logo
Advocates body seeks CJI intervention after ED issues summons to senior lawyers

Advocates body seeks CJI intervention after ED issues summons to senior lawyers

Hindustan Times20-06-2025
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) on Friday raised concerns over the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summoning yet another senior legal professional — this time, senior advocate Pratap Venugopal, and urged Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai to take immediate suo motu cognisance of what the body described as a serious infringement on the independence of the legal profession and lawyer-client confidentiality.
Venugopal was the Advocate-on-Record (AoR) for a legal opinion rendered by senior counsel Arvind Datar that supported the allotment of the Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) by Care Health Insurance to former Religare Enterprises Chairperson Rashmi Saluja. While ED had earlier this month summoned Datar as well, that notice was subsequently withdrawn after protests from the legal fraternity.
In a letter dated June 20, SCAORA President Vipin Nair termed the ED's action 'a deeply disquieting development,' cautioning that such coercive measures strike at the heart of legal privilege and the fundamental tenets of the rule of law.
Venugopal, who was designated as a senior advocate earlier this year, received an ED summons on June 19 under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The summons relates to the ongoing investigation into the ESOP matter.
In its letter, SCAORA asserted that such actions amount to an 'impermissible transgression' of the sacrosanct principle of lawyer-client privilege. It warned that if left unchecked, this trend could have a chilling effect on the entire legal community, discouraging lawyers from rendering candid legal advice and undermining the independence of the Bar.
'The role of an advocate in offering legal advice is both privileged and protected. Interference by investigative agencies, particularly in respect of opinions rendered in a professional capacity—strikes at the core of the rule of law,' the letter stated.
SCAORA urged the Supreme Court to intervene and examine the legality and propriety of issuing summonses to advocates for professional opinions, besides framing guidelines to prevent future incursions into lawyer-client confidentiality.
This is the second time in recent days that the Association has raised its voice against such summonses. On June 16, SCAORA issued a public statement condemning the ED's notice to Datar, terming it 'unwarranted' and indicative of a growing trend of investigative overreach.
On June 17, the Delhi High Court Bar Association also passed a resolution strongly criticising the ED's move, calling it a direct threat to the constitutional right to legal representation and fair trial.
The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association too convened an emergency meeting the same day, with its president Brijesh Trivedi denouncing the ED's actions as violative of legal independence. The body demanded immediate government action to protect attorney-client privilege through statutory amendments to the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UP man loses  ₹1 crore in 'digital arrest' scam with fake court hearings
UP man loses  ₹1 crore in 'digital arrest' scam with fake court hearings

Mint

time33 minutes ago

  • Mint

UP man loses ₹1 crore in 'digital arrest' scam with fake court hearings

Shahjahanpur (UP), Jul 2 (PTI) Uttar Pradesh Police on Wednesday arrested seven men who allegedly impersonated officials from the ED and the CBI to "digitally arrest" a Shahjahanpur resident and swindle more than ₹ one crore through a fabricated online court proceeding, an official said. The gang's modus operandi involved convincing the victim, 60-year-old Sharad Chand, that he was under investigation for an alleged illegal transaction of ₹ 2.8 crore, the officer said. The fraudsters allegedly first contacted him via phone on May 6, posing as ED and CBI officers. Then they escalated the deception by impersonating a judge and conducting fake virtual hearings through WhatsApp for almost a month, according to the police. Digital arrest is a term used in cyber frauds where victims are falsely told they are under surveillance or legal custody through digital means. They are often isolated via continuous video or call surveillance by fraudsters posing as officials, and manipulated into following instructions without alerting others - often leading to extortion or fraud. Shahjahanpur Superintendent of Police Rajesh Dwivedi told PTI that during these "virtual hearings", fake lawyers and judges allegedly intimidated Chand, ultimately coercing him into transferring ₹ 1.04 crore across 40 bank accounts belonging to nine alleged "advocates." The victim, associated with an NGO, did not inform anyone at the time of the "digital arrest" but reported the matter to the police once he realised that he had been conned. During the investigation, police discovered suspicious transactions of ₹ nine crore in a bank account linked to the case. That account is also under scrutiny, Dwivedi said. Those arrested have been identified as Sachin, Prashant, Gautam Singh, Sandeep Kumar, Syed Saif, Aryan Sharma, and Pawan Yadav - all aged between 20 and 28 years. They have been booked under sections 318 (cheating), 319 (cheating by impersonation), 204 (impersonating a government official) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the IT Act. All have been sent to jail, the police added. Uttar Pradesh Police has cautioned citizens against cyber frauds like digital arrest and asked them to report any such experiences to their nearest police station or on the dedicated helpline number 1530.

Illegal mining under political shield? ED targets Mishra-led syndicate in new filing
Illegal mining under political shield? ED targets Mishra-led syndicate in new filing

Hans India

time33 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Illegal mining under political shield? ED targets Mishra-led syndicate in new filing

Ranchi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed its fifth supplementary prosecution complaint in the Sahibganj illegal mining and extortion case, further tightening its net around the alleged syndicate masterminded by Pankaj Mishra, a close aide of the Jharkhand Chief Minister. The complaint, filed before the Special PMLA Court in Ranchi on June 30, names eight individuals and two companies as fresh accused in the money laundering probe, says the agency's press release issued on Wednesday. With this, a total of 19 individuals and entities have been arraigned across six prosecution complaints — one original and five supplementary — in connection with the case, which involves proceeds of crime estimated at over Rs 1,000 crore. Among the newly named accused is Rajesh Yadav alias Dahu Yadav, allegedly a key enforcer in the network who oversaw the illegal transport of stone across the Ganga river, said the release. According to the ED, Yadav also financed a fraudulent ferry tender to aid large-scale smuggling of minerals. He is currently absconding. Another accused, Heera Lal Bhagat, is alleged to have operated illegal mining activities through his firm M/s Jai Maa Bhavani Stone Works. ED officials recovered over Rs 3.13 crore in unaccounted cash from his premises, believed to be direct proceeds of the illicit operations. The complaint also highlights the role of Nimay Chandra Shil, who allegedly conspired with Pankaj Mishra and his wife to fraudulently secure a mining lease in exchange for a 50 per cent profit-sharing deal. Corporate complicity has also come under the scanner. The ED has named M/s Marine Infralink Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and its director Yash Jalan for allegedly providing the vessel M.V. Infralink-III, used for transporting illegally mined stone, said the release. The company reportedly received Rs 2.75 crore sourced from the syndicate's criminal proceeds. The ED's investigation began after an FIR registered by Jharkhand Police against Mishra and his associates under various IPC and Arms Act provisions. The probe under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) revealed a politically protected cartel monopolising mining and mineral transport in the Sahibganj region. So far, the ED has seized and frozen assets including Rs 5.34 crore in cash, an inland vessel, five industrial stone crushers, multiple vehicles, and bank balances exceeding Rs 13.32 crore.

ED raids former HMRL officer, brother's houses in money laundering case
ED raids former HMRL officer, brother's houses in money laundering case

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

ED raids former HMRL officer, brother's houses in money laundering case

HYDERABAD The Enforcement Directorate (ED), on Wednesday, raided two locations in connection with a money laundering probe against former Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited (HMRL) planning officer and Telangana RERA in-charge secretary Shiva Balakrishna. The raids were conducted at his residence in Rajendranagar and at his brother Naveen Kumar's house in Chanakya Nagar, Medchal. ED sources confirmed that documents related to properties and financial transactions were seized during the operation. These searches stem from an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) by the ED last year, following inputs from the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). The ED's action comes months after the ACB arrested Mr. Balakrishna and his brother on January 25 in a Disproportionate Assets (DPA) case. ACB officials had raided 17 locations, including properties of relatives and associates, leading to the seizure of assets worth over ₹8.26 crore, according to government value estimates. The January searches led to the recovery of ₹99.60 lakh cash, over 2 kgs of gold, 6 kg silver ornaments, and documents pointing to assets worth ₹5.96 crore. ACB officials had said that the market value of these assets was likely to be significantly higher. Mr. Balakrishna, who also served as the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) director, is accused of accumulating wealth through questionable means and exploiting his official position. The ACB invoked Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 against him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store