logo
Making sense of markets at the midway point of the year with Mackenzie Investments' CIO

Making sense of markets at the midway point of the year with Mackenzie Investments' CIO

Globe and Mail2 days ago
The first half of 2025 in stock markets is about as easy to summarize as the coming six months are to predict.
Few investors anticipated U.S. President Donald Trump's administration going as far on tariffs as it did on the April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement, and few of those who suffered massive losses in the week that followed predicted markets would have reached new highs before the president's 90-day reprieve ends on July 9.
To help make sense of the past six months, Globe Advisor spoke with Lesley Marks, chief investment officer, equities, at Mackenzie Investments. The conversation on June 26 took place in a rare quiet moment for markets this year.
President Trump was still bashing Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell, but Iran and Israel had reached a truce, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq were on the cusp of new all-time highs, and the president wouldn't upend trade talks with Canada for another day.
Ms. Marks discussed the sliding scale of uncertainty, key investment trends, and the top risk facing markets.
Despite everything that's happened this year, stocks aren't far from where they were at the beginning of the year. How do you explain this?
First is what I describe as the theory of relativity. While it has been very chaotic, when you compare where we are today versus where we were three months ago – for example, on 'Liberation Day' – people feel so much more certain. So, think about certainty as being relative. If that was the maximum uncertainty around the path that tariffs would take, and the fact that we have this 90-day reprieve, on a relative basis, people are feeling a little bit more certain. They've also come to almost get used to this chaotic nature of headlines we've seen.
And then the second trend that has been helping markets is, as we all know, markets are forward-looking. While the near-term certainly has some headwinds, the medium-term is giving investors reason to be more optimistic. Some of the things that investors are focused on in looking through this short-term period of uncertainty are, for example, the likelihood that the Fed will move to ease [interest rates] and also the potential of stimulus that will come on the fiscal side from the passing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Even if markets are at similar levels or a little bit higher than the start of the year, how is the backdrop for equities different now compared to Jan. 1?
One thing that is certainly notable and should be a headwind for equities is that growth rates, when it comes to both economic and earnings growth, are actually lower now than they were on Jan. 1.
But sentiment is quite strong. We went to this very low-sentiment place to basically saying, 'We've looked over the edge, we don't like what we see, and now we feel a lot better,' and investors are having more confidence that the administration is showing a willingness to pivot if things look dark when it comes to policy.
The last piece that impacts both bond markets and equity markets is the outlook for interest rates. Although there's obviously concern about the future for inflation, inflation has been quite surprisingly benign. That's something that, at the beginning of the year, would have been identified as a risk that has not quite played out the way some would have expected by this point in time.
Given this backdrop, what are you looking for in a stock today?
You want to look for stocks that are going to benefit from the key themes or trends that are informing markets, economies, interest rates, growth, etc. For example, we've seen here in Canada a lot of interest around our resource sector, so that's a key theme.
Obviously, AI is a key theme. What we're seeing today is a much greater focus on the productivity benefits of AI. That's particularly important when you think about the impact of inflation. So far, what we've seen are companies taking the brunt of the increased costs that come from tariffs, so they're very much going to rely on things such as AI to generate greater productivity.
A theme that's been stealing headlines today has been related to NATO members' spending on defence as a percentage of their GDP. [It's] not just about traditional defence businesses, but also things that are strategically important, such as critical minerals – even AI. So, some of these expenditures that are great for productivity for countries are going to be included in that extra defence spending calculation.
What do you think is the single biggest risk to markets going into the second half of this year?
The single biggest risk is the one we're talking about today, but we haven't seen yet, which is inflation.
What we've seen so far is that corporations seem to be absorbing the increase in tariffs. But just today, we saw the numbers around the tariff income into the U.S. Treasury, and the numbers are big. Billions are going into the U.S. Treasury from tariffs. It's very much a part of the budget reconciliation, the assumption that these tariffs will pay for some of the tax cuts and any of the fiscal spending. So, in that sense, tariffs are likely – in some shape or form – here to stay.
Eventually, we'll see this come into consumer prices. Businesses are absorbing it today because they view it as temporary. If that proves to be false, then inflation comes back on the table, and that makes it very difficult for the Fed to make decisions about cutting interest rates to support a weaker economy.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

President Donald Trump holds a gavel after he signed his signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts at the White House, Friday, July 4, 2025, in Washington, surrounded by members of Congress. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) WASHINGTON — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. U.S. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. 'The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.' Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Seung Min Kim, The Associated Press

Canada's now-abandoned digital services tax was never enough to begin with
Canada's now-abandoned digital services tax was never enough to begin with

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Canada's now-abandoned digital services tax was never enough to begin with

Days after U.S. President Donald Trump broke off trade talks with Canada, Ottawa suddenly rescinded its new three per cent digital services tax (DST). We all knew bargaining with Trump would be full of drama, threats and bluster. But Canadians had their elbows up. Abandoning the DST so quickly, weeks before the July 21 deadline for a deal, is a worrying sign. What will Trump demand next? At any rate, given Trump's deals with other countries (which are not binding, and leave U.S. tariffs in place), it's not clear any deal (if reached) will be worth the paper it's printed on. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

Carney, Poilievre to partake in competing Stampede events
Carney, Poilievre to partake in competing Stampede events

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

Carney, Poilievre to partake in competing Stampede events

CALGARY — Looking to shore up support at one of the summer's biggest political blowouts, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre are scheduled to court supporters at the Calgary Stampede today. Carney, who strolled the Stampede grounds on Friday night, is scheduled to attend a pancake breakfast this morning and host a party fundraiser later in the day. Carney also appeared at the first set of chuckwagon races, receiving a mix of cheers and boos when he came onstage. Poilievre, currently campaigning to regain his seat in the House of Commons in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, is scheduled to host a party event. The 10-day rodeo is a major event for politicos across levels of government, providing an opportunity to make public appearances, shake hands with voters and meet with counterparts from around the country. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek rang in the rodeo earlier in the week, flipping pancakes in front of an early-morning crowd in downtown Calgary. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 5, 2025. The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store