Lutnick: ‘I have a deal done, done, done, done' as China, Japan and India warm to trade talks
Tensions appear to be defrosting between the Trump administration and some of its key trading partners after the president's announcement of wide-ranging tariffs—most notably with China, the only nation which responded with retaliatory measures of its own.
In the weeks following President Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcements, the White House painted a picture of frantic activity and optimism for a rapid flow of deals coming down the pipe.
A month later, no such agreements have been signed.
While foreign governments were frustrated but willing to come to the table and work with the Trump administration, leaders from across the globe also made it clear that they wouldn't race to sign on the dotted line for a deal which didn't benefit their people in the long term.
Questions are mounting for the Trump cabinet about when anxious voters can expect some action, potentially signaling a fractional easing of the economic pressure facing consumers when the president's 90-day pause expires.
Likewise Wall Street, already battered by the flip-flopping narrative from tariff threats to pause, are keen for signs that the worst of the uncertainty may be over and businesses can start rebuilding some confidence.
It seems that at last the much-anticipated "first mover" (the country which signs a deal with the U.S. first) may at last be coming to the fore.
Perhaps more significantly China—the world's second-largest economy and the primary source of trade war fears—has offered the Trump team some reprieve by saying it is "assessing" the American's approach.
In a statement on Friday China's Ministry of Commerce said "senior U.S. officials have repeatedly expressed their willingness to negotiate with China on tariff issues" and have done so "proactively…through relevant channels."
The more nuanced tactic is seemingly more palatable to the Chinese government than President Trump's initial approach, which has been to robustly critique the U.S.'s economic rival and threaten its government with escalating sanctions if they did not agree to terms.
Likewise, this week Beijing also rejected President Trump's claim that China's leader, Xi Jinping, had called him directly.
"China's position has always been consistent: if it's a fight, we will accompany it to the end; if it's a talk, our door is open. The tariff war and trade war were unilaterally initiated by the U.S.," China's Commerce spokesman added in the statement on May 2. "If the U.S. wants to talk, it must show genuine sincerity—be prepared to correct its wrong practices and cancel the unilateral tariff increases."
The minister added: "Saying one thing and doing another, or even attempting to use talks as a pretext for coercion and blackmail, will not work with China."
Japan was one of the first countries to race to Washington D.C. to begin negotiations with the Oval Office after the tariff announcements, but initial talks concluded without a resolution.
Indeed Japan's prime minister prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, said he was in no rush to work to America's timeframe if it meant making too many concessions.
"I don't think it's good to compromise a lot in order to just get the negotiations done,' he told parliament according to local reports.
But green shoots now seem to be appearing following a second round of conversations between Japan's chief negotiator Ryosei Akazawa and U.S. officials including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
'We were able to have concrete discussions on topics such as expanding our bilateral trade, non-tariff measures, and cooperation on economic security,' Akazawa told reporters Thursday following the two-hour meeting, adding further negotiations could continue in May.
Akazawa added he hoped to see a deal signed by June—the first time a concrete date has been floated—but cautioned: 'It is not simply a matter of speed, as there are national interests that must be protected on both sides, which will take some time. There are still many issues that need to be addressed and resolved before a final agreement can be reached.'
Conversations also seem to be progressing with India, with diplomats on both side confirming developing negotiations. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X following vice president JD Vance's visit to India that the duo "reviewed the fast-paced progress following my visit to the U.S. and meeting with President Trump.
"We are committed to mutually beneficial cooperation, including in trade, technology, defence, energy and people-to-people exchanges."
It seems at last the first deal is almost over the line, with Secretary Lutnick telling CNBC earlier this week that 'I have a deal done, done, done, done."
Lutnick added he is waiting for sign-off from the unnamed nation's prime minister and parliament, but added he expects this "shortly."
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amex earnings: What credit card cos. reveal about the US consumer
American Express (AXP) posted second quarter results that topped Wall Street estimates on both the top and bottom lines. Yahoo Finance Executive Editor Brian Sozzi speaks with Washington Crossing Advisors senior portfolio manager Chad Morganlander and Yahoo Finance Senior Reporters Allie Canal and Ines Ferré about the results, what they reveal about the consumers, and how things like stablecoins could be an opportunity for credit card companies. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid here. AmEx smash second-quarter earnings estimates by 21 cents this morning. Sales and earnings excluding one-time items rose a healthy 9% and 17%, respectively. Company said it saw record card member spending in the quarter. AmEx made no change to its full-year sales and profit outlooks despite the second-quarter upside. American Express CEO Stephen Squeri told me by phone, quote, I think people just want to live their lives, and that's what they're doing. I mean, you're seeing a little less air travel, obviously, but people are still spending and they are still traveling. Chad, yes, people are still living their lives. So what's the, what's the playoff that? Because I, I still think the American Express growth story has not been appreciated by the market. If you want to go elsewhere and you believe in the consumer, where else can you go? Well, you can go towards Visa as well, although there's concern and a little bit of overhang concerns about stablecoin, we believe that Visa is another direct play on the consumer. Uh, we believe that over the long run, you could see growth rates of 8 to 12% on the top line for American Express and for Visa. The consumer is being, has been very resilient. Our expectation is that when you get into two, 2026, uh, after you get through this tariff concern, that you'll see strong labor market, you'll see GDP growth led by productivity as well as business investment that will elevate GDP growth and earnings per share for Visa and American Express. Ali, uh, the, I'm living my best life trade, it includes Netflix. Because the reality is I'm going to go home on Friday, I'm watching Netflix, I'm not going anywhere, and all that makes me very happy. Oh yeah, I can't wait to do that later today, Brian. But throughout this whole week of earnings, it's been very interesting to look at two different camps of the consumers. We heard from American Express, a lot of these big banks, that the consumer is resilient, that they're doing fine. But there's a juxtaposition there. There's the high-income earners, the stock market investors, and then there's those that are still struggling with inflation. And you can see that in some of these earnings reports. We saw Pepsi in the middle of its turnaround plan. They have seen and lowered guidance for consumers pulling back on some of that spending. If you look at on a sector basis, consumer discretionary is one of the worst performing sectors in the S&P 500. And even a company like Netflix performed very well, but their ads business is really the growth driver here, one of the cheapest plans on the market. So what does that tell you? Is that has been a theme that has been emerging and percolating in my brain. So we'll see what we continue to hear from these companies as earning season levels out. But, but that's a focus of mine, the high-income consumer versus the low-income consumer, and at what point do the two need to start to merge before we start to see some cracks there in the economy. Good point is uh, I think you would dig this one. Uh, Squeri telling me that he is open to more stablecoin stuff. Now they recently signed a deal, I believe with Coinbase, but it's not just AmEx having interest in a stablecoin, you have what uh, I think Visa is also in the space, too, in some capacity. Visa, you have uh, Shopify also, look, you've got so many now, uh, companies that are in this stablecoin space, and it'll be interesting to see how this shapes out. As far as payments are concerned, if there will be mass adoption across a payment space, uh, cross-border remittances, that will be, that will be something that is very bullish for the industry as well, that analysts are looking at as far as, uh, the market's concerned with stablecoins. Um, the fact that you have though this genius act that passed, this is significant overall, uh, and this also gives, uh, short-term treasury bills a big buyer here. And these stablecoin issuers, which are buyers of these short-term treasury bills, this is why the street is so bullish on this as well, because they're saying the government will want to play nicely with the stablecoin industry. It's their buyer. Related Videos Why the AI stock bubble may be just getting started Charles Schwab Q2 beat, Union Pacific & Norfolk reports, Sarepta The odds of Trump firing Powell are 'quite low,' perhaps 'zero' Netflix stock slips despite Q2 beat: How valuation factors in Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell
A firing of Jerome Powell by President Trump would likely open up a legal war never before seen in the US, without any guarantee of a courtroom victory for the White House. That may be why Trump hasn't done so. Yet. Powell has made his intentions clear. He said earlier this year that he wouldn't leave if Trump tried to fire him and that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' Fed officials privately have been preparing for a legal battle as far back as Trump's first term, when the president also toyed with removing the chair, according to the Wall Street Journal. The strength of Powell's case is based on some protections of Fed autonomy already embedded in US statute. The Federal Reserve Act, which created the central bank in 1913 and was amended in 1935, states that each member of the Fed board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The intention of the "for cause" condition was to enhance the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to fire its board members, who are appointed by the president. There are also signs that the Supreme Court would step in if Trump were to act, although the high court's views on the topic are unclear. In an ambiguous ruling earlier this year, Supreme Court justices allowed Trump to temporarily proceed with the firings of board members at two other independent agencies. In granting the administration's request, the court said that in its judgment, the government "is likely to show" that the fired board members exercised "considerable executive power," a view that suggests the president possesses broader power to remove the officials at will. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Legal challenges from those board members are still playing out at an appeals court. But Powell got a good sign Thursday when a Washington, D.C., district court judge ruled that another Trump firing of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal and that she should be reappointed. The judge cited a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that limits the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. That precedent offers Powell a layer of protection. It was set in a 1935 case titled Humphrey's Executor v. US that challenged President Franklin Roosevelt's termination of the US Federal Trade Commissioner. The court held that the president's authority to terminate agency officials at will was limited to purely executive officers, and not those leading independent agencies that engage in regulation and adjudication. Congress, the court said, had power to limit the president's removal power over those officials "for cause" — then described that term to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. Trump is challenging whether that precedent applies across various independent agencies, but the Supreme Court has not yet made a definitive ruling on whether it should stand. If the precedent falls and leaves no explicit protection for the central bank, a Powell firing could certainly be a lot easier to pull off. 'For cause' Powell does have one major vulnerability, however. That 'for cause' language embedded in the Federal Reserve Act hasn't really been defined or tested in court. The statute also doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors. And the White House has been using a new line of attack against Powell that could offer a path to a 'for cause' dismissal, as the president and his allies raise concerns about a $2.5 billion renovation of the central bank's headquarters. "I mean it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5 billion renovation," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, after saying earlier that the project "sort of is" a fireable offense. He said he wasn't planning to fire Powell but also left the door open, saying, "I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud.' National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett — one of Powell's potential successors — said last Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But he also acknowledged it was a 'highly uncertain legal matter.' Politico reported that outside lawyers told the White House counsel's office it would likely lose a legal fight with Powell if Trump removed Powell solely over accusations that he mishandled renovations and that White House officials were also unsure whether it would work. Politico quoted one official who said, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.' The White House is certainly showing no signs of letting up on its pressure. They are seeking a site visit to see the Fed's renovations in person. Powell has asked the Fed's inspector general to review the costs involved. He also sent White House budget director Russ Vought a letter Thursday offering a point-by-point rebuttal of questions raised about the project and denying reports of a VIP elevator and VIP dining rooms. "We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources," he said, and "we have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen.' Case Western Reserve University business law professor Eric Chaffee said he thinks Powell would win any legal battle with the White House on the 'for cause' clause, but he doesn't think such a confrontation will come to pass given that Powell only has 10 months left as chair. "We're just so close to the end of the term that I think the Trump administration is very likely just to wait things out,' he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Engadget
22 minutes ago
- Engadget
Xi Jinping warns against China's overinvestment in EVs and AI
Chinese President Xi Jinping has bluntly questioned a nationwide rush of investment into the AI and EV industries. As deflation anxiety grows and Trump's trade war with China ramps up, the world's second largest economy is turning to fast-growth tech industries to remain competitive. But Xi appears to think that the strategy is flawed. As reported by the Financial Times , China's President sent out a pointed message about over-investment at the two-day Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing. "When it comes to projects, there are a few things — artificial intelligence, computing power and new energy vehicles," he said in a speech that made the front page of the People's Daily , the official newspaper of the Communist Party. "Do all provinces in the country have to develop industries in these directions?" The Financial Times reports that Xi went on to criticise officials who encourage hasty development but don't hang around to face the consequences. 'We should not only focus on how much GDP has grown and how many major projects have been built, but also on how much debt is owed,' Xi told conference attendees. "We should not let some people pass the buck and leave problems to future generations." For now though, there's no suggestion that China is shifting its focus away from the sectors Xi directly referenced. This week, NVIDIA was granted permission by the US government to resume selling its AI chips to China, with the company reportedly holding $8 billion in unshipped orders. It was initially blocked from selling the H20 AI GPU to China over concerns it could aid the nation's military. China is the global leader of the EV industry, and the country is taking on the US in the robotaxi race too. It was announced this week that Uber is partnering with Baidu to bring thousands of the Chinese company's Apollo Go autonomous vehicles onto the Uber network in mainland China and other non-US markets.