GE2025: How the main political parties address economic concerns in their manifestos
The International Monetary Fund this week lowered its global growth forecast for this year to 3.3 per cent from 2.8 per cent amid rising trade tensions. Singapore, on its part, has also downgraded its growth forecast for 2025 to 0 per cent to 2 per cent.
This has largely been due to the impact of US President Donald Trump's tariff measures on all countries and his ongoing trade war with China.
Against this backdrop, political parties contesting GE2025 have laid out a range of proposals in their manifestos to strengthen economic resilience and support businesses and workers.
CNA takes a look at some of the key proposals of the five parties fielding the largest number of candidates and which have also released their manifestos. The People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), which is contesting the joint-fourth highest number of seats, has not published its manifesto. PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY (PAP) Help businesses manage rising costs through tax rebates and schemes like the Progressive Wage Credit Scheme, while enhancing Workfare for lower-wage workers and expanding Progressive Wages to more sectors.
Provide more support for PMETs (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) and adopt new technology - such as artificial intelligence - faster, and help companies expand into new markets.
Raise the re-employment age for seniors, increase senior worker CPF contribution rates and co-fund wages to encourage employers to hire and retain seniors.
Help Singaporeans reskill and upskill and provide support for those who have lost their jobs through the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme. WORKERS' PARTY (WP) Recognise, measure and value unpaid labour in households, as excluding this in national income statistics gives the wrong perception that these workers are less valuable than those who undertake paid work.
Provide better support to build up leadership in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and help these companies better attract talent.
Abolish the statutory retirement age to let older workers continue working if they choose to do so.
Refine Central Provident Fund (CPF) policies, such as by enabling the co-investing of CPF savings with GIC, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund. RED DOT UNITED (RDU) Support SMEs by ensuring fairer procurement policies, tackling late payments, moderating rents and making grants more accessible.
Provide a 'Citizen's Dividend' or an 'unconditional cash transfer' to serve as a financial safety net for Singaporeans and ensure "a reliable income floor" for everyone.
Provide financial support to workers in times of job scarcity and underemployment. PROGRESS SINGAPORE PARTY (PSP) Exempt retrenched employees from non-compete clauses that make it difficult for them to find new jobs and be entitled to legally binding retrenchment benefits.
Give Singaporeans more work-life balance by reducing the statutory working hours, increasing minimum paid annual leave and having more public holidays.
Provide equal parental leave for fathers and mothers. SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SDP) Legislate a national minimum wage to reduce income inequality.
Provide involuntarily unemployed workers with retrenchment insurance, paid out of their CPF savings while they look for re-employment.
Abolish the CPF Minimum Sum Scheme and return members' savings to them when they retire, allowing retirees to pay for their living expenses.
Have an alternative indicator of economic progress other than gross domestic product (GDP) growth, such as one that draws on the genuine progress indicator methodology. GE2025 tariffs economy People's Action Party
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Bitcoin climbs to record US$123,000 as US to debate crypto rules
[SINGAPORE] Bitcoin surpassed US$120,000 for the first time on Monday (Jul 14), marking a milestone for the world's largest cryptocurrency as investors bet on long-sought policy wins for the industry this week. Bitcoin scaled a record high of US$123,153.22 before pulling back slightly to trade 2.4 per cent higher around US$122,000. Later in the day, the US House of Representatives will debate a series of bills to provide the digital asset industry with the nation's regulatory framework it has long demanded. Those demands have resonated with US President Donald Trump, who has called himself the 'crypto president' and urged policymakers to revamp rules in favour of the industry. 'It's riding a number of tailwinds at the moment,' said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore, citing strong institutional demand, expectations of further gains and support from Trump as reasons for the bullishness. 'It's been a very, very, strong move over the past six or seven days and it's hard to see where it stops now. It looks like it can easily have a look at the US$125,000 level,' he said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The surge in Bitcoin, which is up 30 per cent so far this year, has sparked a broader rally across other cryptocurrencies over the past few sessions even in the face of Trump's chaotic tariff policies. Ether, the second-largest token, scaled a more than five-month peak of US$3,059.60, while XRP and Solana gained about 3 per cent each. The sector's total market value has swelled to about US$3.81 trillion, according to data from CoinMarketCap. 'What we find interesting and are watching closely are the signs that Bitcoin is now being seen as a long-term reserve asset, not just by retail investors and institutions but even some central banks,' said Gracie Lin, crypto exchange OKX's Singapore CEO. 'We're also seeing increasing participation from Asia-based investors, including family offices and wealth managers. These are strong signs of Bitcoin's role in the global financial system and the structural shift in how it is perceived, suggesting that this isn't just another hype-driven rally,' Lin said. Earlier this month, Washington declared the week of Jul 14 as 'crypto week,' during which members of Congress are set to vote on the Genius Act, the Clarity Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act. The most significant bill is the Genius Act, which would create federal rules for stablecoins. Elsewhere, prices of crypto stocks and exchange traded funds advanced. In US premarket trading, shares of crypto exchange Coinbase surged 1.7 per cent, while Bitcoin holder Strategy climbed 3.3 per cent. Crypto miner Mara Holdings jumped 4.6 per cent. Hong Kong listed spot Bitcoin ETFs launched by China AMC, Harvest and Bosera all hit record highs. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Eroding US exceptionalism will impact world economy
GLOBAL investors have long grown wealthy by following the maxim of never betting against the US economy. Yet, there are growing signs that key foundations of this 'US financial exceptionalism' are eroding in what could be an era-defining moment. Unchecked, the impact could be a dramatically different global financial system for years to come – not only with lower volumes of international trade, but also smaller capital flows, fewer economies of scale for businesses, and slower growth in productivity and living standards worldwide. Longstanding pillars of US financial exceptionalism include institutional integrity, the rule of law, predictable and stable economic policies, central bank independence, deep capital markets, and a core government belief in private enterprise. Underpinning these foundations are the strengths of the US university research system, excellence in science and medicine, traditions of venture capital and entrepreneurship, supportive regulatory and tax structures, and transparent government procurement processes. Global investors also have benefited greatly from US openness to foreign students. Indeed, in recent decades, a very significant portion of all US companies that have gone public with a market capitalisation of more than US$1 billion (so-called 'unicorns') were founded by foreigners who studied at US universities and stayed afterward to become leading entrepreneurs. Over the past decade, this has helped fuel US productivity growth which has increased at more than double Europe's rates. US per capita income is now more than one third higher than European levels, and US equity markets today represent more than half of total global equity valuations. Yet, US financial exceptionalism is today potentially facing its biggest challenge in at least a generation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up President Donald Trump's attempts to boost domestic manufacturing through imposition of large-scale tariffs is causing major disruption. It is true that some countries engage in 'beggar-thy-neighbour' trade policies that have harmed many workers in industrial countries, including lost manufacturing jobs. However, launching a global trade war is misguided. Instead, policies should promote high value-add US manufacturing jobs, like in transportation equipment, capital equipment, semiconductors, clean energy and chemicals. Tariffs on many low value-add products, including on agricultural products that the US does not grow, make little sense. Meanwhile, vilification of US universities and foreign students in an attempt to undo diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and because of an anti-foreigner philosophy, are misguided. Billions of dollars of government research grants are being cut, and many foreign student visa applications are being blocked. In the immediate future, consequences include sharp losses of important service exports. For example, the US exports roughly US$60 billion each year in education services to foreign students attending US universities – more than corn, wheat and soybeans exports combined. Longer term, there will be fewer discoveries, fewer startup companies formed, and a smaller US financial base. There also are concerns about a reverse brain drain, where highly skilled US-based researchers choose to relocate to their home countries or to other nations offering more favourable conditions for academic and professional growth. The US will always get back up Of course, Trump administration officials predict a golden economic era ahead of renewed, even outsized, US exceptionalism. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, for instance, recently said that 'throw whatever you will at our capital markets – the Great Depression, two World Wars, 9/11, a global recession, the Covid pandemic, or the last few years of sky-high inflation. Each time the American economy gets knocked down, it gets back up again. And it gets back up even stronger than it was before'. This narrative is powerful, and many investors still share it. The US economy has multiple formidable advantages, including high levels of household wealth, a secure supply of energy, and a powerful science and technology base. Nevertheless, global investor scrutiny of US exceptionalism is becoming a significant headwind as the financial foundations of US soft power erode. Not only is US economic growth slowing, but business investment is weakening and key industries, such as energy and sustainable infrastructure, are scaling back projects amidst budget cutbacks and trade uncertainty. Even the oil and gas sector, traditionally a beneficiary of Republican deregulatory policies, is moving sideways with its investment plans. This appears to be largely driven by tariffs whose impact includes increasing costs of new drilling equipment due to higher metal prices. Although US equity markets have rebounded since April, and indeed the Nasdaq and S&P 500 have reached record highs again recently, this recovery may reflect more short-term optimism rather than a fundamental improvement in economic conditions. Many investors may still be underestimating potential risks of heightened policy uncertainty, rising inflation expectations, and weakening consumer confidence. Particularly concerning is the sharp decline in the value of the dollar, which had its worst first half performance in 2025 in around half a century. Many global institutional investors are now reassessing US financial exceptionalism with a view to redeploying more capital back to home markets, including in Europe. The future direction of trade negotiations and tariff deals is still uncertain, but there are strong clues. Only two countries so far, the UK and Vietnam, have secured final agreements with the US. While it is likely that additional deals will be secured, the US Commerce Department is actively researching support for potential Section 232 sector-by-sector tariffs that could be imposed on top of previously announced 'retaliatory' tariffs, which are currently facing court challenges. It seems likely that the president will reach for these tariff tools next. The consequences of reduced US financial exceptionalism include smaller foreign capital flows to the United States and slower US investment spending. Innovative US companies will grow less quickly, and the pace of global productivity growth is likely to slow. Moreover, world living standards are likely to post smaller gains. More capital will flow to other markets, including the UK, EU, Japan and South Korea, and there will be a lower cost of funds in these places. This should spark more innovation and growth in these markets. However, it is not yet clear how potential benefits will net out for these countries, because they also will experience downside effects from a less dynamic US economy. This is not a zero-sum game. Less trade, less confidence in global markets, less innovation, fewer economies of scale, and softer demand from the world's largest economy are likely to reduce prosperity not just in the US, but much of the rest of the world too. Dr Robert Wescott served during the Bill Clinton administration as special assistant to the president for economic policy and as chief economist in his Council of Economic Advisers. Andrew Hammond is a former UK special adviser in the government of Tony Blair.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Singapore's new grant signals the need to adapt to tariffs, not just ride them out
[SINGAPORE] Announced in April, suspended till July, then postponed to August, with sectoral variations on the way – the rollercoaster of US President Donald Trump's tariff threats hurtles onward, with no clear end in sight. Even as talks continue over so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' and sector-specific ones, countries and companies are prepared for an inescapably changed trade landscape. If nothing else, the US shows no intention of lifting the global 10 per cent tariff that it has imposed unilaterally. This dual stance of negotiation and preparation was clear in last Thursday's (Jul 10) press conference by the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce, set up in April in response to Trump's tariffs. Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong is heading to the US later this month for trade talks, with a focus on the Republic's pharmaceutical exports. In the meantime, a grant for tariff-affected businesses is in the works. To be launched by October this year, the aim is not to provide relief. Rather, it is to support businesses to 'adapt to the new tariff environment', as stated in a media release. The grant's long-term orientation reinforces a warning that political leaders have repeatedly made: The world has changed. Trump's tariff crisis is not just a passing bout of turbulence that companies can ride out, but part of a more fundamental shift in global dynamics. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Meanwhile, the grant's focus on adapting – with its very name being the Business Adaptation Grant – underlines the need for companies to not simply buckle in for a rough ride, but actively change in pursuit of better prospects. Businesses that export or have overseas operations, and are affected by tariffs, can tap the grant for advisory in free trade agreements and trade compliance; legal and contractual issues; and supply chain optimisation and market diversification. Meanwhile, manufacturers can get support for 'reconfiguration costs', such as costs associated with logistics and holding inventory. Not small change The grant will provide co-funding of up to S$100,000. While the sum may seem modest to some, it is far from negligible for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) – arguably its target audience. Indeed, the grant allocation will be 'more generous' for SMEs, as Manpower Minister Tan See Leng noted at the taskforce press conference. Beyond the practical aim of providing support, the grant may also play a persuasive role. First, the grant is being introduced in October and will be valid for two years. This two-year window is to provide 'some form of reassurance for businesses that, should there be a protracted period of negotiations, it would cover that length', said Dr Tan. But it also suggests, therefore, that the government sees a risk that negotiations might take that long – implying two years of tariff uncertainty. Secondly, the very fact that a grant is being introduced should suggest – not least to SMEs – the importance that the government places on such action. Granted, other government schemes have been underutilised before, such as SkillsFuture credits for individuals to get trained. The government's sense of urgency may not always be shared by the intended audience. But if nothing else, the specificity of this grant should dispel any lingering illusions that companies can simply wait passively for the tariff storm to pass. Larger companies, that can afford their own risk and compliance teams, have undoubtedly been making their own calculations about how to respond to the trade environment. The upcoming grant is a clear push for SMEs, too, to take action.
