
Why the birth rate in Germany continues to nosedive – DW – 08/03/2025
When Julia Brandner recently presented her book "I'm Not Kidding," the 30-year-old influencer and comedian was confronted by a barrage of insults. One 72-year-old mother of three children took to the floor and attacked her in front of the audience as an egoist, Brandner told DW.
However, the book, in which the Austrian-born and Berlin-based Brandner explains, with great humor and frankness, why she never wanted to become pregnant and underwent sterilization for that reason, also drew many positive reactions.
Speaking about the hate that she has experienced from several quarters, she said: "You get stamped as a revolutionary. If you say you don't want children, you are very quickly blamed for sabotaging the pension system and the intergenerational contract, and actually for singlehandedly bringing about the extinction of the human race."
This criticism is fueled by a number that many young women celebrate as a sign of progress in female self-determination, but that others see as a fearful portent of dwindling prosperity and a continuously shrinking population: 1.35.
That's the average number of children had by women in Germany in 2024, according to the Federal Statistical Office. The average birth rate for women with German nationality was just 1.23, a figure that rose to 1.89 for non-German nationals. In total, 677,117 children were born in Germany in 2024, a decrease of 15,872 from the year before.
Brandner was 28 years old when she was sterilized. Her gynecologist demanded a psychiatric assessment of her mental capacity before carrying out the operation.
Brandner was surprised by the controversy caused by her book. She said she is noticing an increasing rightward shift in these tumultuous times, along with a return to more "traditional" values, where women stand at the stove and are supposed to look after the children.
The far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has also latched onto the topic of the sinking fertility rate and is calling for more children instead of immigration as a way to combat the lack of skilled workers.
Brandner feels that even in 2025, the topic of children is still very widely seen as something that concerns just women. "The many single mothers are being left to cope on their own, while fathers are often let off the hook. For women, having children puts them at huge risk of poverty. It can't be that even today a woman has to give up her prosperity to ensure the prosperity of society," she said.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
But Germany isn't the only country experiencing a sinking fertility rate, by far. Numbers are going down drastically across the world, reaching as low as 0.75 in South Korea. Vietnam rang alarm bells earlier this year, when its birth rate hit a record low. The only exception is the Sahel zone, where women are still having more than five children on average.
Michaela Kreyenfeld is a sociologist and was one of the experts behind the German government's family report. She sees a growing connection between economic crises and uncertainties and the birth rate. "Is it egoism or simply autonomous behavior that women don't want to have any children? We have been talking about that since the 1970s at least, so it's nothing new," she told DW.
What is new, she said, are the multiple crises: "The COVID pandemic, rampant climate change and high inflation. For the young generation in particular, that is a new situation," said Kreyenfeld.
A countermovement in the US is trying to buck the trend, with the richest man in the world as its most prominent representative: Pronatalists and Elon Musk want to bring as many children into the world as possible.
However, Kreyenfeld pointed to Romania as an example from eastern European history that can serve as a warning. "President Ceausescu used extreme measures, such as limiting access to contraceptives and imposing draconian penalties for abortions, to push the birth rate from 1.8 to four within a year. The result was the 'lost generation' in Romania: the generation in which parents didn't look after their children because they didn't want them."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
So, what can be done to raise the birth rate again without state pressure? Martin Bujard, the deputy director of the Federal Institute for Population Research, has the answer.
Bujard, an expert on the birth rate in Germany who knows the statistics of the last two decades down to the last decimal place, said the debate about women like Brander, who have deliberately chosen to remain childless, is missing the real point.
"If someone doesn't want to have any children, it's their decision. This shouldn't be stigmatized, and, indeed, it is becoming increasingly acceptable to lead a childless life," he said.
What is really at issue here is something else, he said. "We have asked how many children people want, and this showed that in 2024 both women and men wanted about 1.8 children on average — in other words, well over the birth rate of 1.35. If this existing desire for children was fulfilled, we would have fewer demographic problems and much more prosperity in the long run."
"Fertility gap" is the term used for the difference between the desired number of children and the birth rate, such as when many women perhaps have just one child instead of the two they would like to have. This can be because they don't find a stable partnership until later in life, because children are increasingly being seen in social debates as a problem and not an asset and/or because the state could do more than it is doing to make it easier to have a family.
Bujard praises the family-friendly policies implemented by the German state in the past, such as increasing the number of child care centers and all-day schools and introducing the parental allowance in the early 2000s.
He said this had been a paradigm shift that was widely noticed internationally, with Germany having had one of the lowest birth rates in the world. However, he takes a critical view of the current situation.
"Since 2013, we have had a legal right to child care, but this is no longer very reliable, as such care is often canceled. There is a shortage of child care workers, and the system receives too little money in the end. If there was enough money there, one could talk about higher pay for child care staff," he said.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Germany needs to make a bigger effort again with its family policies, as the current trend is worrying: 22% of women and 36% of men between 30 and 50 years of age do not have children, according to the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. Figures from the Federal Statistical Office show that men in Germany had just 1.24 children on average in 2024.
Above all, young female academics are increasingly remaining childless. For this reason, Bujard said, the only way is to improve the compatibility of work and family.
"The worst-case scenario is that there will be even more serious problems with social insurance in the long term with a continually sinking birth rate in 2030. That would cause serious harm to prosperity: Contributions for social insurance would have to go up, pensions would be lower, and there would also have to be more cuts in the health system and the care sector," he said.While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Sri Lanka: Farmers fight solar plans on ancestral lands – DW – 08/04/2025
Tamil farmers say the Sri Lankan and Indian governments' plans for a solar power plant in eastern Sri Lanka will use land that was seized during the country's civil war. What is being done to compensate them? Standing next to a tall, wired fence, Sinnathurai Chitravelayutham looks out at his farming land. It's been nearly 20 years since he was allowed to use it. "Don't ask me how I feel, I'll get upset," the 68-year-old told DW. Chitravelayutham is a rice farmer from Sampur in eastern Sri Lanka's Trincomalee District. He fled his homeland in April 2006, after the area came under heavy shelling during Sri Lanka's civil war. The conflict, which spanned from the mid 1980s to 2009, was primarily a struggle between the Sinhalese majority and the Tamil minority, with the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) — also known as the Tamil Tigers — fighting government forces for an independent state. When he returned after the conflict had ended, he and 107 others found their farming land was under government control. They said attempts to farm on their land were met with threats of arrest, and a fence was later erected to stop them from gaining access. To date, they say they have not received any compensation. Now, their land has been allocated as the site for a new solar power plant to be built as a collaborative project between Sri Lanka's Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) and India's state-owned National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC). Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake jointly inaugurated the project during Modi's visit to Sri Lanka in April. The land belonging to Chitravelayutham and the other villagers was designated as a high-security zone in 2008, at the height of the civil war. Kandumani Lavakusarasa, the coordinator of the AHAM Humanitarian Resource Center in Trincomalee, said over 500 acres had now been allocated for the solar power plant. Of that total, he said 147 acres used to be farming land belonging to villagers including Chitravelayutham, and a further 58 acres was residential land. The Governor of the Eastern Province's Media Division told DW that "legal action" was being taken to provide redress to claimants "who have rights to the land," while those "who are able to prove their legal status in writing and live here can apply for the compensation process." Although the villagers have temporary deeds, they said the Divisional Secretariat, which handles land allocation, had requested to see the original deeds and survey plans before examining any claims. The villagers told DW they wanted their original lands back because they were fertile and well irrigated, and that other land would likely not meet the same specifications. In a statement, the Muthur Divisional Secretariat (DS), which is responsible for oversight of the land in Sampur, told DW that only two people had applied for compensation, but did not say whether they had received it. It also said officials had received a report from 33 people requesting that the land be returned to them, but that they were "currently residing in other government land and engaged in cultivation." The DS added that steps would be taken to provide alternative land "if they are confirmed to be truly landless". Dhammike Wimalaratne, spokesperson for the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), told DW that he had no knowledge that anyone had come forward to claim the land, which had been identified as being owned by the government. However, he added that "the people are number one" and said they should meet the Divisional Secretariat to prove their right of ownership. DW reached out to India's NTPC and government officials for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Initially, India and Sri Lanka wanted to collaborate on a coal power plant in Sampur, but the plan was scrapped in 2016 after a widespread outcry. Current president Dissanayake's Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party was a staunch opponent of the initial plan. "People were happy because they thought they would get their land back, but it didn't happen," AHAM coordinator Lavakusarasa told DW. Villager Chitravelayutham said he had voted for leftist Dissanayake, whose government took power in November, in the hopes that things might change. "We thought that when this government came to power, they would give us our land back, but it doesn't look like we're going to get anything," he said. He believes Sampur was chosen "because it's a Tamil area" and that the government "wouldn't do this in a Sinhalese area." But Chitravelayutham refused to criticize India. "It's the Sri Lankan government who gave it and it's their responsibility to solve the problems here," he said. "The Indian government doesn't know this land belongs to people." Alakurasa Mathan, deputy coordinator of the AHAM Humanitarian Resource Center, said he believed the "real reason" for the collaboration between India and Sri Lanka was the former's security interests, and that the plant might never be built. "In the interests of international politics, the livelihoods of poor farmers have been sacrificed," he told DW. "That's the truth." The Governor's Media Division rejected the claims about Tamil areas being targeted and India's security intentions as "false," adding that "there is no need or purpose for any group of people or a select group to be inconvenienced." Namasivayam Sivapatham, 58, said the villagers are not against the idea of a solar power plant, but that there was "lots of other land that isn't used for farming" where it could be built. He is also skeptical about the proposed compensation. "They don't have any plans to give us compensation. They have a plan to cheat us," he said. For villagers like Sivapatham, the construction will come at the cost of their land, which they say has been passed down through generations. "I feel sad. What should we do? I'm worrying about how to get my land back, it's a huge concern. How will I give it to my children?" he told DW. "What's the point in giving the land to another country?" Sivapatham asked. "What can you do with electricity? Farming provides us with food. Can you eat current?"


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Germany to raise 'mother's pension' – DW – 08/04/2025
Germany is to give older parents a higher pension than before, thanks to the Bavarian CSU. But businesses and economists say the 'mother's pension' is an extra burden on younger generations. The Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister-party to Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU), appears to have persuaded its big sibling to implement one of its own pet projects: Raising the pension subsidy for older parents — colloquially known as the or "mother's pension" — one year earlier than planned. The pension rise for parents who had children before 1992 comes with a price tag of around €5 billion annually and is now set to be implemented on January 1, 2027, despite major cuts elsewhere in Germany's federal budget. According to German media reports, the government still has a gap of some €172 billion ($198 billion) for its financial planning for the years 2027 to 2029. The planned rise in 2027 is the third of three steps and adds an extra half a percentage point to the pension — that works out at around €20 per child per month for children born before 1992. Previously, parents whose children were born after 1992 received a slightly higher percentage. CSU General Secretary Martin Huber called the move the "completion" of the mother's pension plan, and said that 10 million women would profit. "For many female pensioners, this rise makes a big difference," he told the news network. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Though the change will iron out a disparity between the pensions received by older and younger generations, experts say the measure does nothing to close the gender pay gap between men and women, or indeed overall inequality in the country. Despite the name, all parents are eligible for the "mother's pension," as are foster parents and grandparents, if the child lived with them for a significant amount of time. Peter Haan, specialist in state finance policy at the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), and co-author of a study on the pension, thinks it's not an effective way to close the "gender pension gap." The key question, as far as Haan is concerned, is who actually benefits. It does, he admitted, make superficial sense for older mothers to get the same benefits as those who had their children after 1992. "But the pensions for that generation were significantly higher than for the younger generation," Haan told DW. "And secondly, it's a 'watering can' measure that is equal for all mothers, and so doesn't specifically do anything to combat poverty among older people." The €20 per child per month might certainly be useful for many older people with lower incomes, but the very poorest women won't profit from it anyway — because the "mother's pension" is actually deducted from any welfare benefits they receive. The mother's pension dates back to 2013, when the CSU pushed through the plan under Angela Merkel's government as a way to compensate parents — in practice mainly mothers — who took time off to raise children and therefore paid less into the pension system. Since then, the CSU has made the plan one of its key policies, not least because it is popular among its own Bavarian electorate — many of whom are older people. In the intervening years, keeping the mother's pension has been the CSU's line in the sand in negotiations with its coalition partners the CDU and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). "Backing down on this issue would be unthinkable for a CSU leader," political scientist Ursula Münch, director of the Tutzing Academy for Political Education in Bavaria, told DW. "If the other parties do not meet it, it will refuse to support their proposals while playing on public opinion in an ageing society." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But the idea is also unpopular among Germany's business community, who have been hoping that Merz's conservative government would, instead of increasing pensions, do more to keep more people on the job market. "All this is going completely in the wrong direction," said Judith Röder of the Federal Association of Wholesale, Foreign Trade and Services (BGA). "Everything that leads to increased welfare spending is a problem, and anything that signals less employment in an ageing society is also bad. And the mother's pension is both of those things." "[Raising the mother's pension] is another signal that more and more tax money or social insurance money is being distributed to older generations at the expense of active workers," Röder told DW. "It has to be financed somehow, and this is just a big loan to be paid in the future." This money would be better invested in infrastructure, she added, which benefits both businesses and society at large, rather than a particular group. Röder also argued that older parents are already financially privileged, because they benefited from pension conditions that favored mothers in the past — for instance, before 1999, women could legally start drawing an old age pension earlier than men. According to Haan, there are cheaper ways to help older poor people, such as checking income and wealth so that only those who actually need it get the extra money. "If you really want to reduce the gender pension gap, you have to change the labor market relations between men and women, by promoting more participation on the labor market for women," said Haan. "For example, with better childcare." "In times when the state pension coffers are under pressure, it is difficult to take on such an expansion of costs," he concluded. "Especially for a measure like this. Of course, you can see the justification for it, but there are other measures that I think are more important."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.


DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Finance Minister in Washington for talks – DW – 08/04/2025
Germany's Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil is in Washington for high-level talks with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. DW has more. Germany's Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil is in Washington on his first official visit in office. He'll meet US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to discuss trade, global cooperation, and trans-Atlantic ties. The talks follow a key deal easing tariffs between the EU and the US, cutting duties on European imports to 15%. Back in Germany, just 16% of Germans say they would be willing to take up arms in the event of an attack, a new study has revealed while more than a quarter of those surveyed said they considered a military attack on the country within the next five years to be very or somewhat likely. Meanwhile, Bavarian State Premier Markus Söder has called for a reduction in benefit rates for Ukrainian refugees in from Germany's governing coalition are calling for tougher measures against unemployment benefit fraud, amid growing concerns over rising costs. "Those who exploit the system must be met with clear sanctions," Dirk Wiese, the parliamentary secretary of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), told the Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland (RND) media group. Wiese said he believes changes to the basic income support scheme, known as Bürgergeld, were necessary. The SPD politician also stressed that the majority of those who seek financial help while not working want to be in employment. Wiese said he wants to see an increase to the minimum wage. Tilman Kuban, a lawmaker for the conservative Christian Democrats, which leads Germany's coalition along with the SPD, also called for more scrutiny regarding unemployment benefit. "The new basic income can only be for those who really need help - not for those who don't want to work," he told RND. In 2024, the state paid out some €46.9 billion ($54.3 billion) in basic unemployment support to around 5.5 million people. That was around €4 billion more than in 2023, according to the Ministry of Social Affairs. Police and spy agencies are keen to combat criminality and terrorism with artificial intelligence. But critics say the CIA-funded Palantir surveillance software enables "predictive policing." Read the full story on the controversial Palantir software being used by German police. German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil (SPD) is in Washington on Monday for talks with his US counterpart Scott Bessent, a week after the EU agreed with the United States on a 15% tariff for most European goods. The pair are expected to discuss issues related to trade while also maintaining and expanding the transatlantic partnership, the Ministry of Finance said ahead of the trip. Klingbeil will also meet with World Bank President Ajay Banga and civil society actors to discuss issues of global security and sustainable growth. The premier of Bavaria, Markus Söder, said it is time to reduce the benefits for Ukrainian refugees in Germany. Söder is in favor of offering Ukrainians lower benefits under the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act, as opposed to the citizen's allowance, which is currently in place. In an interview with German broadcaster ZDF, Söder said he is in favor of reducing benefits for certain Ukrainian refugees. Söder said there should be "no more citizen's allowance for all those who have come from Ukraine." The citizen's allowance in Germany is a state welfare benefit given to those with little or no income to ensure a minimum standard of living. Around one in six Germans say they would join the military in the event of a conflict or a call to arms, a new survey revealed on Monday. Conducted by the research institute Forsa for the RND media group, the poll recorded that 16% of participants said they would "definitely" fight, while another 22% said they would "probably" do so. However, 59% said they would "probably not" or definitely not be willing to defend Germany in the event of an attack. Among women, that reluctance is 72%. More than one in four respondents (27%) said they considered a military attack on Germany within the next five years to be very or somewhat likely. Meanwhile, 59% of respondents said they felt it was likely that Germany would have to provide military assistance to another NATO member. Around 1,000 citizens took part in the survey which was carried out on July 28 and July 29, amid heightened debate regarding Germany's defense preparation and increased spending in this area. According to Forsa, the results carry a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. In May, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said that Berlin accepts in principle the demand from the United States that NATO member states increase defense spending to 5% of GDP. Currently, Germany spends around 2% of its GDP on defense. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video from the DW newsroom. German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil is in Washington for talks with his US counterpart Scott Bessent. Elsewhere, Markus Söder has called for an end to the citizen's allowance for Ukrainian refugees in Germany, preferring to offer lower benefits under the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act. A survey of around 1,000 German citizens has been conducted, amid heightened discussion over the country's defense readiness. Follow us for stories on how Germany is coping with the myriad of challenges faced by many countries today, as well as a general roundup of the major talking points regarding Europe's largest economy.