Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law
Campaign group Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws.
An urgent hearing was held in the High Court on Monday related to an application for judicial review on behalf of one of the founders of the direct action group, Huda Ammori.
A further hearing will be held on Friday to decide whether the Government can temporarily be blocked from banning the group, pending a hearing to decide whether Palestine Action can bring the legal challenge.
A decision on whether the group will be given the green light to bring the legal challenge will be given at a further hearing expected to be held in the week of July 21.
Supporting statements have also been submitted by Amnesty International, Liberty and European Legal Support Centre over concerns of unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent, a spokesperson said.
It comes as the Home Secretary is expected to publish a written statement to lay the order to make membership and support for the direct action group illegal.
If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Commenting on the hearing, Ms Ammori said: 'I have been left with no choice but to request this urgent hearing and to seek either an injunction or other form of interim relief because of the Home Secretary's decision to try to steamroll this through Parliament immediately, without proper opportunity for MPs and Peers to debate and scrutinise the proposal, or for legal and human rights experts and civil society organisations to make representations, or for those of us who would be denied fundamental rights as a result and criminalised as 'terrorists' overnight, including the many thousands of people who support Palestine Action.'
The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident.
Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Ms Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Merseyside Labour MPs in turmoil as some prepare to vote against government welfare bill
A number of Merseyside Labour MPs are in turmoil over the government's controversial plans to cut welfare payments - with some still planning to vote against their own government today. Sir Keir Starmer and his government have been working to fend off a significant rebellion over their plans to cut welfare funding in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which will come to the House of Commons today (Tuesday). The original bill sought to reduce the number of people who would qualify for the personal independence payment (PIP) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5bn a year. But facing a rebellion that at one stage included around 120 Labour MPs - enough to kill the bill - the government has outlined a number of concessions. READ MORE: Paul McCartney was 'nervous' and said 'we didn't have it' as he made Beatles decision READ MORE: Prisoner's three-word boast after he left cellmate 'melting' following row over milk The changes mean that current PIP claimants will keep their benefits, with stricter eligibility rules only coming in for new claimants from November 2026. Those currently receiving the health element of UC would see their money rising in line with inflation. But while these concessions may have won over a number of would-be rebels, some remain unhappy and preparing to vote against their own government in today's showdown in the Commons. The ECHO has reached out to a number of Labour MPs in the region. Both Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne and Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson confirmed that as things stand, they will be voting against the government. They were two of six regional MPs who last week signed what is known as a reasoned amendment, which, if passed, would have stopped the welfare reform bill getting a second reading in the House of Commons, effectively defeating the government's plans. The other MPs in the region who signed the amendment - prior to the offer of any concessions - were Southport representative Patrick Hurley, Knowsley MP Anneleise Midgley, St Helens South and Whiston member Marie Rimmer and Liverpool Wavertree MP Paula Barker. Some Merseyside Labour MPs told the ECHO last night that they were still yet to decide on how they will vote today and would be waiting to hear from Work and Pensions Liz Kendall in the chamber. One said they remained conflicted, stating: "The offer to us critics so far has protected the incomes of hundreds of thousands of people and prevented 50,000 children being pushed into poverty. "The material difference is tangible and huge. But people who need it - the disabled who can never work, those who have PTSD because of war or horrendous domestic abuse do need to be ok in the future. "There are other things we can do to get the benefits bill down while protecting those people."
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge gives woman 118 reasons to ditch crook boyfriend after bizarre crime spree
A judge told a woman to ditch her crook boyfriend following a bizarre crime spree. Wayne Green, aged 42, and Sharon Deen, 43, robbed a Lloyds Pharmacy and ended up in a drug dealer's car smashing into police. Green, who has committed 118 previous offences, also burgled a takeaway and broke into a home while the occupants were asleep. READ MORE: Face of dad jailed over three-minute TikTok rant despite grovelling apology In the latter incident he stole bananas which he and Deen were seen eating on CCTV footage after walking away from the scene. The couple, who both have issues with drug addiction, were sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court on Thursday, June 26 but received very different outcomes. Deen, of Hilltop Road, Oldbury, was handed a 15-month suspended sentence after admitting robbery, assault and two counts of possessing class A drugs. In an unusual move Judge Peter Cooke dealt with her separately, as she watched via a video link from HMP Foston Hall. The reason soon became clear as he said: "If you are going to turn your life around you need positive influences in your life. "I'm sorry to have to say this because I know you two are fond of one another, but Wayne Green will never be able to be the positive influence you need. "A man with 118 offences and years in prison behind him even before today. "He is never going to be the positive influence you need. "As soon as you accept that and move on the better." Green, of Hob Moor Road, Small Heath, was then brought back into the dock. He had been disruptive throughout the hearing, at one stage 'sacking' his barrister and u-turning on one of his guilty pleas before reneging on both decisions. Judge Cooke said: "I have dealt with Sharon Deen already. It maybe of some comfort to you I felt I was able to give her a suspended sentence. "This is not a stage in the proceedings for a dialogue between you and me. You have been verbal from the dock this afternoon." Having admitted the same offences as his girlfriend, as well as dangerous driving and two counts of burglary, he was sentenced to five years and banned from driving for five years. Green had gone in to on Bearwood Road in Smethwick on October 5 last year. He swiped a worker's iPhone 13 Pro, worth £1,000, from behind the counter while the staff were all in the kitchen. Later the same night he clambered through the window of a home in Merrivale Road, Smethwick, while the occupants were asleep. He let himself out through the front door having found the keys and stolen a purse, £100 in cash, a packet of biscuits and the bananas. "Footage shows Mr Green and Miss Deen walking along eating bananas," said prosecutor Alison Scott-Jones, who confirmed Deen was not convicted in relation to the burglary. But the couple did act together when they robbed Lloyds Pharmacy at 10.45am on October 17. When two female staff tried to stop them stealing shampoo and conditioner Deen pulled one of the workers to the ground by her hair and spat in the face of another. Green pushed and shoved at them to free his girlfriend. Judge Cooke said: "It was not the gravest in terms of the items of property taken or the violence exhibited but I don't trivialise it for one moment. "This will be an experience at work which will live with each of the ladies involved, probably for the rest of their lives. "It has become a nightmare feature of people engaged in retail work these days, people who are usually women doing shop work finding themselves confronted with behaviour and aggression such as this." Finally, the couple were in a silver Volkswagen Golf in Oldbury on October 20 when they were seen acting 'bizarrely' by police who confronted them. Green, who was driving, tried to ram them three times, hitting force vehicles twice. He then stuffed bags of drugs into his mouth before being detained, with officers recovering further large amounts of cocaine and heroin inside the car. But the couple were not charged with supplying them. Ms Scott-Jones said: "Considerable police intelligence checks were made. "The car was never reported stolen but belonged to a significant drug dealer. "He (Green) did admit taking the vehicle from the dealer." Elizabeth Hartley, defending Green, said he had a difficult upbringing and a 'consistent struggle' with class A drug addiction, which he was now addressing in custody. Elisabeth MacDermott, for Deen, told the court she had learning difficulties and came from a deprived background. She added she had taken positive steps in custody towards tackling her drug addiction as well as taken educational courses. Judge Cooke said: "It is quite clear I am dealing with a very limited person with a number of frailties and vulnerabilities. "She has been assessed as having an IQ of only 70. "It is fair to say her antecedents (criminal record), while not insignificant, are of a different order and magnitude from her co-defendant." He ordered Deen to complete 35 days of rehabilitation activity as part of her sentence.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
LONDON (AP) — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks a year in office this week, fighting a rebellion from his own party over welfare reform and reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings. It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government. In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on U.K. goods. But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy. John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.' Rebellion over welfare reform On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030. After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs. Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition. The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. 'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.' It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's only likely to save about half that amount. Starmer acknowledges errors The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular. In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East' while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure,' he said. UK politics is in flux Starmer's struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers. But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour's – shifted in this year's local elections to Reform U.K., a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties. Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029. 'There's still plenty of time to turn things around,' Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers' rebellion 'will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make in government. 'Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,' he said. Jill Lawless, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
