logo
'It is essential': Riders and advocates plea for a lifeline for RIPTA

'It is essential': Riders and advocates plea for a lifeline for RIPTA

Yahoo13-06-2025
PROVIDENCE - Public transportation advocates are making a final push for state lawmakers to rescue the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority from a looming budget crisis that, if unaddressed, could slash bus service across the state.
They came to the House Finance Committee in support of a slate of bills that would close or partly close a projected $33 million RIPTA budget deficit for the year starting July 1, protecting bus routes and transportation for the disabled.
Jean Ann Giuliano of East Greenwich said RIPTA service had been a "game changer" for her 28-year-old autistic son, allowing him to live independently and ride it to his job at CVS.
"RIPTA for him is a lifeline. It is not a convenience for James, it is a necessity. It is essential," Giuliano said at a May 21 House Finance Committee meeting. "Last year, the bus he takes was on the chopping block ... fortunately it was saved. This year it is probably going to be on the chopping block again and for us it is panic time."
Amy Jo Glidden, co-chair of Rhode Island Transit Riders, said the cuts to bus service that would be required without money budgeted for transit would result in layoffs at RIPTA, routes cut or made less frequent, and lost jobs across the state by people who are no longer able to get to work.
"This issue is personal for me. I do not own a car and rely on the bus to get around," Glidden said. "If RIPTA does not get the $32 million, catastrophe awaits."
RIPTA's budget woes have reached this crisis point over the course of many years, but like most transit agencies in the United States, accelerated during the COVID pandemic.
The pandemic cratered ridership and sent costs spiraling, but for four years federal aid plugged the revenue gap.
Gov. Dan McKee has not suggested any new funding ideas for RIPTA.
The "Save RIPTA" alliance has backed seven different public transit funding bills and it is not clear which have the best chance of passing.
They include:
Appropriating $32 million in the state budget
Borrowing $100 million for transit
Shifting more gas tax collections to RIPTA
Dedicating taxes collected from ride-hailing companies such as Uber to transit
Using every year of inflation to calculate the every-two-year gas tax increase (currently only the most recent year is counted.)
Last year, the General Assembly provided $15 million − the other half of the deficit was plugged with the last remaining COVID funds − but made no move toward funding the agency long term.
The one string attached to the $15 million was a requirement that RIPTA conduct an "efficiency study" by March that would search for ways to run the bus system at lower cost or in a way that generates more revenue.
But last year was also a time of turmoil at RIPTA and, after the ouster of former CEO Scott Avedisian, the bus system's board of directors opted to give new CEO Chris Durand's team and consultants more time to search for efficiencies.
On Thursday, May 22, Durand told the RIPTA board that the study was still being finished and he expected more documents from it to be available next week.
RIPTA did send a "best practices review" of other similar-sized transit agencies from study consultant WSP to lawmakers May 16.
It recommended, among other things, eliminating underperforming routes, increasing eligibility verification for paratransit service and shifting some service to "microtransit."
On the revenue side, the report said agencies could look for more advertising opportunities.
House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi said May 22 he has more requests for spending than the state has revenue and he expects RIPTA to find efficiencies.
"They have to right the ship," he said about RIPTA. "The reality is they have to change. Public transit is important, for the economy and environment ... We gave them an extra $15 million and all I asked for is an efficiency study that's behind schedule."
The only bill in the Save RIPTA package that McKee's administration has weighed in on is a proposal to shift some gas tax proceeds from highway projects to transit.
Transportation Secretary Peter Alviti Jr., who is also the RIPTA board chairman, wrote to lawmakers that the Department of Transportation opposes the bill because it would "result in an annual loss of approximately $7 million, significantly impacting our capital program."
Liza Burkin, board president of the Providence Streets Coalition, argued at the Finance Committee meeting that it is past time state leaders start making long-term decisions about RIPTA.
"It is very sad we are still in the same place. We have studied this over and over and over and over," Burkin said. "The Save RIPTA campaign has chosen seven different ways of funding RIPTA. They are diverse, different ways. It is up to you all to decide. Just choose one or two."
This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: RIPTA is heading toward a crisis. Riders are begging for a lifeline.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

22 Scary Ways Kids Have Changed According To Teachers
22 Scary Ways Kids Have Changed According To Teachers

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

22 Scary Ways Kids Have Changed According To Teachers

I often hear about how American kids today are doing worse in school and having more struggles with socializing and behavior. I was curious to hear some specific examples of how this is showing up in students today, so I asked a few teachers to fill out a questionnaire. The ones who answered ranged from preschool to fourth-grade teachers. Here are some of the ways they've seen how students today have declined in intelligence or changed behaviorally: "I've noticed the attention loss amongst children. What people don't realize is that a lot of the social media that's getting to the students is through school devices that they're allowed to bring home, not just the ones that have at home." "Less consistent physical activity during the COVID lockdown has affected the kids' endurance and energy regulation." "The majority of my students this year did not possess the fine motor skills needed for writing. Most of them went to different schools before my class, so I do not know how they were taught. While students were able to identify letters and corresponding sounds, they had to strengthen their ability to blend letter sounds together in order to read. Students also had trouble with comprehension. They needed time to learn more about story elements, main ideas, and key details." "After the pandemic, the kids didn't know how to play with each other because of all the isolation. So in school, they had to be given an opportunity to learn how to play respectfully." "I hear 7 and 8-year-olds making references and discussing content from right-wing content creators." "One way I've noticed a decline in literacy amongst students today is that a lot of them need to build vocabulary. This will automatically boost reading, speech, and any other academic scenario." "A change I've noticed since I've been a teacher is that students are starting the school year below grade level and have difficulty accessing the new EL (Expeditionary Learning) curriculum." "A basic life skill my students should've known but didn't was how to say common polite courtesies like please and thank you or excuse me." "I've noticed a decline in penmanship due to the kids' use of the internet and social media." "Because of the internet and social media, I hear second graders making references I understand, but they're too young to, and it's alarming." "Post-COVID, students have struggled more with separation when having to leave their parents for school." "I teach first grade, and I've had students who didn't know basic things they should, like letter and number recognition." "Kids today are not given enough opportunities to read for enjoyment, and it's affecting their literacy." "Some basic life skills my preschoolers didn't possess was basic hygiene skills, toileting, cleaning up their own messes, and dressing themselves." "Some students missed foundational skills during the COVID lockdown, especially in literacy and math." "There were many children who had not been socialized during the pandemic. These children are easy to spot as it was difficult for them to settle into a classroom of 16 children. They have to learn how to be around big groups of people, share toys, hold conversations, and so much more." "I teach pre-school, and sometimes I've had students who didn't know their own name." "I've noticed that students today are more apathetic towards other classmates, teachers, and subjects." "I teach kindergarten and I've had students who didn't know basic flat shapes, primary colors, numbers 1-10, or how to write their name." "Since I've been a teacher, I see that there are more children who are addicted to screen time." "I have kindergarteners who don't know how to wash their hands or blow their nose." And finally, "Post-COVID, I think kids are used to running things much more often. For example, if they were at home with siblings or guardians who were always working from home, there wasn't a lot of supervision, which has led them to being rude to adults and other classmates." If you're a teacher, use the form below to tell us about the realities and struggles of teaching today. You can answer as many or as few questions as you'd like.

With Debt Concerns Mounting, Resurfacing Presentation from Jim Rickards Suggests U.S. May Already Own What It Needs to Fund Trump's Economic Revival
With Debt Concerns Mounting, Resurfacing Presentation from Jim Rickards Suggests U.S. May Already Own What It Needs to Fund Trump's Economic Revival

Business Upturn

time4 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

With Debt Concerns Mounting, Resurfacing Presentation from Jim Rickards Suggests U.S. May Already Own What It Needs to Fund Trump's Economic Revival

Washington, D.C., July 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As negotiations intensify over how to pay for President Trump's sweeping economic legislation—dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill' by those close to the administration—a released presentation from economic strategist Jim Rickards details a resource that could ensure this needed windfall does not come in the form of taxes or borrowing at all. Instead, Rickards discusses a hidden reserve of national wealth that has remained buried—both literally and politically—for generations. And now, for the first time in half a century, the doors may be opening. A Financial Resource Buried in the American West Rickards' presentation outlines the vast holdings of critical materials beneath federally owned land—resources essential for energy, defense, technology, and modern infrastructure. While the U.S. Geological Survey has long documented these deposits, Rickards says their potential value has never been fully recognized as a financial tool. According to the presentation, this resource base spans across every state, with extraordinary concentrations in key regions. '$516 billion is here in the Salton Sea area of California… $3.1 trillion is held in Nome, Alaska. And $7.35 trillion is here, in Midland, Texas' . He says that what's most remarkable isn't the size—but the fact that it's never been touched. 'The nature of this 'trust', as I call it, is such that politicians haven't been able to raid it… which has allowed it to grow untouched… for decades' . An Alternative to Debt, Hidden in Plain Sight Rather than relying on new bond issuances or foreign capital, Rickards proposes that America's next economic chapter be funded using what it already owns. 'We've had this rich 'endowment' right under our feet… yet for years, we refused to touch it'. He insists this is not a stimulus check or a new federal program. 'It's not some kind of government program like those COVID relief checks a few years back,' Rickards says. 'But it is a chance for the average American to become richer than they ever imagined'. Trump's Shift Toward Domestic Wealth The presentation positions Trump's current resource policies as a historic pivot. Rickards notes that, unlike past presidents who kept these resources off-limits, Trump is now unlocking them. 'Trump is re-opening our mineral-rich Federal Lands. And fast-tracking companies that could recover trillions of dollars' worth of resources, right here in America' . Even Trump's own comments suggest a new direction. 'There are certain areas where we have great, raw earth… and we're not allowed to use it because of the environment. I'm going to open them up,' Trump said. Projects Delayed for Generations Now Moving Forward Rickards points to specific projects—some sitting dormant for decades—as early signs of movement. 'The Resolution Copper Mine has been sitting for 29 years… Pebble Mine in Alaska has been stalled since 1990… and Thacker Pass Lithium Mine in Nevada has been blocked since 1978' . He says the barriers were never technical—they were political. 'For the past 50 years, fake-experts have strangled us from within the government,' he says. 'They tied us down with reams of regulation' . Now, that's changing. 'We know exactly where these minerals are. We know they're worth trillions of dollars. And now—for the first time in half a century—we can go get them' . A Moment of Reckoning Rickards says that this moment is not just about policy—it's about recognizing what America already has. 'America is anything BUT broke,' he writes. 'And if you understand what's bound to happen next? You could watch your own net worth soar in the years ahead' . He emphasizes that the resource isn't theoretical or abstract. It's real, verifiable, and already owned by the American public. 'It's not earmarked for any specific individual,' Rickards clarifies. 'I'm just trying to use terminology that will make the most sense to viewers' . About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the White House, CIA, Pentagon, and U.S. Treasury. He played a key role in the original Petrodollar Accord and has been involved in the federal response to numerous global crises. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash

Controversial push to develop former tony LI country club could finally get OK after almost a decade
Controversial push to develop former tony LI country club could finally get OK after almost a decade

New York Post

time8 hours ago

  • New York Post

Controversial push to develop former tony LI country club could finally get OK after almost a decade

A yearslong controversial push to develop the site of a former tony Long Island country club may finally get the green light. New Jersey developers Robert Weiss and Efrem Gerszberg have been battling local towns for almost a decade to build on the roughly 117-acre property that used to be the Woodmere Country Club in the town of Hempstead in Nassau County. The developers originally hoped to construct nearly 300 single-family homes at the site but have since revamped their plans and now want to build a smaller luxury senior-living facility. Advertisement A plan to create a senior-living facility at the site of the Woodmere Country Club in Hempstead may finally get approval. Dennis Clark Their reps pleaded with the town's board last week to rezone a 34-acre section so they can move forward with the smaller project — and it appears local officials may finally be ready to buy into the proposal. 'In nearly a decade, we've seen several proposals — many of which didn't align with the surrounding community,' said Woodsburgh Mayor Jake Harman, whose village is in Hempstead, at the hearing. 'This one preserves a significant amount of landscaped open space and meets the needs of our aging population.' Advertisement The current proposal was pitched last year as a compromise to settle a costly ongoing court battle between the developers and the villages of Woodsburgh, Lawrence and Woodmere, which are all in the town of Hempstead. The legal war over the property has involved 10 lawsuits — eight in state court and two in federal — and left taxpayers on the hook for a mountain of lawyers' and other fees. The developers bought the country club in 2017 with plans to close it by 2021 and develop it into housing. COVID shut the course down early in 2020. New Jersey developers Robert Weiss and Efrem Gerszberg have been pushing town officials to build housing on the 117-acre property for nearly a decade. Dennis Clark Advertisement The town had imposed a future-building moratorium at the site in 2016, the year before it was bought, to block any major construction, but that move was later struck down as unconstitutional by a judge. In 2016, the town for extra measure also created a new zoning designation — the Coastal Conservation District — to severely limit building there. The designation capped new construction on the property to 59 single-family homes while preserving 83 acres, including those that housed the nine-hole golf course and its original clubhouse. The developers sued. Tuesday's hearing drew a mix of support and skepticism over their latest plans. Advertisement The builders' lawyer, Jack Martins, said at the hearing that even the land's current designation allows '59 large homes, new roads, real infrastructure burdens' — which is 'not nothing.' Start and end your day informed with our newsletters Morning Report and Evening Update: Your source for today's top stories Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters His clients' revised plan 'offers a better outcome for traffic, parking, environmental impact, and the community as a whole,' he said. 'I would urge the board to consider this as the proper compromise, proper resolution and proper care for what's best for the community when it comes to traffic, parking, and impact,' Martins said. If the developers' latest proposal is approved, housing would be built on a 34-acre northern portion of the site while setting aside 50 acres as open space for preservation and a 5-acre park. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! That northern portion, which sits entirely within the village of Hempstead, would hold more than units of over-55 condos across two buildings linked by a private clubhouse. Harman, whose village also contains a portion of the land, said the updated plan was 'the most appropriate option' put forward in years. Advertisement But some residents are not convinced. 'While the development looks beautiful, I live there — and the road simply can't handle 160 units and over 300 cars,' Woodmere resident Steven Fuchs told the board. 'This changes the entire character [of the neighborhood.]' But once-skeptical Lawrence Mayor-elect Shlomo Nahmias called the proposal 'a good deal' that reflects community concerns. Advertisement 'There might be some small tweaks needed, but for the most part, people are receptive,' Nahmias said. 'At the end of the day, it's up to the town of Hempstead.' The Hempstead Town Board has not yet set a date to vote on whether to change the zoning to allow for the senior complex.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store