
'Plymouth is on the up': First section of a controversial Armada Way project opens
The opening of Plymouth's long-awaited Armada Way regeneration project marks a "major milestone" for the city, according to the council leader. It has become one of the city's most divisive developments in recent years.
The first section, featuring the area surrounding the Phoenix Fountain, alongside a newly constructed amphitheatre and performance space, welcomed visitors this week.
The completion comes nearly two years after the incident that sparked widespread public anger and legal challenges.
At the opening, members of the public told ITV West Country: "I was a bit sceptical when they chopped the trees down, but this has opened up the space really nicely."
Another said: "I've been sat here watching [the work] for a lot of the time, so I've seen it go from rough ground to this. It's really nice."
At the unveiling today, leader for Plymouth City Council, Tudor Evans said: "That commitment to seeing it through is why we've had companies like Schroders buying up the Armada centre to invest in it on the basis of this project being implemented.
"This is why Homes England are here, on the other side of Armada Way, buying up a huge site here, a derelict building for new housing.
"Plymouth is on the up, the investors are really excited and this scheme will be a tribute to the people who have worked on it but more importantly, it'll be a sign of rebirth of our city centre."
A night that changed everything
In March 2023, Plymouth City Council's decision to fell 110 mature trees under cover of darkness sent shockwaves through the community.
The controversial move, carried out by the then Conservative-controlled authority, was intended to clear the way for urban improvements, but instead triggered fierce opposition from environmental campaigners and residents.
Protesters had been attempting to safeguard the trees, making the overnight operation particularly contentious.
The decision ultimately landed the council in the High Court and resulted in a comprehensive independent investigation.
Financial and political fallout
When Labour seized control of the council in May 2023, they inherited not just the controversy but also the financial consequences.
The new administration commissioned a fresh approach to the development, with costs spiralling to £30 million – more than double the original budget.
An independent review conducted by local government organisation Solace revealed the true extent of the damage caused by the tree-felling.
The additional costs totalled £3.3 million, though investigators suggest this represents 'the lower end of the likely cost.'
The financial breakdown includes over £480,000 in legal expenses and more than £1.3 million attributed to inflation due to project delays.
The review painted a picture of an organisation still grappling with the aftermath, noting 'regret, remorse, guilt, blame and defiance' persist within the council.
The council has accepted criticism of its decision-making processes, admitting it 'didn't get it right' and acknowledged that governance principles were poorly applied during the original planning phase.
As part of the restoration efforts, 29 new trees have been planted in the reopened section, with plans for 400 additional plant specimens and wildflower meadows.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fresh boost for Nigel Farage as Britain's top firms book slots at Reform conference
Labour 's panic over Reform deepened last night amid fears that big businesses are following voters and increasingly supporting Nigel Farage 's party. One Cabinet minister confessed to The Mail on Sunday that many leading companies will now attend Reform's high-profile autumn conference in Birmingham. It came as Mr Farage insisted yesterday that his own health was fine, dismissing talk that his lifestyle and relentless schedule were taking their toll, and blaming suggestions to the contrary on rumours spread by Labour and Tory rivals 'because it's the last card they've got'. He joked that he doubted the British Medical Association 'would hold me up as a pin-up boy' but declared: 'I'm feeling good.' However, he later admitted that he was trying to 'moderate with age'. All the parties are currently gearing up for the autumn conference season, with Labour's gathering in Liverpool expected to dwarf the Conservative event in Manchester. Traditionally, conference attendance by major corporate leaders tends to be highest at whichever party is in power, with the official Opposition party reduced to the second-best showing. But one leading Labour minister privately forecast that Reform was likely to upend that tradition this year, saying all the major businesses they had spoken to had said they would buy a stand at the Reform event in Birmingham. The minister said: 'They say they have to. It came as Mr Farage insisted yesterday that his own health was fine, dismissing talk that his lifestyle and relentless schedule were taking their toll, and blaming suggestions to the contrary on rumours spread by Labour and Tory rivals 'because it's the last card they've got' The forecasts come after Sir Keir Starmer made plain that even though Reform had only four MPs, Mr Farage's party – which is leading in recent polls – was Labour's main enemy at the next General Election 'They said that it's the polling numbers – it's making everyone feel they can't miss it this year.' That has stoked Labour fears over the momentum Mr Farage's party is likely to get from the conference season. One Labour source said: 'Business leaders want a presence at Reform partly because they are an unknown – they want their teams to get more detail on policy.' The forecasts come after Sir Keir Starmer made plain that even though Reform had only four MPs, Mr Farage's party – which is leading in recent polls – was Labour's main enemy at the next General Election. Last night there were claims that Labour in the North West was seeking to hire a campaign worker to help save Cabinet ministers Jonathan Reynolds and Angela Rayner from losing their Commons' seats to Reform at the next election.


North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rachel Reeves making ‘even bigger mistakes' than Liz Truss, says Kemi Badenoch
The Tory leader hit out at the Chancellor and the Prime Minister for their economic decisions as she drew a critical comparison to her predecessor at the top of the Conservative Party. 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes,' Mrs Badenoch wrote in The Telegraph. 'They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Short-lived Conservative prime minister Ms Truss's mini-budget spooked the financial markets in 2022 and led to a spike in mortgage rates. 'As we all saw in 2022, the Chancellor and the Prime Minister are reliant on the bond markets,' Mrs Badenoch added. 'Yet those bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. 'Rachel Reeves's unfunded series of U-turns have only added to the pressure. She is boxed in by her party on one side, and her fiscal rules on the other.' The Chancellor earlier admitted Labour had 'disappointed' people while in Government, but said that the Government had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk Fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north-east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.


South Wales Guardian
5 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Rachel Reeves making ‘even bigger mistakes' than Liz Truss, says Kemi Badenoch
The Tory leader hit out at the Chancellor and the Prime Minister for their economic decisions as she drew a critical comparison to her predecessor at the top of the Conservative Party. 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes,' Mrs Badenoch wrote in The Telegraph. 'They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Short-lived Conservative prime minister Ms Truss's mini-budget spooked the financial markets in 2022 and led to a spike in mortgage rates. 'As we all saw in 2022, the Chancellor and the Prime Minister are reliant on the bond markets,' Mrs Badenoch added. 'Yet those bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. 'Rachel Reeves's unfunded series of U-turns have only added to the pressure. She is boxed in by her party on one side, and her fiscal rules on the other.' The Chancellor earlier admitted Labour had 'disappointed' people while in Government, but said that the Government had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk Fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north-east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.