Campaigners for and against assisted dying make feelings known at Westminster
Dame Prue Leith, Dame Esther Rantzen's daughter, Rebecca Wilcox, and the broadcaster, Jonathan Dimbleby, were among the high-profile figures supporting the Bill to change the law in England and Wales.
Members of the Dignity in Dying campaign wore pink and held placards in memory of friends and family members.
Those opposed to the Bill included groups dressed as scientists in white lab coats and bloodied gloves and masks, as well as nuns and other members of religious organisations.
The mood amongst campaigners was largely calm and respectful on both sides.
Dame Prue told the PA news agency she was 'both nervous and confident' about the outcome.
'It's so moving to see all these people with placards of people they've lost or people who are dying of cancer,' she said.
'It's hard not to cry because I think they have done such a good job. Let's hope we've won.'
Mr Dimbleby said he believed the Bill would be 'transformative'.
He added: 'What it will mean is millions of people will be able to say to themselves, 'If I'm terminally ill, I will be able to choose, assuming I am of sound mind and I am not being coerced, to say 'Yes, I want to be assisted – I have dignity in death'.'
Rebecca Wilcox, the daughter of Dame Esther, said: 'It couldn't be a kinder, more compassionate Bill that respects choice at the end of life, that respects kindness and empathy and gives us all an option when other options, every other option, has been taken away, and it would just be the perfect tool for a palliative care doctor to have in their med bag.'
Teachers Catie and Becky Fenner said they wanted other families to benefit from the Bill.
Their mother, who had motor neurone disease, had flown to Dignitas in Switzerland to end her life at a cost of £15,000. The sisters said they did not get to properly say goodbye and grieve and worried about the legal repercussions.
Catie, 37, said: 'We were left quite traumatised by the whole experience – not only seeing a parent go through a really horrible disease but then the secrecy of the planning.'
Campaigners against the Bill, who were gathered outside Parliament, chanted 'We are not dead yet' and 'Kill the Bill, not the ill'.
A display was erected with a gravestone reading 'RIP: The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. Bury it deep', and behind were two mounds meant to resemble graves.
Andrew Hilliard, 75, said he was opposed for religious reasons. He was dressed in a white lab coat with a placard reading: 'Protect our NHS from becoming the National Suicide Service'.
The chief executive of Care Not Killing, Dr Gordon Macdonald, said MPs should prioritise improving palliative care.
He said: 'Most people, when thinking about the practical implications of this, for those most vulnerable, they change their minds.'
George Fielding, a campaigner affiliated with the Not Dead Yet group which is opposed to assisted dying, said he attended to represent disabled people.
He said: 'This Bill will endanger and shorten the lives of disabled people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage urges Reform councils to ditch ‘virtue-signalling' net zero targets
Nigel Farage has pressured Reform-led councils to scrap 'virtue-signalling' climate emergency targets amid concerns they are 'massive diversions of time'. Eight in 10 local authorities across Britain declared so-called climate emergencies between May 2019 and 2023, with many racing to beat each other into announcing their green-focused pledges. The floodgates were opened six years ago after the House of Commons agreed on a motion tabled by Jeremy Corbyn for Parliament to declare an emergency. Local authorities vowed to follow suit by devoting millions of pounds to decarbonise offices, waste collection trucks and all council-run services. Rather than opt for a 2050 deadline – as agreed by Parliament – the majority of councils pledged a more ambitious 2030 target. Mr Farage, whose party gained control of 10 county councils two months ago, told The Telegraph the net zero pledges need to be ditched. He said: 'They need to be scrapped. It's not the job of county councils to deal with global issues, and it wouldn't make any difference at all if they were scrapped. 'It costs money and they are a massive diversion of time. It's virtue-signalling.' Mr Farage's comments come after he said in May that staff working on climate change initiatives should be 'seeking alternative careers'. Of the 10 councils Reform gained control, the party inherited seven climate emergency policies. Kent County Council last week became the first Reform-led authority to announce cost-savings plans of £40m by cutting net zero spending. It declared a climate emergency in 2019. In a move described as 'reckless' by critics, Lincolnshire County Council scrapped its flood management scrutiny committee in May, while Derbyshire County Council axed its climate change committee and cancelled all climate-related meetings. 'We have no idea how much it all costs' Since committing to their climate emergencies, various councils across the UK have been accused of ploughing millions into eco targets at the expense of cutting key services. For example, cash-strapped Lambeth council – which has dimmed streetlights to save money – spent £25m on climate initiatives such as 'rain gardens' and low-traffic neighbourhoods between 2019 and 2024. An investigation by The Times last year found the Labour-run south London authority paid more than 40 staff members at least £100,000 a year, including a 'director of climate and inclusive growth' on £160,000. Pembrokeshire County Council, which vowed in 2019 to become net zero by 2030, is poised to launch a review into its climate emergency after councillors raised concerns over its cost and deliverability. Cllr Mike Stoddart, who previously branded the emergency 'virtue signalling on stilts', successfully tabled a motion last month to start a review. He said: 'We have no idea how much it all costs and there has been no accountability for years. The UK is responsible for just under 1pc of global CO2 emissions, and Pembrokeshire's population of 120,000 is roughly one five hundredth of that of the UK. 'If the council ceased to exist, it would make no difference whatsoever to the Earth's climate.' A meeting of Pembrokeshire's full council – which is coalition-led – will decide whether to pursue a review at a meeting this month. Council papers show that it does 'not currently have an assessment' of the costs of its climate emergency, despite previously pledging to publish bi-annual reviews. Elsewhere, in Merseyside, Sefton Council, which has reduced emissions by 43pc since 2019, said it is 'clear that a substantial amount of investment will be required' to reach net zero by 2030. External funding is needed, but a progress report goes on to state that the council 'must carefully evaluate its position in the coming years'. Councils taking 'minimum action' Having announced climate emergencies, some councils have taken the most 'minimum action possible', according to watchdog group, Climate Emergency UK. Damning findings show that only a quarter of councils have turned at least 10pc of their vehicle fleet electric since pledging to decarbonise. Isaac Beevor, of Climate Emergency UK, said some councils are 'driving forward local climate action', yet others are falling short. He said: 'There are councils which continue to lag behind, taking the minimum action possible.' Having ranked every local authority's performance, the watchdog concluded progress across the UK is 'slow', with hundreds of councils not on track to meet their own self-declared net zero targets. Climate Emergency UK scored councils across seven categories of performance, ranking them on a score from 0 to 100. Just 62 of the 391 councils assessed scored higher than half marks. Rutland came bottom of the pile for county councils, while Castle Point (Essex) ranked last for district authorities. At the other end of the scale, Islington council topped the overall chart. Mr Beevor said: 'We are calling for climate action to be a fully funded legal duty for all UK councils, as we need all councils to be creating the zero-emission communities we need to thrive.' Two-thirds of councils were not confident of meeting their targets, according to a survey published by the Local Government Association (LGA) last year. Adam Hug, a spokesman for the LGA, said: 'The Government will not meet its net zero goals without empowering councils to deliver local climate action in every village, town and city. 'With the right support, local areas could cut carbon quicker and for less money, while boosting the local economy and ensuring local people benefit.'
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Post Office could hand ownership to staff amid review after Horizon scandal
Ministers are to consider handing over ownership of the Post Office to its operators after the Horizon IT scandal. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has published a green paper, starting the first big review of the scandal-plagued organisation in 15 years. The review, which will run until 6 October, follows the publication last week of the first part of the two-year public inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal. Ministers said that part of the review will include looking at the ownership model of the Post Office, which is ultimately controlled by the government, including the possibility of mutualisation. Ministers have previously met representatives of post office operators to discuss the possibility of handing ownership to the network branch managers who run its 11,500 outlets. 'This green paper marks the start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead,' said Gareth Thomas, the post office minister. 'Post Offices continue to be a central part of our high streets and communities across the country. However, after 15 years without a proper review, and in the aftermath of the Horizon scandal, it's clear we need a fresh vision for the future.' About 1,000 post office operators were prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 because of faulty Horizon accounting software that made it look as though they had been committing fraud. The scandal, widely considered to be the most widespread miscarriage of justice in UK history, was the subject of the critically acclaimed ITV drama Mr Bates vs the Post Office, which aired last year and thrust the problem into the national spotlight. Bates has previously criticised the idea of mutualisation. 'Currently, the government subsidises it and will continue to have to support it. They can't just give it to the subpostmasters and say: 'Here you go, mate',' he said last year. In November, the Post Office announced it was to close up to 115 branches putting 2,000 jobs at risk. Nigel Railton, the Post Office chair, is cutting hundreds of staff jobs in order to add £250m annually to operators' remuneration. On Monday, the government also announced that it is to provide a further £118m subsidy to help the Post Office push through its restructure and transformation plans. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The Communications Workers Union (CWU) criticised the award of the subsidy and said the Post Office and Royal Mail, which were split more than a decade ago, needed to be reunified. 'Successive governments have failed the Post Office, its workers and customers,' said a spokesperson for the CWU. 'And choosing to use government subsidies for planned redundancies, closures and so-called transformation plans that are nothing more than managed decline. The only way to build a successful future is to bring Royal Mail and the Post Office back together through a new joint venture ownership model.' The owner of the Royal Mail was bought by Czech tycoon Daniel Křetínský's EP Group in a £3.6bn deal that took the stock market listed business private earlier this year. The government said its green paper will provide the opportunity to work 'hand in hand' with post office operators and the public to ensure the company is 'put on a path to a strong and sustainable future'. 'We now have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to have a national conversation about the future of our post offices and their role in supporting communities across the UK,' said Neil Brocklehurst, the chief executive of the Post Office. According to the latest official figures, just over £1bn has been paid out in compensation to more than 7,300 claimants across the four redress schemes up to 2 June.
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The right wants us to think Britain is on the verge of ethnic conflict. The truth is worse than that
June 2025 was a now typical month for the British press. It began when, on Tuesday 3 June, the Telegraph's Sam Ashworth-Hayes and Charles Hymas worried that white Britons, according to new data published by Matt Goodwin and trailed earlier that day in his column in the Daily Mail, will 'become a minority in the UK population within the next 40 years'. There followed a brief calm, interrupted only by the odd article informing us that 'London's decline is now irreversible', or that 'Starmer and Farage have doomed Britain to an endless spiral of decline'. By Friday 13 June, however, things reached a new pitch. That day, former Tory MP Douglas Carswell used his Telegraph column to complain that 'low-skilled, non-western immigrants' are a 'burden' on the country. We need, he wrote, 'a detailed plan to take foreign nationals off the benefit system and remove them from the country'. A day later, the Sun followed up with a report noting that the 'majority of Brits say UK 'is in decline' and fear civil unrest'. Later, the Telegraph warned the nation of a coming 'revolution', one born from the effects of immigration, state failure and economic stagnation. Here, in full flow, was a new chorus of 'declinism', the fear that the country's relative global decline is the result of the pathological failings of the British state and society. This is not, of course, the first time that declinism has lodged itself in the national consciousness. As historians such as Jim Tomlinson and David Edgerton have noted, it is a recurring feature of British politics, a near ever-present national neurosis in which failure in the present is traced to some corruption in the past. During the last great declinist wave, in the 1970s and early 1980s, Britain's failing industry was blamed on a pincer movement of overmighty unions and a state dominated by an inept upper class who ruled over more qualified recruits. For Margaret Thatcher and her acolytes, these where the 'enemy within'. There has often been a racialised element to declinism. In the late 1970s, the cultural theorist Stuart Hall and his co-authors saw the racial panic around 'mugging' as one aspect of the declinist narrative that led to the later dominance of Thatcherism. Thatcher herself, in 1978, famously spoke of the fear that 'that this country might be swamped by people with a different culture'. What seems new this time is the degree to which the two are fused. The problem for today's declinists is not so much Britain's stagnant economy and eviscerated state but the country's racial demographics, of which economic decline and political crisis are merely symptoms. On 19 June, for example, the Tory peer David Frost warned that under the twin evils of immigration and 'aggressive wokeism', Britain had undergone an 'unprecedented break in national continuity' – gone was the 'Britain of Christianity and the church', of the Romans and the Tudors, Churchill and the all-conquering Victorians, replaced by the ugly online neologism, 'the Yookay'. A day later, David Goodhart, writing in the Evening Standard, pondered the fate of the capital 'when London's white British population falls below 20 per cent in 10 years time'. 'Is there some minimum number of natives that a capital requires before it ceases to be the capital?' he asks, after quoting dubious statistics on the national costs of social housing first published on an obscure, anonymous rightwing blog. Come the end of the month, things had reached such a pitch of wailing hysteria and moral panic that it was difficult to discern fact from wild-eyed projection. The cover story in the summer edition of the Critic, for instance, warned of a soon-to-be-realised Britain of gated compounds and armoured trucks protecting British citizens from ethnic guerrilla conflict, thick with lurid depictions 'of gunfire, off in the distance; you're getting used to it now'. 'Fiction, perhaps,' wrote its author, a Conservative councillor for bucolic Scotton and Lower Wensleydale. 'But for how long?' Much of this can be explained as a form of circular reasoning. The same sources are endlessly recycled, with Goodwin's predictions of demographic collapse and various rightwing memes quoted and requoted in each succeeding piece, in turn justifying the next ratcheting up of racialised panic. Conversely, it is hard to deny that Britain is experiencing something like decline: productivity is stagnant, as are wages for the majority of people; inequality runs rampant, with the country looking increasingly like post-crash Greece without the climate; while faith in the political system and in our politicians and ruling elite reaches record lows. This is a febrile mix, although one only heightened by predictions of state collapse and race war. What we're now witnessing in the rightwing press is the real-time creation of a new political myth. By calling forth the nightmare of state collapse under the ever-increasing pressure of ethnic conflict and white replacement, the right has managed to cast itself as saviours. The nightmare serves as both a rallying cry and a legitimation: a call to a middle-class base which is feeling the pain of a stagnant economy, that those at fault are the racialised outsiders who bring disorder and drain the state of its already squeezed resources; and a justification for the tough actions needed to stem the tide of immigrants from across the border. No mention is made of the policies that might actually help to stem the sense of economic decline that many British people feel, such as wealth redistribution. Nor do today's declinists have anything to say about the role that austerity played in dismantling the state. In this sense, blaming decline on racial demographics is an opportunity to avoid changes that would be anathema to the right. As Labour increasingly apes Conservative rhetoric about fiscal rectitude, tanking ever further in opinion polls as it tails the right, space is opening for a new narrative in British politics. It doesn't matter that the predictions about a racialised apocalypse may never come true, since conjuring these fears opens up new political possibilities. If inter-ethnic conflict is the symptom of decline, then hardened borders and mass deportations can be offered as the solution. This, not ethnic conflict, should be our greatest fear. John Merrick is the deputy editor of the Break–Down
