China's Humanoid Robots Poised to Revolutionize Manufacturing with AI Power
Chinese humanoid robot startup AgiBot, which operates this facility, envisions a future where robots could not only assemble products but also assemble themselves. The technology promises to change the way humans work, live, and interact with machines.
Chinese President Xi Jinping, during his recent visit to AgiBot's Shanghai facility, emphasized the significance of robots for the country's future, even joking that these machines might one day form a football team. The push for innovation in this sector coincides with Xi's broader call for private firms to help propel China's economy amidst global challenges like trade tensions and population decline.
China is striving to build an industrial revolution driven by AI-powered humanoid robots to keep its manufacturing edge and overcome economic hurdles. Chinese humanoid robots are now not just feats of technology but are being equipped with AI to make them commercially viable for real-world applications.
AI Advancements and Government Support Fuel Growth
China's rapid strides in humanoid robotics owe much to significant advancements in AI, backed by homegrown tech giants like DeepSeek, and strong government subsidies. Over the past year alone, the government has allocated over $20 billion to the sector, with an additional $137 billion fund earmarked to support AI and robotics startups. In 2024, state procurement for humanoid robots soared to 214 million yuan from just 4.7 million yuan the previous year.
China's focus on building a competitive edge in humanoid robotics is also supported by its well-established supply chain, which allows for the efficient production of robot components at competitive prices. Experts predict that by 2030, humanoid robot production costs could be halved, making them accessible for large-scale deployment across factories and other industries.
Impact on Manufacturing and Labor Force
China's push to adopt humanoid robots is poised to reshape manufacturing. With major strides in robot agility, including feats like running marathons and performing acrobatics, humanoids are moving beyond the realm of novelty. The Chinese government sees these robots as a potential solution to labor shortages, particularly in industries like elderly care, where the aging population is placing growing demands on services.
However, the rise of humanoid robots has sparked discussions about the future of employment. With over 123 million workers in China's manufacturing sector, experts predict that intelligent robots could replace a significant portion of this workforce. Some lawmakers have even proposed an AI unemployment insurance program to support displaced workers.
While there are concerns about job losses, the Chinese government suggests that the long-term benefits of automation will outweigh the short-term disruptions, with a particular focus on relieving humans from dangerous or repetitive jobs.
The Road Ahead
As humanoid robots become more advanced and capable of performing complex tasks, the global manufacturing landscape will change. With China at the forefront of this technological shift, the potential for economic growth, productivity improvements, and new job creation in emerging sectors looks promising. However, how China manages the social and economic challenges posed by widespread automation will be key to shaping its future role in the global economy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
BRICS Nations Respond to Trump's Ultimatum with Unified Pushback
The strong reaction from BRICS nations come after Donald Trump warned other countries against joining the group, threatening them with an additional 10 per cent tariff if they did. The verbal attacks on Trump were prompted by China, which said BRICS does not target any country and does not appreciate the use of BRICS nations anti-American policies as a tool of coercion. 'The countries are uniting to discuss new ways to participate in the definition of the new world economic order,' President Lula said at the end of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro. 'I think that's why the BRICS are making people uncomfortable,' he added. In an angry speech on Saturday, Trump accused the Trump vs BRICS nations– Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, along with Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia – of indulging in 'anti-American practices'. While the US President did not elaborate what those practices are, he had earlier said the US would slap '100 per cent tariffs' on Trump ultimatum BRICS nations for their attempt on de-dollarisation. Brazil's BRICS presidency had already nixed efforts to advance a common currency for the group. However, that did not stop President Lula from repeating on Monday that global trade needs alternatives. 'Obviously, we have to be responsible about doing that carefully. 'Negotiations are necessary between our central bank and other countries. 'It takes time for it to take root and mature,' he said. China too vented its displeasure over the ultimatum. 'BRICS' mechanism is an important platform for cooperation among emerging markets and developing countries; it advocates openness, inclusiveness, and win-win cooperation, and does not target any country,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning. 'Mao added. On the issue of Trump tariffs implemented under former US president Donald Trump, 'we have always said that trade conflicts are best settled through talks and not threats. The use of tariffs as leverage serves no one's interests,' Mao said
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade tensions, not BRICS, are the bigger threat to global stability: Geoff Dennis
"The Chinese are desperate for the RMB to play a bigger role. But frankly, I do not see what the BRICS are doing or what they are trying to do represents a currency related threat to the US whatsoever," says Geoff Dennis , Independent EM Commentator. When we speak about the idea of de-dollarisation and we have seen countries like India for instance, we have publicly stated that we are not going to move away from the dollar and de-dollarisation is not a policy that India essentially is looking at. But is there an immediate threat to the United States or to the G7 group of nations from BRICS because Donald Trump is making these comments over and over again. So, do you anticipate an immediate threat A) to the dollar and, of course, to US' hegemony? Geoff Dennis: I do not believe so. This is an issue which has allegedly impacted markets for the best part of 50 years. I am an old guy, I have been around a long time and we were talking about potentially the Deutsche Mark replacing the US dollar as a key reserve currency or the key reserve currency in the late 70s and it has just never happened. Now, right now there is some evidence, of course, that central banks are diversifying out of the dollar. The Chinese are desperate for the RMB to play a bigger role. But frankly, I do not see what the BRICS are doing or what they are trying to do represents a currency related threat to the US whatsoever. I just do not get it frankly. And so, there is some de-dollarisation going on for sure, but I am not sure it is major and I am not sure it is involving the BRICS. In fact, frankly, my own interpretation of all of this is that anything that anybody does overseas, especially if countries get together is almost automatically defined by Trump is anti-America and there is nothing about what the BRICS are doing that is really seriously anti-America and this all boils down at the end of the day to the fact that I just think de-dollarisation is not something that is going to go far in the world even if the dollar's really truly dominant position has pulled back a little bit over the last few years. Given the fact that the reform Bretton Woods and reduce dollar reliance in fact is not new, but is BRICS gaining structural momentum this time in your opinion? Geoff Dennis: It is gaining structural momentum in the sense that you have got a number of other large countries as everybody knows joining BRICS that over and above the original BRICS which was defined by my old friend Jim O'Neill in 2001 which was, of course, just Brazil, Russia, India, China. There are some very important countries that have joined. But still I am not sure exactly what a BRICS summit achieves. Yes, they say all the right things about we support free trade. We condemn tariffs whatever it might be or non-tariff barriers, but as to how much power this group actually can demonstrate currently in the world economy especially against a US president who frankly is a bully to everybody who seems to threaten in some vague way the US dominant position of the world economy. Live Events So, I think it does not sort of matter to me within reason what the BRICS does at this point, whether it gets bigger, whether it gets smaller, whether a lot of presidents and heads of state come to the conferences or not. At the end of the day I do not think it has a lot of power except to say all the right things about trade policy and meanwhile President Trump is rampaging around the global economy like a bull in a China shop and the BRICS will become part of that unfortunately and yet, I do not know how the BRICS particularly fights back and I certainly do not see it as I said earlier being something that is going to turn into a brics-led currency, whatever reserve currency that is going to replace the dollar. The problem here is Trump's tariff policy and it is as simple as that frankly. ETMarkets WhatsApp channel )
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trade tensions, not BRICS, are the bigger threat to global stability: Geoff Dennis
The problem here is Trump's tariff policy and it is as simple as that frankly. Synopsis Geoff Dennis, an Independent EM Commentator, dismisses the notion of BRICS posing a currency threat to the US, despite China's desire for a stronger RMB. While some de-dollarization exists, Dennis believes Trump's perception of any overseas collaboration as anti-American is a key factor. "The Chinese are desperate for the RMB to play a bigger role. But frankly, I do not see what the BRICS are doing or what they are trying to do represents a currency related threat to the US whatsoever," says Geoff Dennis, Independent EM Commentator. ADVERTISEMENT When we speak about the idea of de-dollarisation and we have seen countries like India for instance, we have publicly stated that we are not going to move away from the dollar and de-dollarisation is not a policy that India essentially is looking at. But is there an immediate threat to the United States or to the G7 group of nations from BRICS because Donald Trump is making these comments over and over again. So, do you anticipate an immediate threat A) to the dollar and, of course, to US' hegemony? Geoff Dennis: I do not believe so. This is an issue which has allegedly impacted markets for the best part of 50 years. I am an old guy, I have been around a long time and we were talking about potentially the Deutsche Mark replacing the US dollar as a key reserve currency or the key reserve currency in the late 70s and it has just never happened. Now, right now there is some evidence, of course, that central banks are diversifying out of the dollar. The Chinese are desperate for the RMB to play a bigger role. But frankly, I do not see what the BRICS are doing or what they are trying to do represents a currency related threat to the US whatsoever. I just do not get it frankly. And so, there is some de-dollarisation going on for sure, but I am not sure it is major and I am not sure it is involving the BRICS. In fact, frankly, my own interpretation of all of this is that anything that anybody does overseas, especially if countries get together is almost automatically defined by Trump is anti-America and there is nothing about what the BRICS are doing that is really seriously anti-America and this all boils down at the end of the day to the fact that I just think de-dollarisation is not something that is going to go far in the world even if the dollar's really truly dominant position has pulled back a little bit over the last few years. Given the fact that the reform Bretton Woods and reduce dollar reliance in fact is not new, but is BRICS gaining structural momentum this time in your opinion? Geoff Dennis: It is gaining structural momentum in the sense that you have got a number of other large countries as everybody knows joining BRICS that over and above the original BRICS which was defined by my old friend Jim O'Neill in 2001 which was, of course, just Brazil, Russia, India, China. There are some very important countries that have joined. But still I am not sure exactly what a BRICS summit achieves. Yes, they say all the right things about we support free trade. We condemn tariffs whatever it might be or non-tariff barriers, but as to how much power this group actually can demonstrate currently in the world economy especially against a US president who frankly is a bully to everybody who seems to threaten in some vague way the US dominant position of the world economy. So, I think it does not sort of matter to me within reason what the BRICS does at this point, whether it gets bigger, whether it gets smaller, whether a lot of presidents and heads of state come to the conferences or not. ADVERTISEMENT At the end of the day I do not think it has a lot of power except to say all the right things about trade policy and meanwhile President Trump is rampaging around the global economy like a bull in a China shop and the BRICS will become part of that unfortunately and yet, I do not know how the BRICS particularly fights back and I certainly do not see it as I said earlier being something that is going to turn into a brics-led currency, whatever reserve currency that is going to replace the dollar. The problem here is Trump's tariff policy and it is as simple as that frankly. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel) BRICSGeoff Denniscurrency threat to USRMBUS hegemony Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains The rise of Crypto Futures in India: Leverage, tax efficiency, and market maturity, Avinash Shekhar of Pi42 explains NEXT STORY
