No Kings rally: Officials fortify safety plans as protesters prepare to descend on Philadelphia
Thousands of people are expected to attend Saturday's "No Kings" protest in Philadelphia.
Philadelphia Police and the District Attorney said they will protect people's rights to demonstrate while holding law-breakers accountable.
The rally kicks off 12 p.m. at Love Park.
CENTER CITY - 1,800 "No Kings" protests are planned across the country this weekend. The largest is expected to take place in Philadelphia.
What we know
The "No Kings" protests call for a day of action to oppose the policies of President Donald Trump.
The protests coincide with Trump's 79th birthday.
More than 2,000 protests are scheduled around the country. The flagship is being held in Philadelphia.
A noon rally at Love Park will be followed by a march to Eakins Oval where barricades have already been put in place.
Dig deeper
Event organizers for the Philadelphia "No Kings" protest on June 14 anticipate 30,000 attendees, according to police.
"There is a lot of us who are very upset with what's going on," said Jessica Reynoso. "There are a lot of us who want to push back and show that we're upset with the way the administration has been conducting, especially with what's been happening in Los Angeles, the excessive force, and the National Guard that is being used against the citizens."
Reynoso is an activist with Our Revolution, a progressive political organizing group. She has been getting the word out about the mass protests across the country and will volunteer during the Philadelphia rally.
"I'm just worried about due process and I feel like me and my friends focus on that the United States is a democracy, and we just want to make sure our institutions are upholding that and keeping people accountable," said Reynoso.
What they're saying
During a news conference at Salt and Light Church in Kingsessing Thursday, District Attorney Larry Krasner said the upcoming protest was one of the important topics he discussed face-to-face with PPD Commissioner Kevin Bethel on Wednesday.
"We will carefully hold accountable anyone and everyone, whether they are uniformed ice agents or they are opportunistic criminals, who would tuck in behind lawful protest in order to loot. We will hold all of them properly accountable," said Krasner.
PPD Sergeant Eric Gripp said in a statement:
"The Philadelphia Police Department remains firmly committed to protecting the constitutional rights of all individuals, including the right to peacefully assemble and express opinions under the First Amendment. As we have consistently stated, our role during demonstrations is to safeguard public safety while ensuring that individuals can exercise their rights without fear or interference.
While we do not comment on hypothetical situations, we continuously monitor events locally and nationally to ensure we are prepared for any scenario. In coordination with our local, state, and federal partners, the PPD is always working to balance public safety concerns with the need to protect civil liberties.
As with all demonstrations, our priority is to facilitate peaceful protest, prevent violence or disorder, and protect the rights of all residents, businesses, and participants. We train our officers accordingly and deploy resources proportionate to the potential needs of the event.
We encourage anyone who plans to demonstrate to do so peacefully and in accordance with the law. The Philadelphia Police Department will continue to uphold our responsibility to serve all communities with professionalism, honor, and integrity."
Governor Josh Shapiro also released this statement about upcoming protests:
"The right to peacefully protest and exercise our First Amendment is a sacred American right — and here in Pennsylvania, we will always protect it. At the same time, we will always remain focused on keeping our communities safe and ensuring all demonstrations remain peaceful. As Governor, I will stand in defense of this constitutional right and work to ensure all Pennsylvanians can exercise it safely and peacefully.
With demonstrations and protests planned across Pennsylvania this weekend, I want to be very clear: all protests and demonstrations must remain peaceful, lawful, and orderly. Violence is not an answer to any political differences, destruction and chaos are unacceptable — and neither will be permitted here in Pennsylvania.
My Administration is coordinating with the Parker Administration in Philadelphia and local officials and law enforcement all across the Commonwealth to make sure that demonstrations this weekend are lawful and peaceful. Colonel Paris and the Pennsylvania State Police are working closely with local police departments to ensure they have the resources and support they need. Together, we are prepared to keep our communities safe while protecting Pennsylvanians' fundamental rights - and we will be working around the clock to ensure both the rights of protesters and the wellbeing of our cities and towns are protected.
So long as l am your Governor, I will continue working every day to protect our freedom and keep our communities safe. Here in the Commonwealth William Penn founded on the promise that it would be welcoming to people from all walks of life, we can and must do both."
"We're just trying to show our power in numbers, not in any other actions, so we're hoping that that's enough to keep us safe," said Reynoso.
The "No Kings" protest in Philadelphia will begin 2 p.m. Saturday at Love Park then march to the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
Some say there is no better place to exercise free speech than Philly they just hope it stays safe.
"If I was to come down I would just keep my antenna up and be careful. And I have done many protests in my day so I which everybody a safe journey when they come" said a Havertown grandmother walking the Parkway.
A couple blocks off the Ben Franklin Parkway, the happy hour drinks were flowing at McCrossens Tavern Thursday night.
But the buzz around the bar was about what's coming this weekend.
"We are hoping for the best and we support freedom of speech and if the people have something to say we just hope it's said peacefully get their fair shake" said owner Jamie Brennan.
What's next
Philadelphia Police say they are prepared for what could be the biggest protest in the country on Saturday.
Motorists are being told to avoid the area at all costs on Saturday. Eakins Oval and Kelly Drive inbound from Fairmount Ave. will be closed to traffic starting at 3 a.m. Saturday.
There are similar protests going on in several suburban communities as well.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US airstrikes set back Iran's nuclear programme by 'one or two years', Pentagon says
US strikes on key nuclear facilities in Iran 10 days ago have pushed back Iran's nuclear programme by up to two years, the Pentagon's chief spokesperson, Sean Parnell, said on Wednesday. "We have degraded their programme by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the department assess that," Parnell told reporters at a news briefing. "All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's (facilities) have been completely obliterated," Parnell said. On 22 June, the US launched multiple joint attacks with Israel against three of Iran's nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, using more than 30 13,500-kilogram bunker buster missiles and Tomahawk rockets. Parnell's statement on Wednesday offered a more cautious assessment than previous statements from Washington, while at the same time contradicting information released by UN's nuclear watchdog. In the aftermath of the strikes, US President Donald Trump had said the facilities were "totally obliterated" and the attacks had set Iran's nuclear programme back "by decades". Meanwhile, over the weekend, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi, said that Tehran might go back to producing enriched uranium within a few months. "The capacities they have are there. They can have ... in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium," Grossi said in an interview with CBS News on Saturday. "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," he added. Other experts have also said that Iran likely moved the already-produced stock of highly enriched uranium — believed to be near-weapons grade — prior to the strikes on Fordow and other facilities to protect it from the strikes. US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and other Washington officials said that existing intelligence showed no signs of such a move or claims that the stockpile has been hidden away at an unknown location, further contradicting other statements. Related Iran's president halts cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog, reports say Iran could be capable of uranium enrichment in a 'matter of months', UN nuclear watchdog says Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi previously said the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage. "No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araghchi told CBS on Tuesday. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday ordered the country to halt its cooperation with the IAEA, according to state media. Pezeshkian follows a law passed by Iran's parliament last week to suspend that cooperation, as politicians unanimously supported the move against the IAEA. The bill was also backed by Iran's Guardian Council.
CNN
40 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Many Americans want a third party. But where would it fit?
Americans are entrenched into their partisan corners, but the party lines keep moving in weird new ways. Republicans who grew up in the Grand Old Party might not recognize a party overtaken by the Make America Great Again movement. Democrats who cheered when President Bill Clinton declared the era of big government to be over might wonder how it is that a democratic socialist is their party's candidate for mayor of New York City. Others have followed Democratic expat and scion of Camelot Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with his Make America Healthy Again mantra, to vote for Trump. For a variety of structural reasons, two options is what most Americans get, even though poll after poll suggests few are happy with either party. Against that backdrop, it's interesting to consider Elon Musk's pledge to form an 'America Party,' an alternative to Republicans and Democrats, if President Donald Trump's megabill becomes law. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he wrote on his social media platform. Musk's primary concern is that the megabill adds to the national debt, he said – and not, as Trump alleges, that he's sore about the end of tax credits to encourage Americans to buy electric vehicles. The third-party pledge follows Musk's musings last month that the US needs a party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle.' It's an interesting thought experiment to consider what the political middle might look like to a space and computer nerd and technocrat like Musk. He cares deeply about climate change and wants desperately for humans to be interplanetary and to live on Mars, but he opposes the megabill for all its government spending. He has strong thoughts about encouraging more American women to have babies, but thinks the addition of people to the country through illegal immigration is an existential threat to the US. The same thought experiment crossed my mind last month when Karine Jean-Pierre, who was White House press secretary under former President Joe Biden, announced in the run-up to the publication of her memoir that she's leaving the Democratic Party. 'We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past,' she said in a statement to CNN. But it doesn't seem like Jean-Pierre's version of independence will be in the same galaxy as Musk's. One of the more interesting political campaigns of the coming months is likely to be the New York City mayor's race, in which the upstart Democrat (and democratic socialist) Zohran Mamdani will take on Eric Adams, the sitting mayor who is also a Democrat but is running as an independent. Also on the ballot as a 'Fight and Deliver' independent will be former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, another Democrat, although it's not clear if he'll seriously campaign between now and November. That's a lot of different versions of Democrats New Yorkers will be able to sort through. There are, of course, existing third parties in the US. The Green and Libertarian parties appear on most ballots for president, which means they have dedicated followings across the country, but they lack the power to get anyone elected to either the House or Senate. Former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas mounted presidential campaigns as both a Libertarian and a Republican, but he got the most traction as a libertarian-minded Republican. His son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, is one of the few Republicans now willing to cross Trump and oppose the megabill. Paul, like Musk, is worried about the national debt. A senator closer to the middle, Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, did vote for the bill, but only after securing carveouts that will help her state – but could aggravate every other American. Murkowski is that rare moderate who can survive without party backing. She won a write-in reelection campaign – the triple lindy of politics – after losing the Republican primary in 2010. That was before her party veered even more toward Trump, but Murkowski recently told CNN's Audie Cornish there are more quiet centrist Americans than people realize. She's representing them, she said, even if Washington is a dangerous place to be a moderate. 'You're roadkill in the middle,' Murkowski told Cornish for her 'The Assignment' podcast. Another Republican who opposed the megabill is Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. He said cuts to Medicaid would cost too many North Carolinians their health insurance. But prioritizing the people you represent rather than the national party is anathema in today's political environment. 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' Tillis said in a statement Sunday. Fearing a primary and Trump's wrath, or maybe just tired of defending the shrinking middle ground in the Senate, Tillis also announced he would not seek reelection next year, which immediately made his North Carolina seat Democrats' top pickup priority. Democrats must hope that a moderate like former Gov. Roy Cooper will jump in the race and defy Democrats' national branding. Perhaps Cooper would play the same kind of role as former Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Manchin voted with Democrats most of the time, but his tendency to buck the party leadership made him a thorn in the side of progressives. Coincidentally, when Manchin left office, Democrats lost their majority in the Senate. On his way out the door, Manchin said it was time for a third-party alternative, but he opted not to run for president. Kennedy did run for president after leaving the Democratic Party and his ultimate support for Trump likely brought in some new support for the president, who is now letting Kennedy rethink US vaccine policy to the consternation of the scientific community. Kennedy is also trying to take on the food industry. Help from Kennedy's independents probably helped Trump win, but maybe not as much as the nearly $300 million Musk is known to have spent, mostly on Trump's behalf. Musk's political ventures may have now turned off Tesla's natural climate-concerned consumer base as well as the MAGA faithful. Regardless of the wealth he could spend, what middle would his America party fit into?
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Paramount's shameful CBS settlement with Trump deserves congressional scrutiny
Shari Redstone and anyone at Paramount Global who backed this $16 million settlement should be ashamed – and pay for that cowardice. The Columbia Broadcasting System, known as CBS, has long been one of America's most admired media brands, from Edward R. Murrow's radio reports during World War II while bombs fell around him in England to the investigative invention of the televised news magazine "60 Minutes." Now, with American media under constant attack from a presidency eager to tip toward tyranny, there's good reason a recent Broadway revival of a show named after Murrow's famous sign-off line – "Good night, and good luck" – was greeted with such acclaim. The people in charge at Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, have no inspirational words to offer Americans these days. If they had a sign-off line, it would be more like "Give in, and pay up." That's just what Paramount did on July 2, Wednesday, agreeing to pay $16 million to settle a meritless lawsuit from President Donald Trump, who had first demanded $10 billion and then upped that to $20 billion while siccing federal regulators on CBS. Opinion: Trump and Musk renew their feud. Will Elon drop an Epstein 'bomb' again? Trump's CBS lawsuit was an affront to the First Amendment Trump's beef: CBS News twice aired an interview during the 2024 presidential campaign with Kamala Harris, then the vice president and Democratic nominee, that had been edited for two shows, "60 Minutes" and "Face the Nation." His real problem was the constant state of victimhood his seething narcissism forces him to seek. The lawsuit was derided as a blatant assault on the First Amendment protections for free speech in America. Don't take my word for it on that. Consider what CBS News reported Wednesday while announcing the settlement. "First Amendment scholars and constitutional experts largely view the lawsuit as a frivolous misapplication of the law," the network reported, while noting that Trump's lawyers had specifically filed the case in a federal court district in Texas with one judge, who was appointed by Trump in 2019. Trump would have lost this case, either at trial or on appeal. But Paramount has something to lose, too. The company is seeking the Federal Communications Commission's approval for an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media. Trump, who appointed Brendan Carr to head the FCC after winning a second term, has used social media posts to demand punishment for CBS News for the terrible crime of … journalism that didn't say exactly what he wanted to hear. So this settlement is not about the journalism or ethics at CBS News. It's a payoff from Paramount Chair Shari Redstone so she and a band of very wealthy executives at the top of their corporation can get even richer. Paramount made some feeble attempts, in announcing the settlement, to dodge the shame of that cash-driven capitulation, noting that Trump will not receive an apology and that the $16 million will go to his future presidential library, not to him directly. Pathetic stuff. And certainly not the end of this scandal for Paramount, for two reasons. Trump will always be a bully, but Congress could turn over First, Trump is now and always has been a bully willing to use bogus lawsuits to harass his perceived enemies. And second, control of Congress could well tip to the Democratic Party in the 2026 midterm elections, which means Paramount's merger could be the subject of well-deserved legislative oversight. Opinion: Trump's policies on immigration, economy and trade are unpopular with Americans On the bullying, Paramount was so driven by the merger that it missed the lesson from Trump's assault on the journalists at ABC News. That network's parent company, Walt Disney Co., tried to mollify Trump with a $15 million settlement in December for a tantrum-based lawsuit he filed in March 2024. Carr, over at the FCC, launched a federal investigation of Disney and ABC several months after the settlement to see if their efforts at employing a diverse workforce broke the law. Giving in to a bully guarantees more bullying in the future. Over in Congress, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, took to social media to accuse Paramount of bribing Trump, vowing to press for federal charges if his party takes control of his chamber after the 2026 elections. Wyden and two Senate colleagues, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, in May wrote to Redstone to announce their intentions to investigate "potentially illegal conduct" as talk of a settlement circulated. Redstone and anyone at Paramount who backed this settlement should be ashamed, though I expect they're more focused on profits from the merger than the lasting damage they did to their reputations and the legacy of a once-proud institution of journalism. They should pay for that cowardice. Trump, the voracious bully, will want more. Democrats, if they win back Congress, should use their powers of oversight to expose every angle of this embarrassing fiasco. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
