The Irish Times view on national economic planning: strategy must be recession-proof
So a key test of the revised National Development Plan due to be unveiled today will be its resilience. Inevitably a change in economic circumstances will mean that flexibility is needed in any plan, but are the broad goals of what will be outlined achievable, even if the economy is hit by some kind of slowdown, or even a downturn?
Some lessons have been learned in the management of the public finances, with cash being put aside in two funds for the future and the annual figures being kept in surplus. That said, decisions have been made much easier by a big surge in corporation tax. And this has allowed the Government to increase day-to-day, or current, spending rapidly, alongside higher capital investment.
To leave sufficent leeway,
further growth in State capital investment has to be married with tighter control of current spending. Hints on the strategy here may be contained in the Summer Economic Statement, also due for release today. And in the years ahead more tax revenues are also going to be needed. The Irish tax base is increasingly reliant on potentially transient corporate tax receipts and on income tax paid by middle and higher earners.
READ MORE
The key immediate uncertainty in national planning comes, of course, from the new US policies on trade. Significant financial buffers are needed to deal with the potential fall-out here and its implications for growth and tax revenue in the short term.
Ireland cannot go back to a situation where it is forced to slash State investment to balance the books, as happened after the financial crash. The State is still paying the cost of that today through massive deficiencies in housing and other infrastructure. Strong economic growth and high immigration have added to the pressures.
Delivery is also vital, of course . Ireland's slow progress on major investment projects has cast doubts over economic growth prospects, potentially hampering investment. Dealing with this is a key social, as well as economic, priority.
The outlook may be seriously affected by what happens between the EU and the US in trade talks over the coming weeks. Whatever transpires, it is fair to assume that significant uncertainty will remain for a prolonged period of time. And that this will raise questions about Ireland's economic model and how it needs to adjust.
More investment in key infrastructure is a vital part of the answer. As we consider how this is to be paid for, we can only hope that the impact of Trump's trade policies, while certain to be serious, does not become hugely disruptive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
11 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Irish whiskey exporters may be forced to look at other markets if 15% tariff rate applies
Some Irish whiskey exporters may be forced 'to reorientate their focus away' from the US if a 15 per cent tariff rate applies as part of the recently agreed EU-US trade deal, the head of the Irish Whiskey Association (IWA) has warned. 'With a higher tariff, the costs associated with exporting will increase and we could see price on shelf go up also,' IWA director Eoin Ó Catháin said. 'I don't think a 15 per cent tariff would exclude people from exporting per se, but it may see certain companies re-orient strategy towards other markets,' he said. Mr Ó Catháin was responding to reports that the EU had so far failed to secure a carve out for the sensitive wine and spirits sector. READ MORE '[It is] not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included in the first group [of exemptions to be] announced by the US tomorrow, therefore those products will be captured by the 15 per cent ceiling,' said Olof Gill, EU trade spokesperson, adding that negotiations continued. The statement comes as US trading partners are rushing to finalise tariff deals ahead of president Donald Trump's deadline of August 1st. Last weekend, the EU agreed a deal for tariffs of 15 per cent on most exports to the US. The European Commission also signalled on Thursday that a planned EU-US joint statement fleshing out their trade deal could be delayed, saying that 'more time is required' to finalise the text. EU officials had previously expected the joint statement to be issued on Friday. However, the commission said it still expects the US to implement the 15 per cent tariff rate and a number of agreed exemptions as of Friday, though it said this was dependent on Trump signing an executive order. 'The Irish Whiskey Association notes media reports today which indicate that our products will face a 15 per cent tariff when exporting to the USA from August 1st,' Mr Ó Catháin said. 'We understand that negotiations will continue past this deadline, and a return to the zero-for-zero remains a priority for the spirits sector in both the USA and the EU,' he said. 'The application of this tariff will increase costs for both exporters and consumers, and will have knock-on effects on the hospitality and tourism sectors in the USA,' he said. 'The zero-for-zero trade arrangement, which removed tariffs on our products in 1997, worked well for over three decades. It has never been more important to return to this as soon as possible,' he added. Meanwhile Trump said on Thursday he would delay the higher rate of reciprocal tariffs on Mexico by 90 days. Following a call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, he said he would extend 'the exact same Deal as we had for the last short period of time'. 'The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border,' he wrote.– additional reporting by The Financial Times
Irish Independent
13 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
No energy credits in upcoming Budget 2026 but VAT and fuel allowance measures possible
Energy Minister Darragh O'Brien also confirmed he wanted to retain the lower VAT rate on gas and electricity that was introduced as a cost of living support three years ago. His remarks came as latest figures showed a record 301,000 households in arrears on their energy bills. Mr O'Brien said the numbers were a concern and he urged anyone in arrears to talk to their gas or electricity provider and avail of the arrangements for people unable to pay, stressing that only a 'tiny' number of domestic customers were disconnected. The Minister said he had chaired the second meeting of the Energy Affordability Task Force on Thursday to look at the wider issue and the interventions needed. 'I will be bringing an interim report to Government in advance of the Budget and we will assess that as to what measures can be taken,' he said. 'I think the vat reduction from 13.5pc to 9pc is a very important one, one that I would like to see extended into next year. That decision will be taken at Budget time.' Mr O'Brien said the universal energy credits had totalled €3.5bn which ate into funding available for other measures. 'That level of one-off payments is very significant and the more you put into that, the less that you can put into medium and long-term sustainable measures to change our energy system and to ensure that we have secure and affordable energy and green and clean energy too. 'There won't be any energy credits in the budget but we are looking at other measures targeted at those who need them most.' He said he would discuss the level of fuel allowance with Minister for Social Protection, Dara Calleary. 'Vulnerable families, low income families – that's the focus of what we'll do in the budget,' he said. He would also look at growing the Warmer Homes Scheme which provides free retrofits and energy upgrades for low-income households, as well as making grant-assisted works more affordable and accessible for more people. 'We have seen a levelling off of energy prices but we're still the eighth most expensive in Europe. Prices are too expensive within Ireland.'
Irish Times
41 minutes ago
- Irish Times
WRC orders Tesco to rehire worker who was sacked last year after calling a manager ‘useless'
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has ordered Tesco to re-employ a worker it sacked last year for calling his manager 'useless' in a performance review meeting – after ruling the supermarket's management went over the top in dismissing him. Trade union SIPTU had accused supermarket bosses of 'circling the wagons' in response to a legitimate grievance and subjecting the worker to a 'crude exhibition of power' by upgrading a final written warning to summary dismissal to get rid of him. 'The emperor does not like being told that he isn't wearing any clothes,' the complainant's union rep said in a submission when the case came before the tribunal earlier this year. Denying warehouse operative Cathal Hussey's complaint under the Unfair Dismissal Act 1977, Tesco Ireland Ltd took the position that the manager's dignity was violated and the dismissal was 'justified'. READ MORE Vivian Cullen of the SIPTU Workers' Rights Centre, appearing for Mr Hussey, submitted that his client, a Tesco employee of 16 years earning €700 a week, had 'outstanding legitimate grievances which were being ignored by management' when he met with his line manager, Martynas Bajarunas for a performance review meeting on November 25th 2023. [ Tesco reports profits increase as Irish sales near €3.5bn Opens in new window ] According to Mr Bajarunas's account of the meeting, the claimant read from a 12-page document outlining unspecified 'concerns and issues'. 'At the end, he said to me: 'You are useless.'' The witness said he felt 'harassed, stressed and bullied' by the remark, adding later that he had made a formal complaint because he felt 'unsafe coming to work'. The complainant, Mr Hussey, did not give any evidence to the tribunal. The tribunal heard Mr Bajarunas filed a formal grievance under the company's bullying and harassment policy against Mr Hussey – who refused to participate in an investigation meeting in January 2024. The probe concluded Mr Hussey had committed a breach of the policy. The contents of the 12-page document he had produced and read were out of line with company policy and 'very concerning, unreasonable, disrespectful and improper', the investigator further concluded. Following a disciplinary meeting on January 19th, which Mr Hussey did attend, a company disciplinary officer decided there was 'serious misconduct because the dignity of [Mr Bajarunas] was violated', the tribunal heard. Mr Hussey appealed the sanction imposed, a final written warning. However, the senior human resources officer who heard the appeal, Mary White, decided to upgrade the sanction to summary dismissal, the tribunal was told. Ms White gave evidence that the 12-page document showed Mr Hussey's remark was 'not a heat-of-the-moment type of thing'. 'This was all put in writing, that he thought [Martynas Bajarunas] was useless, and he was giving out about other managers,' she said, adding that it was 'inappropriate behaviour to call someone 'useless'.' She believed relocation was 'not really an option' as there was 'no remorse and no apology'. Ms White agreed when Mr Cullen put it to her that bullying was 'inappropriate repetitive behaviour'. Mr Cullen put it to the witness that there was a single allegation that his client 'called someone useless' and asked whether she regarded that as 'a dismissible offence'. 'Yes,' Ms White said. Mr Hussey's further appeal of the sanction was upheld by a second company appeals officer. Adjudicator Eileen Campbell wrote in her decision that the final written warning 'should have remained the sanction and should not have been elevated'. The reason for escalating the sanction to summary dismissal had 'not been justified or explained to any degree of satisfaction' by Tesco, she wrote. 'I do not condone in any way the complainant's behaviour towards the line manager, which is unacceptable on any level,' she wrote. Upholding Mr Hussey's complaint, she rejected the union's application for full reinstatement – a remedy that would have meant the employer was liable to pay Mr Hussey back wages from the point of dismissal. Instead, Ms Campbell directed Tesco to re-engage the worker in employment by mid-August this year, with a final written warning to remain on his personnel file for a year. She directed that the period since his Mr Hussey's dismissal be treated as unpaid suspension.
