Question Time airplay. So too the divisions over net zero. And a depleted number of Liberal women in the opposition's party room took away from its first female leader strutting her stuff. The Nationals remain publicly split on 2050 emissions targets, with Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack pushing to scrap them entirely. It's hard not to think that at some point sooner or later there will be another challenge Nats leader David Littleproud will need to navigate. Then came trade. Australia lifted biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, widely seen as a move to smooth tensions with Washington and hopefully negotiate down the Trump trade tariffs. Labor tried to claim the timing of the policy change was a coincidence, but the Coalition isn't buying that. It wants the decision reviewed, using the final Question Time to push its case that biosecurity standards have been sacrificed to the interests of trade. There was no policy switch on beer tax, as Labor went ahead with its election promise to freeze the excise for the next two years. Cheers! A nice win for the outgoing CEO of the Brewers Association, John Preston, who had long advocated for an end to the continual hikes which have given Australia some of the highest beer taxes in the world. With pressure on the government to ease the cost of living, it will be interesting to see if the industry can successfully lobby to make the freeze permanent. If the Coalition looked fractured and reactive, Labor appeared focused and composed. Less interested in gloating, more committed to governing, or at least projecting that impression. How did the new Opposition leader perform? Taking on what's often called the toughest job in politics, Sussan Ley managed her first full week with steadiness and restraint. It wasn't flashy, to be sure, but she avoided missteps. Ley anchored her messaging to one issue: Labor's plan to tax unrealised super gains. It was a deliberate pitch to older Australians and SMSF holders. Her lines in Question Time were clear and targeted. She even ventured briefly into housing, territory the government prefers to control. Ley didn't bite at the attempts to reignite the net zero wars. She stayed out of the mess, refusing to endorse or criticise the move, thus avoiding inflaming an already unstable internal debate. That said, it's likely this issue will explode within the Coalition sooner rather than later. Away from the chamber, Ley focused on authenticity. Her 60 Minutes appearance on the Sunday before the sitting week commenced - speaking about the death of her mother and her reasons for taking the job - struck the right tone: restrained and sincere. It didn't prevent the first Newspoll of her leadership revealing that the opposition starts this term further down in the polls than the poor election showing in May. Commentary on Ley's performance in her first parliamentary sitting week was mixed. Some accused her of lacking ideological edge. Others noted her improved recognition and clearer messaging. Her approval ratings remain low but she has time to turn that around. Behind the scenes, Ley began rebuilding with internal reviews, outreach to business and community groups, and a reshaped shadow team. It's too soon to judge, but she made it through her first test without slipping. She even met with former long term Liberal deputy leader Julie Bishop during the sitting week, no doubt receiving some tips on how to navigate the male-dominated shadow cabinet she leads. Does anyone remember the crossbench? The crossbench went to the 2025 election with high hopes. A hung parliament was on the cards, and the independents and Teals saw themselves as likely policy shapers and kingmakers. But Labor's outright majority removed that possibility in an instant. In the lower house, the crossbench is now politically irrelevant. Their speeches will still be heartfelt, and they'll get a sizeable share of questions given how small the opposition party room now is. But without leverage anything they do is largely symbolic. The Senate, however, is a different story, but only for the Greens. With eleven seats, they hold the balance of power and have made clear they intend to use it. Most of what's passed so far hasn't been contentious, but that won't last. Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi ensured the crossbench wasn't entirely invisible. During the Governor-General's address, she stood mid-speech and unfurled a sign reading: 'Gaza is starving… Sanction Israel.' It drew formal censure and headlines, but no policy traction. Still, it was a reminder that the Greens won't fade quietly despite their poor performance in lower house electorates. The rest of the crossbench? Watching from the sidelines, for at least the next three years. That includes ACT Senator David Pocock who made such a splash in his first term. The team of four One Nation senators led by Pauline Hanson also has little power, but their enlarged party room is a lead indicator that they will be in the running to share the balance of power after the next election. What debates will we hear more about in the coming weeks? The biggest issue emerging from this week is the looming political fight over taxing unrealised gains in superannuation. The government's Division 296 proposal (a 15 percent tax on earnings for super balances over $3 million, including on gains not yet realised) has become the central line of Coalition attack. Ley and her deputy and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien are already framing it as a broader tax threat. 'Will Labor now tax unrealised gains on everything?' was the line floated in Parliament, designed to create unease among all Australians, not just the rich few with huge super balances. Labor maintains that the tax hits only 0.5 percent of people and will raise over $40 billion in the next decade. But there's disquiet, even internally. Some Labor MPs reportedly 'hate' the idea of taxing paper profits, even if they accept the budget imperative. Whatever way you cut it, the policy is badly designed, even if the goal of restricting super tax concessions for the wealthy has some merit. The industry pushback is already intense, precisely because the design is so poor. SMSF groups warn they'll bear the brunt of what's coming. Hostplus wants indexation to avoid younger savers being caught by the tax in the future. Then there's the politics. Anthony Albanese joked in Question Time: 'The time to run a scare campaign is just before an election, not after one.' A wry line, but from a man who well knows how effective a scare campaign can be. Chalmers is framing the debate in class terms: 'This side of the House is cutting taxes for 14 million Australians. That side is going to the wall for 0.5 percent.' That may resonate, but it won't silence critics, and it gives away the Treasurer's penchant for class warfare, which might cripple his efforts to embrace serious tax reform. If indeed he is even serious about that looming debate. The August tax summit will keep the issue of super in the headlines at the same time as broadening the discussion. Whether it resolves anything is another matter. The noise around Division 296 will therefore carry into August, but it won't be the only game in town. What this week showed (quietly but clearly) is how each player plans to operate in the new political reality. Labor in control and careful not to overreach. The opposition disciplined, for now at least, despite Joyce and McCormack's best efforts. The crossbench adjusting to irrelevance. The curtain has only just gone up, but the tone of the new parliamentary term is already taking shape.
South Wales Argus
22 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to agree Britain-India trade deal
The Prime Minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the Government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: 'Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. 'We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK.' The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will 'reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits'. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds (James Manning/PA) He added: 'The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business.' The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. The Prime Minister is being pressed to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal (Family handout/PA) Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. He added: 'Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. 'But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute.' The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.' Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be 'high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet'.
Rhyl Journal
32 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to agree Britain-India trade deal
The Prime Minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the Government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: 'Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. 'We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK.' The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will 'reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits'. He added: 'The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business.' The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. He added: 'Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. 'But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute.' The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.' Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be 'high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet'.
