logo
Scottish Labour MP not 'proud' of Keir Starmer's first year in charge

Scottish Labour MP not 'proud' of Keir Starmer's first year in charge

The National20 hours ago

Brian Leishman, MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, told the BBC Sunday Show that his 'gut reaction' was there were enough backbench rebels to force Number 10 into changing its decision on welfare reforms.
Last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall to MPs wrote to MPs setting out the UK Government's 'concessions' after more than 120 rebels signed an amendment that would essentially kill the welfare bill.
Those who currently receive Personal Independence Payments (PIP), or the health element of Universal Credit (UC), will continue to do so.
READ MORE: Inside the SNP's political strategy ahead of 2026 Scottish election
However, planned cuts will still hit future claimants from November next year. It means anyone who does not score four or more points in one of the activities assessed for the PIP daily living component will not receive it if they apply after November 2026.
Labour ministers seemed confident they had staved off a rebellion, with a vote due on the legislation in the Commons on Tuesday.
The SNP have urged the rebels to 'stand firm' and refuse to back down to the concessions ahead of the vote.
Meanwhile, Leishman told the BBC: 'I think it's fair to say that some have been placated by the compromises and concessions, as they're called, but there is still a healthy amount of us, a big cohort of MPs who feel that this should be withdrawn.'
(Image: BBC)
Asked if he thinks the welfare reforms will pass, the MP said: 'I'd say that behind the scenes, there's conversations being had all the time…some sort of prediction from me, but my gut reaction would be that there is enough of us to make the Government think again.'
Leishman was pressed on if he thought the UK Government's position on changing disability benefits was right or wrong, or if the system should stay the way it is.
'No, it does need to change,' Leishman said.
'These proposals, this is not the change that we need.
'What we have seen over the last decade and a half has been chronic austerity that has really impoverished some of the most vulnerable people in the country, it's been politics and policy by design to make people poorer.
READ MORE: Police 'examining' Kneecap and Bob Vylan Glastonbury performances
'The notion that we solve these austere cuts with more cuts, that's frankly ridiculous.'
Asked if he was proud of Labour's first year in office, Leishman said simply: 'No.'
When pressed on why, he said: 'Because I don't think we have tackled…let me just say, let me embellish that, we have done things in our first year that only a Labour Government will ever do. The Employment Rights Bill, a phenomenal piece of legislation, generational improvement for workers, absolutely fantastic.'
He said that over 400 of his constituents had benefited from the restoration of miners workers pension scheme, adding: 'Those are two policies only a Labour Government will ever do, have we done enough of those types of things?
'For me, no, that's my job to make sure we do them more often.'
It was then put to Leishman that he thought the Government had got more things wrong than right.
'I think that's only fair to say. I'm going to be open and honest with you, I'm not from a political background,' he said.
'We've got to do better, of that there's no doubt.'
Leishman also revealed he had never had a conversation with Starmer, bar exchanges at FMQs, having only met him three times at Downing Street.
Asked if the PM listens enough to his party, Leishman said: 'No, I think that's quite clear.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel
Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel

Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Times

Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel

Twelve months on from Labour's general election landslide, it is a good time to ditch the slogans and soundbites — and I am afraid there will be plenty of those this week — and assess what the latest economic data says about Labour's stewardship of the economy. From my standpoint its record is neither disastrous, nor dazzling. There is a credible argument that things could have been considerably worse given the structural challenges inherited from the Conservatives. Yet a series of policy missteps have needlessly sapped momentum. In essence, Labour's first year has been defined less by a transformative economic mission and more by steady progress, punctuated by damaging miscalculation. To give credit where it is due, this government appears to be learning on the job. But it is also true that there has been a lot to learn from — unforced errors on welfare reform, labour market policy and the management of the public finances have blunted early optimism among the UK business community. A persistently tricky international backdrop has not helped either. Let us begin our assessment with GDP ­— that most central, yet blunt, measurement tool. Growth in GDP since Labour entered office in July last year has not collapsed, nor has it accelerated meaningfully. On an international comparative basis, the UK has largely tracked the G7 average, growing by a compound 0.8 per cent in US dollar terms across the last three quarters. GDP per capita, a more revealing metric of national wellbeing, has risen by a modest 0.3 per cent. This is an improvement after two years of declines, but hardly a stirring renaissance. Inflation remains central to household perceptions of the government's economic competency, and its record here is mixed. Headline inflation peaked at more than 11 per cent well before Labour took power and has markedly softened since. However, the core problem, quite literally, lies in 'core inflation' which remains stubbornly high at an annualised 3.5 per cent. Above-inflation increases to the national living wage and public sector pay have added volatility to service prices just as the Bank of England was seeking calm. April's spike in consumer price inflation, though partially driven by regulated costs like air fares and energy levies, has muddied the water for monetary policy. This dissonance — between a government talking up interest rate cuts and simultaneously fuelling wage pressures — has not gone unnoticed at the Bank. We should be wary of attributing lower interest rates as the fruit of government policy. They are being delivered despite it. Turning to fiscal policy and the record is equally chequered. While the cost for the UK government to borrow for ten years — the ten-year gilt yield — has held steady in nominal terms, the interest rate spread that the UK pays compared with its G7 peers has widened to a worrying 1.25 percentage points. This reflects heightened debt issuance pressure after the October budget, and market suspicion about the UK's long-term fiscal sustainability. If rebellious Labour backbenchers think this arithmetic magically improves with a change of chancellor I have some bad news for them. The financial markets see Rachel Reeves as considerably more credible than the vast majority of alternatives within the Labour parliamentary party. Against this backdrop the autumn budget now looms large. Having left herself just £9.9 billion of headroom against her primary fiscal rule back in March, the chancellor now faces slippage on multiple fronts. Public sector borrowing has risen faster than forecast. The headwinds from U-turns on welfare reform and winter fuel payments threaten to eat into nearly half of the existing cushion. Visa reforms that suppress labour force growth and murmurings about the two-child benefit cap could further erode fiscal wriggle room. And the private sector is signalling unease with what is to come on tax. Since the general election, both deposits and the household savings rate have risen. This looks like a quiet vote of no confidence in the economic outlook and shows that speculative fiscal noise has a real cost: muted consumer spending, and deferred investment. But Labour's biggest headache is that it has sowed itself problems in the jobs market. Payroll employment, once a bright spot, has stalled since July 2024. Critics rightly argue that employer national insurance increases, combined with expanded employment rights and minimum wage hikes, have depressed hiring appetite. Two caveats are worth considering. First, payroll data may understate real employment if more workers are now classifying as self-employed to avoid higher employer contributions. Indeed Labour Force Survey data — though statistically compromised — shows overall employment still rising. Nonetheless, qualitative data from the Bank of England's decision maker panel confirms a palpable pullback in hiring intentions. This is consistent with the broader trend: firmer labour market regulation may be well-intentioned, but it is weighing on labour demand. The second caveat is that green shoots are now emerging in labour market participation which has inched upwards — possibly aided by NHS capacity improvements. Yet the metric that matters most for fiscal arithmetic — productivity — remains worryingly flat. If the Office for Budget Responsibility downgrades its productivity assumptions in the coming weeks, the government's already tight headroom could vanish entirely ahead of the budget. So what happens this autumn? The chancellor faces a vexing equation. Maintain fiscal rules, avoid tax rises on working people (her words, not mine!), protect spending pledges, and hold her parliamentary party together. At least one of these constraints looks certain to give. Options are narrowing. Loosening rules risks a bond market backlash. New taxes or spending cuts risk backbench revolt and sap economic momentum. Supply-side tweaks — such as speeding up infrastructure approvals or revisiting the North Sea tax and licencing regime — offer some room, but their fiscal payoff is modest and long term. The chancellor may also be tempted to revisit the policy of interest paid on central bank reserves. This is a potentially lucrative move but one fraught with risks to monetary policy effectiveness as her governor, Andrew Bailey, has recently noted in response to similar proposals from Reform UK. None of these options are easy. Some are not credible. But the current fiscal impasse is even less sustainable. Yet mere policy competence will not be enough. The fiscal debate is increasingly constrained not by in-year numbers, but by a refusal to confront long term trade-offs on healthcare spending and pensions. If the government truly wishes to spark the 'renewal' it promised, it must move from a mindset of management to one of reform. The alternative is a parliament of drift — marked by tactical retreats, fiscal fudge and faster growth that never quite arrives. In the months ahead, the OBR's pen may prove more consequential than the chancellor's speeches. Should productivity assumptions fall, the government's entire economic strategy could yet unravel. The risk, as ever, is not that the centre cannot hold — but that no one dares to grip the centre at all.

Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns
Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns

STV News

time19 minutes ago

  • STV News

Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns

Labour has warned of a 'growing mental health crisis' among Scottish police officers, as figures show the number of officers taking time off because of psychological issues rose by more than 50% over the last three years. The figures, obtained by the party via a Freedom of Information request, show the number of officers off work because of anxiety, depression, stress or post-traumatic stress rose from 814 in 2021 to 1,236 in 2024, an increase of 52%. The figures also show the number of officers taking time off grew each year over the period, with 1,024 in 2022 and 1,102 in 2023. The party said the figures showed officers are at 'breaking point' and called on the government to address the 'mounting pressures' facing officers. Scottish Labour Justice spokesperson Pauline McNeill said: 'It's clear police in Scotland are at breaking point after years of SNP mismanagement and neglect. 'We owe it to police officers to ensure they have the support they need while they work to keep our communities safe, but it's clear that is not the case under the SNP. 'The SNP has let police officer numbers collapse over the last five years, piling pressure on remaining officers and threatening to undermine public safety. 'The SNP must wake up to this growing mental health crisis and work with Police Scotland to support officers struggling with stress, trauma or poor mental health. 'Dealing with this crisis is vital to keeping police officers in work and on duty at a time when we need visible officers in communities. 'Police officers cannot keep bearing the brunt of SNP failure – more must be done to support police and the vital work they do.' Earlier this year it was reported that the number of days taken off by police officers and staff suffering from mental ill health rose from 63,797 in 2019/20 to 96,509 in 2023/24, a 51.3% rise Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs said: 'The health and welfare of our officers and staff remains one of Police Scotland's highest priorities with enhanced provisions from both our Employee Assistance and Your Wellbeing Matters programmes. 'This will be further enhanced through the implementation of our new HR structure with increased resource within our Health and Wellbeing team. 'We also have a range of mechanisms in place to support our employees who are absent from work for any reason. 'We continue to work with our occupational health provider to support police officers and staff in their journey back to health and, subsequently, to work.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Police officers and staff do a challenging job and we have welcomed the Chief Constable's commitment to workforce wellbeing. 'Staff and officers can access a range of services to support their physical and mental wellbeing. 'This includes access to a 24/7 employee assistance programme, and direct access to occupational health services. 'We are investing a record £1.64bn for policing in 2025-26, an increase of £90m on 2024-25, and Police Scotland took on more recruits in 2024-25 than at any time since 2013, with more intakes planned this year.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Readers' Letters: Now we know for sure we can't believe political posts on X
Readers' Letters: Now we know for sure we can't believe political posts on X

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: Now we know for sure we can't believe political posts on X

A revelation after Israel's strikes on Iran leaves reader reeling Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The revelation that around 6 per cent of messages on X supporting the SNP and attacking England and the English suddenly stopped after an Israeli attack on Iran's communications infrastructure is telling. I was recently commenting on a YouTube video when I realised that the majority of other comments supportive of the separatists had a very familiar ring to them. There was something rather derivative about them. My reaction was to comment that I was probably one of the few real people commenting and that the rest were probably Russian bots. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The news about the Iranian bots shows we must expect at least the same proportion of the pro-separatist comments on such media sites to be from Russian, Chinese and North Korean bots. We know all these hostile forces know that what is bad for the United Kingdom and Scotland is good for them. Scottish independence marchers in Glasgow - not one of them a bot from foreign shores (Picture: Andy Buchanan/AFP) It is something that Scottish nationalists should consider when they wish to make Scotland "independent". The Axis of Evil would like nothing better than for them to achieve their aim. That would weaken one of the main bulwarks upon which the freedoms of the democratic West relies, namely a strong United Kingdom. The freedom of all of us depends upon a strong UK. There are no broad, sunlit uplands to Scottish independence, only weakness and subjugation. Peter Hopkins, Edinburgh Toxic talk Carbon dioxide (CO2), an essential 'ingredient' in plant and crop growth and metabolism, has become villainised, on flimsy evidence, as a 'toxin' promoting adverse climate changes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In fact its impact on local and global weather patterns is very slight. Victims of the huge African emission recalled by Professor Hugh Pennington (Letters, 28 June) were asphyxiated, as in drowning, by hypoxia, not poisoned by an excess of CO2. As H Douglas Lightfoot points out (Letters, 27 June), net zero-style attempts to deplete atmospheric CO2 are not only ruinously costly but also totally illogical and impractical. Charles Wardrop, Perth Cue problems Instead of making cuts to disability and sickness benefits for all existing and future claimants, Sir Keir Starmer's U-turn means the cuts only apply to new, not existing, claimants. So stand by for another wave of Waspi and two-child benefit-style campaigns to restore payments to people who no longer qualify for the benefits, backed by virtue-signalling politicians who try to win votes and con the public by saying they'd 'like' to restore the benefits when in fact they have no intention of doing so because it's unaffordable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In opposition Labour were the worst culprits of this cynical virtue-signalling so they may be getting a taste of their own medicine – in many cases from within their own ranks. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Tax take When it comes to raising taxes, politicians, mainly on the left, try to strike a balance between assuming the moral high ground and raising as much extra income as possible. To their dismay, the Scottish Government is finding out that their 'progressive' income tax policy is not raising the desired extra revenue, or indeed, producing the desired economic growth. Certainly it would be interesting to see Scottish Government estimates of forecast extra income tax revenue versus that which has actually been achieved. I suspect, though, that it would need an FOI request to release this information. Turning to the forthcoming UK budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves may well find the same problem in that many of her target areas for tax hikes, for example Inheritance Tax, Capital Gains Tax, non-doms etc can be (partially) circumvented, and not yield the desired extra revenues. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One area, though, where there is a little room for manoeuvre (by the taxpayer) is fuel duty and vehicle excise duty. Expect the motorist to be hit hard in the name of net zero, though maximising the tax take would be closer to the truth. Political naivety in understanding the law of unintended consequences is often in short supply when introducing new tax measures and I don't expect any change in the forthcoming UK and Scottish budgets. Alastair Neilson, Edinburgh Soft soaping It's useful to think back, at this time, as far back as 1956, when, in the Suez Crisis, the UK realised it was no longer a major power. President Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt nationalised the Suez Canal, having failed to get US and international backing for the building of the Aswan Dam. Britain and France colluded secretly with Israel to seize and control the canal, but the military operation was a total failure, and Anthony Eden's government fell. The US and UN had given no backing to the project, and there followed financial crisis and fuel shortages for the UK. The EU and 'coalition of the willing' are in a similar position of weakness in the worthy aim of assisting Ukraine, which explains the fawning sycophancy of Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in trying to woo Donald Trump back into Nato and backing Ukraine. Never mind also the small matter of having probably not managed to eliminate Iran's nuclear ambitions. Rutte is fully aware that Trump is an unreliable, erratic criminal President bent on destroying democracy in his own country. But he has to try the soft-soaping anyway. Crawford Mackie, Edinburgh Odd question New guidance has been issued after requests from universities for clarity on how they could uphold freedom of speech. Isn't this like the Vatican requesting clarity on how it could uphold Christianity? Doug Clark, Currie, Midlothian Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store