Apple Re-Released iOS 26 Beta 4: Here's What Changed!
Watch this video on YouTube. Key Updates and Fixes
The re-release of iOS 26 Beta 4 addresses several issues identified in earlier beta versions, aiming to enhance system stability and usability. Below are the key fixes included in this update: Performance Optimization: System lag has been significantly reduced, making sure smoother navigation across apps, menus, and multitasking environments.
System lag has been significantly reduced, making sure smoother navigation across apps, menus, and multitasking environments. Mail App Fixes: Persistent display issues, such as the unread filter visibility, have been resolved, improving functionality for users who rely on email for daily communication.
Persistent display issues, such as the unread filter visibility, have been resolved, improving functionality for users who rely on email for daily communication. Battery Life Improvements: Incremental enhancements have been made to battery performance, though further optimization is expected in future updates.
These fixes are particularly beneficial for users who rely on the beta for daily tasks, providing a more seamless and reliable experience. Developers and testers can now explore the platform with fewer interruptions caused by system instability. New Features to Explore
While the primary focus of this release is on stability and performance, iOS 26 Beta 4 introduces subtle yet impactful features designed to enhance user customization and interactivity. These additions reflect Apple's attention to detail and its efforts to refine the user experience: Dynamic Wallpapers: A selection of new customizable wallpapers has been introduced, offering visually appealing options for both iOS devices and CarPlay interfaces.
A selection of new customizable wallpapers has been introduced, offering visually appealing options for both iOS devices and CarPlay interfaces. Safari Haptic Feedback: Downloading files in Safari now triggers haptic feedback, providing a tactile response that enhances user interaction and awareness.
Downloading files in Safari now triggers haptic feedback, providing a tactile response that enhances user interaction and awareness. Podcast Playback Enhancements: Users can now enjoy adjustable playback speeds and improved dialogue clarity, catering to diverse listening preferences and making podcasts more accessible.
These features, though subtle, demonstrate Apple's commitment to refining the overall user experience, even in the early stages of software development. Performance Enhancements
Benchmark tests conducted on iOS 26 Beta 4 reveal noticeable improvements in system performance. These enhancements are particularly evident in the following areas: CPU Performance: Faster app launches and smoother multitasking have been observed, making the system more responsive for everyday use.
Faster app launches and smoother multitasking have been observed, making the system more responsive for everyday use. Battery Optimization: While not yet at its peak, battery life has been improved compared to earlier beta versions, offering extended usage for resource-intensive applications.
These performance gains are especially valuable for users running the beta on older devices or those testing resource-heavy applications. The improvements ensure a more efficient and enjoyable experience, even during the beta phase. Release Cycle and Recommendations
Apple's beta release cycle appears to be accelerating, with updates now expected on a weekly basis. Beta 5 is anticipated in the coming days, and the final version of iOS 26 is projected to launch in mid-September, coinciding with the release of the iPhone 17. This timeline provides a clear roadmap for developers and public beta testers eager to stay informed and prepared.
If you are considering testing the beta, here are some recommendations to guide your decision: For Developers: Staying on the beta track is ideal for those seeking early access to new features, tools, and APIs that can enhance app development and testing.
Staying on the beta track is ideal for those seeking early access to new features, tools, and APIs that can enhance app development and testing. For Public Beta Users: If stability is your priority, this re-release offers a more reliable platform for daily use while still allowing you to explore new features.
If stability is your priority, this re-release offers a more reliable platform for daily use while still allowing you to explore new features. If Issues Arise: Downgrade options remain available, allowing users to revert to a stable iOS version if the beta does not meet their needs.
By following these recommendations, users can make informed decisions about whether to participate in the beta program and how to navigate potential challenges. Looking Ahead
The iOS 26 Beta 4 Re-Release represents a significant step forward in Apple's iterative development process. By addressing critical bugs, introducing subtle yet meaningful features, and improving overall performance, this update enhances the experience for both developers and public beta testers. With the final release of iOS 26 on the horizon, Apple continues to refine its software ecosystem, setting the stage for the highly anticipated launch of the iPhone 17. This re-release underscores Apple's dedication to delivering a polished and reliable platform, even during the beta testing phase.
Enhance your knowledge on iOS 26 Beta by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject.
Source & Image Credit: zollotech Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
23 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Amazon's 'military-grade' £59 smartwatch 'just as good as' Apple, Fitbit and Garmin
The smartwatch is being hailed as a cheaper alternative to the Apple, Fitbit, and Garmin Amazon customers have been impressed by the quality of a "stylish and expensive-looking" smartwatch, they say is "rugged and durable." The gadget, retailing for under £100, is being praised by shoppers as an affordable alternative to the likes of Apple or Samsung. The Dreamac Military Smartwatch, priced at just £59.99 on Amazon, is less expensive than the hefty price tags often associated with big names such as Apple, Fitbit, and Garmin. Amazon describes the watch as built to "military-grade" specifications and capable of handling "all kinds of harsh environments" as well as everyday activities, whether that is work, play, exploration, or travel. Crafted from wear-resistant materials, the waterproof smartwatch is said to offer robust protection against shocks, temperature changes, pressure, liquids, sand, dust, water, and impacts - it also has a choice of straps, including a 'sporty' silicone one or a 'sleek' stainless steel option. But it's not just about "looking good" - the watch also lives up to its 'smart' name with a range of typical features. Amazon highlights how easy it is to make and receive calls directly from the smartwatch, thanks to its integrated speakers and microphone. The watch also sends notifications from social media updates, text messages, and emails straight from your smartphone to your wrist, reports the Mirror. It doubles as an "accurate" fitness tracker, boasting over 120 different sports programmes to log and monitor exercise routines. It tracks steps and calories burned in real time throughout the day, while at night, it analyses sleep patterns for comprehensive health tracking. Amazon boasts that its device offers exceptional battery life and requires less frequent charging. The retailer suggests that the gadget could outlast "a traditional smartwatch," with the potential for the battery to last up to a week on a single charge during regular use. There are similar options in the market for those looking to grab themselves a smartwatch without shelling out a fortune. For example, Sports Direct is offering this Karrimor Smart Watch (£19.99, down from £49.99) and the Reflex Active Series 23 Smart Watch from Currys (£39.99), yet many customers have shown a preference for this Amazon offering. In customer reviews, one buyer said: "Extremely happy with this watch, it looks great and has excellent functions. It's excellent value for money and has really good build quality. Easy to charge and very comfortable to wear." Another customer shared: "Looks stylish and expensive. Given the cost against Apple or Samsung, this is brilliant. I bought one for my partner, and after watching him set up, I've just ordered myself one." A different user wrote: "The battery life is outstanding-I've gone weeks without needing a recharge. Plus, the call feature is super handy when I'm on the go." Meanwhile, another added: "I didn't take it off when working, it got dirty, sweat on, banged around, slipped under dirty work gloves... And it came through all of that without any damage to speak of. It didn't even scratch the band, much less the screen." Some users did encounter minor issues, such as finding the 'always on screen' a nuisance when worn to bed, as it "bothersome to wear to bed because it lights up every time it's moved - like when rolling over in your sleep". Another customer shared their disappointment with a photo, stating: "Glass already scratched just from normal use". But, the general consensus about this smartwatch was overwhelmingly positive. A satisfied five-star reviewer put: "This is my first venture into the world of smart watches but this thing is really amazing for what it's capable of." And another buyer added: "The battery lasts a super long time (about a week for my use) and the watch is waterproof, so no worries in the shower or in the pool. This is an excellent smartwatch, which I recommend not only for design but also for performance."
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
5 Best Bluetooth trackers
WE all lose stuff, but Bluetooth trackers can make things a whole lot easier. Whether it's your keys, wallet, bag, or even keeping tabs on loved ones, the best Bluetooth trackers help you stay connected to what matters. Sometimes, it's just about peace of mind, knowing your bag's right where you left it, or that your wallet didn't end up in the back of a cab. That kind of peace of mind is exactly what Bluetooth trackers are made for, which is why they're so popular for travel, helping you keep tabs on your essentials without the stress. I've tested a range, from budget tags to sleek, feature-packed options that fit neatly into wider ecosystems. The latest models offer smarter alerts, broader community tracking, and tighter integration with your phone. That said, not all of them are created equal. Some feel limited for the price, while others quietly over-deliver. And if you're into wireless gear that's built for on-the-go, I've also tested the best Bluetooth speakers. Read on for my pick of the best Bluetooth trackers I've tested, and how they held up in everyday life. How I tested I tested a mix of Bluetooth trackers, from affordable picks to well-known brands, using them over several days and weeks. I wasn't precious with them, tossing them in bags and to zippers, to get a feel for how robust they are. The focus was on how quickly and accurately each one could be located using its app, both nearby and at a distance, and what location features each uses to get you to your items. Setup was also important, along with how user-friendly the features were and whether the trackers lived up to their claims. Best Bluetooth trackers - tried and tested Tile Starter Pack (Mate & Slim) 6 Tile Starter Pack (Mate & Slim), £49.99 from Amazon BUY HERE Pros: Easy to set up, intuitive app, works on both iOS and Android, strong crowd-finding network Cons: Non-replaceable batteries, key features require subscription Rating: 8/10 If you want reliable, cross-platform tracking, the Tile Starter Pack is a great buy. You get a Tile Mate for keys and a Slim for your wallet, both of which are easy to set up through the Tile app. Once you download the Tile app, setup is straightforward, and the app is well-designed, letting me ring my phone, check last seen locations, and even crowd-locate lost items through the Tile network. It works with both iOS and Android, plus Alexa and Google Assistant, so it's flexible across platforms. The Mate is small, which I loved, and built for keyrings, while the Slim is credit-card thin and slides neatly into a wallet or passport holder. Both are lightweight and easy to forget they're even there, until you need them. One big downside, though, is that the batteries in both are non-replaceable. The Mate and Slim last up to 3 years, but once they die, you'll need to buy new ones. That's a major drawback, especially when other trackers let you just swap the battery out. In terms of range, it can now ring from over 100m away, and the beeper is one of the loudest I tested, so it took no time to locate. I also appreciated the QR codes on the back of each tracker, so if someone finds your items, they can scan them to see your contact info, without needing the app themselves. That said, it's just a shame that smart alerts, like notifying you when you've left something behind, are locked behind a £2.99 subscription. All in, the Starter Pack is a smart pick if you want dependable tracking across platforms, but the non-replaceable batteries make it feel a bit disposable. Compatibility: iOS and Android, Battery life: Up to 3 years (non-replaceable), Smart features: Community tracking, IP rating: Water-resistant (not fully waterproof) Groov-e My Tag Groov-e My Tag, £17.99 £13.10 at Amazon BUY HERE Pros: Very affordable, lightweight and compact, runs on a replaceable battery, and easy to attach to keys or bags. Cons: Slightly larger than expected, not the loudest Rating: 8.5/10 If you want a solid, no-frills tracking device, the Groov-e My Tag is it, especially at this price point. It works via Apple's Find My network on iOS, which was a big plus for me since I didn't have to mess around with third-party apps. Setup was quick, and it pairs just like a native Apple device, popping up on screen for instant linking. I felt much more confident in its accuracy, knowing it's fully integrated with the iOS system. Physically, it's a bit larger than I expected, but it's super lightweight and doesn't feel bulky on a keyring or in a bag. The rubberised finish also feels surprisingly tough, like it's built to handle daily knocks and scrapes. In terms of features, it covers the basics well. You can make it play a sound if your keys are nearby but hiding, and the 'last seen location' via Find My is genuinely handy. Thanks to Apple's Find My network, it offers precise location tracking, I could see exactly where my item was last detected and even get directions to it when needed. Battery-wise, it runs on a replaceable CR2032 coin cell, and you'll probably get close to a year out of it, depending on how much you use it. When it runs out, it's easy to swap in a new one, so no need to fork out for a whole new tracker, which is always a win. All in all, if you're just after a straightforward, affordable tracker for your keys or bag, the Groove My Tag is worth a look Its beeper isn't the loudest, but it does exactly what you need, and the fact that it works with Apple's Find My makes it a cut above most budget options. Apple AirTag Mini Apple AirTag Mini, £35 £28 at Amazon Pros: Seamless with iOS, compact, replaceable battery, accurate tracking, reliable alerts, water resistant Cons: Battery could last longer, iOS only, relies on nearby iPhones when out of range Rating: 8/10 I bought a pack of four Apple AirTags during a Black Friday sale a couple of years ago, and they've served me well ever since. I mainly use them to track my baggage at the airport, which gives me peace of mind knowing my bags have arrived at the same destination as me. I also have friends who pop them into their kids' pockets when we're in busy public places, just in case someone wanders off. The trackers are small and compact, making them easy to slip into just about anything you want to keep tabs on. If you're an iPhone user, setup is really straightforward, just hold the AirTag near your phone and it automatically detects it. You can then give it a name and start tracking via the Apple Find My app. I believe it works with iPads too, though I haven't tested that myself. The Find My app includes a 'Find' feature that gives you clear directions to your AirTag, which I've found to be accurate and reliable. You can also make it play a sound to help locate it. If your AirTag is more than nine meters (30ft) away, it uses Bluetooth signals from other nearby iPhones to help locate it, which works best in busier areas. Battery life is about a year. I wish it lasted a bit longer, especially compared to some other trackers, but replacing it is simple and hassle-free. You can buy Apple AirTags individually (RRP £35) or in a four-pack (RRP £119), which offers better value. They're also often discounted during sales, so it's worth keeping an eye out for deals. Chipolo POP Chipolo POP, £30 from Amazon BUY HERE Pros: Works with both iOS and Android, bright and easy to spot, loud ring, compact and durable, replaceable battery Cons: Slightly pricey for the feature set, no precision tracking Rating: 7.5/10 The Chipolo POP is a cheerful, compact tracker that blends simplicity with smart design. I liked that it connects seamlessly with Apple's Find My: just pair it like any other Apple device, and it pops up right away in the Find My app. It also works with Android devices, making it one of the few truly cross-platform trackers out there. That's a big win if you use both platforms or share items with family on different devices. Design-wise, it's light, slim, and brightly coloured, which genuinely makes it easier to spot when you've misplaced it. The ring is one of the loudest tested, at about 120 dB, which easily cuts through background noise or couch cushions. The battery lasts about a year and is replaceable (CR2032), which is always good to see. If you install the optional Chipolo app, you unlock extras like calling your phone, custom ringtones, and even a selfie button, nice touches, though not essential if you're just using Apple's Find My. There's also a handy out-of-range alert via the app, which gives you a nudge if you accidentally leave your keys or bag behind. That said, I do think it's a little pricey for what it offers, especially given there's no precision tracking like you'd get with other trackers in this price bracket. You're mostly paying for the cross-platform support and ease of use here. Compatibility: iOS and Android, Battery life: Around 1 year (replaceable CR2032 battery), Smart features: Out-of-range alerts, call your phone feature via app, IP rating: IP55 (splash-proof, not fully waterproof) Samsung Galaxy SmartTag2 BUY HERE Pros: Excellent precision finding, replaceable battery life, handy timeline history Cons: Samsung-only, no broader Android support Rating: 8/10 If you're already in the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy SmartTag2 is easily one of the best Bluetooth trackers out there. It's designed exclusively for Samsung Galaxy devices, so I had to borrow a relative's Galaxy S22 to test it. Unfortunately, it won't work with non-Samsung Android phones or iPhones, which is something to keep in mind. To get started, just download the SmartThings app, pair the tag, and you're up and running in seconds. Physically, it feels sturdy and well-made, with a practical, ring-shaped design that clips easily onto keys or bags. It's also IP67 rated, so it can handle dust and water without issue. Like other trackers, the battery is a standard CR2032 coin cell, which is replaceable and should last over a year. One feature I really appreciated was the timeline view, which shows everywhere your tag has been over the past few days. It's a surprisingly useful touch that not many trackers offer. What really sets the SmartTag2 apart is SmartThings Find, Samsung's answer to Apple's Find My. It similarly taps into nearby Galaxy devices anonymously to help locate your tag. Once you're close, Compass View kicks in to guide you with on-screen directions. If you've already got a Galaxy phone, the SmartTag2 is a great buy. But if you're not in that ecosystem, it's a non-starter, it won't work with other devices, which limits its appeal. Compatibility: Samsung only, Battery life: Up to a year (replaceable), Smart features: Precision tracking, crowd-finding, location history IP rating: IP67 (waterproof) Best Bluetooth trackers FAQs Where to buy Bluetooth trackers You can pick up Bluetooth trackers online through retailers like Amazon, Argos, and Currys, or directly from brands. They're often discounted during major sales like Prime Day and Black Friday, so it's worth keeping an eye out. What is the best Bluetooth tracker? It depends on your device. If you're an iPhone user, Apple's AirTag offers the best integration and precision. For Samsung Galaxy users, the SmartTag2 is the one to buy, and only pairs with the Samsung ecosystem. If you want something more universal, the Chipolo or Tile trackers are solid cross-platform options, not tying you into one device. How accurate is Bluetooth location tracking? When you're nearby, most trackers can pinpoint your item within a few feet, especially those with ultra-wideband (UWB) like AirTags or SmartTag2. Once out of Bluetooth range, they rely on a wider network of nearby devices to update the location, which can vary in accuracy depending on how busy the area is. How far can a Bluetooth tracker go? Bluetooth range typically tops out around 100–120 metres in open spaces, but walls and obstacles can reduce that. Beyond that, trackers like AirTags or Tiles rely on their respective networks (Find My, SmartThings, or Tile Network) to help locate your item. Are tracking devices safe? Yes, Bluetooth trackers are generally safe.
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Intel struggles with key manufacturing process for next PC chip, sources say
SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 5 (Reuters) - The production process that Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab hoped would pave the way to winning manufacturing deals and restore its edge in churning out high-end, high-margin chips is facing a big hurdle on quality as it puts newer technologies to the test, two people briefed on the matter told Reuters. For months, Intel has promised investors it would increase manufacturing using a process it calls 18A. It spent billions of dollars developing 18A, including the construction or upgrades of several factories, with the goal of challenging Taiwan's chipmaking heavyweight, TSMC ( opens new tab. Intel wants to round out its business designing chips that it largely makes in-house and TSMC helps it produce, with a contract manufacturing business that can compete with this key supplier. But whether Intel revives advanced chip production in the U.S. and gets its contract foundry on solid footing depends on closing the technology gap with TSMC. Early tests disappointed customers last year, but Intel has said its 18A is on track to make its "Panther Lake" laptop semiconductors at high volume starting in 2025, which include next-generation transistors and a more efficient way to deliver power to the chip. The chipmaker has hoped that producing such an advanced in-house chip would grow external interest in its foundry, at a time when new CEO Lip-Bu Tan has explored a major shift to course-correct that fledgling business, Reuters previously reported. Yet only a small percentage of the Panther Lake chips printed via 18A have been good enough to make available to customers, said the two people, who were briefed on the company's test data since late last year. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because Intel did not authorize them to disclose such information. This percentage figure, known as yield, means Intel may struggle to make its high-end laptop chip profitably in the near future. Yield may inch up or down as a foundry optimizes its manufacturing process. Companies also calculate yield in a variety of ways, which can make this critical data a moving goal post, the two people and two additional sources with knowledge of Intel's manufacturing operation said. Yields generally "start off low and improve over time," Intel's Chief Financial Officer David Zinsner told Reuters in a July 24 interview. For Panther Lake, "it's early in the ramp," he said. In a statement on July 30, Intel added: "Our performance and yield trajectory gives us confidence this will be a successful launch that further strengthens Intel's position in the notebook market." Intel in the past has aimed for a yield north of 50% before ramping production because starting any earlier risked damaging its profit margin, three of the sources said. Intel typically does not make the lion's share of its profit until yields reach roughly 70% to 80%, key for a chip as small as Panther Lake where many defects would make it a tough sell, the three people said. Profit also flows from market expansions and building up factory output, Intel said. An immense yield increase would be a tall task by Panther Lake's fourth-quarter launch, the two people with knowledge of Intel's manufacturing operation said. But without such a jump, Intel may have to sell some chips at a lower profit margin or at a loss, the two sources briefed on test data said. Panther Lake is "fully on track," Intel said in its July 30 comment. Intel did not specify the yield threshold at which its chips become profitable. The company has warned it could exit leading-edge manufacturing entirely if it does not land external business for 14A, which is 18A's next-generation successor. Intel's 18A process involved big manufacturing changes and introduced newer technologies all at once, such as a next-generation transistor design and a feature that would improve the delivery of energy to a chip. This created manufacturing risks due to the complexity of fabricating chips, three of the sources said. Intel took on this challenge to close the performance gap with TSMC, but its aggressive timeline for a rollout of unproven systems set it up for failure, said the two people briefed on the company's test data. One likened the effort to a "Hail Mary" football pass. In April, Intel said it had begun a crucial step toward printing Panther Lake chips via 18A known as "risk production." The company also showed off several laptops it said used Panther Lake chips at the Taiwan Computex expo in May. But problems have persisted. One way chip manufacturers gauge progress is to measure the number of defects per area of a chip, which can vary based on a semiconductor's design. Relative to industry standards, the Panther Lake chips had about three times too many defects for Intel to start high-volume production, the two sources briefed on test data said. As of late last year, only around 5% of the Panther Lake chips that Intel printed were up to its specifications, these sources said. This yield figure rose to around 10% by this summer, said one of the sources, who cautioned that Intel could claim a higher number if it counted chips that did not hit every performance target. Reuters could not establish the precise yield at present. In the interview with Reuters, Zinsner disputed these figures and said "yields are better than that." He did not give a number for July or late 2024, and Intel declined to provide this data. "Our expectation is every month they'll get better and better, such that we're at a yield level that is good for production-level Panther Lake at the end of the year," he said, adding: "I wouldn't say that margins are accretive even at those yield levels, so we still have to make improvement." Tan has tapped supply-chain contacts more than usual for Intel and has given them data to help improve chip yields, Zinsner said. For now, Intel remains partly dependent on TSMC to make its in-house designed chips. An Intel executive said in June that Nova Lake, a chip it is planning after Panther Lake, will be made partly on TSMC, too.
