Wood heater pollution is a silent killer. Here's where the smoke is worst
This smoke can aggravate asthma, divide neighbours and drive people inside.
Now, new modelling gives a clearer picture of its toll on the nation's health.
The Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania estimates long-term exposure to wood-heater smoke causes 729 premature deaths every year in Australia, which is more than the deaths attributable to emissions from the national fleet of 20 million vehicles, or from energy generation, or even bushfires.
Along with this figure, the Centre has built the first national map of wood-heater emissions and deaths attributable to these emissions, with a resolution that can pick out clusters of suburbs most at risk.
Cost-of-living pressures, power price hikes and a wood-heater sales boom during COVID may mean more houses are burning wood than ever before.
Meanwhile, Australians are increasingly aware the smoke is a risk to their health.
Neighbourly bust-ups over the issue appear to be on the rise.
Here's where the smoke is worst, and where long-term exposure is costing the most lives.
The Centre for Safe Air combined particulate pollution readings from around Australia with surveys of wood heater use to generate its national map of wood heater pollution.
Let's focus on the cities in the south-east corner of Australia, which has the highest concentration of wood heaters.
The map below shows total wood heater emissions by kilograms per year in 2015.
As you might expect, the wood smoke is generally thickest in regional areas.
Towns like Armidale in NSW or Devonport in Tasmania have well-documented smoke problems.
"In small communities where every second person has a wood heater, you do get that pall of smoke and it's really dense," Fay Johnston, lead investigator at the Centre, said.
But wood heater smoke is not solely a regional issue.
In fact, when we look at its public health impact, or how wood smoke affects the population as a whole, we find wood smoke causes more harm in capital cities than in regional areas.
Every morning, Lisa checks her neighbour's chimney for white smoke.
The young mother, who asked to remain anonymous, realised there was a wood-smoke problem soon after moving with her family to Sydney's Sutherland Shire.
"[The neighbour] runs the wood heater most weekday evenings and throughout the weekend, so we can't open our windows, can't access our backyard," she said.
"Our other neighbour says their cat smells of smoke."
She said she was forced to keep her toddler inside on bad smoke days, worried about his health.
When she politely raised the issue with the wood-burning neighbours, she said they responded defensively: "They said 'We've been doing this for 20 years and no-one else has complained.'"
Wood smoke contains tiny airborne particles that can be trapped in our lungs. Long-term exposure can cause heart- and lung disease.
Short-term exposure can aggravate asthma or worsen pre-existing heart conditions.
Even a low background exposure to wood smoke can have a measurable public health impact.
Wood heaters are so polluting, it only takes a relatively small number of homes burning wood to expose millions of people in a city to pollution, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said.
By combining this measured effect of wood smoke on health with the estimate of wood heater emissions in different parts of the country, the Centre created a second national map, showing the public health impact of wood smoke.
The map below shows estimated earlier-than-expected deaths per 100,000 people due to exposure to wood-heater smoke. The top regions are in south-east Australia.
The public health impact of wood smoke squarely falls hardest on the relatively heavily populated cities, even though the concentration of wood smoke may be lower than in some regional towns.
And there's one city where the public health impact is greatest.
Perhaps surprisingly, given their cooler climates, it's not Hobart or Melbourne.
A higher proportion of people die earlier in Lisa's home city of Sydney than expected due to wood-heater pollution than other parts of south-east Australia.
This is partly due to its topography, with the harbour and surrounding land forming a bowl that traps smoke.
"Our topography definitely lends itself to trapping air pollutants within the Sydney basin," Peter Irga, an expert in air quality at the University of Technology Sydney, said.
"Other than Launceston, the other major cities don't have that basin topography."
Within this bowl, "middle suburbs" such as Parramatta or Marrickville have a combination of high population density, freestanding homes with chimneys, and access to relatively cheap firewood.
About 5 per cent of homes in Sydney own a wood heater, but the Centre for Safe Air's modelling suggests these relatively few emitters cause more than 300 earlier-than-expected deaths in the city every year.
"The modelled estimate of deaths attributable to wood heater particulate pollution are higher than that those attributable to motor vehicle particulate pollution," Professor Johnston said.
"Wood heaters really punch above their weight when it comes to putting pollution into the atmosphere, relative to the benefit they give us in terms of heat.
But these maps don't tell the full story.
The modelling relies on air-quality measurement stations dotted around the country that don't capture the emissions for those directly downwind of wood heater chimneys.
It's here, at the very local scale, that smoke can be thickest.
And where there's smoke, there's often angry neighbours.
Arabella Daniel, a Melbourne-based community organiser against wood heater pollution, said it was "a neighbour against neighbour issue".
Ms Daniel, who once took legal action against a neighbour over wood smoke, runs the My Air Quality Australia Facebook page, which has 3,000 members.
"We've really had a surge in members in the last 12 months," she said.
About 10 per cent of households use wood heaters as their primary source of heat, but millions breathe the smoke these heaters produce.
It's this disparity that makes wood-heater smoke a prime source of neighbourly conflict.
Members of the Facebook group share stories of complaints to councils and heated arguments with neighbours.
"There's a lot of suffering. People are silent because to complain about wood smoke means you're dobbing in your neighbour," Ms Daniel said.
Members of the group who spoke to the ABC asked to remain anonymous.
Max in Thirroul, just south of Sydney, has sealed windows and doorways and installed air purifiers to protect his 11-year-old asthmatic son from wood smoke.
"Soon as it gets cold, around 4pm, the wood smoke becomes so bad you can't go outside."
He said his air-quality monitors regularly clocked particulate readings of more than 50 micrograms per cubic meter, which was considered unhealthy with prolonged exposure.
Amber, in Canberra, fell out with neighbours over wood smoke she said was giving her and her family sinus headaches.
"We were initially really good friends with them … Our whole roof is covered in soot from their chimney."
Several members feared a complaint would lead to their neighbour burning more wood — a practice known in the group as "revenge burning".
Many said complaints to local and state governments have gone nowhere.
These were common stories, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said.
"It's a really knotty neighbourhood problem for which we don't have particularly good tools."
Wood smoke pollution was the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said.
Wood heater sales (which don't include open fireplaces, fire pits, pizza ovens or other outdoor wood-burners) increased 40 per cent between 2008 and 2021, according to industry group, the Home Heating Association.
Sales dropped after the pandemic, but there's no sign of a long-term decline.
Dr Irga from UTS said cost-of-living pressures and higher electricity prices were driving more Australians to burn wood for heat, including — in some cases — toxic construction materials.
Meanwhile, new air quality monitoring and mapping technologies are making wood smoke harder to ignore.
On July 6, 2025, a combination of cold and calm weekend weather in Melbourne saw wood smoke emissions spike in some areas of the city.
The night-time event was captured by a relatively new network of low-cost, real-time air quality monitors, many of them privately owned by households.
Called "Purple Air", the data from these monitors is shared to a publicly accessible online database.
On July 6, around 7.30pm, Purple Air sensors around Melbourne showed levels of particulate pollution considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, even for short-term exposure.
As the night wore on, pollution readings peaked. Heater-owners preparing for bed often close heater vents to stop oxygen flow, leading to incomplete combustion causing wood to smoulder, and produces large amounts of smoke that spreads into the surrounding properties.
The pollution spike was also visible on Google Maps, which introduced an air quality overlay earlier this year based on data from government monitoring stations.
New maps may be helping some groups like My Air Quality Australia keep tabs on pollution, but there's little sign they're changing attitudes more widely.
Surveys show Australians are fairly relaxed about wood smoke, despite having one of the highest asthma rates in the world.
Health bodies such as Asthma Australia and the Australian Medical Assocation want state and territory governments to ban new wood heater installs and phase out out the existing ones in residential areas.
But governments appear reluctant to impose such a ban.
On Facebook pages like My Air Quality Australia, there's a mounting sense of outrage.
Even as Australia leads the world in rooftop solar uptake, many rooftops continue to host a much less advanced technology: the smoky chimney.
After the July 6 pollution spike, one user observed that about 10 per cent of the 5 million people who live in Melbourne suffer from asthma, which is aggravated by wood smoke.
"That's 500,000 people and it still feels like no-one cares. How is that even possible?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Albanese government moves ahead with election pledge to cap prescription medicines to $25
The Albanese government says it will introduce legislation this week to cap the cost of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions to $25, down from $31.60 from next year. It means the cost of medicines on the PBS could be reduced by over 20 per cent from 1 January, 2026. Pensioners and concession cardholders will continue to pay just $7.70 for their prescriptions until at least 2030. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said it builds on a pledge for cost of living relief. "The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare," he said. Health Minister Mark Butler said the general patients medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004. In 2024, Australia exported roughly $2.1 billion of medicinal and pharmaceutical products to the United States, Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows. If the US were to put tariffs on medicinal exports, this could make Australian drugs more expensive. Driving down demand could also force manufacturers to move overseas, where the costs of operations are cheaper. The party promised an $8.5 billion boost aimed at strengthening the system and incentivising more clinics to bulk bill. This included $3.5 billion in direct incentives to GPs and medical centres, and $400 million for training more nurses and doctors in primary care settings, outlined in the March federal budget .


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
'Hell-bent on trying to give him time': The Australians going overseas for cancer trials
From cosmetic fixes to life-saving surgery, Insight hears from people who have turned to medical tourism. Is it always worth it, and what happens when things go wrong, far from home? Watch Insight episode Medical Tourism Tuesday 29 July at 8.30pm on SBS or live on SBS On Demand . When Hannah Thomas, 32, received a phone call following a routine blood test, she did not expect it would lead to a cancer diagnosis that same week. In 2022, Hannah was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), a type of cancer that affects the blood and bone marrow, where there's an overproduction of immature white blood cells. She was immediately admitted to hospital and underwent chemotherapy five days a week for two months. The chemotherapy did not work but following other treatments, including a bone marrow transplant , Hannah had no traces of cancer in her body a year later. However, shortly after Hannah married in 2023, the cancer came back. She and her husband, Simon, met with Hannah's haematologist and were introduced to the concept of CAR T-cell therapy, a form of immunotherapy that uses a patient's own genetically modified T-cells (a type of white blood cell). This experimental cancer treatment is offered in Australia for the more common B-cell type of ALL but is not currently offered as standard treatment for T-cell ALL. But Hannah didn't qualify for the clinical trials in Melbourne and London, so she and Simon decided to seek the treatment in Singapore. Hannah and Simon married in 2023, shortly before her cancer came back. Source: Supplied The Sydney couple had less than 24 hours to figure out how they were going to pay for the costs of the trial and accommodation, which they estimated to be around $400,000. The couple immediately investigated loans and started the application process to withdraw their superannuation. "In the end, the only reason we were able to catch that flight and go there was because one of our closest friends Dan set up a GoFundMe for us," Hannah told Insight. "Though it's hard not to feel a bit guilty. And I think it's only natural to wonder if you're worthy of all that." Seeking options abroad Like Hannah and Simon, Dianne Mehmet turned to Asia for experimental cancer treatment when options in Australia became limited. Dianne's son Jordan had just finished high school in 2013 when he was diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma — a rare, aggressive cancerous tumour that affects bones and soft tissue. The 18-year-old went through three years of intensive treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery to remove tumours in his body. However, his condition worsened. Feeling like there was nothing more their medical team could do in Australia, Dianne was desperate to take her son anywhere that might give him a chance to live longer. "With Ewing sarcoma, most people do not live past five years … but I just was hell-bent on trying to give him time," Dianne said. Dianne took her son Jordan to China for experimental cancer treatment. Source: Supplied After hearing about a friend's positive experience, Dianne took Jordan to China in 2016, where he continued conventional treatment for cancer but with the addition of natural therapy. To afford the cost of overseas accommodation and the $100,000 treatment, Dianne remortgaged the family home and crowdfunded with support from their local community. "I didn't want Jordan to think for one more minute, 'What am I going to do?' and have it hanging over his head." Medical tourism's rising popularity Nine years on from when Dianne and Jordan sought treatment overseas, medical tourism continues to grow in popularity. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, roughly 15,000 Australians went on self-funded medical tourism trips each year, according to a 2022 Victoria University thesis. Cosmetic surgery, dentistry, heart surgery, fertility treatments, gender-affirming surgery, stem-cell therapy and cancer treatments are the most common medical reasons Australians go abroad. "We have a world-class health system in Australia, but it can't do everything for everyone at all times," Dr Michael Bonning told Insight. The general physician and Australian Medical Association (NSW) president says that, in addition to the unavailability of certain treatments in Australia, saving money also motivates many to participate in medical tourism. "Sometimes it is because of access; we just don't do some of these procedures. And the second part is sometimes because of cost." But seeking treatment overseas is riskier than sticking with Australia's highly regulated health system, he warns. "When you go overseas, you open yourself up to other challenges [such as] language barriers. Sometimes we also see the standards of care are not the same as we would expect here." The cost and personal toll of travel were two other factors people considering medical tourism should take into account, he added. 'A single purpose' Hannah and Simon lived in Singapore for five months while Hannah participated in the clinical trial. They celebrated Christmas, New Year and Hannah's 32nd birthday while she was in hospital. Simon said that there were many dark times for him during those five months but "obviously nothing compared to what Hannah was going through". "What made it simple for me was having a single purpose ... to look after Hannah, make sure she was comfortable and got the treatment that she needed," Simon said. "And ultimately to get her better and bring her back." Hannah received treatment at a Singapore hospital. Source: Supplied Upon completion of the trial, Hannah was discharged with no detectable cancer cells. They returned to Sydney where, after a second bone marrow transplant, the good news was confirmed again. "I'm in remission and I have been for the last 15 months, but I say that with caution because we still have tests every eight weeks … to check and see if the cancer is coming back." The impact of overseas treatment For Dianne's son Jordan, things appeared to be improving with the "amazing" Chinese medical team working with him. "He was going very well at the start … he felt 100 per cent supported." However, Jordan started to behave unusually towards the end of their three-month stay. Doctors then discovered he had brain swelling due to a growing tumour. After emergency surgery and changes to his treatment while in operation recovery, Jordan's cancer continued to metastasise. Although overseas treatment didn't wholly work for Jordan, Dianne doesn't regret her attempt to give her son a longer life. Source: Supplied The family returned home to Melbourne in October 2016 where Jordan died three months later at the age of 22. Dianne says she would have liked for all of Jordan's treatment to have taken place in Australia if more could have been done to save her son. "If you have to travel overseas for treatment, your life is disrupted in so many ways. And it's not just you, it's the impact on your family [and] your friends," she says. "You're living in a place where you don't speak the language, you're totally out of your comfort zone. You can't have all your support there." Although the treatment did not wholly work for Jordan, Dianne does not regret taking him overseas for experimental treatment. "He was happy, and he always had hope. "I wanted him to have hope right up till the last minute."

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Ambulance Victoria launches neuro-inclusion toolkit to help paramedics and patients
As a child, Chris Cleghorn was slow at reading. He remembers it being a hidden thing that he did not talk about, but it was always there. Now aged 45 and working as a paramedic, Mr Cleghorn has the words to describe the difficulty he faced: dyslexia. Reading comes with the territory as a paramedic, but thanks to some adjustments at work, he has been able to manage his dyslexia and establish a thriving career. For example, he transferred lists of medications to an audio format that he could listen to on the commute, a format that suits his brain far better than reading and re-reading text. "I was a very good example of how these adjustments could work for someone, and how that person could thrive with those helps along the way," he said. Ambulance Victoria has launched its first neuro-inclusion toolkit, which sets out what sort of adjustments can help in the workplace. The aim is to better support neurodivergent patients and staff like Mr Cleghorn. He said adjustments that could be helpful for neurodivergent staff included allowing decompression time for paramedics in quiet places, or space to do their paperwork in a distraction-free environment after a job. When it comes to making neurodivergent patients comfortable, he said the toolkit suggested questions paramedics could ask, such as "Would you like the lights dimmed?" or "Would you like the noisy devices turned off?" "Now that there's more of a spotlight on neurodiversity and disability, we do see that we don't do a fantastic job all the time in those areas," he said. "Being able to ask questions and make those adjustments to allow people to feel comfortable … enough to be able to answer our questions and allow us to assess them is such a key point." About 11 per cent of Ambulance Victoria's employees identify as neurodivergent, but it is believed this could be higher due to under-reporting. Ambulance Victoria Gippsland Two region area manager Warwick Bone said he hoped the toolkit would provide clear support for managers, employees and patients. "We know around 15 to 20 per cent of people have some sort of neurodivergence, which can include things like autism, ADHD, obsessive compulsive disorder, dyslexia and other neurological differences," he said. The toolkit includes a community-facing information sheet on the potential sensory impacts inside an ambulance. "If they're in the back of an ambulance and machines are beeping and buzzing, then we can turn those down if they have sensory overload," Mr Bone said. "We reinforce that if you do feel overcome with the sensory experience … talk to the paramedic that's with you and explain that you are neurodiverse and we can definitely support [you]." Amaze chief executive David Tonge said his organisation co-designed the toolkit for Ambulance Victoria after a survey of patients. "What we heard from the community was they'd had varied experiences in their encounters … but there's often a lot of sensory overload," he said. "Pulling together the expertise of Ambulance Victoria and the paramedics with lived experience … is the strength of this project." Mr Cleghorn said when it came to adjusting for disability needs, lived experience was crucial for getting things right. "I can't think of anything where not getting lived experience hasn't improved the outcome or created a more robust system," he said. "It's the gold standard."