First images from world's largest digital camera reveal galaxies and cosmic collisions
Astronomers have been eagerly anticipating the first images from the new observatory, with experts saying it could help solve some of the universe's most enduring mysteries and revolutionize our understanding of the cosmos.
'We're entering a golden age of American science,' Harriet Kung, acting director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science, said in a statement.
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory is jointly operated by the Department of Energy and the U.S. National Science Foundation.
The facility, named after the American astronomer who discovered evidence of dark matter in the universe, sits atop Cerro Pachón, a mountain in central Chile. The observatory is designed to take roughly 1,000 images of the Southern Hemisphere sky each night, covering the entire visible Southern sky every three to four nights.
'Through this remarkable scientific facility, we will explore many cosmic mysteries, including the dark matter and dark energy that permeate the universe,' Brian Stone, chief of staff at the National Science Foundation, said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Netflix's 'terrific' comedy axed after four series as fans left 'heartbroken'
Netflix's much-loved comedy Resident Alien has been brutally axed after four series - with fans left devastated by the sudden news ahead of the sci-fi show's big finale Netflix users have been left heartbroken after one of its hit comedies was cancelled after four series. American sitcom Resident Alien - which is available for UK viewers on Netflix - will be coming to an end after its four series. The Syfy comedy stars Alan Tudyk as Harry Vanderspeigle - an alien who crash lands in Patience, Colorado and assumes the identity of a human doctor that he killed. Despite being sent to Earth to destroy the human race, he begins to question the reasoning behind his mission as he grows attached to those around him. The show's creator Chris Sheridan announced today: "I knew going into it that this was likely going to be our final season. "Creatively, that was exciting because I knew we could spend the time wrapping up some storylines and driving toward an ending." He added to TV Line: "I'm so proud of how good Season 4 is and especially proud that we were able to finish as strongly as we did, with a finale that is probably my favourite episode of the series." Fans of the show quickly took to X to vent their frustration at the news. One wrote: "Resident Alien was one of the funniest shows and this season the show has gotten even better. So bummed more people didn't give it a look. Alan Tudyk is a delight and the rest of the cast were great. #ResidentAlien." While a second wrote: "With the TV market increasingly saturated with cheap reality shows, procedurals, and sequel shows, it is so hard to find a truly unique but terrific show. That's why I'm very sad to see Resident "Alien is canceled. Alan Tudyk is amazing in it and it is wildly amusing." A third complained: "Awww man. I haven't finished season 3 yet but I love this show." While a fourth said: "It's worth pointing out that #ResidentAlien not only had yet another great episode with drama, comedy and plenty of great character moments, but they did it with just a few minutes of VFX. Clearly, it's cost-effective to give them another season." "NOOO THIS IS SOME B******T. I love this show sm i rlly hope the rest of s4 brings it to a satisfying ending," another wrote. "gonna miss my fav alien," they added, alongside a broken-heart emoji. Others were hopeful that the show may find another life on a different network or streamer. "Streaming might finance a final season if needed," one fan said. Another added: "Hope they shop it around to streamers, the show is fantastic."
Reuters
9 hours ago
- Reuters
Health Rounds: RSV can boost seniors' heart risks
July 24 (Reuters) - (This is an excerpt of the Health Rounds newsletter, where we present latest medical studies on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here.) Older adults hospitalized for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) face an elevated risk of developing heart failure and a dangerous heart rhythm problem, a Canadian study found. The risk for heart failure was seen even in individuals without a history of heart problems, researchers reported in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, opens new tab. The researchers reviewed data on more than 100,000 adults aged 65 and older hospitalized in Ontario between 2011 and 2020 for either RSV, influenza, urinary tract infection, or a fracture. The proportion of patients with a subsequent cardiovascular event was 18.5% after an RSV-related hospitalization, compared to 17.7%, 12.1% and 8.4% after hospitalizations for influenza, urinary tract infection, or fracture, respectively. In comparisons of patients who were closely matched according to demographics and risk factors, heart failure (10%–11%) was the most common outcome for RSV patients, occurring in 10% to 11%. Next most common was the heart rhythm disorder atrial fibrillation, occurring in 5% to 6% of RSV patients. The risk for those outcomes, as well as for heart attack, 'was at least two to three times higher in patients with a pre-existing cardiovascular condition compared to those without,' the researchers also said. 'Our findings reinforce the importance of RSV vaccination in older adults and suggest that monitoring for signs of heart disease following an RSV illness may be pragmatic,' study leader Chris Verschoor of Health Sciences North Research Institute in Sudbury, Ontario, said in a statement. Sending dye through the small intestine to look for blockages has been sparing a significant proportion of patients from needing to undergo surgery, a new study shows. The dye, Gastrografin from Bracco Diagnostics Inc., is administered to symptomatic patients before an X-ray or CT scan so that surgeons can see the location and severity of any so-called adhesive small bowel obstructions. Researchers reviewed nationwide data on more than 20,000 patients with suspected small bowel obstruction managed in two periods - 2012 to 2016, before Gastrografin was widely used for this purpose, and 2019 to 2023, when using Gastrografin to visualize intestinal blockages was a standard of care. They found nearly a 45% decrease in surgeries for small bowel obstruction in the Gastrografin era, from 13,257 to 7,333. Small bowel obstruction accounts for 15% of hospital admissions in the U.S., with about 20% of cases needing surgery to reconstruct the intestine, the researchers said. The resulting healthcare costs total over $3 billion each year. Despite better small bowel obstruction outcomes overall, post-surgery mortality increased from 4.4% to 5.9% after use of the dye became standard, and reoperations within 30 days rose from 4.7% to 6.2% - likely because surgeries were probably more complex in the later era, the researchers said. Gastrografin testing had weeded out patients with relatively mild obstructions who ultimately didn't need surgery, they added. 'Previously, patients who had a relatively mild adhesive small bowel obstruction would have been operated on, as we didn't have an alternative option,' study leader Dr. Robert McLoughlin from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in Farmington said in a statement. 'This meant that in the post-Gastrografin era, the surgeries were more complex and challenging, hence the increased morbidity and mortality.' Still, because surgeons have gotten better at managing patients after surgery for small bowel obstructions, patients in the Gastrografin group averaged 6 days in the hospital, versus about 10 days for patients treated before the Gastrografin era, the researchers reported in the Journal of Surgical Research, opens new tab. The current study was not designed to prove that any of the outcomes were the result of Gastrografin use, the article pointed out. McLoughlin recalled that during a discussion with a younger colleague about managing small bowel obstructions, he mentioned that when he was in training, surgeons operated 'on a lot more' of these patients. That recollection prompted the current study, he said. (To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
National Science Foundation staff decry Trump's ‘politically motivated' cuts
Almost 150 workers from the National Science Foundation (NSF) have lambasted Donald Trump's cuts to the agency as 'politically motivated and legally questionable', joining colleagues at three other federal research agencies in warning that the administration is destroying innovation and sacrificing the US's position as a global scientific leader. The three-page dissent states the actions of the administration 'collectively amount to the systemic dismantling of a world-renowned scientific agency' and that they have been compelled to act because 'NSF employees are bound by their oath to uphold the Constitution.' The document condemns the decision as 'illegally' withholding $2.2bn of the $9bn budget appropriated by Congress for 2025 and the 'unlawful termination and threatened mass reductions' in the workforce, which has already seen more than 10% of the agency's staff dismissed. They also point to the termination of more than 1,600 active NSF grants 'using undisclosed criteria devised by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)' – the quasi-government agency set up by Trump's billionaire donor Elon Musk. Earlier this month, the Guardian reported on the unprecedented political interference being wielded by Doge which, together with the chaotic cuts, has already undermined the gold standard review process used by the NSF to support cutting-edge science, and was jeopardizing the future of US industries and economic growth. 'A covert and ideologically driven secondary review process by unqualified political appointees is now interfering with the scientific merit-based review system,' the letter states. The NSF was created 75 years ago and until Trump took office for his second term had enjoyed bipartisan support. It is the only federal agency that funds fundamental research across all fields of science and engineering, and which over the years has contributed to major breakthroughs in organ transplants, gene technology, AI, smartphones, extreme weather warning systems, American sign language, cybersecurity and even the language app Duolingo. Trump's budget proposal calls for a 56% cut to the NSF budget for 2026, which if enacted 'would undermine US leadership in science, eliminate funding for over 250,000 researchers and students, and break bipartisan commitments made under the CHIPS and Science Act', the letter states. The NSF statement follows similar unprecedented dissent by hundreds of scientists and other staff at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and most recently the Voyager Declaration from almost 300 current and former Nasa scientists including four astronauts. All have warned about the devastating impact of the administration's arbitrary and chaotic cuts to staff and research funds on the lives of Americans – now and in the future – in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy including Trump's billionaire donors. The NSF dissent is addressed to California member of Congress Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the House science committee, who has repeatedly condemned Trump's assault on science. Only one employee, Jesus Soriano, president of the local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees which represents two thirds of the NSF's unionized bargaining unit, included his name; 148 of the 149 signatories are anonymous due to fear of reprisals. The fear is well founded given that around 140 named signatories of the EPA 'declaration of dissent' were put on administrative leave, and Lee Zeldin, the climate change denier and EPA secretary, warned that there was a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting' the current administration. It ends with a stark warning: 'NSF employees are committed to serving the American people through research, education, and innovation. But they cannot do so under fear, censorship, and institutional sabotage. Without immediate oversight and corrective action from Congress, one of our nation's greatest engines for scientific and technological advancement faces irreversible long-term damage. Put simply, America will forfeit its scientific leadership position to China and other rival nations.'
