
‘Buy now, pay later' plans are booming as young people struggle with expenses — and some may be losing control
These are just some of the things Canadians are buying with mini-loans.
Thanks to the rise of 'buy now, pay later' (BNPL), consumers can split all kinds of purchases into interest-free instalments by clicking a button — often without a credit check or only a soft credit check.
Today, BNPL lenders like Klarna, Sezzle, Afterpay and Affirm can be found at checkouts across the nation. They've partnered with popular retailers such as Ticketmaster, Sephora, Amazon and Costco, and have seen a big surge in users as a result, particularly among gen Z and millennials.
How do most 'buy now, pay later' apps make money?
The share of Canadians who completed a purchase in-store or online using a BNPL service jumped to 25 per cent in 2024 from just nine per cent in 2022, according to Payments Canada, the organization that operates payment clearing and settlement infrastructure in the country.
And, by the end of 2030, the Canadian BNPL sector is expected to almost double its 2024 value of $6.69 billion (U.S.), to approximately $11.32 billion,
Dublin-based firm Research and Markets
projects.
Lenders say they are helping young Canadians, many of whom are just starting to build their credit scores, get access to smaller loans that are more manageable than traditional lines of credit.
'We're credit on training wheels,' said Patrick Chan, general manager of Sezzle Canada.
But recent studies have found that BNPL increases spending and puts consumers at risk of losing control of their debt, with
nearly half of American users reporting they've regretted financing at least one purchase with BNPL
.
As the Canadian market evolves rapidly, there is growing concern around young people developing unhealthy spending habits with BNPL tools — especially as
youth unemployment soars
— while many are feeling pressure to keep up with pricey, unrealistic lifestyles promoted by sponsored digital influencers and social media.
People tend to see credit 'as a tool that can enable that lifestyle,'
said Miranda Goode, an associate professor of marketing at Ivey Business School who specializes in consumer behaviour and debt.
With rising costs of living, a lot of the things we want to buy today are not in our budgets, she added.
'That's just the reality for a lot of people — you still want it and you're still going to make (the purchase).'
Toronto resident Leeyhan Dizon, 40, remembers the first time he used a BNPL service. It was a few years ago, and he financed a coat costing around $500 (Canadian) from the trendy Canadian brand Moose Knuckles.
'I was a working student back then,' said Dizon, an employment development consultant at Brock University.
He was excited to make the purchase, he said, and even felt more motivated to work because he knew he needed the money to pay it off.
Then, a couple months later, he went on to get two pairs of winter boots with another loan, costing him about $400. Skin care and electronics purchases followed, and Dizon soon found himself losing control of his loans.
'I would try to recall, 'why did I get this deduction or why did I get a debit of this amount?' Then I would remember, 'oh, yeah, it's because I have a Klarna payment' ... And I would just be surprised.'
'It can get addictive, to be honest,' said Dizon. 'Then you realize that you have spread yourself too thin on these items, or these purchases.'
The issue with BNPL boils down to human psychology, according to the Ivey Business School's Goode.
Paying in instalments can make someone feel like they're less financially restrained. 'So therefore you make more frequent purchases using 'buy now, pay later.' And you usually spend a bit more,' she said.
'If I spent $50 at Sephora right out of pocket, right then and there, that would feel a lot worse than if I break it up a little bit,' she explained.
But at the end of the day, you're still paying $50 — maybe more if you start missing payments.
While buy now, pay later offers convenience at no direct cost to consumers, experts warn it is not without risks as merchants cover the fees hoping shoppers will spend more. (July 3, 2025 / The Canadian Press)
While paying in instalments isn't a new concept, more consumers have been gravitating toward 'Pay in Four' loan offerings.
The way these loans typically work is, rather than paying the full amount upfront, the consumer pays a quarter of the value upon making the purchase. The remaining three equal payments then get charged to a credit card, debit card or bank account every two weeks afterwards.
Most BNPL lenders don't charge any interest or fees on these loans if you pay on time, making them especially attractive to borrowers.
According to Payments Canada, young and middle-aged Canadians aged 18-34 and 35-54, respectively, are much more likely to frequently use BNPL than older Canadians.
But young Canadians appear to be relying more on these services to purchase necessities compared to middle-aged Canadians.
While young people say their top reason for using BNPL is the ability to easily borrow or defer payments, middle-aged Canadians are using it primarily to budget, according to Payments Canada data.
Young Canadians also included buying food and groceries among their top three BNPL purchase categories as opposed to middle-aged Canadians.
'The problem is, it's hard to make enough money in this country to actually sustain your life,' said licensed insolvency trustee Joshua Harris of Harris & Partners.
'This is just the next generation of payday loans ... baby boomers, they just go to Money Mart because they're more comfortable with that.'
Harris said that, while he hasn't come across borrowers defaulting on grocery payments, he's increasingly seeing BNPL loans pop up in bankruptcy and consumer proposal filings. Often, the loans are on discretionary items, he added.
'It's that sweatshirt you don't need. It's that gadget for the kitchen you definitely don't need, and somehow people are getting stuck into this.'
The Star spoke with two BNPL lenders, Affirm and Sezzle, who maintained that they don't benefit from customers overconsuming and falling behind on their payments. (Klarna did not respond to requests for comment and Afterpay declined to be interviewed for this story).
That's because most of their revenue comes from charging merchants transaction fees, and not from late payment penalties.
'Because we have very minimal fees if you miss payments, the reality is, we can't survive unless people actually pay us,' said Chan, Sezzle Canada's general manager.
If someone misses an instalment, Sezzle will lock their account, stopping them for spending further until they make the payment as well as pay a 'reactivation' fee of $10. Sezzle also charges a 'rescheduling convenience fee' of up to $5 to allow users to delay their payment by up to two weeks.
Wayne Pommen, chief revenue officer for Affirm, said that while the
company offers some loans that charge interest, it doesn't collect late payment fees at all. 'We take the full loss of not being able to collect the money that we sent the retailer on behalf of the consumer,' he said.
Wayne Pommen, chief revenue officer for 'buy now, pay later' company Affirm, says that that while the firm offers some loans that charge interest, it doesn't collect late payment fees at all.
It's difficult to know how prevalent late payments on these popular loans are, as different entities report varying statistics.
A study by American firm LendingTree found that 41 per cent of BNPL users reported paying late last year, up from 34 per cent the year before. However, 76 per cent of those people were late by only a week or so.
'I wouldn't say that's any more or less significant than what we're seeing with credit card debt,' said Goode in response to LendingTree's findings. 'I think in the short term, those late payments are probably a little less impactful on people's pocketbook than the interest that people are accumulating off of revolving debt.'
BNPL providers say the majority of their customers pay either on time or even early.
Afterpay states that 96 per cent of Canadian users are diligent borrowers. Meanwhile, Affirm reported in its latest earnings that the share of customers who missed a payment on a monthly instalment loan by 30 days or more was just 2.4 per cent.
Still, research supports that people spend more with BNPL, even compared to credit cards, with retailers seeing significantly higher sales and profitability.
A recent study published by the American National Bureau of Economic Research showed that BNPL increases sales by 20 per cent at checkout, driven by low-creditworthiness consumers — those who are least likely to repay their debt.
'It's all about the incremental sale,' explained Dan Perlin, managing director of research in payments, processing and IT Services at RBC Capital Markets, in an article published by the bank in 2021.
'Retailers for years have complained about the cost of credit cards and the ultimate corresponding interchange fees that go along with that. The problem is that general-purpose cards are not driving another incremental sale at this point,' Perlin wrote.
'But BNPL shows upwards of 20 to 30 per cent lifts in incremental share at checkout. And average basket sizes are going up above those levels.'
Asked whether BNPL could be encouraging overconsumption in a way that isn't putting consumers into dangerous levels of debt, but also might not be helping them spend responsibly either, Chan said it's possible.
'Can Sezzle cause somebody to think that they should buy something that maybe they shouldn't? Yeah, potentially,' he said.
'But I think people just need to be more, you know, mindful of how they spend.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Texas Flood Victims Offered 30 Days Free Storage at 37 U-Haul Centers
AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--U-Haul ® has expanded an existing disaster relief offering in metro San Antonio to include its Company centers across metro Austin, where Central Texas flood victims needing a dry and secure place to stow belongings can receive 30 days of free self-storage and U-Box ® services. U-Haul has added 21 centers in metro Austin to its 16 centers in the San Antonio area that are now offering a month of free storage services to Texas flood victims in need of assistance during the recovery process. Share The Guadalupe River's catastrophic flooding has tragically resulted in the loss of life. Intense rains also produced property damage for many residents. Access to dry and secure self-storage units and portable storage containers can assist communities during the clean-up and recovery process after natural disasters. By adding 21 centers in metro Austin to 16 stores in the San Antonio area, there are 37 U-Haul-owned and -operated facilities now participating in the goodwill offer. The U-Haul disaster relief program applies to new self-storage and U-Box rentals and is based on availability at participating facilities. The U-Box portable container offer is for on-site storage at Company centers. People seeking more information on the 30 days free storage offer or needing to arrange services can contact their nearest regional office or stop by a U-Haul self-storage facility in the cities below: U-Haul Co. of North Austin (13 stores) Store locations: Austin, Cedar Park, Copperas Cove, Killeen, Pflugerville, Round Rock, Temple (512) 865-4154 U-Haul Co. of South Austin (8 stores) Store locations: Austin (512) 331-7705 U-Haul Co. of San Antonio East (7 stores) Store locations: New Braunfels, San Antonio (210) 731-2805 U-Haul Co. of San Antonio West (9 stores) Store locations: San Antonio (210) 569-0962 In addition to its 30 days free self-storage disaster relief program, U-Haul is proud to be at the forefront of aiding communities in times of need as an official American Red Cross Disaster Responder. About U-HAUL Celebrating our 80th anniversary in 2025, U-Haul is the No. 1 choice of do-it-yourself movers with more than 24,000 rental locations across all 50 states and 10 Canadian provinces. The U-Haul app makes it easy for customers to use U-Haul Truck Share 24/7 to access trucks anytime through the self-dispatch and -return options on their smartphones with our patented Live Verify technology. Our customers' patronage has enabled the U-Haul fleet to grow to 193,900 trucks, 138,200 trailers and 40,300 towing devices. U-Haul is the third largest self-storage operator in North America and offers 1,060,000 rentable storage units and 92.0 million square feet of self-storage space at owned and managed facilities. U-Haul is the top retailer of propane in the U.S. and the largest installer of permanent trailer hitches in the automotive aftermarket industry. Get the U-Haul app from the App Store or Google Play.


Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Fight continues to save Main Street Station in Hobart from wrecking ball
The owner of a long-shuttered, 151-year-old building deemed unsafe by the city of Hobart and scheduled for demolition is making one last-ditch effort to save it so he can reestablish his bar. In an email Jimmie Batalis' Portage-based attorney sent to the Post-Tribune, Patrick McEuen said he and Batalis filed an appeal with Hobart Building Official Steve McDermott asking him to rescind the July 5, 2023, demolition order imposed by the city. The Hobart Board of Public Works and Safety at its February 19 meeting awarded a $40,631 contract to C. Lee Construction Services of Gary to complete the demolition within the next month or two. McEuen, on behalf of Batalis, asked McDermott 'to modify the demolition order dated July 5, 2023, to permit John Cantu an opportunity to present plans to renovate the building.' McEuen also sent a purchase agreement, apparently signed by Cantu, that said, 'John Cantu has agreed to purchase Main Street Station 235 Main Street Hobart IN 46342 for $100,000 on contingency of the building not being demolished by the City of Hobart.' 'Jimmie Batalis understands that Mr. Cantu will pursue a restaurant/bar operation, and my (sic) intend to renovate the single-family apartment dwelling upstairs,' the appeal said. McEuen also attached a 2022 opinion from Porter-based James F. Gianni & Associates engineer Mark Stern that said, 'It is our opinion that the building is structurally sound and capable of sustaining code-compliant structural loads required for a retail/mercantile operation on the first floor and a single-family residential apartment on the second floor.' That letter was submitted to the Lake County Superior Court's Civil Division during hearings on the matter. 'We have based this opinion on our observations made at time of inspection; specifically, that no distress of structural members was observed,' Stern's letter said. 'The frustrating part about it is that the City never heard evidence in July 2023 to confirm the claim of the former Building Commissioner, Mr. McDermott, that the building is unsafe,' McEuen said in an email. 'We have an engineer's report to refute the claims of the former Building Commissioner showing the building is structurally sound. Privately, every politician from the Mayor on down admits the building is not unsafe, but either they have an insider who wants it, or they just don't want Jimmie Batalis to own it. 'The city is so hell-bent on tearing down a perfect historical building, they are acting as if the Petition does not exist. In fact, an asbestos inspector went through the building on Monday, June 30, and made sure to tell Mr. Batalis he did not feel unsafe in the building at all. So, we are left with a city fighting a person, Jimmie Batalis, not a city fighting for the safety of its citizens or the appearance of its downtown. With the eyesore on Main Street known as the former Bright Spot, the city has other problems more important than tearing down an iconic building at taxpayer expense.' Hobart City Attorney Heather McCarthy issued a statement on behalf of the city, reiterating the city has held multiple talks with Batalis about renovating or rebuilding on the property because Batalis – not the city – owns it. 'Beginning in June of 2022, the investigation began regarding complaints that the building was unsafe,' the City's statement said. 'The City provided over a year for the owner to address the ongoing issues with the building prior to issuing the initial demolition order. 'The initial Demolition Order of the Unsafe Building Hearing Authority was issued July 5, 2023. Additionally, the Lake County Superior Court granted two orders for the City to proceed with the demolition. 'The majority of building owners bring their buildings into compliance after being notified of an investigation. In this case, despite the owner being represented by multiple attorneys and the Unsafe Building Hearing Authority granting numerous hearings and opportunities, the building was never brought into compliance.' Batalis, who was paroled in December 2023 after serving 16.5 years of a 57-year sentence for the May 2003 murder of 28-year-old Jason Nosker, said previously he believes the city is against his plans because he is a convicted felon. Nosker was the boyfriend of Batalis' ex-girlfriend, and they were threatened repeatedly by Batalis before he shot into their bedroom window while they were asleep, according to court records. Nosker was paralyzed from the waist down before dying of his injuries. Batalis' sentence was handed down before the state of Indiana required those with high-level felonies and murder convictions to serve at least 75% of their sentence. Batalis said the property went into probate after his father and brother died while he was in prison, and the unsafe building issues started during that time. 'They (city officials) are coming up with every little excuse to tear the building down because they don't want me there,' Batalis said. Lake Superior Court Civil Judge Stephen Scheele on March 8 ruled in favor of the city of Hobart, the Hobart Board of Works and former Hobart Building Official Karen Hansen against Batalis and his business partner, Harold Killian, the Post-Tribune previously reported. In the building case, Scheele found 'no genuine issue as to the fact that Plaintiffs failed to file a timely complaint for judicial review as required by the Indiana Unsafe Building Law,' the city 'is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint for Judicial Review,' the judge wrote. The court also found that the city 'did not violate Plaintiffs' procedural or substantive due process rights,' he wrote in the judgment. Batalis and Killian previously offered to put $60,000 into renovating the building, but Huddlestun said that isn't enough to make the building habitable. The Board of Works originally set 235 Main St. for condemnation at its July 5, 2023, meeting after at least a year of trying to get the owner's representatives to repair it, the Post-Tribune previously reported. During that meeting, a local contractor appeared before the board with attorney Dana Rifai, who said Batalis had given him limited power of attorney to act on his behalf while he was in prison. Since the contractor's company wasn't licensed with the city to do work at the time, he told the board he reached out to Tak Construction, which is licensed to work in Hobart, to do the work with him acting as the project manager — a move the board immediately shot down, the Post-Tribune reported. The contractor then said he had a copy of a report that says the building is structurally sound, a point which Hansen disputed, the Post-Tribune reported. The building's east wall needs to be replaced, plus the owners failed to maintain it, she said at the time. Additionally, the owners did have a Hobart-licensed contractor lined up to do the work at one point, but that contractor claims they never got a deposit from the owner, Hansen said. Former Hobart Fire Chief Randy Smith added that there have been two fires at the building, and as it stands now, he would not allow his firefighters to enter the building if there were a third, the Post-Tribune reported. The Lake Superior Court Civil Division on May 23 denied Batalis' motion for summary judgment, a temporary restraining order and for hearing on preliminary injunction saying, among other things, that the Indiana Unsafe Building Law grants the City 'all requisite authority to enforce and carry out its July 2023 demolition order, according to the ruling.'


New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
More luxury homebuyers paying with cash this year, report says
More luxury homebuyers are paying with cash to acquire properties this year, a report from Coldwell Banker Real Estate revealed. The company said in its '2025 Mid-Year Report' that more than half of over 200 surveyed Coldwell Banker luxury property specialists reported an uptick in wealthy buyers purchasing homes with cash. Advertisement Roughly 34.1% said there has been a 'slight increase' while 16.6% said there has been a 'significant' rise in that method. Mortgage rates have played into the increase in buyers paying cash to acquire homes, according to National Association of Realtors Chief Economist and Senior Vice President of Research Lawrence Yun. 'High mortgage rates are not appealing for borrowing, and, therefore, that induces the wealthy to pay all cash for real estate (after selling off a few of their assets),' he told FOX Business. 4 Mortgage rates have reportedly played into the increase in buyers paying cash to acquire homes. Jaruwan photo – Advertisement Many have been turning to personal savings, stocks or funds they netted from selling another property as the 'primary' means to make their luxury home purchases, according to the Coldwell Banker Real Estate report. Meanwhile, for 45.4% of specialists, cash purchases have stayed at their current levels so far this year, per the report. On the flip side, just 3.9% of the Coldwell Banker luxury property specialists indicated their clients were moving away from buying homes through all-cash deals, Coldwell Banker Real Estate said. 4 A lot of luxury homebuyers are selling off some of their assets to help purchase the home, according to Yun. Golden_hind – Advertisement The trend in cash purchases comes as roughly 68% of Coldwell Banker agents said rich homebuyers they work with are 'maintaining – or increasing – current real estate exposure.' 'We've had a lot of volatility along with macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty this year. There's been a lot of transition and that's actually turned a lot affluent buyers toward real estate,' Jenna Stauffer, a Florida-based broker and Global Real Estate Advisor for Sotheby's Internal Realty, told FOX Business. 'Real estate proves itself as an anti-fragile asset,' she continued. 'Unlike many investments that struggle under uncertainty, real estate tends to strengthen over time and remains one of the best long-term hedges against inflation. That's why so many smart investors and high net worth buyers are parking their money in property this year. They're using it to preserve and grow their wealth.' 4 Just 3.9% of the Coldwell Banker property specialists said their clients were moving away from buying homes through cash-only deals. – Advertisement While wealthy buyers are sticking to their guns when it comes to what they want from a home, Coldwell Banker Real Estate also said they 'are being strategic about their purchases and prioritizing aspects of the home that create value over aesthetic perfection' such as affordability, taxes, and investment potential. That could drive a rise in 'smart buyers' focused on 'discernment and strategy instead of pure indulgence,' according to the report. The report also shed light on how ultra-high net worth buyers with over $30 million in assets and 'aspirational buyer' worth $1-5 million are engaging with the luxury real estate market. Some in the latter category, faced with economic uncertainty, are approaching the market with caution, per the report. 4 Coldwell Banker Real Estate said that the wealthy buyers 'are being strategic about their purchases and prioritizing aspects of the home that create value over aesthetic perfection.' Andy Dean – Michael Altneu, vice president of Coldwell Banker Global Luxury, said in the report that the luxury market 'has continued to show strength' in 2025 but various factors have 'tempered a more full-scale rebound in market activity.' The Institute for Luxury Home Marketing data showed a 1.7% increase in sales of luxury single-family homes in the period spanning January to the end of May from those seen in the same timeframe last year and a 1.8% uptick in sale prices, according to Coldwell Banker Real Estate. For attached luxury properties, there was a 8.1% decrease in sales but the median transaction price went up an average of 8.4%. Advertisement Both types of properties saw year-over-year increases in supply during the first five months of the year, with luxury single-family homes posting a 19.6% jump and attached notching a 14.8% rise, the report said. The U.S. saw active listings of single family homes, condos, townhomes and other types of housing reach over 1 million in May, a level that the country hadn't climbed above since the winter of 2019, according to a report released in early June.