
EXCLUSIVE What Dakota Johnson got WRONG in Materialists as The Millionaire Matchmaker weighs in
To separate fact from fantasy, DailyMail.com spoke to four high-profile insiders: Patti Stanger (The Millionaire Matchmaker), Jaydi Samuels (co-founder of LJMatchmaking), Nick Rosen (founder of Met By Nick and co-founder of QUALITY), and Susan Trombetti (CEO of Exclusive Matchmaking), and, they didn't hold back.
'There's this sexy allure to the industry,' says Trombetti. 'The burnout is real. You need a team for support and balance.'
Stanger, known to millions as The Millionaire Matchmaker, confirmed that most matchmakers 'are often single as they see the dark side of dating.'
Samuels, co-founder of LJMatchmaking, also pointed out that the movie leans hard into their client's super luxurious world, but that most experts spend their days in front of a laptop, not at cocktail parties or getting toasted at weddings.
'The majority of a matchmaker's day, for most of us, is sitting around in sweatpants, scheduling dates, sorting through a database, conducting coaching sessions and intakes over Zoom,' Samuels says.
'There are no cakes every time someone gets engaged,' Trombetti adds. 'And [clients] don't always invite you to weddings.'
And while Lucy is shown taking client calls between lavish dinners and flirty rooftop dates, the real balancing act can be much messier.
'I just returned from an exotic vacation, where I was taking client calls out of the country in a rainforest,' Trombetti says. 'You want to be available at all times - 24/7.'
Still, Rosen, founder of Met By Nick and co-founder of QUALITY, emphasized that he does not make promises to clients about finding 'The One.'
'The biggest issue is how the luxury model itself can compromise genuine matchmaking,' he explained. 'When you're under pressure to maintain high fees and constantly upsell, it can create conflicts between what's best for the client and what's best for revenue.'
Rosen added, 'Ethical matchmakers set realistic expectations about what we can deliver—excellent introductions and guidance—while being honest that the ultimate outcome depends on the clients themselves. Love involves two people and countless variables beyond our control.'
Another moment in the film that sparked outrage among the pros? A client is sexually assaulted on a date arranged by Lucy, and her boss brushes it off.
'It's not normal in the business,' Trombetti says. 'It's a shame that was portrayed like that. I find it disgusting.'
'I've never encountered this occurrence personally, but the fear of it kept me awake at night until I switched to a referral-only model,' Samuels stresses. 'I do want to stress that something like that is logically most likely to occur when you're working with less experienced matchmakers, though.'
Samuels points out 'Johnson's character wasn't even aware that could happen' and hardly got to know anyone beyond their "stats" on paper (beyond height and income).
Stanger echoes the sentiment. 'I run a tight ship. We background check everyone. But even then, it's never 100%.'
Beyond the procedural issues, experts took aim at Lucy's personal choices, especially in her own love life.
Samuels explains that Lucy self-sabotages constantly, including belittling herself to Pedro Pascal's character by telling him 'multiple times' that he can 'do much better.'
Samuels, co-founder of LJMatchmaking, also pointed out that the movie leans hard into their client's super luxurious world, but that most experts spend their days in front of a laptop
The way Lucy interacts with clients also raised eyebrows.
'We aren't chasing people down the street to become a client,' Trombetti says. 'I might chase what I perceive as the perfect match for a client... but I don't chase clients down. They have to want to become a client.'
Samuels admits: 'A truly bad date could ruin my night in addition to my client's, as typically I want them to find love as badly as they do.'
Stanger is more direct about her boundaries to prevent professional and personal lines from blurring.
'Yes clients can become your friends but it's a tricky situation because if they renew they'll want a huge discount,' she warns. 'I tell my staff it's not wise to become friends with your clients or even date them as it will backfire on you. You must always be professional at all times.'
Samuels, the author of Your Last First Date: Secrets from a Hollywood Matchmaker, confessed you can't always predict what will happen.
'It's true you can date a potential or current client, I wound up marrying one!' she exclaims.
One thing The Materialists nailed? The outlandish demands.
'I loved when Dakota tells a woman she isn't a catch,' Trombetti says, before noting that the longer her clients stay single the 'longer' their lists of expectations get.
When asked about Johnson's performance overall, the experts answers were mixed.
'I loved it, I think Celine Song nailed it and I think Dakota's portrayal of a young matchmaker was authentic. She cared about her clients and went beyond the call of duty. That is a good matchmaker in the end,' Stanger says.
But the industry veterans also agree: the film's portrayal is incomplete.
'[The film captures] the exhausting reality of constantly managing other people's romantic expectations while struggling with your own relationship choices. The film doesn't shy away from showing matchmaker burnout, which is painfully real but rarely discussed publicly,' Rosen says.
'Lucy was too cynical to last in the real world,' Trombetti says. 'Clients would pick up on that energy instantly. And don't get me started on her stalking. There would be legal consequences.'
And Samuels couldn't help but add that Lucy is an abysmal dater, who could not see she has more options than her unstable ex or the guy she doesn't feel worthy of.
'There is a third option, which is to remain single, and find someone who has his life together and treats her well like Pedro, who she's as passionate about as Chris. To me, that would have been a stronger ending,' she reminds audiences.
Ann Parnes, the co-founder of After Hello, found the 'portrayal of matchmaking as something transitional and impersonal.'
'l. It gave the impression that as professional matchmakers, we make matches based on a checklist of data points, much like dating apps often encourage, rather than considering the whole person: their needs, wants, lifestyle, and values. That's the opposite of how we work,' she insists.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JoJo Siwa and boyfriend Chris Hughes look loved-up in LA as he states that he's 'really in love' with her
Chris Hughes and girlfriend JoJo Siwa show their blossoming romance is still going strong on their day out at a massage session in LA. After their day out on Monday, Chris admitted over the weekend that he's 'obsessed' with JoJo after meeting her in the UK's Celebrity Big Brother house in. The 32-year-old British TV presenter flew across the Atlantic to reunite with JoJo, 22, and they hugged and held hands outside The Now Massage parlor together where Chris said he's 'really in love' with JoJo, who he called his 'princess'. Adored: Chris stopped to express that he's 'in love' with his 'princess' JoJo Reality bites: The lovebirds met in the UK's Celebrity Big Brother house in April


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How Rachael Ray is 'swimming against the tide' with her career in 'critical' transition
Over the past few months, celebrity chef Rachael Ray has been making headlines with fans growing increasingly concerned for her health amid a string of 'bizarre' behavior - and, according to a psychic, her career might be in a 'critical' transition. Ray, 56, was the star of the Food Network for many years, as she hosted multiple shows on the channel, including her signature 30 Minute Meals, which skyrocketed her to fame in the early 2000s. The chef also had a talk show, called The Rachael Ray Show, which lasted for nearly two decades on television from 2006 to 2023. At one point, she was at the top of the food industry, her first talk show season having 2.3 million national household rating, per Variety - the best premiere of a syndicated talk show since the premiere of Dr. Phil. But over the past few years, Ray has sparked fresh concern from fans, especially last September, when she was seen slurring her words in a video she had posted to social media. The video was a preview from her new show, Rachael Ray in Tuscany, and showed her cooking Ossobuco while paying tribute to the late Tony Bennett. Soon after the video, viewers voiced their worry for the star, which prompted Ray to admit that she had recently suffered from a 'couple of bad falls.' Things only seemed to get worse from there, as she left fans concerned once again in May after she appeared to slur her words in a Mother's Day video on Instagram, and left fans disturbed by 'bizarre' behavior at a meet-and-greet in New York City this month. It begs the question: amid all this concern, where is her career going? Currently, Ray has a show on FYI, Rachael Ray in Tuscany, which she films from her home in Italy, and stars in A+E's Meals In Minutes. She also released the first season of her podcast, I'll Sleep When I'm Dead, this past Fall. In addition, she is the head of her own content studio with some of her longtime partners, Free Food Content Studios - which A+E Network acquired a 50 percent stake in last year, per Variety. But according to psychic Athos Salomé, 38, from Brazil, Ray is 'swimming against the tide' as the market she is a part of is rapidly changing directions. Salomé is often referred to as the 'Living Nostradamus' due to his numerous accurate predictions - including his forecasting of the coronavirus pandemic, Queen Elizabeth II's death and the Microsoft global outage. He has now told the Daily Mail that Ray's best bet in business right now may be to aim towards cutting a deal with a streaming platform. 'She is in a critical transition phase,' Salomé told Daily Mail exclusively. 'She should be able to sign one or two cable or streaming deals by the end of 2026. Nothing grandiose - short specials, "safe and risk-free" programs, to keep her name in circulation,' the clairvoyant said. However, he predicted that there is only a 30 percent chance of Ray getting a 'major' streaming deal - but it's a goal that she should be aiming for. He also noted that her YouTube and Instagram pages, where she posts clips from her episodes, have the potential to grow, but many of her videos have not gone viral. 'It will be a slow and consistent increase, to keep the loyal audience, which is already older,' he said. Ideally, the best case scenario for Ray would be to get another lucrative contract with The Food Network once again, or a different TV platform like Hulu, Salomé explained. 'We're talking big money, fancy production, heavy promotion,' he said. 'The result? A special that goes viral, puts her back in the headlines and makes her seem "current" even though she's been on the road for decades,' the Living Nostradamus continued. If she were to sign with a big network, Salomé suggested that she could use that momentum to introduce her own line of utensils or publish more cookbooks. She could use the momentum to launch a new line of utensils or more cookbooks, capitalizing on the good times with strong sales in stores and online. In May, an insider revealed to Daily Mail that those close to Ray are 'concerned,' especially after the Mother's Day video that she posted where she appeared to be slurring her words He warns that her brand could become 'irrelevant' if it fails to evolve over time. In May, an insider revealed to Daily Mail that those close to Ray are 'concerned,' especially after the Mother's Day video that she posted where she appeared to be slurring her words. 'Those close to Rachael are so concerned,' the insider disclosed. 'She has shut people out and lives a very secluded life.' 'She seems lost and when anyone reaches out to her she doesn't respond. 'Rachael was always so meticulous about her appearance, and it is very telling and concerning that she now just doesn't care. It is indicative of a bigger issue.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Girls gone bad: Lena Dunham's Too Much is just not good enough
There is one TV show that has been enjoyed most often, and most reliably, among my cohort in New York: Girls, the seminal HBO dramedy about Brooklyn's downwardly mobile and highly self-important creative class of the 2010s. Though a cultural lightning rod when it aired from 2012 until 2017 – its whiteness, convincing narcissism, frank sexuality and frequent nudity all catnip for the cresting blogosphere and cyclical moral panic – Girls has rightfully settled into its status as one of the best television series of the 21st century, a foundational text for millennials as well as a biting satire of solipsistic, Obama-era striving. (Although viewers too young to remember it as anything other than canon now see the girls' flailing – their freedom to wear terrible prints, listen to Vampire Weekend and be earnest – as something to be envied rather than derided, a core tenet of the millennial redemption arc.) The show was always sharper than tendentious criticism acknowledged, a knowing send-up not to be taken too seriously, though it did seriously shape the TV that followed – the idea of an 'unlikable' female protagonist was always ahistorical, but messy, compelling women on television proliferated in Hannah Horvath's wake, from the girls of Broad City to Insecure's Issa, Phoebe Waller-Bridge's Fleabag to Pamela Adlon's Better Things. It is unfortunately still radical to see someone who looks like creator, writer and star Lena Dunham be naked on screen without judgment; though television has explored sex much more successfully than movies in the years since, no show has fully succeeded Girls' unvarnished vision of sex as something both banal and essential. No wonder so many people are rewatching it. All of which is to say: expectations were high for Too Much, Dunham's new TV series for Netflix. Though not her first project since Girls – she helmed HBO's ill-fated series Camping, made two feature films (one much better than the other) and directed the (excellent) pilot of Industry – Too Much is the first true follow-up to the show that made her a cultural flashpoint at the age of 26. From the jump, Jessica, played by the comedian Megan Stalter, appears as a natural successor to Dunham's annoying but subtly endearing Hannah Horvath. Once again in Brooklyn, Jessica does something headstrong and inadvisable: she breaks into her ex-boyfriend Zev's (Michael Zegen) apartment and screams him and his new girlfriend Wendy (longtime Dunham friend Emily Ratajkowski) awake, hysterically demanding that he declare leaving her to be the worst thing anyone has ever done. The amateur and ultimately futile home invasion is the first sign that Too Much will, like Girls before it, concern at least one prickly and off-putting character who is refreshingly and unashamedly not skinny. It is also the first sign that something is off. Whereas Hannah annoyed with a recognizable, skewering self-obsession, Jessica's Too Much-ness – shocking volume, machine-gun delivery, inherent awkwardness – is a gag. Stalter comes from the world of front-facing camera internet comedy, where heightened bits and jarring phrases reign supreme (her best work – 'hi, gay!' – will get stuck in your head for hours). The translation to television works in small parts, as in Hacks, but flounders as a lead, particularly one supposed to attract a handsome musician (Will Sharpe) at a pub and succeed as an advertising director while showing up to work in bunny ears. Dunham is now in her late 30s and married (her husband, the indie musician Luis Felber, co-created the show with her); no one will begrudge her avoiding a repeat of the Girls formula, which no show has been able to crack (Adults tried this spring, and failed). With Too Much, she steers far from any specific scene, instead focusing on the relationship between Jessica and Sharpe's Felix, loosely based on her own. The 10-part romcom features the welcome presence of Dunham's underrated acting, a buzzy lead in Stalter, a refreshingly grey vision of London, a murderers' row of cameos – among them, Andrew Scott, Naomi Watts, Stephen Fry and Kit Harington – and sensitive scenes between two weirdo lovers. But without a scene or a trope to satirize – Dunham, through Jessica, is thoroughly enamored by English romcoms from Pride & Prejudice to Notting Hill – its comedy falters. Long on grating gags and short on zingers, Too Much is, and I say this begrudgingly, an overlong and underbaked disappointment. It is, however, very much of its era in television, when the downsides of the streaming boom have come into clearer focus. Episode lengths for Too Much vary from 31 minutes to a baggy 50+, less evidence of creative flexibility than a resistance to editing. Like Jessica's favored nightgowns, the chapters are oversized and diaphanous, standard Netflix second-screen fare; some, such the standout third episode depicting an accidental all-nighter punctuated by repeated, insistent sex as Jessica and Felix fall in love, believably advance their relationship with Dunham's distinctive sense of erotic realism. Others, such as a Jessica meeting Felix's friends and, true to form, doing too much ketamine, trap the characters in a cyclical loop of dysfunction. Dunham is, as the critic Lili Loofbourow put it, an excellent miniaturist – Too Much shines when the world falls away from Jessica and Felix, as they build the couple's secret language of bits, vulnerabilities and callbacks. But as soon as the show meanders – to some egregiously overdrawn co-workers, to Jessica's mother (Rita Wilson) on FaceTime across the pond, Dunham loses her grip. One scene, Jessica is getting a dressing-down from her boss (Richard E Grant) for her performance; the next, they're bingeing coke at a work party at his house. But perhaps most disappointing to me, as a fan of Girls, is the show's tenuous grip on the reality of the body. It is refreshing to see Stalter, a plus-size actor, play an unabashed character who generally gets what she wants, and whose romantic rivals are played by Ratajkowski, the epitome of conventional hot on Instagram, and the French movie star Adèle Exarchopoulos. It also feels a bit disingenuous to not acknowledge appearances at all, particularly when the culture is regressing back to the eating disorder-riddled 'thin is in' of the 2000s. During one early sex scene, Felix lays a hand on Jessica's bandaged stomach – always hapless, she burned herself – but does not grab her, as if he respects her curves, but does not crave her, as if they are beside the point of attraction. Such is the muted energy of Too Much, a show at once too broad and not enough. Dunham, once the tongue-in-cheek 'voice of a generation', has succeeded again – unfortunately this time, it's in making Netflix background TV.