‘A Great Blow to the Church': Japan Mourns the Passing of Pope Francis
expressed
his deep sadness following the death of Pope Francis on Easter Monday. He described the late pontiff as someone who 'dedicated himself to protecting the environment and promoting peaceful diplomacy with a strong voice supported by approximately 1.4 billion Catholics.' He also paid his 'heartfelt respect' for his achievements and called his death 'not only a great loss for the people of the Vatican and Catholics, but also for the international community.'
Another leader to pay his respects was former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. Posting on
X
, he commended his Holiness Pope Francis for his achievements and offered his heartfelt condolences. The two men met in 2022 and discussed their common hope for a world free of nuclear weapons. Like Kishida, Hiroshi Suzuki, the Japanese Ambassador to the United Kingdom, posted a picture of himself with the late
P
ope. He
wrote
, 'His Holiness Pope Francis was a great inspiration. I am saddened with profound grief at His Holiness's passing away.'
According to the death certificate released by Vatican doctor Andrea Arcangeli, Pope Francis died of a cerebral stroke and irreversible heart failure on Monday. He was 88. A day earlier, he delivered a blessing through an aide to thousands of Easter worship
p
ers in St Peter's Square. Born Jose Bergoglio in Buenos Aires, he was known as the 'People's Pope.' A former janitor and nightclub bouncer, he welcomed communities that were historically shunned by the church and famously took the bus instead of riding in the chauffeur-driven Vatican car on the way to say mass at the Sistine Chapel.
List of Contents:
Pope Francis' Visit to Japan
Electing the Next Pope
Related Posts
Pope Francis' Visit to Japan
In 2019, he became the first Pope to visit Japan since Pope John Paul II in 1981. Delivering speeches in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he called for the elimination of nuclear weapons. 'His call for nuclear abolition was inspiring.
It's
truly regrettable that someone who worked so hard for peace is now gone,'
said
Shigemitsu Tanaka, 84, co-chair of Nihon
Hidankyo
and chair of the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors Council. Kayoko Mori, an 82-year-old Catholic atomic bomb survivor, said listening to the late pope speak made her 'feel deeply that he was on our side.'
During his short stay in Japan, Pope Francis also met with victims of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami and said mass to around 50,000 people at the Tokyo Dome. 'When we rode around the Tokyo Dome in an open car together, I saw in him a pastor filled with love and mercy, waving to everyone with a smile of genuine joy and blessing the children,'
said
Cardinal Isao Kikuchi, who serves as the archbishop of Tokyo.
Kikuchi, who was appointed to the College of Cardinals last December, first met Pope Francis in May 2013. 'It is a great blow to the Church to lose such a strong pastor at this time when we are on the path to the Holy Year,' he said. 'I did not expect the Holy Father to go away so fast… I would like to continue to walk the path he showed us, following his example, while finding the role he expects me to play.'
Electing the Next Pope
Pope Francis's death will be followed by a nine-day mourning period, which is known as Novemdiales. During this period, his funeral — weather permitting — will be held in St. Peter's Square. He has asked to be laid to rest in Rome's St. Mary Major Basilica and buried in a simple wooden casket. Between 15 and 20 days after his death, the election of a new Pope will begin.
During the ancient selection process known as the papal conclave, the voting cardinals are cut off from communication with the outside world. It's held in strict secrecy inside the Sistine Chapel. If white smoke emerges from the chapel, a new Pope has been chosen.
Related Posts
The Vatican Unveils Its Anime Mascot: Luce
English-Speaking Churches in Tokyo
The Story of Japan's Hidden Christians
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
4 hours ago
Energy from the North? Japan Eyes the Promise and Perils of Alaskan Gas Investment
Among the barrage of executive orders that US President Donald Trump issued upon taking office in January 2025 is one titled Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential, which proclaims the need to tap the state's natural resources, including liquefied natural gas, to rein in inflation, create jobs, correct trade imbalances, boost America's global clout, and counter moves by foreign powers to weaponize energy supplies. In conjunction with this policy, the Trump administration is urging Japan—under pressure from tough tariff negotiations—to invest in the Alaska LNG project, a costly plan to pipe gas across the state, liquefy it, and ship it to East Asian countries. Liquefied natural gas has a long history in Alaska. Japan's very first imports of LNG, back in 1969, were shipped from the state. But apart from the name, the Alaska LNG project being pushed by the White House has very little in common with its predecessor. Under the earlier plan, natural gas was extracted from reserves on the Kenai Peninsula on the south coast of Alaska, where it was processed into LNG and loaded onto ships for export. Total capacity was only about 1.5 million tons a year. Beginning in 2015, global LNG prices dropped as supplies increased and demand weakened, and it became increasingly difficult for Alaska to compete with other suppliers. In 2017, Alaska LNG's operations were shut down. The new Alaska LNG development project proposes to tap the North Slope gas fields on the Arctic Ocean coast in northern Alaska. A 1,300-kilometer trans-Alaska pipeline would transport the gas all the way down to the Kenai Peninsula, where chilling facilities would produce up to 20 million tons of LNG annually. Alaska Gasline Development Corp. (AGDC), the independent public corporation heading up the project (including construction of a natural-gas pipeline and liquefaction plant) hopes to begin shipping LNG around 2030. Alaska depends heavily on locally extracted natural gas for its own heating and industrial purposes, and the Kenai Peninsula's gas reserves have been dwindling, with supplies expected to run out sometime in the mid-2030s. For the state, therefore, development of the North Slope fields promises a new source of affordable energy for Alaskans, as well as significant revenue from exports. LNG Demand in East Asia In February 2025, the Japanese government released its Seventh Strategic Energy Plan, which calculates the outlook for energy supply and demand in 2040. Alongside its basic energy outlook, the plan incorporates an alternative scenario in which the official targets for adoption of nonfossil fuels (such as renewable energy and hydrogen) are not met. If the goals are achieved, demand for LNG in fiscal 2040 is expected to drop from the current level of 66 million tons (fiscal 2022) to somewhere between 54 million and 60 million tons. If the country falls short of the targets, though, it will need an estimated 74 million tons of LNG. In short, a certain level of demand for LNG is expected to persist through 2040. In the interim, the long-term contracts under which Japanese utilities and trading companies purchase LNG are coming up for renewal. New contracts will have to be signed to ensure a stable energy supply farther down the road, and Alaska LNG is one potential supplier. South Korea and Taiwan are in a similar position. Much like Japan, South Korea can only guess at the amount of energy renewables will be able to supply over the next 10 or 20 years. Taiwan, which shut down its last operating nuclear power plant in May this year, has adopted an energy strategy that calls for converting coal-fired plants to natural gas. All three countries have a clear need for LNG going forward, presenting a business opportunity for Alaska LNG. Geographical Merits Clearly, Alaska LNG enjoys the Trump administration's enthusiastic backing, but what are the relative benefits for Japan and its neighbors? The biggest advantage is probably geographical proximity. Japan already imports LNG from the United States, but those shipments originate in the Gulf of Mexico. The shortest route, through the Panama Canal, is about 17,000 kilometers. Moreover, because congestion has made it difficult for LNG tankers to transit the canal, the preferred route nowadays is around the Cape of Good Hope, a 29,000-kilometer trip. The southern coast of Alaska, by contrast, is only about 6,000 kilometers from Japan. The shorter distance and shipping time would mean lower transportation costs and more flexible delivery schedules. Shipping from Alaska is also attractive from the standpoint of safety of navigation. LNG from Qatar typically passes through the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca before traveling north through the South China Sea. The Strait of Hormuz poses safety risks whenever the situation in the Middle East is unstable, and piracy continues to be an issue in the Strait of Malacca. China's increasingly assertive activity in the South China Sea, most of which it claims as its own territory, makes navigation problematic there. Shipping LNG from Alaska is a way of avoiding these safety risks. Cost Questions Remain But the Alaska LNG plan raises some serious questions centered on costs and lead time. Gas from the North Slope is inexpensive in and of itself, but the construction of a new gas treatment plant on the North Slope, a trans-Alaska pipeline, and a liquefaction plant on the Kenai Peninsula would incur enormous costs. An early estimate by the developer put the total expense at about $44 billion, but inflation has pushed up construction costs since then, and the challenges of laying pipeline through permafrost areas could add significantly to the expense. Any final decision must await a detailed, independent analysis, which will doubtless yield a higher price tag. For purposes of comparison, one might note that total investment in the Rio Grande LNG project, now under construction in Brownsville, Texas, is estimated at roughly $20 billion. To be sure, the two projects differ significantly in terms of the scale of construction and the kinds of expenses involved, but the comparison helps put the cost of the Alaska LNG project in perspective. The high initial investment required augments the challenges of financing the project and could also push up the selling price of the LNG thus produced. Bad Timing? The long lead time required for Alaska LNG to launch commercial operations is problematic on several counts. First, it could affect Alaska LNG's ability to compete with other LNG projects targeting Asian markets, including various US ventures, a Canadian project that began shipping LNG from the Pacific Coast in May 2025, and plans to expand production in Qatar. In short, Asian customers have multiple options for investing in and importing natural gas, and they will only choose Alaska LNG if it suits their needs with respect to timing and terms of sale. This is especially true in Japan, where most of the importers are private companies. In South Korea and Taiwan, where public corporations handle the importation of LNG, political considerations may play some role in purchasing decisions, but even so, buyers will have to decide whether the political benefits are worth the additional costs. Second, under the current timeline, Alaska LNG will not begin exporting until after the end of Trump's second term of office in January 2029. We have witnessed firsthand the policy U-turns that can result when a new president from a different party takes control in Washington. The next administration might well resurrect the environmental protections and climate-change policies that Trump has discarded, a shift that could spell trouble for Alaska LNG. Long-term business decisions require a measure of policy predictability, and in this key respect, the United States has become a high-risk country. The third issue with Alaska LNG's long lead time pertains to the target year for achieving net zero carbon emissions. Demand for LNG from Japanese and other East Asian importers is bound to decline sharply as the 2050 target year approaches. A 20-year LNG contract concluded in 2030 will last through 2049. If long-term contracts are needed to secure funding for the future, then it makes sense to begin export operations as soon as possible. Alaska LNG has very little time to spare. A Narrow Window of Opportunity Plans for tapping the North Slope's natural gas resources have been around for decades, but they have stalled repeatedly in the face of financial and political obstacles. Trump's executive order Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential presents an unprecedented opportunity for the Alaska LNG project. But given Trump's term of office and the looming net-zero deadline, the window of opportunity is narrow. Ultimately, speed and cost will determine whether Alaska LNG can tap into the East Asian market. In terms of speed, the project needs to make concrete progress—meaning a final investment decision and initial construction—soon, while the political winds are still favorable. Otherwise, the project will lose momentum, and the market will be snapped up by competing LNG projects. The importance of cost considerations goes without saying. It would be foolish to overrate the value of Alaska LNG solely on the basis of geography. That said, if Alaska LNG can offer its product at a price comparable to that of competitors, then its geographical location becomes a powerful inducement, vastly increasing its chances of claiming a share of the East Asian market. (Originally published in Japanese on July 25, 2025. Banner photo: A liquefied natural gas tanker arrives at Futtsu Power Station in Futtsu, Chiba Prefecture, in February 2023. © Kyodo.)
6 hours ago
Japan Foreign Chief Vows to Continue Supporting Ukraine
News from Japan Politics Aug 4, 2025 21:49 (JST) Tokyo, Aug. 4 (Jiji Press)--Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya on Monday pledged Tokyo's continued support for Ukraine, which has been invaded by Russia. At a meeting with visiting Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Taras Kachka, Iwaya said that Japan will keep working closely with the international community, including its Group of Seven partners, to support Ukraine's efforts to realize a just and lasting peace. Kachka replied that Ukraine hopes to deepen ties with Japan, including by utilizing an anti-mine conference set to be held in Tokyo in October. He also asked Japan for additional cooperation in the field of defense. The meeting was joined by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, who Iwaya shared a working dinner with later in the day. Kachka is visiting Japan to attend Ukraine's "national day" event Tuesday at the World Exposition in the western city of Osaka. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
6 hours ago
Ishiba Open to Message Marking 80th Anniversary of War's End
News from Japan Politics Aug 4, 2025 21:16 (JST) Tokyo, Aug. 4 (Jiji Press)--Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Monday voiced willingness to release a message marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II that would include a reflection on the war. "Regardless of the format (of the message), we should issue something to avoid memories being forgotten and never let a war happen again," Ishiba told the day's meeting of the House of Representatives Budget Committee. There was no mention of when such a message might be announced. Ishiba will avoid issuing it on Aug. 15, which is the anniversary of Japan's surrender in the war, or Sept. 2, the day on which Japan signed the Instrument of Surrender 80 years ago. Ishiba's remark came in response to a request by Yoshihiko Noda, leader of the major opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, for the prime minister to release a comment. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
